Slashdot Mirror
Arizona County Attorney To Ditch iPhones Over Apple Dispute With FBI (networkworld.com)
alphadogg writes: Apple's refusal to help the FBI unlock an iPhone 5c used by one of the terrorists in the San Bernardino, California attack on Dec. 2 has prompted the Maricopa County attorney's office in Arizona to ban providing new iPhones to its staff. 'Apple's refusal to cooperate with a legitimate law enforcement investigation to unlock a phone used by terrorists puts Apple on the side of terrorists instead of on the side of public safety,' Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery said in a statement Montgomery described as a corporate public relations stunt Apple's positioning of its refusal to cooperate on privacy grounds. On the other hand, I suspect Apple's public refusal to decrypt, and Tim Cook's strong words in favor of user privacy, have probably triggered an opposite reaction among many would-be phone buyers.
Apple DOES cooperate, when they are able to do things like pull data out of iCloud backups.
What they are being asked to do is write a custom OS for free. To fix a mistake the FBI made.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
False. My father owns a lock/locksmithing and safe business. He has been hired by police to open locks, and many times refused for a multitude of reasons. He is still in business.
Apple has not bee served with a warrant or a subpoena. They have been served with a writ of assistance.