Slashdot Mirror


DC Metro Closes For Emergency Safety Inspection (nbcwashington.com)

McGruber writes with NBC's report that Washington, DC's Metrorail system has been completely shut down for at least 29 hours, so crews can check 600 underground jumper cables: A problem with those jumper cables caused a fire at the McPherson Square station early Monday and was also the cause of a fatal smoke incident in January, 2015, that killed one person and injured others. The safety checks could have been delayed until the weekend or conducted at night over about six days, officials said. But if the system were kept open, a public announcement about the risk would have to be made. That would have put passengers, and Metro, in the awkward position of publicly acknowledging that it was operating despite being aware of a potentially deadly safety problem. Metro also would have been liable in the case of any crashes or calamities. The shutdown prompted the Washington Post to publish an editorial titled It's official: Metro is a national embarrassment."

16 of 110 comments (clear)

  1. Why wait over a year? by timrod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the first deadly accident with these jumper cables happened in January of last year, why did they wait so long to close down to inspect?

    1. Re:Why wait over a year? by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because...well, because it's the DC Metro and it's run by horrible people.

      The only thing they seem to actually care about is how much money they can make, while pushing things to the absolute limit in terms of customer service and equipment.

      I spent 6 years using the system to get back and forth from NoVA to downtown DC every day for work....and if I had to move back there now, I would be driving and paying for parking, absolutely no hesitation, even though it'd probably be at least twice the cost.

      See https://twitter.com/unsuckdcme... for many, many examples.

    2. Re:Why wait over a year? by oneiros27 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The biggest reason is that someone else was in charge last year.

      After the first* incident government agency (NTSB?) ordered the cables inspected, and WMATA (the people who run the DC Metro) use their own crews to do the inspection, in the off-hours.

      Now WMATA has a new leader, who's much more focused on safety (I think they said he came from the airline industry) ... and the incident happened again. So he said (or at least hinted at, I was driving while WTOP was broadcasting the press conference) that they can't trust the last inspection, and they're bringing in outside crews to do the inspection this time around.

      * "first" only in terms of this problem. Two family friends died in the 2009 red line crash, which killed nine people.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    3. Re:Why wait over a year? by merky1 · · Score: 2

      They did inspect them. They just did such a craptacular job, that another lit on fire 2 days ago (luckily off hours). The problem with metro is purely political. Between all of the contracts and oversight, nothing gets done. Situations like this are a prime example why outsourcing in government fails horribly.

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
  2. In related news... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2

    In related news, I-94 outside of Milwaukee will be shut down late Friday night to allow bridge construction to continue. Seriously though, infrastructure breaks down and needs major repairs from time to time, so why is this news to the point of causing the Washington Post to whine about some repairs as a "national embarrassment." (Believe me - no one outside of DC cares one bit about this story.)

    1. Re:In related news... by digitalderbs · · Score: 3, Informative

      I lived in DC for 5 years. Before, I lived in NYC for 5 years, and I'm now living in Chicago for 3, so I have some basis for comparison. The DC metro system is in an unusually high state of disrepair. Fixes don't happen until they're life threatening--and even then, they sometimes don't happen for a year.

      While I was living in DC, at least 2 DC metro events made the national news: the first was the train collision that killed a few people because the conductors weren't coordinated, and the second was due to an escalator brake collapsing, leading to multiple injuries. I've also had to find alternative means of transportation due to 2 fires in the metro system. People aren't complaining that work is being done on the system. People are complaining that there is very little maintenance and that problems get so severe that a whole system shutdown is needed.

      There have been a number of articles in the Post about the state of disrepair for the DC metro system. Many people have speculated that the system is corrupt. They certainly charge enough for the service. A 30 minute trip costs about $2.25, and a one hour trip costs about $5.00.

      After having used the NYC, DC and Chicago systems extensively--and the BART system--I'd have to say that the DC system is a disaster. The problem is particularly acute for the DC area since the city is not designed to handle the amount of traffic its population would otherwise need.

  3. Re:Good for them! by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Good for them! Over a first year since the first incident, they're finally getting around to it! What a responsible bunch!

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. DC is the embarrassment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or rather, the culture that allowed this to happen.

    Last January, an electrical fire caused by problems in feeder wires that provide power to the rails killed someone. The NTSB ordered DC Metro to inspect ALL such feeder wires.

    Last Monday, another electrical fire was caused by a problem in feeder wires - wires that were apparently "inspected" and "passed" just a few months ago.

    In other words, the previous inspections were falsified. In US Navy parlance, they were "gundecked".

    My guess is a few mid-level managers and quite a bit of workers who did the earlier "inspections" are about to be fired - after EVERYONE spends 24 hours not getting paid overtime fixing the problems they previously worked hard to hide.

    FWIW, the new director of DC Metro - Paul Wiedefeld - came from running BWI airport, which he once shut down for an entire day due to a crappy safety record.

  5. Did an Initial Inspection & Repair, New Fire by Koreantoast · · Score: 4, Informative

    WMATA did an inspection of the jumper cables back in February 2015 and then replaced around 120 or so. They probably thought the problem was resolved at that point. Unfortunately, a new fire earlier this week revealed that the problem has not been resolved.

  6. Re:Wheres my flying car. by KGIII · · Score: 2

    Nautical miles. I assume...

    Anyhow, at first I thought that it'd be okay just to let some of the DC folks die in accidents, there's a lot of politicians there and many of them are straight up evil. But, then I thought more about it and, having been on the metro in DC, I know no politicians are going to be impacted by this at all. So, only some mostly-good people would be at risk and it's probably best to shut it down.

    Mostly-good is, of course, in comparison to the above mentioned politicians.

    I'm actually not surprised that the terrorists don't take out Congress. If they did, some of us might not mind that much and others would actively cheer. (See approval ratings for more accurate statistics.) It'd be one way to get rid of the incumbents who, oddly, get reelected even though they've often managed to acquire rather low approval ratings.

    Note: Some of the above is meant as sarcasm and/or humor and should not be taken seriously. Which parts are which is an exercise best left to the reader.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  7. Let me get this straight.... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is a serious incident on Monday, one of a number that have been raising concern. The metro decides to shut down the system to do a major safety inspection. That is somehow bad?

    The summary suggests that they could have waited until the weekend, which is true or done it at night over a longer period of time, which is also true. Of course, if another incident had occurred in either of those time frames and lives were lost, what then?

    Have we really gotten to the point in the US that no matter what the authorities do, even with matters of safety, it is always bad?

    1. Re:Let me get this straight.... by decsnake · · Score: 2

      Have we really gotten to the point in the US that no matter what the authorities do, even with matters of safety, it is always bad?

      the answer to that question is, clearly, yes.

    2. Re:Let me get this straight.... by WheezyJoe · · Score: 2

      ...but a step in the right direction. After a long string of charlatan political hacks at the helm, DC Metro finally has a guy in charge with the balls to do something so terribly impolitic as shut down the system for 29 hours during the week with little warning, to fix stuff.

      This was a ballsy move, any way you slice it. He's gonna take some heat for this, but it was the right thing to do. But he has a long way to go. 3-flight escalators in and out of stations haven't run in years, cars desperately need upgrades, track work, and not a small bit of morale for a work force that often seems to care less.

      DC Metro was the newest, cleanest, nicest, bestest subway in the world when it opened in 1977. Trouble is, politicians haven't learned how to make maintenance sexy (but I give props to NYC... their system looks better each time I visit, pretty good for a system going on 100 years... you put up with some rats, urine and crazies every so often, depending on the stop, but in NYC, it's amazing how quickly you get used to is as just part of the flavor of the City).

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  8. Re:2014 experience with USA public transit by KGIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's 'cause we can afford cars. No, seriously. We don't rely on mass transit - it's a cultural thing. Look at the percentages and socio-economic class of people who use the (limited) mass transit available.

    Also, I have to wonder if you're stupid or just ignorant - and, if the latter, it is willfully so? Seriously. The US is a rather diverse and large place. I notice you compared the mass transit of the US to just cities in other countries - which demonstrates an even greater willingness to bias your statements.

    I'd also wonder why you'd lie... You've absolutely, zero chance, not seen all of the public transit in the US. So, I doubt you were astonished by such a thing as you've not seen it.

    Which leads me to this... You're almost certainly, by deduction, a liar - and you've probably not been to any of the places you seem to claim you've been and that includes the places you're contrasting with. It's telling, in some ways, that you used Moscow - I've been to Moscow and been on public transit there (you'll need to narrow down which transit(s) you speak of) and am inclined to think you've never actually been.

    So, you're probably actually from the US. Your writing style, the grammar and verbiage used, indicate that you're really from the US. That means you probably don't own a passport and haven't been out of the US in your life. I'm not sure why you'd lie - except to troll. However, trolls are my source of amusement at times - more so when I'm bored, and it's fun to pick apart the idiocy they spout for their own amusement. Thank you for the fun game. I appreciated it and the folks who read the response may also be aware of the idiocies in your post.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  9. Re:Wheres my flying car. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nautical miles. I assume...

    No, nautical miles are more commonly known as knots, so the appropriate abbreviation is "km". I see it all the time, especially in Europe, where they use km for almost everything.

  10. Re:Good for them! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    This is just "maintenance theater". This problem has been festering for years, and then all of the sudden they decide it is a "crisis" and they need to shutdown the entire system for a full day in the middle of a work week. This maintenance could have easily been done during regular daily shutdowns from midnight to 5am. Or it could have been done on a weekend. Or they could have done it one line at a time, so that there would be enough buses/taxies/ubers to handle the displaced commuters.

    The only reason they did a full system shutdown is to draw attention to themselves, and give the public the perception that they are underfunded and need more subsidies.