Slashdot Mirror


Crossword Database Analysis Spots What Looks Like Plagiarism

Seattle software developer Saul Pwanson has a hobby of developing crossword puzzles, but another related hobby, too: analyzing the way that existing puzzles have been constructed. He created a database that aggregates puzzles that have appeared in various publications, including, crucially, the New York Times and USA Today, and sorts them based on similarities. Puzzles that have a greater percentage of the same black squares, or the same letters in identical positions, are ranked as more similar. Crosswords often re-use answers; puzzle-solvers are used to encountering some of the usual glue words that connect parts of the grid. As 538 reports, though, Pwanson noticed something odd in the data: Many of the puzzles that appeared in USA Today and affiliated publications, listed under various creators' names but all published under Timothy Parker as editor, were highly similar to each other, differing in as little as four answer words. These Pwanson classifies as "shoddy" -- they seem to be about as different as test responses based on a passed-around answer sheet. These seem to shortchange readers expecting original works, but may represent no real copyright problem, since Universal Uclick holds the copyright to them all. Perhaps puzzle enthusiasts aren't surprised that a publishing syndicate economizes on crosswords with slight variations, or that horoscopes are sometimes recycled.

However, another tranche of puzzles Pwanson calls "shady": these are puzzles that bear such strong resemblance in their central clues and answers to puzzles that have appeared in the New York Times that it's very hard to accept Parker's claim that the overlap is coincidental. In one example given, for instance, the answers "Drive Up the Wall," "Get On One's Nerves," and "Rub the Wrong Way" appeared in the same order and the same position in a Parker-edited puzzle that appeared in USA Today in June 2010 as they had in a Will Shortz-edited puzzle published nine years before in the New York Times.

44 comments

  1. Recycle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Horoscopes are always recycled. Otherwise how would they ever get it right?

    1. Re:Recycle! by lucm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Horoscopes are always recycled. Otherwise how would they ever get it right?

      Horoscopes are always right. If the one you read doesn't seem to apply that day, it's because your ascendant is more potent so you need a customized chart to understand how it applies to you. The problem could also be that your Chinese sign is confusing things, especially if your elemental aspect (Fire, Earth, Air and Water) in both traditions don't match. The celestial forces are complex and mysterious, only a certified astrologist can decipher your destiny.

      Also, horoscopes are based on recurring astronomical events. Until there's a new planet or star significant enough to impact people's destiny, there will be a limited pool of possibilities; how those events are interpreted to individually reach the millions of people who have the same signs requires the expertise of a certified astrologist.

      One last point: did you know that on the Yahoo portal, the horoscope is found in the Women section? How sexist is that?

      https://www.yahoo.com/style/ho...

      Thousands of years of cosmic wisdom now crammed between makeup tips and "should you break up with him" tests. Thank you Marissa.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re: Recycle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thousands of years of nonsense.

      FTFY

    3. Re:Recycle! by houghi · · Score: 2

      I once was asked was asked what my sign was. I told then that if they knew anything about it, they should be able to deduct my sign. It took them 13 times. They named one twice when they started just saying them in order.

      If people ask my sign I always say Elephant and when they realize that isn't a sign, I say 'But I have a trunk!'

      On another occasion a friend of mine told a girl that he knew nothing about palm reading., That he knows it is bull. That anybody could do it by guessing a bit.
      He repeated that several times, took the hand, made some general assumptions and she believed he could do it, even when he said IT WAS MADE UP.

      When people want to read me a horoscope, I pick a sign at random. They are always very generic, so they are correct.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  2. USA Today - meh by tomhath · · Score: 1

    The only surprise is that anyone reads that rag. Their circulation numbers are as made up as their crossword puzzles; every hotel in the country has a stack of them that customers won't touch.

    1. Re:USA Today - meh by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember when they sent a guy to Australia to report on the America's Cup. He got there well in advance, and wrote several preliminary columns to "educate" the readers in what sailing is all about. He began with an entire column's worth of rambling, incoherent explanation of the definitions of "port" and "starboard" -- and got it backwards.

    2. Re:USA Today - meh by lucm · · Score: 1

      He began with an entire column's worth of rambling, incoherent explanation of the definitions of "port" and "starboard" -- and got it backwards.

      Maybe he was quartered on the port side during his transatlantic crossings, like W.S. Gilbert...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    3. Re:USA Today - meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "port" and "starboard" -- and got it backwards

      he was upside down. give him a break.

    4. Re:USA Today - meh by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Their circulation numbers are as made up as their crossword puzzles;

      Wait, I don't get that analogy - does that mean their circulation numbers are stolen from the NY Times?

  3. The most logical explanation is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    America's crosswords are used to communicate to a ring of secret agents.

    The only question is whose? The Russians use the Chess column, the Chinese use Sudoko, the French use the personals...

    1. Re:The most logical explanation is obvious by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      Ragle Gumm, is that you?

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
  4. This has to stop by Kohath · · Score: 1, Funny

    Government regulation of crossword puzzles is the only answer. It's time for the Obama administration to appoint an undersecretary of Commerce for crossword puzzles and word jumbles. Congress must immediately enact the Comprehensive Crossword Puzzle Reform Act of 2016 and fund the new office before it's too late!

    1. Re: This has to stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That won't work. All materials produced by government employees is public domain in the US.

      No, what we need is a massive bailout of the crossword industry. A few billion in loans will do nicely.

      Also we should invade a county like Elsalvador or Honduras to make them change their name.

    2. Re:This has to stop by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You jest but there's almost certainly a group of people who agree with that sentiment, or could be easily convinced to express agreement zealously. I suspect that group of people is larger in number than many people realize. That's even more disturbing is how many folks are in that camp who don't realize they are members of that camp.

      Now that I think about it, I don't want to think about it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  5. Wow! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I’ve never heard of such a brutal and shocking injustice that I cared so little about!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Wow! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Funny
      When they came for the crossword pirates I did not care because I was not a crossword pirate.

      ...

      ...

      When they came for 93 Escort Wagon there was not one left to care.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This poor bastard reacts to things the way I do. what he needs to do is publish a book.

    3. Re:Wow! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      When they came for 93 Escort Wagon there was not one left to care.

      I assure you, this is not true!

      There'd be plenty of people around, pointing and laughing...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  6. Play the electronic version... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    [...] these are puzzles that bear such strong resemblance in their central clues and answers to puzzles [...]

    My parents gave me a Coleco Quiz Wiz game in the late 1970's. The trivia book had 1,001 questions with an electronic keyboard that could plug into different trivia books. I went through three trivia books before I discovered that I had a memorized the answers for all 1,001 questions, which were identical for all the trivia books. In fact, you don't even need a trivia book. You could punch in the same numbers and letters to get the correct answer. I threw it away in disgust because I expected the answers for each trivia book to be different. As an adult who have gotten back into electronics as a hobby, the circuits in many electronic games from that era were quite simple to implement repetitive game play.

    https://steveffisher.wordpress.com/2011/03/31/retro-coleco-quiz-wiz-computer-game/

    1. Re:Play the electronic version... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      When I was a wee lad, and the Sun still had a price-tag attached, we had these rectangular cases. Inside was a scroll of paper the case had off-set slits in it that were large enough to read the text on the scroll. You'd scroll, read a question, and flip it over to find out the answer. When you hit the end, you turned it over, flipped it upside down, and repeated the process. That meant one scroll would have something like 500 questions on it.

      After going through them enough times, I'd memorized all the questions and was master and commander at the game, much to the angst of my siblings and parents as they relied on their wits.

      Well, it wasn't *that* long ago, they were made of plastic. Like real plastic, not stone and papyrus. I went looking to see if I could find an example but they appear to have disappeared off the face of the planet and can't be found online. They had nature, sports, geography, history, "current" (ha!) events, and things like that. I had quite a collection of 'em. It was a step-up from a hula-hoop or a stick and an bicycle rim. We didn't have much in the way of electronics for kids, at least not like that.

      I did have a neat 101-in-1 type of deal and I'd purloined an older sibling's chemistry set. Come to think of it, I might have purloined the 101-in-1 electronics kit set from him too. Ah well... He wasn't using it and I've surely made up for it. Not long ago, I sent him a much more recent version and got one for myself. Mine was delivered to Maine so I haven't played with it yet.

      At any rate, the trivia did have multiple choice in some cases. You might even have had to scroll a few lines to read the question. I'll be damned if I know what brand they were under but they were fun until, much like you, I'd found a way to cheat. Well, I consider it cheating to memorize all the answers. I'd even fake being wrong at times. Ah, those were the heady days of youth.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  7. Long Ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a long conversation about Cross words and Copying. The problem they ran into was how few 13 and 12 letter words are out there. Those words define your axis. Thus if you give 3 cross-word makers the same basic setup (13 x 13) you will end up with the same words.

  8. Re:Who cares? by WarJolt · · Score: 1

    All those cheaters who graduate from universities without getting caught care. Now they know where they can get a job.

    If you own a copyright, modify your original work and then sell the derived work as something new that's shady. Maybe illegal, but I'd need to talk to a lawyer about that one.

    If you don't own the copyright, modify someone else's original work and then sell it as something new then that's clearly illegal.

  9. Tranche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's that word again. My own hobby is watching the evolution of word usage over time; this one seems to be at the beginning of a trend(let). Maybe it will be Enron's one contribution to society.

  10. There is lot more plagiarisms waiting to be ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    I am sure there a lot more such plagiarisms to be unearthed. All those recipes in all those cooking magazines, shows, and books. Who actually vetted them or even filed copyright? Same with crochet patterns and embroidery ideas. Home furnishings and decorative ideas seem to be recycled forever, except for more recent and more glossier pictures. BTW who keeps random lemons and half cut red peppers next to washed and cleaned dishes on the counter? Who are those lemon obsesses demons?

    I know for a fact lots of Bollywood music is totally pirated from the West. Actually there is one actor in Tamil who keeps remaking Hollywood hits in Tamil, not sure he is paying royalties. I am looking at you Kamal Hasan. Superstar Rajnikant does not plagiarize Hollywood because he is making the same movie again and again for the last 25 years. (Rajni good. Other guy bad. Dishoom dishoom! bang! Everyone is happy, the end.)

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:There is lot more plagiarisms waiting to be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Copyright law does not protect recipes that are mere listings of ingredients. Nor does it protect other mere listings of ingredients such as those found in formulas, compounds, or prescriptions. Copyright protection may, however, extend to substantial literary expression—a description, explanation, or illustration, for example—that accompanies a recipe or formula or to a combination of recipes, as in a cookbook."

      http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl122.html

    2. Re:There is lot more plagiarisms waiting to be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure there a lot more such plagiarisms to be unearthed. All those recipes in all those cooking magazines..

      I don't see how you could have a cookbook/magazine that didn't involve plagiarism. Find me such a book, open to a random recipe and I can guess with reasonable accuracy that it will start with either "chop onion and garlic and fry in a little oil" or "cream butter and sugar together" (with permutations to suit local lingo). Give me a dozen recipes for the same dish and I'll hazard a guess that 11 of them are practically identical. Unless you're doing something really weird/different (say for example your name is Heston Blumenthal) then trying to assert copyright on variation 1048576 of spaghetti bolognese would be a rather pointless exercise.

      Home furnishings...

      ...on the other hand are an area of contention. For some reason people get annoyed when for example someone comes out with a cheap Eames knock-off. Which is pretty stupid I will agree as the original designer is long dead.

    3. Re:There is lot more plagiarisms waiting to be ... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Easy: recipes can't be copyrighted.

      Besides, plagiarism is the *intentional* claim of someone else's work as your own. If you can honestly and thoroughly prove that you didn't take something from someone else, it's not plagiarism (though good luck anyway if it is copyrighted).

    4. Re:There is lot more plagiarisms waiting to be ... by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Copyright law does not protect recipes that are mere listings of ingredients.

      Quite. But plagiarism is as much about stealing credit, as it is about copyright.

      Ethically (if not legally), if I collect a bunch of recipes off the web and publish them in a book, its a pretty douche move if I present them like they were in anyway "my recipes".

  11. Probably cheats at ping-pong too by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    How sad for him.

  12. The stars are not on your side. by lucm · · Score: 1

    Venus is in Aquarius right now, it will remain there for almost a week. That explains your negative attitude. Wait until it moves to Pisces on Saturday, joining Neptune; you'll see things differently then. Unless you were born in the house of Mercury and have an Aries ascendant; then you'll have to wait until Pluto goes retrograde in Capricorn to see a change, and that won't happen until mid-April.

    You should see a certified astrologist (or a women, according to Yahoo) to learn more.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
    1. Re: The stars are not on your side. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck did you do to my thread?
      Certainly didn't add anything.

    2. Re: The stars are not on your side. by lucm · · Score: 1

      This isn't "your" thread and it wasn't much to start with. Try putting in some actual content if you want people to contribute something meaningful.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
  13. And... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    He would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for those meddling kids!

  14. Not copyright but still might be fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares?

    Maybe someone who pay money for the paper and expects an original crossword?

    1. Re:Not copyright but still might be fraud by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Or those who get paid to write crosswords and had their stolen...

  15. Well to some degree it's part of the game. by hey! · · Score: 0

    There are clues that appear commonly in crosswords and people have been compiling lists of them for years now (e.g. a five letter word starting in "O" and ending in "A" with the clue "works" --> "opera"; four letter word beginning and ending in "A" with clue "largest of 7" --> "Asia").

    I suppose you could call using commonplace clues and answers "plagiarism", or you could call it "part of the game". But even if it's part of the game, wholesale copying of clues/answers from another puzzle would be plagiarism.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Well to some degree it's part of the game. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the article, did you? This is not what it's talking about.

  16. mercury is falling by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    And now we need to get rid of the person who cracked the code.

  17. But what is it by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Plagiarism, or syndication?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  18. Almost all legal documents are plagiarized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The copyright lawyers themselves do this too. Most legal licenses, including IP are copies from existing docs at least in part, without attribution.

  19. Why so obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's easy to write a program that generates large numbers of crossword puzzles from a list of words/cues. So what's the point in copying entire regions of existing puzzles?