Slashdot Mirror


Scuba Diver Survives Being Sucked Into Nuclear Plant (nydailynews.com)

mdsolar writes: A man scuba diving in Florida somehow survived being sucked into a nuclear power plant in a terrifying log flume ride. Christopher Le Cun was boating off the coast of Hutchinson Island when he and his friend went under to check out three large shadows beneath the waves that looked like buildings. After diving down, he felt a current that quickly pulled him toward one of three intake pipes, got sucked in and was immersed in darkness for five minutes in the water being taken to cool the St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant. Le Cun told WPTV that he thought he was going to be chopped into tiny bits when he hit a turbine at the end of the 16-foot-wide, quarter-mile tube. However, the turbine never came, and the pipe eventually spat him out into a reservoir at the plant holding water used to cool the nuclear reactor. After finding a passing worker, Le Cun was able to call wife Brittany, who thought her husband was dead after seeing the shocked face of his diving partner.

27 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. from the not-so-bright department by geoskd · · Score: 5, Informative

    So, apparently these guys moored to the warning buoy being interested in what was beneath it. Upon entering the water, they see a gigantic pipe, with some hardware that was clearly intended to prevent marine stuff from accidentally entering the pipe, so they thought: "What a great idea! lets bypass these things intended to keep big stuff out and enter this here pipe!"

    Darwin just missed on this one...

    --
    I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    1. Re:from the not-so-bright department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's a picture of the location of the buoy and a diagram of the intakes:

      http://imgur.com/a/Ve4to

      The buoy is close enough to the plant that there is no doubt that it is part of the nuclear power plant.

    2. Re: from the not-so-bright department by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you under the impression that Nuclear power plants have great security?

      More like rent-a-cop security from the guy off the night job at the mall.

      The only thing of any real value there is the uranium in the tanks and it isn't something that could be moved by anyone without really special equipment.

      I suppose you could drive a truck in with explosives and blow it up, but you could do that at the Mall of America as well and frankly scare far more people.

    3. Re: from the not-so-bright department by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nuke plants go down once in a while without such catastrophic consequences. Indian Point was just in the news for exactly this.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:from the not-so-bright department by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They show the buoy in the accompanying video. They even tied up to it, though they claim that the warnings were not readable anymore.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:from the not-so-bright department by delt0r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any diver worth his salt knows that there is no such thing as a random buoy in the ocean. And you always check up to date charts. They are there for a reason, its your job to know the bloody reason.

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    6. Re:from the not-so-bright department by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Heh. I like how this guy telling him to be risk taker drew the line at logging in to make his remark.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re: from the not-so-bright department by Known+Nutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Umm....maybe this isn't obvious to everyone, but to me it's clearly a bad idea to publish publicly on the internet a perfect covert entrance to a nuclear power plant.

      The reservoir where the man surfaced does not appear to be within the secure area of the facility. One could jump into the water from a low bridge crossing on S Ocean Dr.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    8. Re: from the not-so-bright department by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You could just drive along Ocean Drive and get out of your car. You would be closer to the plant than where this guy popped up. He is not inside the plant at this stage.

    9. Re:from the not-so-bright department by mysidia · · Score: 5, Informative

      said he saw it but didn't know what it meant.

      Boaters MUST know how to identify Buoys, Otherwise, they should not have a license to drive a boat or be part of a boating crew, and should not be navigating....

      YELLOW BUOYS INDICATE VARIOUS HAZARDS.

      The boater must identify what the Buoy is instructing before approaching, let alone mooring to it.

      Information and Regulatory Marks These orange-and-white Aids are used to alert vessel operators to various warnings and regulations. ....

      Exclusion:
      A diamond shape
      with a cross means
      boats are prohibited
      from the area


  2. Re:Wut by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Informative

    It wasn't a nuclear plant that sucked in the diver. It was a current created by an artificial lagoon being drained below sea level and the sea via gravity refilling it. That is why there was no impeller or turbine to chew him up.

  3. #FloridaMan by GenieGenieGenie · · Score: 4, Funny

    "#FloridaMan arrested for attempted impersonation of reactor coolant in order to penetrate nuclear facility"

  4. Does this happen often? by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 5, Informative

    A long long long time ago I heard exactly the same story.

    Here's a blog discussion among scuba divers claiming the exact same event, at the exact same nuclear power plant, that was posted in 2013 (referring to a past, previous event).

    So, either this is a hoax, or this happens occasionally at the nuclear power plant in question.

    (I *do* have to wonder how something gets sucked into a reservoir without encountering propulsive blades.)

    When I first heard the story, it mentioned that there was no warning of any kind to deter scuba divers from that location. The current news story says the same thing.

    I mean, it is *exactly* the same story!

    Does this happen often?

    1. Re:Does this happen often? by mdsolar · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. Re:Does this happen often? by sumdumass · · Score: 4, Informative

      The reservoir works by gravity and water pressure. That is how there was no blades. It is basically a man made lagoon except the opening connecting it to the ocean is a series of pipes run underground and out to sea a bit to get deeper and cooler water.

      The power plant will take water from the lagoon lowering its level slightly which water from the ocean will flood back in creating a current.

    3. Re:Does this happen often? by NotInHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just hope its not the exact same scuba diver...

  5. Guy is a moron by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not like you just come across pipes like this in open water, but no SCUBA diver worth their salt would get near an unknown pipe like that.

    Differential pressure makes it terrifyingly easy to get pulled into something you can't get out of. This guy is incredibly lucky.

    1. Re:Guy is a moron by wildstoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Before you go down . . . look around!"

      Good advice in all situations.

  6. mdsolar scraping the bottom of the barrel by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Title says it all. Everyone's favourite anti-nuke troll is running out of things to troll about.

  7. Jonathan Osterman by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

    This article sounds exactly like the origin story of a superhero.

    A stupid, Florida superhero, but superhero nonetheless.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  8. Re:Wut by Deadstick · · Score: 5, Informative

    How do you think they drive cooling water into the reactor?

    With a pump.

    A turbine converts flow energy to mechanical energy by driving a shaft. A compressor/pump (whether it has rotating blades or not) does the reverse.

    If the fluid is a gas, it's called a compressor; if liquid, it's called a pump.

  9. Re:Nuclear power intentionally inefficient by Deadstick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trump will do away with that Second Law shit.

  10. It's also not like it is unknown by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shit like this is marked on navigational charts, and there is a warning buoy. It isn't like this is some new feature either so if you happened not to have updated charts it wouldn't be there, the plant is decades old, your charts have it. Don't have charts? That's on you. Ocean navigation is serious business.

    That aside, if you see something and you don't know what it is in the water, or see a buoy and don't know what it signifies, the right answer is to FIND OUT, not to go and look. Get on the radio and see what's up. In this case, even that wouldn't be necessary: This is right off the US coast, well within cellular range. He could have just pulled up maps on his smartphone.

    Hopefully his lawsuit gets dismissed out of hand.

  11. Re:Nuclear power intentionally inefficient by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 4, Funny

    Trump will do away with that Second Law shit.

    God, like I needed another reason not to vote for that asshole.

    Sure, I'll continue living my life without fearing robots, but apparently Trump doesn't want me ordering them to jump into volcanoes for my own amusement.

  12. Re:Nuclear power intentionally inefficient by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Uh huh.... http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/a...

    The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) is a measure of a power source which attempts to compare different methods of electricity generation on a comparable basis. It is an economic assessment of the average total cost to build and operate a power-generating asset over its lifetime divided by the total energy output of the asset over that lifetime. The LCOE can also be regarded as the minimum cost at which electricity must be sold in order to break-even over the lifetime of the project.

    Projected LCOE in the U.S. by 2020 (as of 2015)
    Power generating technology Minimum Average Maximum
    NG: Advanced CC with CCS 93.3 100.2 110.8
    Advanced Nuclear 91.8 95.2 101

  13. Re:Nuclear power intentionally inefficient by Harlequin80 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right, so you want to ignore something written in April, 2015 by multiple people and a huge organisation as being too out of date in exchange for a paper written by one person with a particular focus on moving to solar and wind?

  14. Re: Wut by friedmud · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just a bit of clarification:

    In a pressurized water reactor there are typically 3 loops: primary, secondary and "feedwater".

    Both the primary and secondary loops are closed... but can hardly be considered "radioactive". The water in the primary system will develop a small (very small) amount of tritium that will build up. Tritrium does have a medium length half-life (about 12 years) so you wouldn't want to drink a bunch of it... but it also won't be radioactive for long. However, the amount in the primary system is really small.

    Other reactor types (like CANDU) that use heavy water (deuterium) are much more likely to develop tritium... but even then it is a tiny amount (a few kilograms a year in thousands of tons of water).

    The primary and secondary are really closed because they're at high pressure and have carefully controlled chemistry (to keep down corrosion and, in the case of the primary system, to help control the nuclear reaction using boron (dissolved boric acid).

    The feedwater (which is what comes from rivers/lakes/oceans typically) is simply there to condense the steam generated in the secondary system back into water after it flows through the turbine.