Slashdot Mirror


LIGO Will Make Gravitational Waves Announcement on Thursday

StartsWithABang writes: When we look out into the Universe, we normally gain information about it by gathering light of various wavelengths. However, there are other possibilities for astronomy, including by looking for the neutrinos emitted by astrophysical sources - first detected in the supernova explosion of 1987 - and in the gravitational waves emitted by accelerating masses. These ripples in the fabric of space were theorized back in the early days of Einstein's General Relativity, and experiments to detect them have been ongoing since the 1960s. However, in September of 2015, Advanced LIGO came online, and it was the first gravitational wave observatory that was expected to detect a real gravitational wave signal. The press conference on Thursday is where the collaboration will make their official announcement, and in the meantime, here's an explainer of what gravitational waves are, what Advanced LIGO can teach us, and how.

16 of 120 comments (clear)

  1. And the announcement will be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "We expect to find some any day now."

    1. Re:And the announcement will be by RenderSeven · · Score: 4, Funny

      For an announcement, yes. But this was an announcement for an announcement, like a trailer, so the reveal is probably bigger. And no spoilers please. Clearly the NSF and DOE want the VIP's at LIGO in LA, WA and MIT want to keep the PC on the QT, 'cause if it leaks to CNN and MSNBC the UK and EU might cut the GWIC budget PDQ for AIGO and GEO and the VC's would go MIA. And then we'd all be put on KP.

  2. Re:heavy, man! by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's that word again. "Heavy." Why are things so heavy in the future? Is there a problem with the Earth's gravitational pull?

  3. Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    StartsWithABang and his Forbes bullshit again. So much for new management. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

    1. Re:Here we go again by sexconker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They probably have an existing contract in place that they can't just kill off without being sued.

    2. Re:Here we go again by Soulskill · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's no contract. Or any communication aside from the actual submissions. If you want different astronomy/science stories on Slashdot, you have easy recourse; submit your own!

  4. Praise science! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can you imagine the quality of Yo Mama's So Fat jokes that will come out of this? You don't get that kind of entertainment without spending some cash on science.

  5. Hide Forbes Option? by Chmarr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can I have an option to just hide any articles with links to forbes.com ? That'd be really handy, thanks.

    1. Re:Hide Forbes Option? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Slashdot: new for nerds that can't write an userscript and prefer waiting for their corporate masters.
      Edited from some other post
      // ==UserScript==
      // @name No forbes articles
      // @description Remove forbes posts from Slashdot front page.
      // @include http://slashdot.org/*
      // @include http://.slashdot.org/*
      // @include https://slashdot.org/*
      // @include https://.slashdot.org/*
      // @exclude https://.slashdot.org/story/*
      // @exclude http://.slashdot.org/story/*
      // @grant none
      // ==/UserScript==

      var elements = document.getElementsByTagName('article');

      for(var i = 0; i < elements.length; i++) {

      if(elements[i].querySelector('a[href*="forbes.com"]')) {

      elements[i].parentNode.removeChild(elements[i]);

      }

      }

  6. Better non-forbes link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://phys.org/news/2016-02-thursday-einstein-gravitational.html

  7. When did this nonsense start? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This "we're announcing that we'll be announcing something soon" crap, I mean.

    The first time I was really aware of it happening was with "Ginger", that silly self-balancing scooter. Then, and every time since, the announcement has been underwhelming at best. Most of the time it's a complete waste of time - so I now let these pre-announcements go in one ear and right out the other.

    We have the Internet. If something cool is announced, we'll know about it right away. Stop wasting our time - and yours - with pre-announcements about coming announcements!

    Truly we live in the future... but, unfortunately, too often this future makes Futurama look like a prescient documentary.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  8. Solar Neutrinos First by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Informative

    StartsWithABang must think Forbes is a popular science magazine.

    Well it would be nice if he got his science right then. The first astrophysical neutrinos detected came from the sun and were detected by the Homestake Experiment in the late 1960s for which a Nobel Prize was awarded. Those from SN1987a were the first neutrinos detected from a source outside the solar system.

  9. Re:I dunno .. by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a thought, why not wait until Thursday for the actual announcement...

    So that we'll know to go to an actual news site on Thursday instead of waiting until Monday for Slashdot to run it.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  10. non-Forbes link by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  11. Link to announcement by XXongo · · Score: 4, Informative

    The actual LIGO Media Advisory is here: http://www.ligo.org/news/media... (with a bunch of links to background info)

  12. Re:Shame on you slashdot for this... by Bengie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slashdot needs to start a blacklist of domains, starting with forbes and medium.