Slashdot Mirror


Ubuntu 15.10 Kernel Regression That Broke Graphics Displays In VMWare Patched

prisoninmate writes: On Monday, February 22, 2016, Softpedia reported on the availability of new kernel updates for several of Canonical's supported Ubuntu Linux operating systems, including Ubuntu 15.10, for which five kernel vulnerabilities have been patched at that point in time. And from the looks of it, the respective kernel updates introduced a regression, which Canonical patched four days later, on February 26, 2016, saying that the issue was introduced along with the fixed vulnerabilities for Ubuntu 15.10 (Wily Werewolf) and it broke graphics displays for those running the OS in VMWare VMs.

76 comments

  1. Ubuntu == Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Windows of the Linux world.

    AVOID.

    1. Re:Ubuntu == Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean?

    2. Re:Ubuntu == Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He means that Ubuntu is the Windows of the Linux world, much like how Linux is the Windows of the Unix world

    3. Re:Ubuntu == Spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget how FreeBSD is the Windows of the BSD world.

  2. VMWare Broken, Ubuntu Patched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >it broke graphics displays for those running the OS in VMWare VMs
    WHAT?!
    The guest OS can do whatever it wants.
    It's the VM software task to keep it away from the host kernel space and host drivers.
    The only thing that had to be patched here was broken VMWare.

    1. Re:VMWare Broken, Ubuntu Patched by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guest OS did do whatever it wants. What it wanted to do was break its own graphics output. The host was not affected, but the user got grumpy.

  3. front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't know how many people are running Ubuntu 15.10 in VMWare on a daily basis for production,

    yeah, probably not very many. The story here is some kernel security updates were released that contained a regression which affected the graphics display of 15.10 running in VMWare. A fix was released four days later after the problem was identified. Why is this newsworthy?

    1. Re:front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you run any NON LTS version of Ubuntu in Production then frankly, you deserve anything you get.
      NON LTS versions are by their very nature unstable.
      This is even truer because of the way Canonical use their own kernels which are forked from the mainstream one AND that they don't seem to contribute any patches back into the mainstream line.

    2. Re:front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story here is some kernel security updates were released that contained a regression which affected the graphics display of 15.10 running in VMWare. A fix was released four days later after the problem was identified. Why is this newsworthy?

      Because the kernel update clearly didn't go through proper quality assurance. It does not matter if it was fixed four days later. A problematic kernel update should not be released in the wild in the first place. Users will get frustrated if the carpet is constantly pulled under them with weird breakage.

      This is just unprofessional, unstable, quirky software, just like Windows 95.

    3. Re:front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's disappointing to see this attitude from the Linux community. It wasn't like this before. In the past, every distro release was considered rock solid and stable, and it didn't even matter which distro you were using. Now the standards have been lowered so much that only one release every 2 years or whatever it is is considered stable enough for any sort of real use! We don't see this kind of instability from OS X. Each release is stable, and they manage to get one of those put out once a year! It's pathetic how low the Linux community's standards and expectations have dropped.

    4. Re:front page? by karnal · · Score: 1

      I loaded up LTS on my vmware yesterday because I hit this bug on updating. Not production, but disappointing nonetheless.

      --
      Karnal
    5. Re:front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's some Red Hat/Suse FUD. A quick browse through the lkml would tell you that. Secondly, the bug was a VMWare bug that was fixed by a VMWare developer. And there is nothing new about maintaining your own kernel tree, and anyone is free to use Ubuntu kernels or apply their patches to their own tree. Its not true Canonical doesn't contribute to upsteam. Sheesh If Canonical was the size of Red Hat, or Intel, or IBM the bitching would be that they have a ninja assassination team trying to take out Linus and Greg as part of their evil plan to take over Linux.

    6. Re:front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you update? The fix was released yesterday.

    7. Re:front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No RH/SUSE FUD. I run several Debian VM's under VMWare all the time.
      Never had this sort of crash. My experiences with Ubuntu have not been enjoyable. I lost count of the number of WTF?'s I did before I said, 'I can't be half aresed with this POS'. So I went back to Debian.

    8. Re:front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so happy for you.

    9. Re:front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last 90 percent is the hardest phase.

    10. Re: front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the stable branch.

      Guess what guys, when you run bleeding edge code, you get fucked up problems like this. That's why it was fixed in 4 days. Because people are testing the unstable branches for use in stable branches.

      I'm not saying Linux is the bezt. I'm saying that if you run an unstable branch, don't be surprised if shit fucked up.

    11. Re: front page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely the screen not working means it's a bit more than "Unstable". Maybe they should just label interim releases "Broken" to avoid confusion.

    12. Re: front page? by nnull · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, Ubuntu 15.10 is their latest stable release, not bleeding edge code or some unstable branch. Ubuntu 16.04 is their unstable branch.

    13. Re:front page? by karnal · · Score: 1

      When I initially updated and it borked, I didn't see anything in the googles that it broke and/or a fix, so I copied my home directory and installed LTS (via ssh). If I had been running something important, I wouldn't want that to crop up just because I updated on a whim, so I learned my lesson.

      --
      Karnal
  4. It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    News like this is important because it highlights the sorry state of Linux today.

    Linux used to be all about quality, stability, reliability, and robustness. Linux is what we used to use when we wanted our computers to just work, and continue working.

    Yet over the last 5 to 10 years, we've seen a massive decrease in quality across the board. It isn't just Ubuntu. This affects pretty much all distros.

    Many of us switched to Linux in the first place because we were fed up with Windows repeatedly crashing, or Mac OS being too limited.

    For a long time Linux was better than both of them. We could use Linux for months on end without it crashing, and it gave us the full power of a UNIX-like environment, too.

    But that has been eroded away.

    Like we see in this incident, Linux has become less-stable than Windows. First there are these kernel fixes, indicating a low quality to begin with. Then there was the regression introduced by the fixes, which further shows a lack of quality!

    A kernel change should never break user space. Ever. As Linus Torvalds himself said, "If a change results in user programs breaking, it's a bug in the kernel. We never EVER blame the user programs. ... WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE!"

    So not only is Linux now approaching the low level of stability we saw with Windows 95 and 98, but it's also stripping away the UNIX-like environment that made it so powerful. We're seeing more and more anti-UNIX software being included in most distributions, including systemd and GNOME 3.

    So this makes many of us ask, Why the heck do we still use Linux?!

    We need stability. We need a UNIX-like environment. We don't want to use Windows. Linux used to offer all of that, but no longer does. So many of us have moved to FreeBSD, with the rest going to OS X.

    You might say, "Well, fuck off then! We don't need you!", but it turns out that we are the kind of people the Linux community desperately needs. We are the ones who contributed code, fixes, bug reports, and documentation. We are the people who helped make Linux what it is. As we've been slowly driven away from Linux we've seen the quality continue to fall and fall. We surely won't be coming back as long as that's the case!

    So it could very well be a chicken-and-egg problem. Linux initially drew us in because it was better than the competitors. But now that it has become worse, thanks to efforts like systemd and GNOME 3, we are being driven away. And as we are driven away, Linux gets even worse and worse. But since it's getting worse, it doesn't draw us back in! The FreeBSD and OS X communities now benefit from our contributions, while Linux withers away.

    1. Re: It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One regression that wasn't fixed for four days... yep, that's clearly the least stable OS in history.

    2. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sheesh. This is Canonical. They don't have the reputation of stability to begin with.

      Bunch of monkeys tampering with the kernel as if they were competent. Linus snubbed their proposal of maintaining the long term branch for a reason.

    3. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by F.Ultra · · Score: 0

      You do realise that this was affecting 15.10 right? Which is an intermediate/unstable version, the latest LTS from Ubuntu is 14.04. And there is nothing anti-UNIX with either systemd or GNOME 3, that you don't like a project does not automatically deem it anti Unix.

    4. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by ThatTreeOverThere · · Score: 1

      Try Arch Linux. It gives up 1% of stability for the ability to (mostly) safely install bleeding-edge packages. Few kernel patches, super simple package management, ports system. Oh, and there's no graphical installer, so if you manage to install it, you'll know how to fix it when it breaks.

      It's a distro that takes all the magic out of Linux.

      The only thing that's going to wither here is Ubuntu. Because it's not very good.

    5. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      All true. I personally would probably prefer to not run any systemd distros, and will avoid them for a while. Just far too flaky and troublesome. initd works just fine. Maybe in 5 years systemd will either have settled down and be usable, or a new service will come in to replace it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    6. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's exactly these reasons why I moved back to Windows about two years ago. All the warning signs are there for Linux, but they all seem to have their hands on their ears.

    7. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, OK, Linux. Now STFU and get back to work.

    8. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to Red Hat which let this bug continue for almost a month before fixing...
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303270
      Bug 1303270 - OOM kernel panic and network DoS
      Slightly more significant and widespread bug. Of course, Ubuntu had no such problem.

    9. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by retchdog · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I would be modding it up if I had points.

      As it is, i'll just call you a thin-skinned fool. it's the Linux community's complete failure to move beyond the 70s (but still trying, in an adorably pathetic way) that drove me, and a large number of paid professionals, to OS X and even Windows. Linux is increasingly relegated to cloud and local development VMs. That's as close as Linux is ever going to get to the desktop market.

      I am also posting an OPEN CALL for Linux developers to create a Linux platform which is 90% as usable as Mac OS X is, out of the box. I really do hate Apple and its philosophy, but stick to it mostly because my time isn't worthless. I am willing to put my money where my mouth is! Since so many Linux fanatics call Apple's work "trivial", you now have the opportunity to make $10,000 payable as $2,000 over five years (contingent on maintaining a stable platform) to perform this trivial task. I'm currently paying about $200/year amortized to Apple, in the form of their overpriced "hardware tax", in order to have a stable, usable POSIX-compliant experience. I am willing to pay at least ten times that much just to spite Apple. Any takers? Is anyone interested in my free money for doing a trivial task? Or am I just going to get insults for posting this?

      I can follow up with details and specifications, if there is genuine interest. Basically: you are allowed to specialize your Linux distribution to specific hardware if you can take care of sourcing that hardware reliably (the cost of the hardware would be borne by me, in addition to the $10,000 for software, as long as it is close to the reasonable market price). I am not interested in an "App Store" (I don't use it anyway, and don't really like it). I just want a rock-solid build of basic applications (text editor, Chromium, music manager, etc.) with a half-way decent interface, and also painless availability of more specialized software from the usual repositories. I don't expect interfacing with iStuff since it's proprietary and that's not really your fault. I also don't expect stable, easy-to-use office software, since apparently that's impossible.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    10. Re: It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh it affected 14.04 all right, as both the ubuntu bug and several of our users could attest

    11. Re: It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Fedora 22 live CD failed on 3 widely different Toshiba laptops I tried, giving a friendly Oops and a frozen screen instead of the required working bloody operating system.

    12. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Like we see in this incident, Linux has become less-stable than Windows.

      Oh wow. So much ignorance in one post, I'd mod you troll if I didn't want to actually write a rebuttal.

      Let's start with "this incident".
      Many of use run linux on servers. Many of us continue to run linux on servers. Linux is still and has been a stability god compared to Windows on servers. This incident here affects running graphics on one very specific piece of hardware (or virtual hardware). The result was that graphics were stuffed up in this scenario. At not point did the resulting system become unbootable or completely inoperable. In fact it is to Linux's core strength that in this scenario you could fire up any old network session and get a display remotely. Also each of the kernel patches fixed an issue that required an authenticated logged in user in the first place. That user could potentially cause a DoS or gain some privileges in some scenarios. Certainly nothing to do with stability.

      Which bring us to "less stable than windows"
      You may want to qualify that statement. Few if any issues that have cropped up in Linux over the past few years have been related to stability issues. Some bugs have caused operational issues and some vulnerabilities have been discovered that could lead to attack vectors. But throughout all of this the one thing Linux has been and continues to be is "stable".

      While we're talking about the now, let's look at your use of "has become"
      Linux is as stable now as it's always been, but is it worse in other ways? Several major vulnerabilities discovered over the past few years were introduced decades ago. The specific case we're talking about now is a hardware issue. We've never had to look at hardware support in the past to make sure Linux worked properly right? Right? I mean no one has ever published or needed to maintain lists of working or buggy hardware, right? Yeah didn't think so. Linux may have always been a king in terms of the breadth of out of the box hardware support, but it has never been a favourite for manufacturers to write 100% perfectly working drivers. Even in the server space a good 20 years ago remember bashing my head against the wall due to drivers for RAID controllers misbehaving. This is certainly nothing new and the sheer breadth of Linux's hardware support makes regression testing a heck of a difficult mission.

      So here we are then. Yet again a Linux article comes up on Slashdot, and yet again someone spews a bit of unrelated garbage, claiming competitors (Windows) is better, and it's all because of Systemd and Gnome, both of which are as unrelated to the problem as your post.

    13. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      initd works just fine

      Funny I had the same thought about systemd. I mean when I downloaded the latest Ubuntu ISO I had the fire extinguisher in hand, ensured 911 was on quick dial, and talked to my dear sweet mother on the phone during the entire installation.

      When the entire world didn't get sucked into a blackhole originating from the systemd bits on my server's HDD it was all a bit of a let down. I didn't actually want to talk to my mother in the first place, and then she wouldn't get off the phone.

      Side note: Does anyone want to buy a 5kg Class-D fire extinguisher?

    14. Re: It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Fedora 23 with the nouveau driver, I get an occassional freeze of the entire GPU (Nvidia 750Ti.). The system is fully operational, but the X server is completely frozen along with the keyboard and the power button. The machine and all VM's are fully functional, apart from X server. The X server will not work, even after a manual restart via SSH, showing just the last video frame before it crashed.

      I've got two keybinds available, one to restart X and one to restart my desktop manager. I've never seen a graphics issue take out the keyboard before.

      This is apparently happening since November 2015, according to a quick google search.

    15. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denial and excuses. That's all we can really expect from Linux supporters these days. Denials and excuses. It's pathetic how rotten the Linux community has become. Nothing but denial and excuses.

    16. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still waiting for the Microsoft Office "killer" that Openoffice and now libreoffice is supposed to be. What a joke. The office suites in Android have more functionality and easier to use than any opensource alternative. The fact that OpenOffice and Libreoffice slows to an absolute crawl when you add a few pictures into the document (Which is well documented, just google it, a "bug" that's been there for years) just completely kills it for me.

    17. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not pathetic, it's sad. It has been pounded into our head how better opensource software is and now at a time when tons of commercial software simply do things better, the linux crowd fails to deliver anything of worth. Solidworks? Nope. Autocad? Nope. Photoshop? Nope. Even commercial development for linux (And even companies that used to have unix software) has almost completely disappeared.

      And you want to know what the saddest part of it all is? Windows Server is actually growing and people telling me it's much better to use.

    18. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by retchdog · · Score: 0

      amen. what a goddam travesty.

      apart from the appalling lack of features, the closest thing i've found to what i might want is the Apple office suite. again, it's like Apple are the only people around who even fucking bother to try having an idea of what users might want, instead of throwing in the kitchen sink. their word processor and spreadsheet are, unfortunately, too limited for me to recommend, but i'd rather claw my eyes out than use anything but Keynote for non-mathematical presentations, even if only for the fact that it has popup guides and snaps aligning elements. for math presentations, LaTeX+Beamer is still, of course, the only realistic option.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    19. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      couldn't agree more. Gnome3 still infuriates me. I hate Canonical, and Canonical employees hate Shuttleworth, from what I hear.

    20. Re:It highlights the sorry state of Linux today. by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 1

      Paid Shill?

  5. Linus Torvalds: "WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As Linus Torvalds himself would say in this case, "Anonymous Coward, SHUT THE FUCK UP!"

    Seriously, read how our God and Savior has responded to similar kernel regressions in the past:

    It's a bug alright - in the kernel. How long have you been a
    maintainer? And you *still* haven't learnt the first rule of kernel
    maintenance?

    If a change results in user programs breaking, it's a bug in the
    kernel. We never EVER blame the user programs. How hard can this be to
    understand?

    WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE!

    Don't go fucking blaming VMware. It's a kernel bug. And as Lord Torvalds himself says, "WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE!"

    1. Re:Linus Torvalds: "WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow linus seems like a dick
      he could have gotten his point across without being such a rude dick

    2. Re:Linus Torvalds: "WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the AC using profanity. And then *Linus* is the dick.

    3. Re:Linus Torvalds: "WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE!" by Yosho · · Score: 1

      wow linus seems like a dick
      he could have gotten his point across without being such a rude dick

      Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who just won't get the point if you try to be polite to them about it.

      And if protecting your feelings is more important than kernel stability, you're not cut out to be a kernel developer.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    4. Re:Linus Torvalds: "WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE!" by xvan · · Score: 2

      Are you sure this is a userspace issue?
      Because virtualization software has a kernel component.

    5. Re:Linus Torvalds: "WE DO NOT BREAK USERSPACE!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, whatever; Linus is cut out to be a dick.

  6. More shockingly people still use VMWare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You already have a good OS. Why ruin it with some fairly mediocre emulator?

    Not that it was an issue for very long, but still.

    1. Re:More shockingly people still use VMWare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot.

    2. Re: More shockingly people still use VMWare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly do you think VMware is?

  7. Never use Linux as a desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is very fragile. It can stop working any day with the latest updates. But Linux is usually OK as a server.

    1. Re:Never use Linux as a desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never listen to people who say "Never use Linux as a desktop". If you listen to them you may suffer bad burns from spilling your coffee from laughing so hard, and possible spontaneous diarrhea or pee pee pants from said laughing.

    2. Re: Never use Linux as a desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Linux as a desktop (KDE) but have learnt to save my work before I leave it because there's no guarantee that the desktop will still be there on my return. As someone said above, it has the same level of stability as Windows 95 (I'd say early 95).

    3. Re: Never use Linux as a desktop by nnull · · Score: 1

      That sounds a bit silly. I use Arch with of course the latest and greatest, but KDE has been pretty much rock stable. I never had this problem. What I do have a problem with is proprietary video drivers that have annoying issues.

    4. Re: Never use Linux as a desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you have it: same desktop, different experience. I think a lot of the problem is that these distributions are tested too little and on too small a variety of platforms (is that sort of thing collated to identify gaps?) so the end users become beta testers. How many people test Mint before it's released? I tried it a month ago, login to the desktop, something doesn't work, back to login (nice photo on the login screen though). I don't mean to pick on Mint, they're just an example.

    5. Re: Never use Linux as a desktop by ebh · · Score: 1

      My daily driver runs Linux Mint 17.3 Cinnamon under VMware 12 under Windows 10. All of those have been stable enough that the only unplanned reboots are due to power failures longer than what the UPS can handle, or me attaching flakey hardware (i.e., my own damn fault). That's way more stable than Windows 95 ever was. Not to mention Win95's propensity for forced reboots ("You have moved your mouse. Windows 95 must be restarted for this to take effect. Would you like to reboot your computer now?").

  8. 1000 eyes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And the thousand eyes didn't see this one? What's their excuse for the lack of proper QA this time?

  9. This. This right here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why Linux Mint does not blindly include updates from upstream Ubuntu.

  10. 14.04 LTS was also broken by theapeman · · Score: 3, Informative

    I found that 14.04 LTS would not run with the latest kernel under vmware But it has been updated and now does run (3.19.0-51)

    1. Re:14.04 LTS was also broken by bswarm · · Score: 1

      The updated kernel was released yesterday. Why are you still using 3.19? You can upgrade to 4.2 via LTS Enablement Stack... https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel...

    2. Re:14.04 LTS was also broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The updated kernel was released yesterday. Why are you still using 3.19? You can upgrade to 4.2 via LTS Enablement Stack...
      https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel...

      Cause it works just fine for him? Anyway with 16.04 coming in April he could to a LTS->LTS upgrade without worrying about any possible complications with the HWE which has affected some users in the past when they attempted to upgrade.

    3. Re:14.04 LTS was also broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never do dist upgrade. I prefer copying my home directory to an external drive, do a fresh install, then copy back what I need. It makes for a less troublesome upgrade. The last time I did a dist upgrade, it always hung on logout.

    4. Re:14.04 LTS was also broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer clean installs too, but did you know that you can choose to do a clean install over the existing system in place? The installer will simply delete all directories except /home, /opt/ and I think /local and /srv. Just choose to install to / (or wherever you have it installed ) but don't check the format button.

  11. LTS is the way to go by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    Although I do see a post further down stating the same issue in 14.04, I have long since learned the hard way to stick with LTS releases, whether derivatives or Ubuntu proper (derivatives seem the worst in the case). When 15.10 came out, I installed it on a few machines. I am not go to cite specific problems so take this as an anecdotal if you must, but those systems were quickly converted to 14.04. Recently, and against my better judgement, I decided to install the 15.10 release of Ubuntu Studio. I have never, not even close, encountered such instability and such a remarkable number of error messages. Simple programs like Audacity would lock so frequently and badly, it took the system with it. I assume in the case such a drastic crash may be due to the implementation of a low-latency kernel. But it was so bad my only avenue for recovery was alt + F1. I re-installed the 14.04 version and have not experienced a single issue.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  12. changelogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when are changelogs so important to be newsworthy... and then slashdot frontpage material?

  13. I'm not surprised... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    it broke graphics displays for those running the OS in VMWare VMs.

    I used to run Ubuntu for a home file server on a desktop PC with a Nvidia Geforce 4200 AGP video card. Every time the Nvidia driver got updated, it hosed the system and wouldn't boot. Every two to three months this would happen. I switched to FreeNAS in 2010 and haven't looked at Ubuntu since then.

    1. Re:I'm not surprised... by nnull · · Score: 1

      Your problem is running a home file server with nvidia drivers. Nvidia issues have been well know for hosing systems during upgrades. Ubuntu used to handle these upgrade quirks with Nvidia pretty damn well compared to other distros, considering...

      And if it's a server, why do you need the nvidia display driver? It's not like you're running 3d programs on it.

    2. Re:I'm not surprised... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      And if it's a server, why do you need the nvidia display driver?

      The only old AGP video cards that I had at the time were Nvidia video cards. I no longer had any of my old PCI cards from the late 1990's. When I switched to FreeNAS in 2010, I didn't have to worry about the video card driver hosing the system.

  14. Not a big deal by decep · · Score: 1

    I am surprised to see this on Slashdot, but this bit me. VM under VMWare fusion would not boot so I spent about 15 minutes on it and eventually booted under a previous kernel.

    Normally, I do not reboot my Linux machines after every kernel update, but this was my desktop and I just want to get rid of the reboot notifications.

    1. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sew ubuntu is bokren and the graficts dont work right. Becuase it keep going back to TTY prompt does not make good capible compters. This should be fixed but had to trobule choot becuase I cant get outta the TTY pormpt.

    2. Re:Not a big deal by nnull · · Score: 1

      What?

  15. who cares it's linux not windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this such a big deal? Drivers broke when using Ubuntu 15.10 as a guest in VMWare, WHO CARES!. Maybe if my primary OS was a linux distro and my guests OS's were Windows and OSX, then maybe I would be pissed but why would ppl be upset with linux not working under a VM it's not like you are missing out on anything. All the professional applications and gaming are under Windows.

  16. Lowercase "w" in VMware by Danborg · · Score: 2

    It's VMware, not VMWare. #pet #peeve

    1. Re:Lowercase "w" in VMware by antdude · · Score: 1

      OK, nazi. J/K. Yeah, I agree. I'm picky like that too and people call us crazy. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  17. Hosed system after update by miltonh26 · · Score: 1

    Did a security update over this weekend, as I always do when available. The update resulted in a reboot so there must have been a kernel update. Hosed my system big time, couldn't even get to the login page. Instead was getting "EQ Overflowing" errors in low graphics mode. Had to rebuild my Optimus laptop in my spare partition to recover. Running Optimus has been dicey at best since owning it.