Facebook Exec Explains Why Technical Skills Aren't Enough To Be a Great Engineer (geekwire.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Facebook's Regina Wallace-Jones, who is in charge of protecting 1.6 billion people on the social network, says math and science skills aren't enough to tackle challenges at a firm. "Don't let anyone tell you that engineering is only about math and science or that engineering expertise is all you have to offer the world. Your experiences and your perspectives can help inspire a company to find a different approach to a problem or encourage someone else to speak up," she said. "The impact of engineers goes well beyond the mobile apps, the gadgets, and the security systems that we build. The quest to engineer meaningful solutions... is not just about math and science, it's about making amazing solutions for real people in the real world. It's about pushing mankind to its outer limits by inspiring the world to imagine bigger solutions than our hands can hold."

Comments

It is all a rat race

[ickleberry]

Nothing is ever enough for these corporations while there are still dollars in circulation that don't belong to them. Facebook is about making amazing solutions to fill Mark Zuckerberg's pocket, nothing more, nothing less. "Real people in the real world" my bollox

Re:It is all a rat race

[Aighearach]

Yeah, the crap about "pushing mankind to its outer limits" is hard to read. Is that really what engineering does?

Obviously, understanding the humans and the use cases is more important to being a great engineer than just math; the math is just a base requirement, not the job of engineering.

Re:It is all a rat race

[Kjella]

Nothing is ever enough for these corporations while there are still dollars in circulation that don't belong to them. Facebook is about making amazing solutions to fill Mark Zuckerberg's pocket, nothing more, nothing less. "Real people in the real world" my bollox

And yet... how many of us have actually made a product 1+ billion "real people in the real world" use and how many are just being Internet warriors in the comments field? I've seen a lot of engineers get lost in technical or academic challenges, philosophical issues or just perceived wants and needs the customers/users would have that they really don't. Cue the infamous "No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame." when Apple released the iPod. Or why "assume a spherical cow" has become a running joke of theoretical models.

There is a lot of hubris that it's what the STEM people do that's important and everything else is fluff. If nobody else will stick their neck out, I will: I don't really understand people, like what the mainstream wants or why. And that's okay, because the people who do generally haven't don't know much about actually building it. And sometimes the economists will tell you that yes, people want it and yes, we could build it but you'd be spending $100 for a solution to a $10 problem. And sometimes you build it and it's the best solution nobody's heard about.

real world <-- investigate, analyze --> problems
problems <-- design, build, test --> solutions
solutions <-- communicate, distribute --> real world

I've written a lot of good code that went to naught not because there was anything wrong with it, but because it wasn't actually solving real world problems. And you can of course blame the spec or that the user is holding it wrong, but at the end of the day it just isn't providing value. So I try to go beyond what they teach in STEM classes and work on what's the user really trying to achieve and can I deliver on that. Or maybe it's just in-house what the business analyst wants or the way the architect or development team wants to build things but there's hardly any position where you don't need those skills.

I have this person at work in mind, no doubt he's very bright but he's also quite terrible at talking to people in a way they can understand. Even for an IT person it becomes an incoherent rant of technical details, niche concepts and proscribing solutions instead of explaining them. Meanwhile I pushed through a good technical change recently asking "What if the person changes his mind?" because the proposed solution failed to take that into account. That I pointed out how we'd already solved this other places helped, of course. But if nobody pays attention, we're going to reinvent the wheel and poorly, over and over again.

H1b and the will to work 80 hours a week

[Joe_Dragon]

H1b and the will to work 80 hours a week is what they really want.

Insightful

[El_Muerte_TDS]

And that's why she earns the big bucks. Because she's the one with this insightful knowledge which no one ever though about before.

Yes, but...

[Raenex]

Facebook's Regina Wallace-Jones, who is in charge of protecting 1.6 billion people on the social network

Who's in charge of protecting 1.6 billion people from the social network?

This...

[fyngyrz]

The quest to engineer meaningful solutions

This... coming from Facebook... is just about the funniest thing I've seen in several days.

"meaningful"

Ah ha.

Ha ha ha ha. :)

Re: This...

[fyngyrz]

Billionaire != meaningful.

Well duh ...

[Tetch]

Regina Wallace-Jones apparently said:

"The impact of engineers goes well beyond the mobile apps, the gadgets, and the security systems that we build. The quest to engineer meaningful solutions... is not just about math and science, it's about making amazing solutions for real people in the real world"

Regina, this is not news. Any software engineer worth their salt (i.e. with a natural aptitude for computer and software engineering and science) knows this. The whole problem with our industry is that management has seen fit to offer jobs to just about anyone who wants to "work with computers". Worse, they employ the ones who *don't* even like the work ... they just want the money (they've heard there's good money in IT), but actually detest the work ... you'll never get inspirational work out of them.

Could it be that you're one of those managers who think they have a monopoly on intelligence and insight ? Some of us have known what you've just said for a decade or two, but management didn't want to listen, because "the numbers". Now that your numbers are looking good, some of you are stumbling on our prior art as if it's new and deep wisdom.

Re:What the hell ...

[DerekLyons]

How is mankind's lot significantly improved by the presence of Facebook?

Let's see what I've accomplished on Facebook today...

• - Corresponded with my sister on a medieval recipe recreation we're both working on.
• - Took part in a discussion in a group dedicated to Food and Society on the relationship between geography and food choices.
• - Helped someone in the KSP group with the design of a new lifter.
• - Voted on the anime we'll be watching at next month's meeting of our local anime club.
• - Helped a fellow photographer troubleshoot a problem he had in processing an image.
• - Commented on a restaurant review in a group about local restaurants. (The reviewer had gotten the hours wrong.)
• - Commented on an analysis of SpaceX's landing attempts that was posted to a group dedicated to discussion of space related businesses.
• - Helped someone new to our local SCA branch hook up with the local expert on a topic he's interested in.

All that - and it's only quarter to four in the afternoon on a slow Sunday.

You may not find communicating with your fellows useful, but I certainly do. Contrary to the ignorant and idiotic position often seen here on /. (and one continues to be held in defiance of repeated corrections on the matter), there's a lot more to Facebook than playing Farmville and posting inane photographs.