Slashdot Mirror


Obama Lands In Cuba As First US President To Visit In Nearly A Century (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Barack Obama descended on Cuba with a pomp unmatched by the Pope on Sunday, becoming the first American president to visit Cuba in nearly a century, and the first since a revolution led by Fidel Castro toppled a U.S.-backed strongman in 1959. As he arrived, Obama used a Cuban phrase meaning "what's up?" when he tweeted: "Que bola Cuba? Just touched down here, looking forward to meeting and hearing directly from the Cuban people." "This is a historic visit," Obama said as he greeted U.S. Embassy staff and their families at a Havana hotel. "It's an historic opportunity to engage with the Cuban people." One of the many results of the new diplomatic relations between the two countries is the ability for Cuban residents to become more connected to the internet. Reuters is reporting that Alphabet Inc's Google is poised to expand internet access in Cuba. "One of the things that we'll be announcing here is that Google has a deal to start setting up more Wi-Fi and broadband access on the island," Obama said in an ABC News interview that aired on Monday. The U.S. Treasury Department has even authorized San Francisco's Airbnb service to expand its home rental listings in Cuba to non-U.S. travelers.

14 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Cruz isn't a fan by steveha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here is what Senator Ted Cruz wrote about this:

    News reports say there are more than 100 long-term prisoners of conscience in Cuba. Nobody knows for sure, as the Castro regime does not grant international organizations access to its prisons. But we know they are there and that hundreds are held for shorter periods, and beaten in prison regularly.

    Just two months ago, the president told Yahoo News that he would only travel to Cuba "if, in fact, I with confidence can say that we're seeing some progress in the liberty and freedom and possibilities of ordinary Cubans. ... If we're going backwards, then there's not much reason for me to be there."

    I have news, Mr. President: No progress has taken place. Cuba is going backward.

    http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/obama-cuba-visit-ted-cruz-213749

    If you are a fan of President Obama, could you please explain to me why you think Senator Cruz is wrong about this? Because at the moment I agree with Senator Cruz. President Obama's administration has dropped the embargo and helped out the government of Cuba, and I'm not aware of a single demand that Cuba has granted in return. Set free political prisoners? Allow Amnesty International to visit the prisons? Maybe beat the political prisoners a little bit less? No, no, and no.

    Not only did President Obama not make any demands of Cuba, but now Cuba is making demands of President Obama. Pay reparations, return Guantanamo Bay.

    I do hope that President Obama will at least use his "bully pulpit" to say something about human rights in Cuba. Words are what he is best at. I would have preferred a binding agreement, but he already didn't do that.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Cruz isn't a fan by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The US does business with countries like China and Saudi Arabia, so why would Cuba be left out in the cold? Besides, the national interest is best served by not having China replacing Russia as a major force in Cuba, which is exactly what will happen if relations and trade with Cuba are not normalized.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Cruz isn't a fan by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Flip it around. Has our policy of embargo and detachment helped any of those people? How many "prisoners of conscience" does China hold? Is Cruz proposing we embargo them too? I doubt it. I'm not sure if opening relations with Cuba will fix it. But we know that China is more open now than it was. At least it's worth trying.

    3. Re:Cruz isn't a fan by jittles · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here is what Senator Ted Cruz wrote about this:

      News reports say there are more than 100 long-term prisoners of conscience in Cuba. Nobody knows for sure, as the Castro regime does not grant international organizations access to its prisons. But we know they are there and that hundreds are held for shorter periods, and beaten in prison regularly.

      Just two months ago, the president told Yahoo News that he would only travel to Cuba "if, in fact, I with confidence can say that we're seeing some progress in the liberty and freedom and possibilities of ordinary Cubans. ... If we're going backwards, then there's not much reason for me to be there."

      I have news, Mr. President: No progress has taken place. Cuba is going backward.

      http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/obama-cuba-visit-ted-cruz-213749

      If you are a fan of President Obama, could you please explain to me why you think Senator Cruz is wrong about this? Because at the moment I agree with Senator Cruz. President Obama's administration has dropped the embargo and helped out the government of Cuba, and I'm not aware of a single demand that Cuba has granted in return. Set free political prisoners? Allow Amnesty International to visit the prisons? Maybe beat the political prisoners a little bit less? No, no, and no.

      Not only did President Obama not make any demands of Cuba, but now Cuba is making demands of President Obama. Pay reparations, return Guantanamo Bay.

      I do hope that President Obama will at least use his "bully pulpit" to say something about human rights in Cuba. Words are what he is best at. I would have preferred a binding agreement, but he already didn't do that.

      Maybe because the embargo probably really isn't doing any good and there's no reason to continue it? Nobody is going to try and host nuclear weapons there ever again, I don't think. And we're not going to win any friends by trying to destroy the economy of the country. I'm not saying that we should concede to any demands about Gitmo (though I do not agree with the prison camp there), but we could certainly be better neighbors to Cuba and many other Latin American countries.

    4. Re:Cruz isn't a fan by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the countries we do billions of dollars of business with a year do far, far worse than Cuba and no one gives a shit. why make Cuba special, I don't get it.

    5. Re:Cruz isn't a fan by Galaga88 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What has the fifty or sixty years of the embargo achieved on that front? The status quo has achieved nothing so far.

      Let Cuba have a hit of sweet, sweet capitalism. Once they get hooked, we can refuse to offer more unless they start doing what we want.

    6. Re:Cruz isn't a fan by steveha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let Cuba have a hit of sweet, sweet capitalism. Once they get hooked, we can refuse to offer more unless they start doing what we want.

      This sounds like a great plan. But why do you think it is going to happen? Is the government of Cuba about to allow free enterprise by its citizens?

      The Economy of Cuba is a planned economy dominated by state-run enterprises. Most industries are owned and operated by the government and most of the labor force is employed by the state.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Cuba

      Actually, that article goes on to say that after the Soviet Union collapsed, the government of Cuba began to allow a tiny amount of free enterprise. But:

      Investment is restricted and requires approval by the government. The government sets most prices and rations goods to citizens.

      I agree, if the people of Cuba get a taste of free enterprise they will want more. But I fear the government of Cuba knows this and will not cooperate with the plan.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  2. Re:This is quite possibly the photo of the year by DaHat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And yet due to Reagan, you don't exactly see all that many Lenin statues in the world anymore.

    Sadly I don't see hipsters & their Che t-shirts going away anytime soon.

  3. Re:While we're all bemoaning wretched Guantanamo by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As opposed to say what Saudis do, or the Chinese? I don't understand why people get fixated on the problems with Cuba when other nations that do far, far worse are our best pals and we do billions of dollars of business with those dirtbags.

  4. Re:While we're all bemoaning wretched Guantanamo by Bartles · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because Cuba is 60 miles from the United States.

  5. Re:Not an Obama accomplishment by sysrammer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I hear what you're saying, but I don't see the US having much of a moral platform on this, as we have the largest per capita prison population in the world.

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  6. Re: Don't Let Him Back! by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The mark of a true leftist, is that they always view themselves as the political center.

    Does the expression "Fair and Balanced" strike a familiar note?

  7. It took way too long to end the CE hypocrisy. by istartedi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It took way too long for this to happen. Back when we gave China MFN status, what, early 90s? I was already complaining about the hypocrisy. The rationale was that by engaging with China we would eventually transfer our ideas as well as our goods. The theory behind this was called "Constructive Engagement".

    But if CE was really the proper way to deal with these regimes, what about Cuba? It never really worked anyway. CE was just justification--it was all about the money, and earlier it was about playing China against the USSR. It was hypocritical on its face, right from the start.

    I've literally been complaining about this since before some of you were born. Sheesh! Look, I get it. Castro stole your stuff, and you're mad; but most of the people who directly lost are dead. Aside from that, conquest happens. It's how America was built. At some point you have to write that off.

    Don't get me wrong. Communism sucks. It's an evil little anachronism that exists down there; but our way of dealing with it didn't work. Time to try something different... finally!

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  8. Re:While we're all bemoaning wretched Guantanamo by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and Mexico is zero miles and have horrific prison conditions and has government complicit in religious discrimination against non-catholic groups, and we do a third of a trillion dollars in trade with them. Do you even have a point?