Refugees Rely On Biometrics To Receive Aid, Even As Privacy Concerns Loom (dailydot.com)
New submitter Selena Larson writes: The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) rolled out a pilot program for refugees this week that connects biometric data directly to points of sale and enables people to buy groceries with an iris scan. The computerized system communicates with the United Nations refugee agency, UNHCR, which keeps a database of biometric data collected from refugees around the world. If the individual is confirmed to be a refugee in Jordan, based on their iris scan, a bank the organization works with approves the transaction.
It's not like they're the ones coming to *US* asking for help, or that they're populated with at least some potential terrorists, or anything.
SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
Get your freshly scooped out eyeballs here! Best prices in the camp!
They are relying on the charity of others.
Seriously. Do people think they are owed something here? This system was likely being exploited and this is a way to ensure that resources go to those it was intended to go to. The alternative is to either not distribute resources or for the refugees to take a stand.
If i give you two dollars and say you have to walk across town to get it from me, the only way you are going to get it is if you come to me. This doesn't mean you owe me a trip across town, It means that you have to do something to get my charity but you are doing it for yourself.
So no. The donors are not expecting the refugees to owe them anything. But they expect what they donate to be used for the people donated to. If the requires them to do something to help themselves out, it is all on them.
It's not like they have to put 20 hours in at a salt mine or anything. If they want assistance, they can't expect it to be delivered on a silver platter.
Biometrics: It's all fun and games... until someone loses an eye.
Wouldn't it be cheaper to just tattoo a bar code onto everyone's hand or forehead? Maybe use an ink the is only visible under UV or IR?
That way when the refugees get to go home or end up settling in someplace new they can get the tattoo removed, or not. But it wouldn't be as big a privacy risk as a retina scan or other biometric that can't be changed when it gets compromised.
Living in a modern society where we have multiple ways to prove who we are when asked we loose sight of one of the basic problems refugees face: being able to prove who they are and what country they come from.
For a refugee who is having a hard time proving who they are, privacy concerns are a moot point. An iris scan that can give them food in store like food distribution center is far better than waiting in line and hoping there will be food available when the get to the head of the line.
This is very similar to one of the problems homeless people face here in the US.
RLH