Slashdot Mirror


FBI Delays Case Against Apple; May Have Way To Break Phone (threatpost.com)

msm1267 writes: The FBI has delayed its case against Apple less than a day before a scheduled court hearing and showdown over its demands that Apple help unlock a terrorist's iPhone. The government late Monday afternoon filed a motion to vacate its case, putting a halt to a saga that began in mid-February when a federal magistrate ordered Apple to help the FBI access a phone belonging to one of the shooters involved in last December's attack that killed 14 in San Bernardino, Calif.

The motion also indicates that the FBI may have found a way onto the phone without Apple's help. "On Sunday, March 20, 2016, an outside party demonstrated to the FBI a possible method for unlocking [shooter Syed] Farook's iPhone," the motion says. "Testing is required to determine whether it is a viable method that will not compromise data on Farook's iPhone. If the method is viable, it should eliminate the need for the assistance from Apple Inc. ("Apple") set forth in the All Writs Act Order in this case."
Update 3/22/16 at 01:05:00 GMT: The story was updated to reflect the correct information that the case was delayed, not dropped. A federal judge agreed to postpone the oral arguments between Apple and the U.S. government.

1 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. Re:DOJ did not want precedent from a loss in court by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1, Troll

    Don't forget that Tim Cook has also said very publicly that he is totally willing to go all the way to the Supreme Court over this, and said court just lost its most thuggish scumbag justice. By folding now, the FBI loses this particular round; but avoids setting a precedent and still gets to extort anyone who can't darken the sky with quite so many lawyers as an enraged Apple.

    (I'm not sure if you're referring to my post last week. But I pointed out then that, when the DoJ thought to take on IBM in the '70s, Big Blue ground them down under so many lawyers, dragging the case out for better than a decade, that the DoJ just gave up entirely... and Apple is richer (ie. can afford more and better lawyers) now than IBM was then.)

    --
    Imagine all the people...