Slashdot Mirror
E-book Museum At the Library of Congress? (teleread.com)
David Rothman writes: Back in 2003, Slashdot ran TeleRead's call for a brick-and-mortar international e-book museum at the Library of Congress. The proposed museum would focus on the devices and other technology rather than the content. It still isn't too late for such a project, and TeleRead is again advocating the idea. Content, too, actually would benefit -- considering that proprietary formats and DRM can imperil the future readability of e-books. Meanwhile, a small-scale e-book museum is about to open in Paris and is looking for donations. A worthy cause!
>> focus on the devices and other technology rather than the content...Content, too, actually would benefit -- considering that proprietary formats and DRM can imperil the future readability of e-books
This was and is still a dumb idea. Concentrate on exporting the content in an open format and f*** the devices, proprietary and otherwise. It's not like many mere mortals can physically get to DC anyway to use a bunch of archaic devices, so the end goal should be "open format content accessible from anywhere".
Content only benefits to the extent where it exists in the e-book museum in a proprietary, DRM-locked format in addition to the other part of the Library of Congress--the library part.
So... this is intended to be a museum of devices that can read e-books.
That means it'll need to have a collection of phones, tablets and computers along with e-book readers.
Yeah... I don't see how that's relevant to the Library of Congress.
I thought museums were for long past dead things, for which there is a historical perspective
Exactly. Open Format = Investing in our Future for Everyone. Closed Format == Short Term Greed.
One of the reasons books have survived so long is because you don't need yet-another-stupid-obsolete-device to find them useful. Public Accessibility is the WHOLE point of a library.
Now if this was a "Tech History Museum" they might have a point ... but it's not.
--
Why is StackOverflow hostile to the less experienced? Everyone was a beginner at one point
Wait, why is this a dumb idea?
How can you correlate the presence of a museum with a lack of effort toward content standardization for e-books?
That's like saying airplane museums shouldn't exist because we haven't standardized on a single flying machine design.
My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
If the content were the focus, it would be just another wing of the Library.
Wait, why is this a dumb idea?
Because we have a public debt of $19 trillion, and we shouldn't be making it bigger for the sake of mission creep at the LOC.
The analogy doesn't hold.
The better attempt at your analogy is to state that we will have airplane museums where the airplanes can only be viewed through a special type of glass. In the event that plate of glass is broken, you can buy another if the glass company is still in business, if it is not, the ability to view the plane is lost forever.
Like any self-respecting airplane museum, they care about the planes, and the glass is a barrier to what they care about. If I were running such a museum, the plane behind the glass better be a value, that is, it better be such a draw that the risk of losing it would be massively outweighed by the enormous profits the plane would bring. That's because, at any point in the future, my investment in the exhibit might require a research effort just to continue existing. In short, I'd probably pay more for a quality replica plane without the encumbrance of the viewing glass, because my risk profile is greatly reduced.
As author of the post, I couldn't agree more with the commenters on the need for open standards. The idea is to give people a feel for the devices, not force them to come to the museum to read the books. But, yes, the content issue does enter into it. What if some future DRM is super-hard to crack? Then, if nothing else, screen scans could be made. I would hope it wouldn't come to that. Down with DRM! But just in case. What's more, the museum would let people in the future be able to experience the look and feel of today's e-books. Today's taken-for-granted gadgets will be yesterday's historical finds. Regarding financing, the museum could happen at LoC or the Smithsonian through donations.
Let me add that we can't anticipate the future needs of historians and others, in regard to old books and other documents. Yes, I'd like everything available for eternity in open formats. But that doesn't mean it'll happen.
Ebooks should be stored as conventional books. If they are to be preserved, they need to be in printed format. I see no added value in storing such in digital format.
Like backing up all kinds of data on Laserdiscs seemed like an excellent idea in the 80's, it's very difficult to handle such backups today. Not only are compliant players hard to find, nobody has a clue about how to read the formats stored on them.
-SR
Like the classic brick s**thouse? I hope so, because that's exactly as big as I think it should be. Like, 3' x 3' x 8', with a door on one wall and a big touchscreen on the opposite wall. Put it outside next to the big library. Best way to illuminate the difference in technologies I think.