Slashdot Mirror
Opera Introduces Native Adblocking, 45% Faster Than Chrome With Adblock Plus (thestack.com)
An anonymous reader writes: A new version of the Opera desktop web browser introduces fully-featured native adblocking which is able to load adblocked pages significantly faster than rivals running the Adblock Plus browser. The new feature includes whitelisting of domains and a benchmarker to test the difference between page load-times with and without ads. Krystian Kolondra, head of Opera desktop, indicates in his post that the company's hope is to encourage the 'simpler' and less intrusive advertising which has been promised, but does not yet seem to be evident.
How about comparing it to a good adblocker instead?
3...2...1....
- Don't do what I do, it's probably not healthy nor safe. -
because it has many flaws, here are just a few I can think of:
-can't list blocked elements
-can't disable ad-blocking for a single web site
-can't disable ad-blocking temporarily without restarting browser (or even PC)
-need admin rights
-doesn't allow complex patterns (regex), which makes the database huge
-can't block ads located on the same server (host name) as the main site
ABP is known to be a pig. A comparison with uBlock Origin would be a lot more meaningful. A comparison with a hostsfile would, of course, not reflect well on any ad blocking extension.
Log in or piss off.
who cares, it's still opera... and owned by chinese.... Vivaldi is better
Go away!
You can lead a hos to water but you can't make it drink.
No it isn't and it is insufficient at blocking malicious javascript that is part of the page itself.
That javascript can manipulate the CSS and load and add, or malware. So hosts file could be just one layer of the security onion, but by far not the only one.
You still need a deep packet inspection proxy, that manipulates pages (e.g. like privoxy) or you need an inbrowser object dom blocker, like adblock or ublock origin.
And if I have more than one PC at home, it is much better that I properly bock on my border router than use a hosts file, as hosts files are useless for mobile devices, and you have to apply on each PC, whereas with the firewall you only do it once. Also I redirect all DNS requests to my local resolver on my border router and have local static entries for e number of sites, that point them out to IP addresses in the 239/24 and block those out in my firewall, but have the benefit of using counters and a centralized syslog for dropped packets so I can inspect which machine is sending request.
Hosts file just don't cut it. Not by a long shot on their own. Anybody advocating hosts file as the ultimate solution, is a ultimate fool if they don't understand that is insufficient, and an ultimate tool if they understand it, yet don't speak about the rest.
While Vivaldi browser is still in beta (on Linux anyway) I've found it amazingly fast. It can use Chrome plug in and combined with the uMatrix plugin (NoSlash on major steroids) I've found it amazing .Made by the guys who created Opera.
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
Host files also cause issues when the domain is pointing to 127.0.0.1 A request is made, but there probably isn't an http daemon waiting on the localhost, which in turn causes wait delays and IP stack issues. For those of us that have a local http, we have to deal with all these pointless requests, which will return 404s.
Anyone pushing hostfiles to defeat adverts is a twat and doesn't know what they're talking about. Steve Gibson level twattery no less.
You can change the IP to anything you want. It's text, edit it if you use a local HTTP deamon.
But if you do that, you are probably also running local BIND, use that to insert authoritative zones to catch new subdomains, and speed up the process with NXDOMAIN
HOSTS files with tens of thousands of entries (like mine) do not cause any noticeable delay. None. Something is wrong with your operating system if it chokes.
The Twats are the advertisers. The whiner is you.
I have an even better idea, that bypasses the entire problem: Get rid of any Microsoft 'operating system' (using the term loosely here, since it's getting to be more and more like a 'botnet system' or 'advertising delivery system' than anything else) and install some flavor of Linux (or literally anything else you can get your hands on) instead. Then there won't be ads, 'telemetry' (read as: 'spyware') or any of this other bullshit. Don't really care what your difficulties with the alternatives are, either. Deal with it.
Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
Somehow that got posted to the wrong story.. not sure how that happened!
Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
As for "can't disable ad-blocking for a single web site", true but irrelevant - why would you do that?
I have disabled ad-blocks on a few sites that a.) I wish to remain alive and b.) I've used regularly for years and never had one complaint about their advertising. If you've never felt altruistic in this regard then I can also mention that sometimes ad-blockers get false positives, preventing me from using some features of sites.
"I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
Weird... your fervent and zealous supporter, whose style is extremely similar to yours, also posted to the wrong story.
Opera has been a Chrome ripoff for a long time now. Real Opera(tm) is INFINITELY better than anything else... the same set of tabs open in Opera vs. Chrome (and New Opera): 200M vs. 1.2G -- New Opera makes no meaningful improvements.