Slashdot Mirror


How Ugandans Overturned an Election-Day Blackout of Social Media Apps (vice.com)

tedlistens writes: When Ugandans went to the polls last Thursday in presidential and parliamentary elections, they participated in the most heavily-contested political battle since multiparty democracy began in 2005. As reports swirled of vote buying and excessive use of force by the police on opposition protesters, it was the attempt to block access to Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp and mobile phone-based money services that produced the loudest reactions. In a country with the youngest population in the world, where 77 percent of the population is under 30 years of age, mobile apps have become vital to communication and commerce. During the three-day ban, an estimated 1.5 million citizens, or 15 percent of the internet-using populace, downloaded VPN software and Tor to reroute their internet connections and return to social media, where discussion about the election continued to rage.

54 comments

  1. Survival of the fittest by freshlimesoda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..And internet always finds a way

    --
    I come to Slashdot only to read sigs. One you are reading is mine.
    1. Re:Survival of the fittest by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Yeah? Let's see it get around the ISP that cuts you off or the TLA that jams your wifi.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Survival of the fittest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, in Uganda its "survival of the fattest": https://www.psychologytoday.co...

    3. Re:Survival of the fittest by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      Sneaker net and bluetooth AP.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    4. Re:Survival of the fittest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually dated a woman from Uganda a few years ago, and it is entirely true. She said that Ugandan men prefer their women to be "juicy" (her words).

      They also are taught almost nothing about sex. On your wedding day, you're pretty much brought into a room with all your female relatives, and they explain what's going to happen and provide pointers.

      Obviously, this will differ a bit based on your background, and she was clearly not waiting for marriage to have sex, but she was also an ex-pat working in the United States and who wanted to go to Switzerland for an internship program for business.

      The one thing I will say about actual Africans, as opposed to African-Americans, is that while their home countries may well be somewhat behind the times in certain aspects, they do not lack for self-image or the ability to believe they can get ahead. Africa can be a shitty place, but I have more optimism for actual Africans than I do for those in the US who whine about being handed disadvantages. Their own relatives in Africa are working against actual physical and economic barriers and have not lost their pride or sense of independence from it. Being born in Africa is not "winning" the lottery, but they live their lives despite the major hurdles they have to deal with.

  2. A preview of America by BruceNotWillis · · Score: 0

    If Trump is elected, Americans will have to encrypt their communication if they want to trash talk the president.

    1. Re:A preview of America by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Dial down the paranoia. Just like the Republicans with President Obama this terror of an individual is uncalled for. No matter who is president he doesn't act in a vacuum. Trump will have to suffer under the same limits of power that all his predecessors labored under. President Obama managed to ram through his health care bill over all objections only because his party had control of both the House and Senate. He's also spent the rest of his presidency paying the bill for it as it caused a reversal in both houses of Congress putting them both solidly into the Republicans hands and they've used that power to curtail much of what he wanted to do and they fully intend to make sure he can't place another liberal onto the Supreme Court. If Trump should somehow win he'd not only have to deal with the Democrats but he'd also have only the shakiest support of the Republicans as well. If he wants to do anything it will require a lot of compromise.

    2. Re:A preview of America by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Possibly the best thing that could come out of Trump or Sanders becoming President would be the radical snipping of the 'Executive Privileged' virus that would ensue. The creeping power of the Executive Branch has grown for decades. I see Congress and the Courts snipping that stuff off instantly when the Trump or Sanders administration takes control. They can stay in charge of the Post Office and the Army. Lots of other stuff can go.

      I have this dream of Office Furniture and Equipment companies going bankrupt worldwide because of the surplus auctions of equipment from closed buildings in Washington.

      I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.

    3. Re:A preview of America by maroberts · · Score: 1

      > The creeping power of the Executive Branch has grown for decades.

      Hardly. The presidents authority has been regularly limited by Congress. When you say "other stuff", do you include, for example the Department for Transportation, including the Federal Aviation Authority? I don't think I'd like to see the states managing US airspace and aircraft thanks very much.

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    4. Re:A preview of America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      limits of power?

      WHAT limits of power?

      Anyone seen limits of power anywhere around here? ;)

    5. Re:A preview of America by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      You think a Trump or a Sanders is going to stop Executive overreach?

      How do you think they're going to get their programs in place?

      Sanders is more likely to work with Congress than Trump, but there's a lot of hostility to both in Congress.

      Sanders is a bit more of a humble sort, but even he will probably need to get "creative" to make any of his programs have any traction. Trump will just declare that Congress is "low energy" and proceed to attempt to rule by decree.

      No. None of our candidates is going to shrink the government. Sanders is actually going to *increase* the government. How do you think he's going to administer his single payer health care system?

      Trump isn't promising to increase the government, but he'll probably need a new building just for his Office of the Border Wall Project, assuming he wasn't lying about trying it.

      And yes, kids, the border wall is entirely possible to build in four years. It will be expensive, and I don't see at all how he's going to get a billion dollars out of Mexico, but if he makes the effort, he could do it. But that's not going to shrink the government.

    6. Re:A preview of America by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Rumor has it that the Mexicans will soon be eager to pay for and build the wall. All the jobs are moving down there and they'll need a wall to keep work-seeking Americans out.

  3. Re:uganda FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its right next door to Rwanda you remember the place that attempted to commit genocide a few years back? That one.

  4. Re: uganda FTW by galgon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Uganda be kidding me

  5. Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They're not exactly a liberal bunch. Even with all the fraud, the incumbents still have a lot of support.

    Also it looks like there was lots of help from the Department of State, so let's not get all excited about this being a 'grassroots' effort or anything.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      So, they need to agree with your far-left political views to be good people? WTF? Where did that even come from?

      The Department of State helped in the color revolutions too, so what's your point? Tunisia is free today because of it, and the Arab Spring was a great win for both the US President and the Secretary of State.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now there's a bunch of young people in Uganda who know more about VPN and Tor and Smartphones than me. Old dog, hard for new tricks.. few simple guides around that aren't "manager level" (no content outside of marketing descriptions of VPN, etc) or so darn technical you don't know where to begin.

    3. Re:Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, they need to agree with your far-left political views to be good people? WTF? Where did that even come from?

      You, apparently. They didn't state that anything was good or bad, only that no change was likely due to excessive support for conservative views which most western countries discarded 50+ years ago.

    4. Re:Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by mvdwege · · Score: 2

      Well, since you consider it apparently so far-left as to be beyond the pale to think that LGBT people shouldn't have to fear for their lives, I'm going to call you exactly what you are: A disgusting bigoted dinosaur.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    5. Re:Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by Maritz · · Score: 1

      Even with all the fraud, the incumbents still have a lot of support.

      It's amazing how much support you can drum up with a few lowloaders of youths brandishing bats and encouraging the populace to give them your vote.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    6. Re:Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      :-) Heh. Good troll! But your bait is just not that attractive this time around.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    7. Re:Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't use bats in Uganda; they use child soldiers, balakas and AK-47s.

      KONY 2016!

    8. Re:Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I value the lives of all people, including those who choose to be part of the self-styled LGBTQ community, but also including the many, many more who do not. Those who would imprison or murder people for being a part of that community are wrong, but so are those who would allow the destruction of an entire civilization at that community's behest. Civilized societies have found a way to find a balance somewhere between those two extremes.

    9. Re:Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I value the lives of all people, including those who choose to be part of the self-styled LGBTQ community, but also including the many, many more who do not. Those who would imprison or murder people for being a part of that community are wrong, but so are those who would allow the destruction of an entire civilization at that community's behest.

      The difference is the latter group doesn't exist, because the LGBTQ community can't destroy the civilization because how in the heck could it possibly do that even if it wanted to?

      Civilized societies have found a way to find a balance somewhere between those two extremes.

      Barbarous societies found ways to balance people's need to live against Great Moloch's need for human sacrifice. Civilized societies don't sacrifice actual people's actual needs for the sake of boogeymen.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    10. Re:Yeah, they may have their social media, so what by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I think that his point is that we are constantly told to respect the beliefs of other cultures, that does not appear to extend to those things that are objectionable to current thought from the same people. So, effectively, "tolerance" becomes a word used to berate people who don't have the same idea of what is "tolerable" as others.

      The Spanish conquerors thought it was obscene that the Aztecs would sacrifice thousands on an altar for their religious beliefs, but yet today, much is made about how Spain were imperialist oppressors. The reality is that both were oppressive, but for different reasons. Perhaps we *don't* have to respect the Aztec civilization, and we can be happy it is gone, despite its more positive aspects, such as its engineering feats and such.

      Now, I am not suggesting that Uganda's cultural drive to outlaw and kill gays is a good thing. I think it is horrible.

      However, perhaps we should agree to whether we condemn a whole culture for its most objectionable traits, or we agree to accept certain culture for who they are. What will not work is the idea that you can define "tolerance" by your own idea of such, and expect that people will simply accept that as a matter of course just because you label your views as "progressive".

  6. Whats that old saying by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone remember who first said "The Internet interprets censorship as a fault and routes around it" or something to that effect?

    This is a perfect example.

    1. Re:Whats that old saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      ...a perfect example of people doing whatever they can to complain about things to their peers instead of actually getting out and trying to fix them.

    2. Re:Whats that old saying by Pax681 · · Score: 2

      Anyone remember who first said "The Internet interprets censorship as a fault and routes around it" or something to that effect? This is a perfect example.

      John Gilmore bud

    3. Re:Whats that old saying by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      Thank you :)

  7. What's so bad by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's so bad that the incumbents decided it was better to piss everyone off by banning social media than let them talk about it?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  8. I might be a cynic by youngone · · Score: 2
    As I read the Washington Post article I just kept thinking about what a total failure African independence has been. There are hardly any real democracies in Africa.

    If you look at the map, an awful lot of African countries have long straight borders that look like they were created by someone in London or Paris with no thought for the realities on the ground.

    It's entirely possible that I don't really understand Africa either, but I've often thought that the best thing would be to scrap every country on the continent, and divide the place up along ethnic lines. I know that would hardly be trouble free, but there might at least a chance for some sort of peace in the place.

    his critics now charge that Museveni manipulates the military to keep a firm grip on power.

    Yeah, well, it's Africa

    Besigye, a retired army colonel

    So probably no better than the last guy

    1. Re:I might be a cynic by Tokolosh · · Score: 2

      Upon the founding of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) in 1963, when the continent was being decolonized, the first resolution adopted by the Africans themselves was that the white man's borders would not be changed.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    2. Re:I might be a cynic by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Would you really expect anyone who's just come into power to willingly give up territory?

    3. Re:I might be a cynic by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      When I visited Uganda in 2012, there was a state visit from the Rwandan President, which was a big event - there was a ceremony that was televised where the Ugandan President and the Rwandan President gave each other medals to celebrate the end of the Rwandan civil war, and both men were in full military dress uniform with a chest full of medals.

      It struck me then that you only ever see that from governments which are, for want of a better word, somewhat "suspect". Even my Ugandan friends admit that there is utterly no chance of change in the country - even though its a "democracy", the current presidents son is already being groomed as a replacement, and is already largely accepted by the populace as the true successor to the current president, which basically says it all about democracy in Uganda.

    4. Re:I might be a cynic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The borders cut up along cultural lines are much, much more violent.

    5. Re:I might be a cynic by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Much of Africa is effectively in the stage of political development where Europe was a few centuries ago. In Europe, all of this was accepted because there were Kings and Kings needed Crown Princes.

      The problem with Africa today is that we have sort of made them call themselves Presidents, but they want to be Kings, and their people treat them similarly. They never had the tribalism beat out of them by long and hard experience, so they're still effectively acting like tribes who have chiefs and kings.

      Uganda actually has an internal Kingdom of Buganda (the source of the word Uganda), which is actually led by an actual King today. It's not really a state or a political entity, but it still has some form of authority for the Buganda people who are the largest ethnic group in Uganda. A lot of Africa is tribal rule with a national government slapped on top of it. They really don't have the grounding in democracy, so the people themselves have trouble making it work and fall into older patterns of thought.

    6. Re:I might be a cynic by youngone · · Score: 1

      No, of course not.

  9. The internet interprets censorship as damage... by one_red_eye · · Score: 1

    etc.

  10. Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I very much doubt they all deleted their VPN/TOR software on the day after election, either.

    The tighter you clench your fist, the more sand disappears through your fingers.

    1. Re: Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weren't those "star systems"?

  11. west's exaggerated notion of power of media by sittingnut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if we stick to facts as opposed to hype, we learn that while use of methods to go round the blocked media increased, it did not change much. nor should it.
    same thing happened after the so called 'arab spring', all those stories about westernized arab liberals chasing away mubarak using social media. (some western media even calling it the twitter revolution.) then parties representing them got very little votes, while muslim brotherhood and other islamist parties won big. and then military took back the power.

    westerners have highly exaggerated notion of power of media, in their own countries and elsewhere. in their minds success of unwanted politicians, whether they be foreign 'dictators', or local right/left wingers, are due mainly to propaganda for them, and/or censorship of opponents, through media. not so.

    people and issues are more complex than that.

    1. Re:west's exaggerated notion of power of media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the original Tunisia revolution didn't fail AFAIK.

  12. Well done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Teaching monkey see, monkey do to the first monkey must have taken much patience.

    1. Re: Well done! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes well done. Once speech is controlled, or in this case squelched, it is then ever so much easier to control the media further dividing nations into the corrupt democractic electoral practices you see today. As for degrading comments in regards to ethnicity or color. Just more diversionary childish tactics of a stupid person.

  13. Election-Day by MaxSmoke · · Score: 1

    "How often do you have election?"
    "Evely day."

  14. chaussure nike air jordan pas cher by zhenguomei · · Score: 1

    air jordan pas cher management of both hands, to create a number of new mainstream media, built a few have a strong public trust and communication, in line with modern international communication and social and political needs of the new media group is the core of the. media integration is an old topic, many years of upheaval. From the early start to reform newspapers radio and television group to test the water, whether it is confined to the industry a "vertical" or "horizontal" across the industry, keen to practice China media has never stopped the pace of exploration. Practice has proved that relying on the old road new shoes, the traditional media is very difficult to get out of the new media. In order to promote the integration of traditional media and new media, media organizations and management must first out of conservative thinking, from the "new start" - "new" in consciousness and concept, attitude and "new" in "new" in management, technology and practice. In addition,chaussure nike air jordan pas cher it must focus on the development of the unity of knowledge, promote and force the tension between old and new, to leave room for the pioneer, reserved for the later approach.

  15. Re: Yeah, they may have their social media, so wha by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

    It is the Ugandans who hold these views, but thanks for projecting. If you don't like Africans because they don't agree with white liberal political views then it's you who are the bigot. Why don't we all ask the indigenous people what they think about you and your racist opinions?

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  16. I live in Uganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The summary suggests that these elections democratic, when in reality they were the most blatantly rigged elections in the country's history.

    Opposition leaders were repeatedly arrested, often denied the ability to hold rallies, and had their offices raided by the government on multiple occasions. There were even mysterious disappearances of opposition campaign staff: http://www.observer.ug/news-he...

    On election day, voting materials in Kampala -- the opposition stronghold -- did not show up at polling stations until an hour before polling was scheduled to close. Social media was deliberately blocked, and even Mobile Money was shut down in order to undermine the oppositions ability to pay fuel and food costs for its polling station workers: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02...

    Al Jazeera covered an incident where opposition claimed to have found a vote rigging center in Nuguru, a Kampala suburb. When the opposition showed up with cameras, and knocked on the gate, two men jumped over the fence and ran. After being apprehended, they turned out to be carrying police issue guns and other equipment. Police then swiftly arrived and arrested everyone for attempted to trespass on a government intelligence facility: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/...

    Also: I don't know where this number of VPN downloads comes from. I see it everywhere, and have for days, yet nobody can cite a source for it, and every journalist I know has failed to independently verify it. While it is true (and great news) that a very significant number of people in Uganda quickly managed to work around the blockade, I would view the download figures with extreme skepticism.

  17. Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it was the attempt to block access to Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp and mobile phone-based money services that produced the loudest reactions.

    You don't have a fucking clue. People rioted and set up burning roadblocks in the streets because they had no ballot papers and their favorite candidate got arrested, not because they couldn't access Facebook.

    There is a great story in all of this about people getting around censorship, but don't spread bullshit.

  18. Re: Yeah, they may have their social media, so wha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is the Ugandans who hold these views, but thanks for projecting. If you don't like Africans because they don't agree with white liberal political views then it's you who are the bigot. Why don't we all ask the indigenous people what they think about you and your racist opinions?

    Oh, GP's logical failings don't rule out the Ugandans being bigots.

    The fundamental problem the GP has is that he's actually a racist - he holds white Christians to different and higher standards than he holds black Muslims to.

  19. Re: Yeah, they may have their social media, so wha by mvdwege · · Score: 1

    Oh fuck off already. You obviously think it is a-okay that they hold those views, otherwise you wouldn't have railed against someone who denounced them. And playing the "but you're the real bigot" card is a tacit admission of having no defense.

    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  20. Re: Yeah, they may have their social media, so wh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can disagree, but you can't write off a whole nation as bigoted because they don't agree with you. There are plenty of things that are OK in other cultures that you would balk at, and they don't call you a bigot for it.

  21. bye freedom of speech by encrypted · · Score: 1

    One of my ISP's sounded the alarm one day before elections. They were told it's a national emergency and were required to block "all social media". All social media was ambiguous and despite efforts we never got the official communication - but whatsapp, facebook, twitter were specified as the main ones. They also received no notification to restore services but decided to anyways when one of the major telcos did. I see the same president still prevails so oppression still works well for raping a nation. For any Ugandans, A simple VPN would have bypassed the blocks. I like tunnelbear for the cool pictures of bears and it's free for a limited amount of data.