Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

6 Tiny Robotic Ants, Weighing 3.5 Oz. In Total, Pull a 3900-lb. Car (nytimes.com)

Posted by msmash on from the friends-of-ant-man dept.

Reader schwit1 writes about MicroTug, a team of six microrobots that weigh just 3.5 ounces (99 grams), and can move a car: Researchers at Standford University's Biomimetics and Dexterous Manipulation Lab have developed six miniature robots that have the pulling-power to move objects 2,000 times of their own body weight. The tiny robots and their inter-coordination are based on that of ants. The microrobot uses a special kind of glue on its feet that make them serve as sticky gecko toes. "Their new demonstration is the functional equivalent of a team of six humans moving a weight equivalent to that of an Eiffel Tower and three Statues of Liberty," said David Christensen, a graduate student who is one of the authors of "Let's All Pull Together: Principles for Sharing Large Loads in Microrobot Teams paper. Researchers' fascination with gecko adhesive is nothing new. In 2010, Stanford mechanical engineer Mark Cutkosky developed a Stickybot that could climb walls. A similar robot that could roll up on smooth as well rough surfaces was demonstrated by a group of researchers in Canada in 2011.

12 of 130 comments (clear)

  1. The car wasn't pulled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They made the car roll, not the same thing as pulling the effeil tower...

    1. Re:The car wasn't pulled by KBentley57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was going to post something similar. I hate comparisons like these. The 'ants' are pulling against the rolling resistance of the car, not the car laying on its side, as would be the case with the tower equivalent weights. Unless you had some gigantic roller bearings to slide them across.

    2. Re:The car wasn't pulled by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The car wasn't pulled

      They made the car roll

      Yes... by pulling it.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:The car wasn't pulled by Obfuscant · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't feel that was misleading. When somebody says that they towed their car, I do not assume that they put it on it's roof to do so.

      And when they include the weight of the car in the statement, they are implying that the weight of the vehicle is somehow relevant.

      The main hurdle to "pulling" something is the friction, not the mass. If you put the Eiffel Tower on a set of rollers that had the equivalent rolling resistance that a 3900 pound car has, I betcha six people could pull it, too. If the brakes aren't on, one person can push a loaded railroad car. And if you use levers and pulleys (machines) for assistance, you can pull a lot.

      At many county fairs there used to be a popular show called "the tractor pull". People would compete in pulling a loaded sled with their tractors. They'd all start out able to pull the sled, but as the sled moved forward, so did a large weight that increased the friction between the sled and the ground. Only the beefier tractors could pull it the full distance, but all of them could pull it.

  2. It's all fun and games... by Etherwalk · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's all fun and games until somebody loses an Eiffel Tower and three statutes of liberty.

    1. Re:It's all fun and games... by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Funny

      Next you need to explain how you fit 3,000TB on 15 2TB drives.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    2. Re:It's all fun and games... by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      How many station wagons would it take to haul 600 lbs worth of 2 TB drives?

      Less than 1.

      If you have less than one car, it might not carry as much as you were hoping.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  3. Not that tiny by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    6 Tiny Robotic Ants

    They're not tiny if you're comparing them with ants.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  4. Terrible summary by burtosis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    F=ma so if a is small then F, the force from the robots, can also be small. With over inflated tires and a smooth flat surface the rolling friction F needs to overcome can be quite small. Even a small child could push a 3900lb vehicle under the right circumstances. It would be far more useful (and less impressive to the masses) if an actual figure of force was given, much less any other relevant information.

    1. Re:Terrible summary by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the paper ( http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&arnumber=7407333&contentType=Early+Access+Articles linked to in the summary ):

      We present a simple statistical model to predict the maximum pulling force available from robot teams. The expected performance is a function of interactions between each robot and the ground (e.g. whether running or walking). We confirm the model with experiments involving impulsive bristlebots, small walking and running hexapods, and 17 gram Tugs that employ adhesion instead of friction. With attention to load sharing, each Tug can operate at its individual limit so that a team of six pulls with forces exceeding 200 N.

      So it looks like the 6 robots can pull with 200 Newtons of force

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  5. New unit system needed by mschaffer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We probably need a new system of units for explaining things to non-technical people:
              1 car-pull (symbol Cp): ? newtons
              1 football field us (Ff-US): 1000 yards
              1 Blue Whale (Whb): 30 meters
              Sun temperature (Tps): 5000C

    1. Re:New unit system needed by Sax+Russell+5449D29A · · Score: 5, Funny

      My personal favorites:

      • 1 inch: 2.54 cm
      • 1 foot: 30.48 cm
      • 1 foot pound: 1.36 joules
      • 1 ounce: 28.35 grams
      • 1 pint: 0.47 liters
      --
      -SR