Slashdot Mirror
Anonymous Hacker Gets Lost At Sea, Rescued, Then Arrested (softpedia.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Martin Gottesfeld, 31, from Somerville, Massachusetts, was arrested by FBI agents after being rescued at sea in the Gulf of Mexico. According to the FBI, Mr. Gottsfeld was under investigation after launching a series of cyber-attacks against Boston Children's Hospital in 2014, as part of the Anonymous hacker collective. Gottesfeld and his wife were found in a sailboat, near the coast of Cuba, with lots of luggage and 3 laptops. A Disney Cruise ship took them to the Bahamas, where FBI agents took him into custody.
Go thing they weren't Jews.
you display the same low level of education that most americans display.
you are free to continue your display of ignorant irrationality by replying without understanding what is written.
i said Anonymous is a tool of western 'liberal' establishment, because it is ignoring its crimes, like drone killing of children, but branding as isis, and trying to ban those who directly oppose and resist the same establishment and its crimes, by mere tweets ( if you are ignorant of their much publicized campaign doing this i suggest you look it up starting with slashdot posts on the subject). Anonymous is clearly favoring one side on that single issue (note single not some 'third' or separate issue).
you are free to ignorantly, irrationally, and incorrectly, call that a logical fallacy all you want.
there is no false equivalence, there is equivalence, period. crimes of western establishment and isis are comparable in horror. how exactly is any crime worse than drone killing of children? do untangle and clarify your twisted morality. if anything, while quality of evil is similar, as far as quantity goes western establishment is far worse.
Anonymous is the self named prosecutor, judge, and executor, of those it attacks. as a defender of Anonymous why don't you reveal all the tweets of those it tried to brand and ban from twitter? in what way are all of them isis supporters? and in what way are those tweets and tweeters guilty of crimes worse than drone killing of children? do explain. don't run from questions.
btw do you support banning people for even tweeting support for violence(if there are any such tweets)? if so are you in favor of banning those who support violent actions of western military in variety of countries? or banning people who support torture camps? you know that would include almost whole of western establishment. or do you side with one side over another? as in drone killing children is ok, systematic torture and killing of unarmed prisoners without judicial oversight is ok, bombing whole towns to dust is ok , but terrorist attacks in paris is not ok, torturing and killing of unarmed prisoners(by other side) is not ok,
twisted much? irrational ignorance like yours does that !