Slashdot Mirror


Meteorite Strike Kills Man In India

knwny writes: In what is believed to be the first such incident in modern times, a meteorite strike in India killed a man and injured three others. According to police sources, a loud blast was heard at the site of the strike which also left a four-feet deep crater. Preliminary investigation by forensic and bomb experts showed no sign of any explosive substance at the scene. The second link has a picture of the supposed crater which I believe will interest Slashdotters with experience in this area.

130 comments

  1. It could have been worse... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A cow might have died.

    1. Re: It could have been worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meteors are for ... oh, wait...

    2. Re:It could have been worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or a rat!

      Fucking mods! Parent was funny goddammit!

    3. Re: It could have been worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meteors are for proving the world actually is overpopulated. It should be obvious that the more people, the greater the chance a random strike will kill someone. It's been a long time coming, but the proof is here now.

    4. Re:It could have been worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May his slashdot karma rise!

    5. Re:It could have been worse... by SQLGuru · · Score: 4, Funny

      That would have been a meaty-orite......

    6. Re:It could have been worse... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      No way. The Orthodox Jews don't allow for cheeseburgers.

    7. Re: It could have been worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, just like our recent snowstorm proves we are entering a new Ice Age.

      Oh wait, it doesn't prove that at all. And neither does one meteor hit on a person either.

      People have been hit by meteors in modern times, they just haven't died of them until now.

  2. Stop the let desert north by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the same of the sand. In India mean strike by metroid far. Never has make occur for all is not.

    1. Re:Stop the let desert north by Falos · · Score: 1

      >mean strike by metroid
      >metroid

      If this means what I think it means, we're boned.

    2. Re:Stop the let desert north by malditaenvidia · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the last metroid is in captivity...

    3. Re:Stop the let desert north by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 insightful. Thanks.

    4. Re: Stop the let desert north by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      I think that he may be speaking perfectly correct Indian dialect English, which I have been assured is "crisp".

  3. Smiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the very definition of a God smiting somebody?

    1. Re:Smiting by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      Only with brimstone. Otherwise, it's just being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    2. Re:Smiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close enough I think.

    3. Re:Smiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this the very definition of a God smiting somebody?

      If the shoe fits... This guy got a kick from the almighty I guess..

    4. Re:Smiting by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      I prefer to imagine that God chose to smite a random Indian bus driver out of all the people in the world that he could have used a hurtling space rock on.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:Smiting by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      It bounced off of Trump's hair.

  4. Isn't that a level 9 spell? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    >> a meteorite strike in India killed a man and injured three others

    Isn't that a level 9 spell? Were there any related "prismatic", er, rainbow attacks in the area too?

    1. Re:Isn't that a level 9 spell? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Actually, Mark Zuckerberg was the one who cast the spell.

      He was pissed off at India for blocking his free Internet, so he used his Weapon of Mass Destruction. He doesn't have an ICBM with an H-bomb, like North Korea, but he has something more powerful and deadly!

      The Zuck disliked India.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Isn't that a level 9 spell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After a thorough investigation, it was concluded that the event resulted from a diet with a high fiber content.

    3. Re:Isn't that a level 9 spell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of meteor swarm, since there was only a single small crater, this is clearly the level 5 divine spell (humorously) named 'cometfall'.

    4. Re:Isn't that a level 9 spell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      drat. 6, not 5.

    5. Re: Isn't that a level 9 spell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fool. That was just a warning.
      The Day of Lavos is upon us!

    6. Re:Isn't that a level 9 spell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Were there any related "prismatic", er, rainbow attacks in the area too?

      No, that was in California!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGMc91yJSgc

  5. Sad but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's sad for his family and condolences. But man, what a unique way to go! Probably high up on my list of ways to go. No pain, no fear, just one minute you're there and the next your in the history books for being one of the few to be taken out by a meteorite.

    1. Re:Sad but... by Xenx · · Score: 2

      In this case, one minute you're there and a while later you're pronounced dead. It wasn't exactly quick. He suffered serious injuries that resulted in death.

    2. Re:Sad but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, that would suck. With the headline it sounded like he was hit directly, and I'd imagine getting directly hit would basically cause you to explode.

    3. Re:Sad but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no honor. A real warrior wants to die in battle! Not by some rock falling from the stars.

    4. Re: Sad but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But your ancestors can claim that you were a warrior at a universal level! You fought the heavenly bodies themselves, and made the ultimate sacrifice.

    5. Re:Sad but... by Falos · · Score: 1

      It's probably the peak effort:fame ratio possible. Or "effort" is the first word I thought of.

    6. Re:Sad but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people want to go to heaven when they die. In this case, the heavens came to him!

    7. Re:Sad but... by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Unless they're really big (Chelyabinsk, Tunguska, Barringer Crater, etc) meteorites don't explode, they're slowed down to whatever their terminal velocity is by the atmosphere (and burned up to some degree in the process).

      Assume this thing was the size of a large brick (give or take), it'd hit with about the same force as if it were tossed out of an aeroplane. It's still going to kill you, but you won't explode.

      Every film or TV depiction of a meteorite impact I've ever seen (Deep Impact, Smallville, etc) gets it wrong.

      --
      -- Alastair
    8. Re:Sad but... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Umm... I do believe they were talking about the person exploding and not the meteorite.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    9. Re:Sad but... by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Did anybody get an interview with the professor of vindictive astronomy ?

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  6. Going to become more common. by tekrat · · Score: 0

    As we inhabit more and more of the planet, as we continue to expand and grow, up from 7billion to 8billion and more, we cover more and more territory, and therefore, we are more likely to be killed by falling debris.

    Of course, without a nice big one, we'll not be reduced enough to make a difference. We've eliminated predators, the only things left to kill us is ourselves or a nice big chunk of rock from space.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re: Going to become more common. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can do everyone one a favor and make it 7 billion - 1.

    2. Re:Going to become more common. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >We've eliminated predators

      No we haven't. We just killed off most of the large predators. A bacteria or virus will lessen our numbers.

    3. Re:Going to become more common. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      We've eliminated predators

      I'm sure that groups like Boko Haram, ISIS and the rest would be surprised to hear they've been eliminated. They do a lot of preying while they're praying.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Going to become more common. by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      As we inhabit more and more of the planet, as we continue to expand and grow, up from 7billion to 8billion and more, we cover more and more territory, and therefore, we are more likely to be killed by falling debris.

      Technically correct: the best kind of correct.

      If I've done all the math correctly, and we assume that a single human takes up 1 m^2 of area, 8 billion humans only fill on the order of 1/100,000 of the total surface area of Earth. As the population increases, the probability of a meteorite striking a human goes from a really small number to a slightly less small number.

      In other words, you're vastly overestimating how much of the surface area of Earth is inhabited by humans.

    5. Re:Going to become more common. by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      we are more likely to be killed by falling debris.

      Only if "we" means Homo Sap as a whole. Your personal chances are constant.

    6. Re:Going to become more common. by Deadstick · · Score: 2

      I have a few exercises I give my students in which they have to make a guess at a quantity and then make a calculation to back it up. My favorite: If you marked off a tract of land in a 3x3 foot grid, and one person stood at each intersection, how many square miles would accommodate the entire world population, and what would be a country of comparable size?

      Of course, after doing the calculation, one might ponder what it would smell like...

    7. Re:Going to become more common. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Of course, you also need to take into account the size of the meteorite and the size of its' blast zone. It does not not need to be a direct hit to kill you, and this did not appear to be a direct hit, either.

    8. Re:Going to become more common. by cellocgw · · Score: 1

      I have a few exercises I give my students in which they have to make a guess at a quantity and then make a calculation to back it up. My favorite: If you marked off a tract of land in a 3x3 foot grid, and one person stood at each intersection, how many square miles would accommodate the entire world population, and what would be a country of comparable size?

      Oblig: https://what-if.xkcd.com/8/

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    9. Re: Going to become more common. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can do everyone one a favor and make it 7 billion - 1.

      Or -10.

      This post is sponsored by the Islamic State - enlist today and fight overpopulation.

    10. Re:Going to become more common. by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Without running the numbers, I can't be sure, but at a guess I'd say standing about ankle deep in the water off the island of Zanzibar.

      --
      -- Alastair
    11. Re:Going to become more common. by cavreader · · Score: 2

      Boko Haram and ISIS are not predators they are prey. The real predators are the various spec op teams on the hunt around the world. These predators are also capable of designating targets for "meteor strikes"

    12. Re: Going to become more common. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mosquitos kill close to half a million annually; they are by far the deadliest animals on the planet. (Besides us of course)

    13. Re:Going to become more common. by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >We've eliminated predators

      Only the big ones. We won the battle against bacteria but we are losing the war and so far virusses are still beating almost everything we throw at them.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    14. Re:Going to become more common. by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Just because they're prey to our special operators doesn't make them any less predators from the point of view of the thousands and thousands of people they are slaughtering in the name of rewinding to the dark ages. They're definitely predators, as their world view requires that sort of predation in order to exist.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    15. Re:Going to become more common. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are serial murderers and psychopaths. They attract like minded losers living in other regions of the world with the promise of slave brides, creative torture exhibitions, and unrestricted killing. Their existence is proof that the true sense of right and wrong has evaporated from today's world. There are no diplomatic solutions to eliminating these assholes and so far no one seems willing to do what is necessary to kill them all in such a manner that anyone thinking of supporting them in the future will have second thoughts. Every terrorist group in the world thrives on the ridiculous Rules of Engagement the military is burdened with. Cries of killing non-combatants and causing collateral damage totally ignore the fact that these groups are already killing non-combatants, enslaving people, thrusting a mass refugee problem on other countries, and causing collateral damage on a daily basis. And all the chattering morons on the planet can do is endlessly repeat that the US or "the West" is the cause of the problem and believing assigning blame will actually solve the problem.

    16. Re:Going to become more common. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      We've eliminated predators, the only things left to kill us is ourselves or a nice big chunk of rock from space.

      The biggest killers of humans in all history are still out there, brewing up new attacks and devastations.

      Disease bacteria. Opportunistic wound-invading, skin-attacking and gut-attacking moulds, viruses and bacteria.

      And of, the biggest killer of all - other humans, by various means.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  7. The Loo God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was no ordinary Meteorite strike. That was the Loo God speaking to India.
    The Loo God says:
    POO IN THE LOO
    O
    O

    I
    N

    T
    H
    E

    L
    O
    O

    And stop wasting millions of pounds on trips to Mars and build loos instead.

    1. Re:The Loo God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  8. pop density x area by romit_icarus · · Score: 0

    For a country with high population density as well as area, I'd say India was asking for it...

    1. Re:pop density x area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The odds of an individual being killed by a meteor is highly proportional to the number of people in the country, not the population density. 1 billion people in China or 1 billion people in Rhode island. In fact, the latter would have a lower chance of having anyone die in a meteor strike but a higher number of average fatalities per strike.

      This episode of Math Facts brought to you by a freaking pedantic guy. Please watch again soon.

    2. Re:pop density x area by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      For a country with high population density as well as area, I'd say India was asking for it...

      Tamil Nadu has about the same population density as Aruba, San Marino, and Mayotte. India as a state is ranked 33 in the world for density.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  9. Grabbed the wrong one by wkwilley2 · · Score: 1

    Don't nobody piss of my man Sephiroth.

    --
    Have you ever fallen asleep at the keybhanusdiog?
  10. Lottery by drpimp · · Score: 1

    That man needs to go buy a lottery ticket ... oh wait.

    --
    -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    1. Re:Lottery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He swore on his life the Panthers would win.

      -Blatantly ripped from that other S site

  11. Wrong image in second link? by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Informative

    CNN shows a roped off area in what appears to be a small thicket, while the second link shows a crater in a rice paddy. If you read the article in the second link, the 4th paragraph mentions another incident believed to be a meteorite struck a rice paddy on Jan 26. So the caption on that image is probably incorrect.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Wrong image in second link? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah it looks like the image is from the first strike, not the second. It says the guy who was killed was going to a water tank to drink and that it damaged the water tank and several vehicles. That doesn't sound like something that landed in the middle of a rice paddy.

      What I find strange is that there was a strike on Jan. 26th, and so a scientist was camping in the area, and then another strike in the same area only a couple weeks later. What are the odds of that?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:Wrong image in second link? by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 1

      This is probably a better picture. I hope it's legit.

    3. Re:Wrong image in second link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CNN shows a roped off area in what appears to be a small thicket, while the second link shows a crater in a rice paddy. If you read the article in the second link, the 4th paragraph mentions another incident believed to be a meteorite struck a rice paddy on Jan 26. So the caption on that image is probably incorrect.

      I actually came to the comments just to crack a joke about the current state of the art Indian engineering colleges. Kind of disappointed.

    4. Re:Wrong image in second link? by lazarus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bad Astronomy talks about the odds of getting killed by one as 1:700,000. But this includes extinction events, etc. You are more likely to die by meteorite than terrorist apparently.

      I couldn't find any odds of getting hit by one, never mind two falling in the same area within the space of a couple of weeks, but I think it would be much lower than getting hit by lightning (1:960,000). About 500 meteorites hit the earth each year. There are 138 million lightning strikes per year. So, not accounting for population density, I would estimate that your odds of getting hit by a meteorite is 1:265,000,000,000 (1 in 265 billion).

      Roughly.

      --
      I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    5. Re:Wrong image in second link? by asvravi · · Score: 1

      What I find strange is that there was a strike on Jan. 26th, and so a scientist was camping in the area, and then another strike in the same area only a couple weeks later. What are the odds of that?

      I would say very high. It could have been an orbiting rock that broke into pieces some time in the past (for whatever reason), each piece continuing to follow more or less the same orbit but slightly separated in time.

    6. Re:Wrong image in second link? by vux984 · · Score: 2

      It was a couple weeks later. The earth would have spun on its axis ~14 times in the interim. Not to mention traversing 3%-4% of its solar orbit.

      At best the odds are higher they'd hit the same hemisphere (north or south) if they were from the same source.

    7. Re:Wrong image in second link? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is what happens when an object breaks up and the pieces strike a planet, you get a line of impacts. If these fragments both came from the same object then they would have to be very far apart, so the breakup of the object would have happened long ago, and even so they still probably wouldn't strike in the same place. The Earth is not stationary, the equator is rotating at around 1,000 miles per hour and the planet is moving through space at 67,000 miles per hour. So for 2 impact events that occur 11 days apart, you're talking about the earth moving over 17 million miles through space during that time and completing around 11 rotations. If you think that these fragments came from the same object then you're talking about something that must have been in geosynchronous orbit, where the object was orbiting the planet roughly above the area where they came down (probably a little "farther"), and it took one fragment 11 days longer than the other to fall from orbit. They've already identified rocks as belonging to the object that fell, so we aren't talking about man-made space junk, and there aren't any rocky satellites in geosynchronous orbit. In fact, the only rocky satellite in orbit around the planet is the moon, and it is most definitely not in a geosynchronous orbit. The odds are anything but "very high".

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    8. Re:Wrong image in second link? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      That 67,000 miles per hour number is relative to the sun. The entire solar system orbits the galaxy at nearly 500,000 miles per hour relative to the galactic center.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    9. Re:Wrong image in second link? by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

      Bad Astronomy talks about the odds of getting killed by one as 1:700,000.

      I thought that 700,000 number looked suspiciously low, but when allowing for a "humanity extinct" situation, the large population cancels out the small chance to some extent. I wonder what problems we spend an inordinate amount of resources on that are less of a threat. Intuitively, once every 100,000,000 years seems like nothing to worry about, but the damage is unimaginable. It seems like the inverse at the other end of the scale from the "don't worry about driving but afraid to get on a plane" thing.

      --
      ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
    10. Re:Wrong image in second link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amicusnycl how does eating your words taste as apk made you eat them http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? Like your foot in your mouth washed down with the bitter taste of SELF-defeat perhaps? R O T F L M A O!

  12. I have a theory by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Was he wearing a dinosaur suit, by chance?

    1. Re:I have a theory by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Was he wearing a dinosaur suit, by chance?

      Could be guerrilla marketing for the new Independence Day movie gone horribly wrong.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:I have a theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I always hated Barney anyhow. Glad The Universe does also.

  13. Something strange going on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Article there was a previous similar "blast" on Jan 26 and a meteorite expert investigating that just happened to be nearby so he could rush over to the new blast sight. Sounds absurdly unlikely. No. What we have here is somebody testing a space-born rail run on unsuspecting civilians.

    1. Re:Something strange going on... by WillRobinson · · Score: 1

      Humm, maybe from North Korean Launch? Sling shot from space?

    2. Re:Something strange going on... by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      Surely you meant space-borne railgun? Not being pedantic, as not everybody know what a railgun is yet...

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    3. Re:Something strange going on... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Humm, maybe from North Korean Launch? Sling shot from space?

      Interesting theory.. It was Littl' Un's toy rocket!

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  14. Any pictures of the scene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such a unique occurrence deserves a picture.

  15. nah ... by tibbar · · Score: 1

    North Korean ICBM ..
            effective range world wide / blast area 1 meter

    1. Re:nah ... by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Blast area where Dear Leader whishes? We are working on that...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  16. Pissed off the DM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like somebody pissed off the DM.

  17. Given typical human response to predators. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . a smart one would avoid notice. Like not registering on optics. And striking out of nowhere, leaving a drained corpse behind.

    Oh, nevermind, they operate in the open, even have a website. . .

    irs.gov. . .

  18. Picture of interest why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why exactly would that picture be of interest to slashdotters?

    I'm genuinely curious - what realistic conclusions could anyone reasonably draw from that picture?

    While it's distinguishable from a molehill due to what seems to be it's size I fail to see what other conclusions could be drawn. Maybe it's not an anthill? :P

    Jeez. Trollbait editorialization...

    1. Re:Picture of interest why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The scene immediately following sounds intriguing. Did it him him square on, or was the effect secondary? Just interested in the gory details. We need proof.

  19. that explains it by sunking2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was wondering why I didn't receive a call back from Bob in customer service.

    1. Re:that explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, Mr Ahhmericann , I am from India and I find that verrry funneee.. NOOTTT (as Mr Borat would say.)
      Now stop masturbating in your basement or else your white gawd the Jebeezus gonna blind you.
      NERD!

    2. Re:that explains it by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      wondering why I didn't receive a call back from...customer service.

      No, Comcast is always that way, meteor or not.

      Although, I hope there is a Big One with their name on it anyhow.

    3. Re:that explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right - there's a very good chance a member of his family is technically savvy, with access to the internet. Maybe the person likes Slashdot. All the cool kids do, right? But then the person reads comments like yours, and your "hey I can be funny" remark about someone's death has disillusioned another person about 'Merica.

      Things on here live forever. Not everything needs to be archived as a shining example of stupidity.

  20. Predicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paul Verhoeven predicted this in 1997 in Starship Troopers. The end is near...

  21. misleading title (what else) by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    The WSJ article says fragments thrown out from the impact were what killed one person and injured others (and damaged things). Not really what we all expected, i.e. a meteorite fell right onto someone - in which case there'd be little to no identifiable organic material left.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
    1. Re: misleading title (what else) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was hoping he'd end up like Wiley coyote, one big flat pancake.

    2. Re:misleading title (what else) by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      I think you are probably wrong. A small meteorite will likely wind up at terminal velocity long before it gets to the ground, so it won't be whizzing in at miles/seconds, maybe a few hundred miles an hour. Still a bad day if it hits you, but it won't likely vaporize you or turn you to plasma entirely.

    3. Re:misleading title (what else) by Dantoo · · Score: 2

      Nah. If that crater was caused by a small meteorite it wasn't travelling at a few hundred miles an hour. If the ejecta had sufficient energy to maim and kill, either the meteorite has transferred momentum from it's great mass or great velocity (or a useful combination of both). Let's try and bury the old Slashdot shibboleth about how meteorites just fall to earth like stones from the top of the Empire State building. More than willing to hear from somebody better equipped.

      A meteorite entering at as near damn vertical to the atmosphere will take less than 10 seconds to plough through the last 60 miles (100k), if you fully discount deceleration just for the moment (not going all Calculus). If it starts in at a reasonable 25000mph, roughly 40000km/h, (on the low side for these things) that pissy bit of atmospheric braking has a job to do. a = v-u/t . That looks like a deceleration of 4X10^6 m/sec/sec to me. It's not an even deceleration of course because there isn't a whole lot of atmospheric density until the last 20k. Now the good old gravity thing adds 9.0 m/sec/sec to the acceleration side of the equation making it that bit harder to slow this thing down to a few m/sec constant velocity at some reasonable undefined height above ground. The outcome required would be a "survivor" saying "who threw that" vs a "bystander" saying 'did that guy just blow up"?

      It is reasonable to argue that ablation removes momentum so we probably can't get any further until we can find useful figures that allow a back of hand calculation for loss of mass. I suppose we'd need to define a standard mass/velocity (momentum) required at the Earth's surface to maim somebody and go backward from there.
      The terminal velocity argument needs a lot more definition of its parameters IMHO.

      Some sort of committee is needed to eventually, after much debate, to lay down the basis for further investigation.

      Small has to be defined. (Smaller than Wolf Creek impactor isn't sufficient)
      Angle of entry to the atmosphere has to be defined. ("Any angle that delivers my proposed outcome" kind of lacks force of argument).

      If this thing is to be funded I suspect it is necessary to investigate how this type of incident, something, something, climate change.

      You know, this guy has given his given his life for science and saved us a whole lot of future bother. Next time somebody states that a meteorite won't kill you - just post the picture of the hole.

  22. Actually, the picture is of the first crater... by rgbatduke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...as one can easily see. This is a crater in the middle of a paddy field. The regular array of tufts of greener is planted rice. The crater is order of a meter across or maybe a bit less (scale from the array of rice plants) and is formed in soft paddy mud that has had all of the rocks and solid material removed over as many as hundreds of years. This strike didn't kill anyone.

    From the article, the second strike was near a tank -- which is basically a large open well sometimes surrounded by or even formed out of stone or masonry, typically NOT located in the middle of a muddy, flooded rice paddy -- injured several people and killed one, which means that it had more energy than the rice paddy strike and likely hit ground solid enough to cause significant shrapnel. A rice paddy is pretty close to a perfect environment to NOT cause a lot of shrapnel.

    Just sayin'. I'm guessing the newspaper had a stock photo of the first hit and figured most people would be too ignorant to detect the "error" and wanted to be first to press to get wider reading and didn't wait on somebody going to photograph the actual crater.

    rgb

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    1. Re:Actually, the picture is of the first crater... by mandark1967 · · Score: 1

      Ya can't have long newspaper articles when your readers are pooping in public. They need to get their business done fast.

      --
      Sig Follows: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." -- Mark Twain
    2. Re:Actually, the picture is of the first crater... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not in public: they use designated shitting streets.

  23. On a related note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three-headed baby found in Romania: can speak a different language from each mouth. Weird shit always pops up in unverifiable locales, like 3rd world shit holes.

    1. Re:On a related note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romania was second world

  24. We don't take up that much space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9 sq ft per person * 8,000,000,000 = 72,000,000,000 sq ft = 2,583 sq mi = Wrangell, Alaska

    Land area of Earth = 196,600,000 sq mi

    2,583 / 196,600,000 = 0.00001313835 = 0.0013%

    1. Re: We don't take up that much space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of that is water though :). Maybe if we start living like the Kevin Costner movie waterworld. 'Twas a good movie, but long wit some boring parts.

    2. Re:We don't take up that much space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm safe, my space is in square meters.

    3. Re:We don't take up that much space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.836127 m^2. Wow. That's probably why we won't convert to metric. You don't get nice round numbers, like 9.

  25. Space Junk? by JakartaDean · · Score: 2

    Given the small impact crater (60cm according to CNN) and the police statement that they have a piece of whatever fell to earth this seems unlikely to be a meteorite to me. If it was big enough to leave remains, and moving as fast as a meteor then I don't see how the crater could be so small. More likely IMO to have been a bit of space junk from one of the many satellites and stuff up there.

    --
    The subject who is truly loyal to the Chief Magistrate will neither advise nor submit to arbitrary measures (Junius)
    1. Re:Space Junk? by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

      Frozen piss from an airplane?

    2. Re:Space Junk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meteors slow down during atmospheric descent. It is completely normal for the result to be a small rock coming in at a much reduced velocity. See this famous example:

      https://www.phactual.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/knapp.jpeg

  26. Public Utilities by PPH · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    a college employee, who had gone to drink water suffered serious injuries and was declared dead

    And then there's a photo of a crater in the middle of a muddy rice paddy. And I thought Flint Michigan had problems with drinking water.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  27. Act of FSM by MrEd74 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like an act of Flying Spaghetti Monster. If only he was wearing his colander, he would have been spared.

  28. Picture is a fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see any drag marks, or any indication of disturbance around the crater.

  29. It Was a Meterrorite by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    Definitely a meterrorite attack. They're becoming more sophisticated every day!

  30. Shooting star by Eloking · · Score: 1

    That's what you call a "shooting" Star!

    Get it? Dead by a "Shooting" star?

    Ok I'll walk myself out...

    --
    Elok
  31. New legislation has been issued by zwarte+piet · · Score: 1

    ... to prevent any further cases of meteorites landing in inhabited areas.

  32. And the family's compensation? by Chas · · Score: 1

    $1473!

    And people think insurance companies are cheapskates!

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:And the family's compensation? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Even an insurance company can't shake down God for money. He's got better lawyers than they do.

      I mean, His acts are literally excluded from almost every contract ever written by a lawyer. Talk about having a good legal team.

    2. Re:And the family's compensation? by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Even an insurance company can't shake down God for money. He's got better lawyers than they do.

      You sure about that?

      An engineer died and reported to the pearly gates. An newly annointed angel, filling in for St. Peter, checked his dossier and grimly said, "Ah, you're an engineer; you're in the wrong place." So the engineer was cast down to the gates of hell and was let in.

      Pretty soon, the engineer became gravely dissatisfied with the level of comfort in hell, and began designing and building improvements. After a while, the underworld had air conditioning, flush toilets, and escalators, and the engineer was becoming a pretty popular guy among the demons.

      One day, God called Satan up on the telephone and asked with a sneer, "So, how's it going down there in hell?" Satan laughed and replied, "Hey, things are going great. We've got air conditioning and flush toilets and escalators, and there's no telling what this engineer is going to come up with next."

      God's face clouded over and he exploded, "What? You've got an engineer? That's a mistake; he should never have gotten down there; send him up here." Satan shook his head, "No way. I like having an engineer on the staff, and I'm keeping him."

      God was as mad as he had ever been, "This is not the way things are supposed to work and you know it. Send him back up here or I'll sue." Satan laughed uproariously, "Yeah, right. And just where are YOU going to get a lawyer?"

  33. Cloud.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, when I heard about Meteor killing someone, I was relieved, but still a little disappointed to find out that it only killed one person. I was given the impression that if Sephiroth was allowed to complete his plan, everyone would die. Now I just don't feel like all that effort was worth it if I didn't actually save the world.

  34. Dinosaurs by Smiddi · · Score: 1

    Imagine how many meteorites it took to wipe out the dinosaurs then?

  35. Was there any warning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if there was any warnings of the inbound meteorite shower? You'd think in this day and age we'd be able to warn potential impact zones when the meteorites are not likely to breakup enough in our atmosphere.

  36. Ann Hodges got first bounce in 1954 by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 2

    The True Story of History's Only Known Meteorite Victim

    "On a clear afternoon in Sylacauga, Alabama (see map), in late November 1954, Ann was napping on her couch, covered by quilts, when a softball-size hunk of black rock broke through the ceiling, bounced off a radio, and hit her in the thigh, leaving a pineapple-shaped bruise..."

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  37. Dumb Luck by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    He was probably on his way to cash in his winning lottery ticket.

  38. Obviously, Allah was speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What he was saying will be fought over for centuries to come.

  39. picture tells us nothing by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    Neither does the article. How big is the hole? What sort of blast would it have been? Sonic boom? How about a dazzling flash? Hell's teeth, the meteor that exploded over Chelyabinsk killed a dashcam when it popped.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  40. Well it least it wasn't a Mir Toilet Seat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still an odd way to go. RIP.

  41. This is a far more important answer for us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amicusnycl how does eating your words taste as apk made you eat them http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? Like your foot in your mouth washed down with the bitter taste of SELF-defeat perhaps? R O T F L M A O!

  42. I find it strange you don't answer this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amicusnycl how does eating your words taste as apk made you eat them http://slashdot.org/comments.p... ? Like your foot in your mouth washed down with the bitter taste of SELF-defeat perhaps? R O T F L M A O!