Slashdot Mirror
A New Technique Makes GPS Accurate To An Inch (gizmodo.com)
A team from the University of California, Riverside, has developed a technique that augments regular GPS data with on-board inertial measurements from a sensor. Actually, that's been tried before, but in the past it's required large computers to combine the two data streams, rendering it ineffective for use in cars or mobile devices. Instead what the University of California team has done is create a set of new algorithms which, it claims, reduce the complexity of the calculation by several orders of magnitude. In turn, that allows GPS systems in a mobile device to calculate position with an accuracy of just an inch.
One of the most time consuming parts of a short journey is getting the passenger doors aligned with the port-side gangways. Unlike airports, it's not the gangways that move to the plane, it's the vessel that must align with the portside. Sometimes the portside gangway can move up or down, but many times, the crew have to tie down these mini gangways with ropes when the tides and ballast tanks aren't enough. It takes several minutes of maneuvering to get the ship aligned with the dockside, sometimes even having to reverse and try again, especially in heavy swells. If they could get GPS down to several inches, combined with the sideways movement that many catamarans have, docking could be done automatically.
Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
Given that we can now use GPS to great accuracy. Does this mean that the US military no longer needs to encrypt the end of the GPS signal? After all, the military has always been able to use GPS for very precise location, whereas civilians had to put up with very coarse location.
Couldn't the same level of 'automatic' be achieved with image recognition cameras at the doors, or other sensors to achieve the same result?
-=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
I'm sure there will be a lot of obvious applications for this technology, but I can see robotics being a big one.
GPS hasn't been practical for robotics but with this level of accuracy, I wouldn't be surprised to many robotic applications currently being done by humans.
It would be interesting to see how the algorithm keeps its accuracy over time and distance.
Mimetics Inc. Twitter
The rest of the world gets it "accurate to a centimetre".
...nobody actually uses GPS for anything life-critical requiring accuracy, because signals can be jammed/spoofed, and sometimes the calculation is off due to reflections or satellites behaving not as expected.
And by "nobody", I except the military, but nobody notices when they miss their target.
Couldn't the same level of 'automatic' be achieved with image recognition cameras at the doors, or other sensors to achieve the same result?
Why would you want to do it in a simple way?
Sig ?
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7349142
Accurate GPS is good.
But I'd really much prefer a GPS that can work indoors, in cities with tall buildings, near hills and mountains etc.
That seems to have much more uses than getting something from a handful of inches down to fractions of an inch.
My car and phone sometimes get confused about precisely where I am and which turn-off I've taken. And in Belgium (where there are a LOT of underground roads), it barely works at all - by the time it locks on, I've had to go down another tunnel. In Central London, it can lose accuracy just at critical points. But everywhere else it's okay.
Improve the reception and time-to-first-fix. Then worry about sub-meter accuracy. Nobody really uses it for that level of accuracy anyway.
I wonder how the Three Letter Agencies will respond to this? Military GPS has always had access to more accurate coordinates, now anyone can have it? Someone in Maryland is shitting bricks.
"Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
In turn, that allows GPS systems in a mobile device to calculate position with an accuracy of just an inch.
Dick measuring goes high-tech.
It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
So can I blame Jamie Condliffe for taking an IEEE article in metric and converting to imperial?
After all, Gizmodo is a tech lite site; so you think they would want to culturally lead the way in dropping a unit of measure that no other country uses anymore.
46137
The accelerometers on the phone are usually not that good, at all. "A mobile device" yes, but that's nothing new - the sensor fusion technology is old (kalman).
Anyone that figured out what the new part is?
Why try to maneuver the huge vessel? A simple floating bridge with gangways manually controlled like they do with airbridges for the airplanes is even more simple. Given the mass and inertia of the ships, throwing a couple of thick ropes and tightening them automatically will adjust the floating bridge gangway to the ship.
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
From a technical standpoint this is very cool. However, from a privacy/security standpoint, I am legitimately concerned that government could really misuse and abuse something like this.
That would require your property boundaries to be described in coordinates, rather than beginning at the iron pin 20 feet east south east from the largest oak tree; thence northwest 1 furlong until the stone wall bounding farmer Jones' land. More accurate GPS isn't really going to help you interpret something like this. At least the US doesn't have to deal with issues like changes to the length of a furlong made by Queen Elizabeth I.
I used to work at a precision GPS company, on differential GPS. What they would do is have a 'base station' that would stay in a single spot, and average the position from the GPS signal for a period of time. This is because, due to atmospheric interference, the position 'wobbles'.. Once we have an average position, we use that position to come up with correctors to send to the mobile units (via radio modem usually, though other means are possible). This got us to be on par with what this article is claiming.
I wonder if they account for the 'position wobble' of atmospheric interference. I suspect its possible, as they just pick one position they've received, and use the inertial adjust for the correctors. Not much more work than we were doing.
(I didnt write any of the algorithms or anything, just shuffled data around to different devices and libraries.)
Slashdot is like Playboy: I read it for the articles
I believe that ship based dead reckoning systems are physically attached to the ship and "up" for the dead reckoning system is always "up" with respect the the physical ship. Same thing for "forward" or "front" (or "fore" if you want to get all nautical). How could this work for a phone that is in some random (and changing) orientation in your pocket?
Scanning Lidar will work. Map it first and run some ICP algorithms. Basically you have a GPS pose and a ICP Lidar corrected pose. Highly accurate if you can map the dock well enough.
Yeah right, the US has it's own odd measurement, the US survey mile:
;)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mile#US_survey_mile
Speaking about odd, what about feet, inches and yards?
"The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
I use a usb gps sensor I built around 1998 which simply measured rate of change, connected via CAN to the speedometer and power steering, considered angle travel as well as using a compass/gimble. Certainly, it wasn't real precise, but it worked quite well. I don't think I used more than two hours in matlab to code it.
As for CPU, it's a 16mhz z80 derivative... no FP.
Rotfl.
It is so funny when you meet someone who believes all the marketing brochures.
Bolt enough addons to your Camry and out well beat a ferrari also.. Didn't you know. Just add up the marketing numbers.
No.. You must be right. The marketing brochures are right and the hard physical definitions of the actual system itself are wrong.. Yeah.. That's the ticket.
One of the most time consuming parts of a short journey is getting the passenger doors aligned with the port-side gangways. Unlike airports, it's not the gangways that move to the plane, it's the vessel that must align with the portside. Sometimes the portside gangway can move up or down, but many times, the crew have to tie down these mini gangways with ropes when the tides and ballast tanks aren't enough. It takes several minutes of maneuvering to get the ship aligned with the dockside, sometimes even having to reverse and try again, especially in heavy swells. If they could get GPS down to several inches, combined with the sideways movement that many catamarans have, docking could be done automatically.
Maybe they'd have better luck with the starboard side.
How would you deal with continental drift? North America and Eurasia are moving apart by 2.5 cm per year.
At the very least this could be used to tare or zero the readings from a local survey monument.
Whats funny is the inch is officially defined as 25.4 mm. Dual scale measuring tape confirms this at multiples, as does using a unit converter
A product with these specifications seems to be already available on the market: MTi-G by Xsens. The technical specifications talk of a resolution of 2.5 cm, which is about an inch. It uses the kind of sensor fusion algorithms described in the article. Xsens is a Fairchild Semiconductor company, an industry icon delivering power solutions for the mobile, industrial, cloud, automotive, lighting, and computing industries. Xsens has offices in Enschede, the Netherlands and Los Angeles, California.
I never knew Juggalos were so concerned with positioning.
Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
Compute power is such today that it seems *very* likely they could just have a live video feed and a touch screen. When you're close enough to the dock to see it, you touch where it is on the screen, then just using that pattern the docking can happen automatically from there on out. Obviously there will still be potential to override it and use manual control (often via lateral thrusters). It should be trivial for something like the lasso tool to grab and recognize a gangway.
And, you know what they say, "Gangway or sickbay!" Err... Maybe you don't know what they say. Anyhow, it'd be pretty easy (I should think) to write a system that holds a temporary gangway image in storage. With a clever hack or two, they could probably even share it by database among various docking ships, the same company, or things like that - they can push it out by cellular protocols or even just radio encoded data. Then anyone will be able to use the images. Storage is cheap, they can just store that image on the device and never have to worry about it again - coupled with GPS then it might actually be possible to get rid of some of the specialist pilots who come out and tell them how to get into the bay, dock, wharf, etc... (A person comes out on a small boat, climbs up the side of the big boat, and then tells them how to avoid obstacles and whatnot - or sometimes actually does the piloting themselves.)
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
I'm still convinced the 'net could use a "smack user" button. That was horrible and you should be ashamed of yourself! Why, I ought to...
I have a niece who's into that thing. She even wears war paint and goes out to festivals and whatnot. I think they call them gatherings. I've met some of them and I've been given the title of "Honorary Juggalo." That's not exactly something I was looking forward to gaining as an accomplishment but, well... It's something and I guess it's good that they have each other.
They do seem really keen on spending gobs of money for official merchandise. There's seemingly some things that are more rare than others (or they claim it is) and they do a bunch of trading among themselves. They often sport very poorly done tattoos of a hatchet man - except they appear to be carrying a cleaver in the best of cases and an 8 bit goombah in the worst of cases.
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
Aircraft already have enough accuracy to land automatically. Below a certain visibility, we're not even allowed to land manually. Pilots are still required to set everything up, but in principle the technology is there.
The problem is, things fail. Frequently. Short circuits, computer failures, software bugs, mechanical failures, leaks, etcetera. You should see a crew in action during a simulator training session, and you'd be immediately convinced that we're nowhere near fully automatic airplanes no matter how sophisticated the automation has become. The positioning part is not what's holding us back, in fact that's the easy part that's already been solved long ago.
As long as they get paid enough, get enough vacation,...
Yawn, come back when it's 1cm, then I'm impressed.
That would shift the bottleneck to engine power, and the deliverability of that power. That costs serious coin for any working vessel,
Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
No, sadly it's not even that nice. The State Plane Coordinate System uses "feet" and by feet I mean either the "International Foot" which is defined as .3048 meters or the "U.S. Survey Foot" which is 1200/3937 meters. Sadly both are still in use today.
http://vterrain.org/Projection...
Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?