Slashdot Mirror


CompuLab Rolls out Fanless, High-End PCs With Unique Design (phoronix.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Israeli PC maker CompuLab has begun shipping the Airtop PC that allows assembling high-end PC components into a completely fanless design. Phoronix's initial testing of the Airtop PC showed that it has a Core i7 5775C Broadwell processor, 16GB of RAM, 256GB SSD, and GeForce GTX 950 all while being fan-less thanks to the innovative design. The early results are quite positive for this uniquely designed PC but it comes at a cost premium of a fully-loaded system costing more than $2,200 USD.

101 comments

  1. GTX 950 == high end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL.

    1. Re:GTX 950 == high end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The article was written by a noob. The i7 5775c is a 3.3GHz CPU, not 3.7GHz. 3.7GHz is only the *turbo boost* clockspeed.

      If they can't even get simple facts correct, then it doesn't lend much credibility to the rest of the article.

    2. Re:GTX 950 == high end? by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      The article was written by a noob. The i7 5775c is a 3.3GHz CPU, not 3.7GHz. 3.7GHz is only the *turbo boost* clockspeed.

      If they can't even get simple facts correct, then it doesn't lend much credibility to the rest of the article.

      My desktop has 6 fans in it, including the CPU fan and it is whisper quiet until I start playing Fallout, then my 970 kicks in and it sounds like a plane about to take off...

      I used anti-vibration rubber screws and specifically choose fans that are designed to be quiet and went SSD for the OS drive. No need to go fanless these days...

    3. Re:GTX 950 == high end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My desktop has 6 fans in it, including the CPU fan and it is whisper quiet until I start playing Fallout, then my 970 kicks in and it sounds like a vertibird about to take off...

      FTFY

    4. Re:GTX 950 == high end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people have more important things to spend $4k on. You're just a dick.

    5. Re:GTX 950 == high end? by jb11 · · Score: 1

      The only place I see 3.7GHz is in the linked chart from OpenBenchmarking.org, where it has the same description for every other benchmark for that processor.

    6. Re:GTX 950 == high end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't cost anywhere near $4K but at least I now know you're a liar. Go dig a hole and die in it, you worthless sack of shit.

    7. Re:GTX 950 == high end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only place I see 3.7GHz is in the linked chart from OpenBenchmarking.org

      Which uses the Phoronix Test Suite. Try reading.

    8. Re: GTX 950 == high end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That feel good?

    9. Re: GTX 950 == high end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You tell me, hypocrite.

  2. lol by gcnaddict · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ever since BIZX acquired slashdot, we've been seeing these slashvertisements at least once per day (worse than Dice's twice-weekly rate). What's the going price for buying an article on slashdot these days?

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:lol by Harlequin80 · · Score: 2

      I don't see this as an advertisement as it is a review and pull down by a review site. Sure it's commodity hardware and its been possible to build your own fan less system for ages.

      Personally if it had linked to Compulab or a press release puff piece then yes. This isn't going to interest everyone, personally I think the concept of a fanless PC of this spec is pointless, but it is a nice solution to the problem.

    2. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      200 bucks and I'll submit one for you.

      Send the money to my bitcoin wallet.

    3. Re:lol by whipslash · · Score: 4, Informative

      $0

    4. Re:lol by enrique556 · · Score: 2

      Given that it links to a Phoronix article, it's hard to argue that it's an ad.. unless Michael Larabel owns shares in CompuLab and paid for it.

    5. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever since BIZX acquired slashdot, we've been seeing these slashvertisements at least once per day (worse than Dice's twice-weekly rate).

      Evidence or GTFO.

    6. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't see any ads? Something must be wrong with your browser.

    7. Re:lol by apoc.famine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you considered upping your price and reducing the number of sidebar advertisements?

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    8. Re:lol by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Hey, Whipslash.

      After having a talk with a couple of people, I've come to a decision.

      If you want more help on turning /. around, I'll help you for free. I know this site very well, and I'm one of the more vocal no-nonsense proponents. In the past, I've regularly contributed to /. in both story submission, commenting, and in giving you all the survey information you asked for.

      If you want the help from a long-time user and fan of /., I am a phone call away. To hell with the text feedback, things get done faster and more reliably via voice.

      Where shall I send you my phone number?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    9. Re: lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't want the kind of help you are offering. If you had a MBA and could figure out a way to monetize the /. Geeks, then you would have been contacted long ago.

  3. fanless GeForce GTX 950 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google finds nothing. fanless GeForce GTX 950 passive GeForce GTX 950

    1. Re:fanless GeForce GTX 950 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy aftermarket passive coolers. I'm sure that's what these guys did. Notice that the motherboard is completely custom as well - but they put in only two memory slots and they're trying to call the thing "high end" and sell it for more than double of what the parts are worth. Bah. One place where you need a completely silent computer is in a recording studio, but then it wouldn't need a GTX 950, and there's nowhere to plug in a recording interface. I just don't understand their market. I'm straining to hear my computer right now, and simply can't. And I put very little extra effort into making it silent. Let me loose on eBay with $500 and I will give you a practically inaudible system that runs faster and gets more FPS.

  4. No fans at all? by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 5, Funny

    How odd. I would have thought that a silent machine with reasonable power would garner LOTS of fans.

  5. Please Test The Coil Whine. by zenlessyank · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After replacing the fans in my rig with ultra-low quiet ones, I found that the coil whine from the power supply and video card are more annoying than the whoosh of noisy fans. I'm too cheap to subscribe to phoronix's site, so maybe someone can suggest it to him.

    1. Re:Please Test The Coil Whine. by slaker · · Score: 2

      I also found that to be true when I put together a system for my bedroom. And then I got a PicoPSU + transformer, only to find that the transformer had its own disagreeable little hum.

      I went back to a traditional desktop and some fancy Noctua fans. They make noise I can hear but almost anything else I do is quiet enough for it to not be an issue.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    2. Re:Please Test The Coil Whine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to tell them to get off your lawn...

    3. Re:Please Test The Coil Whine. by Neredera · · Score: 2

      From http://airtop-pc.com/airtop/qu... :

      Is Airtop totally silent?

      [...]

      High power electronics system usually has some acoustic side effect commonly known as "coil whine" caused by mechanical vibrations in coils and capacitors amplified by the PCB.
      In the design of Airtop motherboard special attention was given to make it inaudible.
      The power supply is also silent.

    4. Re:Please Test The Coil Whine. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I also found that to be true when I put together a system for my bedroom. And then I got a PicoPSU + transformer, only to find that the transformer had its own disagreeable little hum.

      I went back to a traditional desktop and some fancy Noctua fans. They make noise I can hear but almost anything else I do is quiet enough for it to not be an issue.

      There are full-size fanless PSUs that are much more robust than the PicoPSU+brick type combos. I've been very happy with my 460 W and 520 W models from Seasonic, no coil whine issues there.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Please Test The Coil Whine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure silentpcreview.com will review this system soon...

    6. Re:Please Test The Coil Whine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true though, right? Fan noise, in moderation mind you, is like white noise. I have no issue with a low fan hum.

      Make a fanless PC and it's like you are setting the bar high, so that any noise at all violates the point of the rig. Assuming of course that the point of fanless was the noise (and not eliminating fans as a potential failure point).

  6. Belongs here by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Advertisement or not, this is a pretty neat piece of engineering and definitely belongs on /.

    1. Re:Belongs here by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      It's fine, I guess. But I have to admit that I was pretty disappointed when I clicked on an article touting an "innovative" PC, only to find out that it was a rectangular box. I'd say "well-engineered", but not "innovative".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes innovative was my pc design of running the radiator outside the window during winter months ;)

    3. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see what's so innovative about it? Looks like a Dell Optiplex 7040 mini tower desktop PC with a graphics card.

    4. Re:Belongs here by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd argue a rectangular box is still the most practical form factor for a PC and most other hardware (consoles, appliances, etc). The Mac Pro had a bizarre cylindrical shape which was pretty cool from a design standpoint, but ultimately didn't have much success in the marketplace. The PC ecosystem is designed around standardized, commodity parts that generally fit into a rectangular chassis. That's partly why PCs have such an amazing price-performance ratio.

      The only thing a non-rectangular box would do for me is to prevent me from fitting it under the desk in the slot designed for a rectangular box-shaped PC.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    5. Re:Belongs here by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's quite practical. Like every other rectangular PC, save the Apple that you mentioned (why the past tense?). Other than some solid engineering, which other commenters pointed out has been done before, I don't really see much "innovation". You mentioned Apple - remember their fanless "cube"?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    6. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What's so neat about the engineering?
      As far as I can see, they're simply using the ribbed cast aluminium sides of the case as big passive heatsinks.
      Audio amps have been doing that for half a century.
      Hell, you can get off the shelf HTPC cases that do just that, except those use heatpipes to couple the CPU/GPU to the case, so they take a variety of standard components instead of requiring a $700 custom mainboard with a previous-gen chipset.

    7. Re:Belongs here by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Hell, you can get off the shelf HTPC cases that do just that, except those use heatpipes to couple the CPU/GPU to the case, so they take a variety of standard components instead of requiring a $700 custom mainboard with a previous-gen chipset.

      You got any links to these off the shelf cases?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HDPLEX H5 (ATX, 95W CPU + 95W GPU)
      Perfect Home Theater FLM-7 (Mini-ITX, CPU only)

    9. Re:Belongs here by KGIII · · Score: 2

      'Innovative' and even 'unique design' don't immediately scream aesthetics to me - not on this site. On other sites? Yeah, I'd expect 'unique design' to mean that it was some form factor other than rectangular. On this site? Not so much. We, as a group, seem more inclined to look at the engineering than the appearance.

      On top of that, I'm not sure it's an ad? If it were an ad, why filter it through a third party site? That's a pretty popular and reasonably well trusted site here. It seems a rather roundabout way to do an ad and would mean that the site was probably in on it. I'm not sure that he'd risk his reputation on such as it might be seen as him biasing his reviews.

      So, it's possible that it's an ad but it seems unlikely to me. It's a rather convoluted way that requires a conspiracy or complacency.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:Belongs here by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I probably should have used "has", not "had" - don't read anything into it. Personally, I tend to want my PC to sit under the desk and out of sight. I don't really care what it looks like. And I don't want it some bizarre shape that won't fit where a PC is normally supposed to fit.

      There are definitely some people who are looking more for aesthetic appeal or more radically engineering solutions. Quite a few notable examples tend to come from Apple - I can think of several other examples as well. For instance, the current iMacs look like just a simple display and nothing else. The original iMac had a unique form factor as well. It shouldn't be too surprising, as this is what Apple is known for - solid engineering with a lot of attention paid to aesthetics, but at a premium price.

      There's also real innovation over on the PC side too. There are a lot of really cool small form factor PCs on the market, ranging from reasonably powerful mini-PCs to Intel's tiny Compute Stick. Microsoft recently released their new Surface Book, which looks like a pretty cool piece of hardware - a very nice laptop with detachable monitor that transforms into a tablet.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    11. Re:Belongs here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Innovative is not limited to design. Why are you even here? You're like the third person to mention this, I'm inclined to think you're just parroting the first person - or are the same person. Think for yourself as to what the word innovative means. If it's limited, in your lexicon, to design then Fark and Reddit are down the road and to the left. Hell, if it includes just the design then I believe Digg is still open and Facebook needs some additional users - they're down the road on the right.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    12. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> You got any links to these off the shelf cases?

      > HDPLEX H5 (ATX, 95W CPU + 95W GPU)

      So no, not really? It should be noted that that's an awesome case that you linked to but it really isn't the same. I guess it can be the same in results, or very close to it, but it's not really the same.

    13. Re:Belongs here by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If this were the first mid-range PC with a high-end price that's claim to fame was that it didn't have a fan, I'd be more charitable. But I remember the "cube" from Apple... :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    14. Re:Belongs here by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My PCs I still go old-school and build myself. I usually buy a nice, quiet case. I don't really care what they look like too much, but one is in the spare bedroom and so I like that it's quiet. I do have a Mac in the living room. It's old, but it looks nice. I wouldn't want to spend all this money on nice living room furniture and then have a cheap, loud plastic box sitting in the middle of it. I saw a cool project online where a guy made a wooden PC case to match his furniture.

      I'm not sure I agree that there's much innovation going on in the PC space. It's very mature and there's not a lot that hasn't been done before. Sure, things get smaller and the detachable screen thing makes an appearance every few years - but at the end of the day notebooks generally all look like a mid-90s PowerBook and desktops look like variations on the original PC. All in ones got so small that they essentially just look like monitors. But I guess it is almost a philosophical question... where is the line between innovation and just solid engineering? The iPod was, I think, pretty innovative - but it didn't really do anything special or new. It was just smaller and had better engineering than the competition. So, shows what I know :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, a 91W 4.2GHz Skylake just isn't a 65W 3.7GHz Broadwell.

    16. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, wow, a low TDP CPU and what about the hottest component, the GPU? they use the absolute slowest one from the gtx 9 series (which itself made big strides in power efficiency compared to previous gens).

      look at this crap:

      "Airtop has no fans at all, yet it can dissipate 200W – enough to cool a Xeon CPU and a professional (or gaming) graphics card."

      a gtx 980ti GPU is already more than the case can dissipate, and previous generations are much worse.

    17. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that prcice i just got a pc that has 32GB ram, a 512GB ssd, a i7 5930k cpu, a GTX 980 ti and a 4T harddrive.
      Performance-wise it's a lot better for the money. The only thing is that the case is bigger.
      So with this product, you pay (guestimate) around 1000 dollar for the case.

    18. Re:Belongs here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      This is hardly the same. For starters, it's actually useful! ;-)

      But, seriously... The Cube wasn't anything like this - though it did have some passive cooling. This is actually quite a bit of heat being contained in a different way. I dare say it is innovative. An AC listed (I went and searched) a different case that is sort of similar but, again, not like this. That makes it innovative in function.

      I kind of like the idea but I don't really care much about the quiet. As I use solar and already have DC available at home, I'm curious if I might be able to find DC power supplies.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    19. Re:Belongs here by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      It looks like the design rely's on airflow pulled in at the bottom and released at the top, probably generated by the movement of the hot air rising. Putting this in a "slot" under a desk would probably restrict that airflow and make it overheat. Putting it on the floor, would probably result in dust eventually clogging the lower intake ports and overheating the system.

    20. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I use solar and already have DC available at home, I'm curious if I might be able to find DC power supplies.

      Yes, assuming you want to take an ATX PSU, there are DC options available to you.

      Well, obviously there are plenty of other options, but given the subject of discussion, I figure ATX is the most likely interest.

      If you're serious, you can do it. If you don't care, well, others will do it anyway.

    21. Re:Belongs here by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Sweet! Thanks. Seriously, thanks a bunch.

      I've actually been looking into going partially DC with some of the other electrical things. I understood that there were some servers that ran straight from DC but I've never seen one in the flesh. Skipping the inverter would be a bit efficiency savings right there. I don't remember the numbers but quite a bit of energy is lost right there.

      I'd never seen one for ATX. That would be awesome! Part of the problem is that so many things require varied voltages. I'd have to figure that out and I'm pretty sure I'd have to do a lot of outlets with both AC and DC but that's certainly do-able. When I designed the house, I designed it with upgrading in mind. All of the wiring runs through conduit. Well, not conduit but PVC pipe which is close enough.

      I do wish I'd done a race channel (or three) and I really like the functionality of the L-shaped BUS lines that support 110v and 220v depending on the shape of the plug. I did not know those existed and only found out about them after a buddy bought an old factory. They would be awesome! I could just make up lights and snap them into place, move things with impunity, and have access to an outlet everywhere. On my list of things to do is to have an electrician come in and take a look at running them out in the shop, garage, and barn. The barn, shop, and garage do not, but I guess they could for a short while, run on the solar or wind. They use mains electricity but the shop and garage both fail back to the same generator system.

      I don't want to swear to it but I'm pretty sure I've seen large scale generators that will output both AC and DC, at house-level capacity. My home is way out in the mountains of NW Maine and, as odd as it may sound, mains electricity is actually more a backup than anything else. I use propane for my stove and clothes dryer. Some of my water is heated with propane. I know I can get DC refrigeration but I understand that's NOT very efficient, less efficient than going through an inverter actually. I'm starting to run a little low on roof-space and I've already got two ground-mount clusters of panels. I guess I could add more and the battery packs from Tesla (the Power Wall units) are attractive - I'd like to look into those further.

      Hmm... Thanks again! That gives me some food for thought. I'd pondered this briefly in the past but never looked into it. It seems like it's getting easier and easier and more things are starting to be created for the market. I've seen a lot of devices for RVs and camps but this is interesting. I'll be home in the spring. I'll have to grab a notebook, meander around the house, and take a bunch of notes. I'll have to look into reliability and longevity and then see about hiring someone in to give me an estimate and let me know how realistic this is.

      No, I'm not kidding - thanks.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    22. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can't put it in a sealed enclosure, but that's true for every cooling technique. Dust seems to be less of a problem than in fanned systems because there is no airflow through the inner space where dust could accumulate, clog fans, cause short circuits etc. I guess (unless you have hairballs under your desk) the dust just falls out, because there are no filters or grilles where it could accumulate. The air tubes shouldn't be so hard to clean.
      FAQ: Can the air-tubes get clogged with dust? Are there filters? (tldr: no and no)
      But it probably does require a bit more space around it. I couldn't find anything in the specs about that.

    23. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understood that there were some servers that ran straight from DC but I've never seen one in the flesh.

      If you're looking for rack-mount 48V DC servers then I know Huawei has a selection. They don't do PCs.

    24. Re:Belongs here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I can get DC refrigeration but I understand that's NOT very efficient, less efficient than going through an inverter actually.

      Not sure what your understanding is based on, but there's little to be gained with DC versus AC when it comes to refrigeration, it's a motor pumping refrigerant around, it doesn't care really.

      Now if somebody ever gets magnetic refrigeration to work, that'd be a change of process.

      Otherwise, you might as well just build an Einstein Refrigerator.

  7. GTX 950 is the (only) important part here by Kittown · · Score: 1

    I always had very high sensitivity to fans noise and dreamed of absolutely slient pc. I've finaly made it using streacom case. It's running great. Newer intel cpus also have good integrated GPU, so everything except gaming is simply exceptional (and I have a separate pc for gaming). But adding powerful GPU to the system was a pipe dream. If they have managed that in such a small case, that's beyond cool.

    1. Re:GTX 950 is the (only) important part here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GTX950 is not a powerful GPU. It's a crippled GTX960. For a lot of use cases it won't be any faster than an Intel 6200, but with much more power/heat.

  8. Lovingly constructed with all of the latest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in spyware developed by top Israeli engineers. Available to the NSA, CIA, FBI, Pentagon and other government employees/elected officials at a steep discount.

    1. Re:Lovingly constructed with all of the latest by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Ha! You made me win a sandwich. When I opened the thread I knew there'd be some goober in here that said that. I told the missus and she said, "No, nobody's that dumb." (Yes, that is verbatim.) I said that I'd bet her a sandwich and she bet me a back rub. I'm getting a tune fish sandwich thanks to you! You're truly appreciated Mr. AC, truly appreciated. The best part is that you're using a computer made in China.

      You're really predictable Mr. AC. Keep it up and I might raise the stakes for the next thread.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Lovingly constructed with all of the latest by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the presence of Mossad's finest spyware or not, I wouldn't buy it precisely because it is made in Israel.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  9. High end really? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Not sure I'd call that spec high end but whatever.

  10. No fans = built-in obsolescence by Nunya666 · · Score: 0

    Too bad advertisements are not required to be 100% truthful. If they were, I could see an ad for this system where a devil on one shoulder whispers "No fans! Ain't that cool?" while an angel on the other shoulder whispers "No fans! You'll have to replace it in 2 years!"

    1. Re:No fans = built-in obsolescence by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Care to qualify why you think that is?

      -Person who's run fanless system for many more than 2 years.

    2. Re:No fans = built-in obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I've had a mythbuntu box running fanless since 2006 with no issues. Massive heatsink on the CPU, slightly low-end fanless video card (but still good enough for TV and movie playback), overspec power supply running at a fraction of its rated output with fan removed and heatsinks added (with care - remember that there's 240v in there) and lots of discrete venting for passive air-flow. Just passed its 10 years anniversary and still running strong.

      Only noise is the hard-drives. Currently it's running 3x 2.5" laptop drives suspended in 5.25" bays on elastic straps: very quiet but they're still just audible at times. I've considered upgrading to SSD but last time I looked the price-gap was too big.

    3. Re:No fans = built-in obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never understood the appeal of fanless computers. Why not just use a few large high-quality, low-RPM fans? They're almost silent and decent cooling makes your hardware last a lot longer.

    4. Re:No fans = built-in obsolescence by Nunya666 · · Score: 1

      Care to qualify why you think that is?

      -Person who's run fanless system for many more than 2 years.

      Perhaps because heat kills electronics?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    5. Re:No fans = built-in obsolescence by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Except that fanless does not mean excessive heat. There's only a few components that generate heat and as long as that heat is piped away from the electronics and radiated in a sufficient way then there's no problem going fanless. Fanless designs typically engineer around constraints such as maximum heatsink size. Actually a quick survey of the 3 fanless systems I have in my house show that they all run at a lower temperature than my desktop across GPU, CPU and Motherboard temperature sensors. This includes a server, a HTPC, and a small form factor PC mounted to a telescope. So based on those sensors alone the fanless systems will last significantly longer than my main desktop PC.

      But then your article doesn't cite any common failure modes of electronics and how they are measured. Thermal cycling inducing physical stress, and total thermal load on the device affects failure rate. Thermal cycling is almost a non issue outside of devices that operate in extremes and isn't a primary cause of failure in computers (where as it is in things like cars and industrial equipment).
      Total thermal load is exponentially bad, but ultimately for junction temperatures kept below 90degrees your computer will die of you throwing it out long before thermal damage. For a typical consumer device if you keep the junction below 90 degrees you will achieve the full service life of the device. For applications with long service life requirements you ideally want to keep junctions below 70degrees which will give you a roughly 100 fold increase in reliability compared to the consumer target.

      Not only is that trivial to do from an engineering perspective, but it ultimately improves device reliability as even under stress moving parts will fail before electronics will. There's a reason why a lot of industry hardened equipment is fanless.

  11. One word: dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure it performs fine when brand new but how well is it going to work after a few years of dust buildup?

    1. Re:One word: dust by dejitaru · · Score: 2

      It would probably perform better than a normal computer because there's no fans sucking in dust?

    2. Re:One word: dust by DadLeopard · · Score: 1

      Uhm, you did read the article, Right? it's got a bunch of tubes that act as chimneys, those are going to get clogged with dust even faster than a fan, since, smaller diameter opening. going to need one heck of a long pipe cleaner, or something else to get the dust and Kitty fuzz out of those!

    3. Re:One word: dust by dejitaru · · Score: 1

      Okay, but how does make it less than forcing air, dust, dandruff, etc from surroundings into it via a fan? I never said it wouldn't collect ANY dust.

  12. Apple already did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    16 years ago. It was called the G4 Cube.

    1. Re:Apple already did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You called it that - the rest of us called it what it was: A trash can.

  13. $2,200??? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    No one buys $2,200 PCs anymore, unless they are Apple. Come to think of it, no one buys desktop PC's for home anymore.

    1. Re:$2,200??? by nintendoeats · · Score: 1

      That is simply not true. This is the decade of PC gaming being easy and awesome. There are some insane people who will happily drop 1500 dollars on a pair of GPUs.

    2. Re:$2,200??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know people who spend nearly that in video cards alone. Once again you've proven that you're a know nothing.

  14. Interesting, but not that impressive by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been building silent, often fanless systems since 2003, so I'm always interested at these rare occasions when a commercial offering actually cares about noise. However, I'm somewhat worried about the peak temperatures of 80 C, and frankly it doesn't surprise me. Passive cooling is hard, and it's almost always better to aim for the low hum of large, slow fans. I'm running high end GPUs fully loaded all the time, and they stay around 50...60 C with aftermarket coolers (not water) in open cases, with 140 mm fans running at 7..10 V. The same goes for CPUs, though I'm not sure if they count as high end. Anyway, quiet and cool is easily done with aftermarket coolers that cost around 50 euros apiece. I live in a single-room apartment, so the lack of noise is pretty important.

    I always wonder why proper cooling seems like an afterthought in components such as motherboards and cases, and why you always need aftermarket solutions if you don't want your machine to sound like a jet engine. For example, if the CPU were at the backside of the mobo, there would be no limit to the size of the heatsink. Yet the default is always a very crowded place in the middle of everything, where the "solution" is a small and whiny fan.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  15. Re:Modern Outdoor Lighting Under $19 by secretsquirel · · Score: 0

    are the IoT compatible?

  16. Not worth it. by kuzb · · Score: 1

    If you strip everything out except the mainboard and the case (no cpu, no gpu, no ram, etc), you're still looking at $700. This is what they mean by "starts at".

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  17. Is this junk by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    like the Gigabyte brick with the "Desktop" GPU that just clocks itself down when it gets hot.? Or is this just a laptop without a screen again?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Is this junk by dave420 · · Score: 2

      In the time it took you to write your questions, you could have found the answers...

  18. Is it hot to touch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I'd like to know, and isn't covered in the linked article, is whether or not this system is hot to the touch.

  19. Very Neat But... by nintendoeats · · Score: 1

    Not only do I have concerns about how this will work under very high ambient temperatures, I don't see it's usefulness for 99.99999% of users. If you are spending that kind of money, you could have a machine that is virtually soundless and has at least one and probably 2 high end GPUs. This really limits your options because of the unique form factor and I don't really see tradeoff.

    For comparison, my PC with an overclocked i5 2500k and 7970 is 3 decibles above ambient (34 db in my apartment) as measured by an open vent in the top. That is actually coil whine, not fans. I could do the same thing to any single GPU machine for at most 400 USD and in most cases under 300.

  20. Re:Interesting, but not that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "However, I'm somewhat worried about the peak temperatures of 80 C, and frankly it doesn't surprise me"

    The thermal limit of the i7 Broadwell CPU was/is 103 C. I have had it running around 70 C at 100% load, totally passive Akasa case. Normally it runs from 34 - 40 C under light load.

    It doesn't surprise me that some of the Skylake Xeons will run at similarly high temps. Compared to stock, however, it seems that my passive build is more efficient at cooling, without the noise.

  21. Re:Interesting, but not that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The motherboard layout is standard (ATX) dating from the mid 90s. Things were different then. ITX is newer, but not much better.

    Also, if you put the CPU on the other side, you couldn't just mount the motherboard to one side of the case.

    If you well designed cooling, you need it to be designed for the components involved. Apple does this for their computers (the single fan cylindrical power mac is a great example), as do most laptops, but its impractical for standardized part swap-able desktops unfortunately.

    I like to run my systems hot: cooling is more efficient the hotter you run. If it is specked for it, you might as well use it.

  22. Think again. by westlake · · Score: 1, Informative
  23. Re:Interesting, but not that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I like to run my systems hot: cooling is more efficient the hotter you run. If it is specked for it, you might as well use it.

    Yup, great idea.

  24. Hard to feel joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Israel continues to harm and oppress. It's like an abusive person who is a good engineer. Sure, that person maims, kills, and imprisons innocents, but darn--what a good engineer!

  25. That's cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, libreboot support?

  26. You can almost build this yourself, cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you can almost build "something similar" cheaper yourself. This is what I did: https://www.techtalk.cc/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=1814 (How to build a 100% fanless zero decibels quiet gaming PC), full specifications and all the parts which I used. Granted, it's not a "super gaming PC" but it is still pretty good I would say. I can for example run ArmA3 without any issues pretty good.

  27. Re:Interesting, but not that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting article!

  28. Re:Interesting, but not that impressive by TeknoHog · · Score: 2

    I like to run my systems hot: cooling is more efficient the hotter you run. If it is specked for it, you might as well use it.

    Specifications are not binary. Things will generally last longer if they don't run at the extreme of allowed specs all the time, due to effects such as electromigration.

    In the second hand GPU market, a lot of people are always worried about overclocking history. What they should be asking about is temperatures. In overclocking, it's not the frequency that kills components, it's the heat. And it's easy to do heat damage while staying within allowed frequencies. Long-term heat damage is also an issue for other components around the main chip, such as VRMs on a GPU board.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  29. Re:Easy to feel joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel makes advances in PC Technology, medicine, biology...

    "Palestine" makes advances in bombings, hijacking, shooting, stabbing, suicide bomb vests, terrorist tunnels, beheading, killing gays, killing girls over "family honor"

  30. Asking Slashdot - Silent Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking about just such a machine quite a lot lately. Rather than some sort of desktop gaming system, I'm more interested in a server solution. I'd really like to buy/build a server with Xeon CPU(s), 30-60GB of RAM, hardware RAID 5 6 10, SSDs, dual power supplies(ideal) and NO FANS.

    I want a passively cooled and (near)completely silent server. A real server.

    Does anyone know if/how I can achieve such a beast?

  31. Why Didn't You Tell Me?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been running mp PBX on a fanless CompuLab PC2 for over 6 years.

    Why didn't you tell me I couldn't do that and would have to replace the PC in two years? Now I look/feel stupid! Why didn't you tell me?

  32. Seasonic by phorm · · Score: 1

    Sonsonic PSU's are awesome. I have a 2u server where I needed a power supply that didn't have a bottom fan intake (would be blocked by the case). The only one I could find that fit was a Seasonic but it's been rock-solid for years without an issues. Quiet and reliable. A bit pricey but you're paying for a quality product.