'Moth Eye' Graphene Breakthrough Could Create Indoor Solar Cells (newsweek.com)
A scientific breakthrough with the "wonder material" graphene has opened up the possibility of indoor solar cells that capture energy from indirect sunlight, as well as ambient energy from household devices. Researchers from the University of Surrey in the U.K. studied the eyes of moths to create sheets of graphene that they claim is the most light-absorbent material ever created. "We realized that the moth's eye works in a particular way that traps electromagnetic waves very efficiently," Professor Ravi Silva, head of the Advanced Technology Institute at the University of Surrey, tells Newsweek. "As a result of our studies, we've been able to mimic the surface of a moth's eye and create an amazingly thin, efficient, light-absorbent material made of graphene."
I really do love having access to science by press release/news article, but we see hundreds if not thousands of them with no followup.
It's almost like hey, I did this, where's my grant.. Two years later we only hear the chirp of crickets.
Yes, I realize that science moves, yes, I realize that somethings don't pan out. But it seems like almost all don't work out?
Unless Elon Musk is making them with a 3D printer I'm not interested.
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Light colored walls play a crucial role diffusing light into other parts of the room. Having these panels on the walls would darken them, requiring more electric lights, and making the room seem smaller.
Anyway, thumbs up on the basic research on moth eyes.
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
Against "regular" solar panels? If it's that much more efficient, I would think having them outdoors would be more useful than indoors. TFA shows them as very flexible too, so one might even just be able to slap them on top of already existing solar panels, or even underneath them...to take advantage of the preexisting power storage systems.
This isn't the first time us Brits have come up with solar for cloudy days. See:
British scientists develop solar panels which work better on a cloudy day [March 2014]
Both articles lack details about the efficiency in diffused light conditions.
I doubt this very much, the best solar collectors will collect 46% of light, but of course they don't come cheap, current cheap cells are the ones collecting up to 15 to 22% of light.
Cell Efficiency Chart (jpg)If the researchers had created solar collectors with more than 46% efficiency then they would say what the efficiency is and have it verified and it would be big news.
Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
When you see the word Graphene mentioned you can be sure it's perpetually another 10 years from production. When you see any mention of improved solar panels you can be sure its perpetually another 10 years from production.
We'll have had 99 years of Linux on the Desktop by the time you can buy these
"Why would sensors and IoT devices use more power than a calculator of old?"
Because they need enough power to transmit a radio signal.
"National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
the curtains could be the solar cell. perhaps or make the curtain a set of window blinds which can be a bit more rigid
There are hundreds of miles of limestone caves in Kentucky. We can line the walls of those caverns with these cells and produce more power than Niagara Falls. Kentucky can be the Saudi Arabia of green electric power. Electricity too cheap to meter ... Wazzat? They need SOME light? ... DRAT. ... Cancel the IPO.
You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
Simple solution, just put in some lights.
John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'