Reason Excoriates Paper On "Glaciers, Gender, and Science" (reason.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Reason.com's Robby Soave criticizes an article published in the journal Progress in Human Geography, for being "utterly incomprehensible," and "the least essential paper ever written." Entitled Glaciers, Gender, and Science--A feminist glaciology framework for global environmental climate change, the article is authored by researchers at the University of Oregon and funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Despite being filled with "buzzwords -- colonialism, marginalization, masculinist discourses, etc. -- with such frequency that the entire thing comes off like a joke," the article is accompanied by an enthusiastic press release from the University of Oregon, stating that "glacier research has been intertwined with gender relations, masculine cultures of exploration, geopolitics, and individual and institutional power. That, in turn, led to glacier-related academic and governmental jobs being predominantly filled by men. ... Melting glaciers are today considered a national security risk for numerous countries,' [one of the researchers] said. 'Power and colonialism have shaped the science.' That message is detailed extensively in the paper."

Comments

Re:Wishful thinking?

[AmiMoJo]

You are right, it is an attempt to divide. There will always be idiots, badly reported incidents and outright lies to make you angry. It's all part of the push-back against feminism.

It's so bad that the mere mention of feminism, or often misunderstood feminist jargon, triggers a Pavlovian response from many otherwise quite rational people.