Slashdot Mirror


Google's $149 Nik Photo Editing Suite Goes Free

Google has announced that it is making its $149 Nik Collection photo editing suite available for free of charge. The move, which should make plenty of amateur and professional photographers happy, comes roughly three and a half years after Google acquired Nik Software. The suite includes seven desktop plugins and allows you to add effects and apply filters to your photos. Those of you who had purchased Nik Software, the company assures that it will issue a full refund. In a blog post, the company writes: As we continue to focus our long-term investments in building incredible photo editing tools for mobile, including Google Photos and Snapseed, we've decided to make the Nik Collection desktop suite available for free, so that now anyone can use it.

52 comments

  1. Motive by OverlordQ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In other words, they dont want to support or develop it any more and now they can point to the Free price tag for justification.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spare us your cynical attitude. They are giving away a decent tool for no fucking money. Don't like it? Fuck off elsewhere and find something else to bitch about. Many people will be pleased. And for your dimwitted information, the price doesn't change existing functionality, twat.

    2. Re:Motive by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Spare us your bullying attitude. They are giving away their opinions for no fucking money. Don't like it? Fuck off elsewhere and find something else to bitch about. Many people agree with them. And for your information, the price doesn't change who is entitled to have their own opinion, or state it.

    3. Re:Motive by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      In other words, they dont want to support or develop it any more and now they can point to the Free price tag for justification.

      Which is awesome of them? I mean, companies are under no obligation to give you their software for free just because they're going to stop development on it. Most don't. They can just stop selling, stop supporting, and move on.

      I mean, talk about entitlement mentality. They give you software and you respond by saying, "but you're going to stop investing your resources on it!" They don't owe you anything, thank them for what they chose to give you anyway.

    4. Re:Motive by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      In other words, they dont want to support or develop it any more and now they can point to the Free price tag for justification.

      Since when does Google need to have a justification to drop a product? They do that sort of thing all the time.

      Also, look at how many products and services that they have that are free. If making a product free was just an excuse to kill something then they must have it in for a substantial number of their products.

    5. Re:Motive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After looking it over, it doesn't seem like it was ever worth the $150 pricetag. Hell, it's not even worth checking out for free. It's just a few crappy filters that practically all image viewers and editors have built in.

      If you've got paint.net, Gimp, IrfanView, FastStone, XnView or similar, then you already have more capability than this "Nik Collection" offers.

  2. When is it discontinued? by spyfrog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, the obvious question now is "when is it discontinued"?
    Because that seam to be the ultimate end for most of Googles projects. Especially these who isn't cloud related, like this. I would be surprised if this isn't killed of within 5 years.

    For instance, they have only recently killed of the desktop Picasa application - a really good and free solution to organize your pictures. And now they want us to use other software that probably will be discontinued in the future whey you rely on it?

    1. Re:When is it discontinued? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Just like MyTracks. A basic but very useful activity tracker. Will be discontinued end of April.

    2. Re:When is it discontinued? by EvilSS · · Score: 2

      So, the obvious question now is "when is it discontinued"?

      Pretty sure that would be today. I see this as Google setting it out on the curb with a "free" sign on it. Shame they won't open source it.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    3. Re:When is it discontinued? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Not surprising. I switched to an open source tracker from F-Droid a couple years ago, after they started messing with the map apps and removing features and shutting down other unrelated services. This is exactly why I switched all the google tools I was using, other than gmail. If I can't trust it to be there in a few years, I don't want to invest my time using it. Data conversion takes time, and things don't always really import perfectly.

      I want tools I can still be using in 10 years. The vast majority of my software dev tools are much older, even if the latest version is recent.

      Tracking apps don't actually have a lot of code in them. If they want me to switch every few years, I'd actually be able to just write my own and keep using it in about the same amount of time. And if I don't advertise it there won't even be any silly users to submit bug reports or anything; I can just use it forever with only rare maintenance when I switch to a new OS version.

    4. Re:When is it discontinued? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Who cares? This is an image editing software. It's not a cataloguing system, it's not a database, it doesn't store anything. You lose nothing by using it and having them discontinue it at a later date.

  3. Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is cool and all, but for those who don't read TFS (let alone TFA), you may want to look at the requirements (bottom of page), and you'll discover that you will need either Photoshop of some flavor installed (no effing way I'm coughing up money to Adobe for just a hobby), or Aperture for OSX.

    BTW, no love for GIMP? dafuq?

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by spyfrog · · Score: 2

      Continue to read and you will realize that there isn't going to be any more releases for desktop versions. So it is a dead end. Like Picasa before it...

    2. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

      Yes these are plugins for popular photo editors such as Photoshop, Lightroom and Aperture. The plugins were originally targeted at the professional photographer market. Pretty much all of us use at least one of those applications.

      Most photo editing these days is done in nondestructive RAW mode in Aperture or Lightroom, and photoshop is now only touched when more precise editing tools are needed to fix a localized problem or paint out a telephone line (for non-editorial images.) So it's nice to have the plugins available directly in LR or Aperture.

      GIMP still has some serious shortcomings when applied to a professional workflow, so it was never really on the radar for this market, and why plugins like this do not typically support GIMP.

    3. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since there aren't going to be any more releases for Aperture either, that ain't no problem.

      I'm happily off to download the Nik plugins for Aperture ... as long as Google's TOS for them isn't unreasonable.

    4. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by bmo · · Score: 5, Informative

      > Photoshop of some flavor installed (no effing way I'm coughing up money to Adobe for just a hobby)

      It's called CS2.

      Create Adobe account
      Lie and say you already bought CS2
      Be brought to the download page
      Download. Input free key supplied from Adobe.

      ???

      Slight Profit. It's good enough for hobbyist work - it doesn't have all the latest bells and whistles (no video card acceleration, etc). But hey, it's free-beer free.

      >no love for Gimp

      Install PSPI in Gimp.

      http://the-tml.net/gimp/pspi.h...

      I love Gimp and am kinda proficient at it, but then also, CS2 runs great in Wine.

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of cheaper/easier tools on Mac OS X than Aperture or Photoshop. I like Pixelmator, although it's not quite perfect.

      if nothing else, for casual use I feel like Pixelmator launches and has a docuemnt open in the time it takes Photoshop to get a splash screen up.

    6. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 2

      CS2 won't help here, the earliest release supported by these plugins is CS4.

      Windows Requirements ( mostly the same as Mac except Mac is only supported 10.7.5 - 10.10 ) :
      Windows Vista®, Windows 7, Windows 8
      Adobe Photoshop CS4 through CC 2015
      Adobe Photoshop Elements 9 through 13 (apart from HDR Efex Pro 2, which is not compatible with Photoshop Elements)
      Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 through 6/CC

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
    7. Re: Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GIMP? Come on, this ain't amateur stuff.

    8. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Gimp has a better programming interface than Photoshop (and already did in the 90s!) and there is a flourishing plugin community.

      There is no reason to try to sell them plugins in the first place to need to make it free later. ;)

    9. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Pixelmator is allright, but Aperture / Photos do something it doesn't (simple white balance anyone?) Between the two, you have 99% of anything most will do with PS. (Note, I'm not talking about pros using PS for things that us normal folks just won't ever be able to do:)

      I still haven't decided what to use for my photos once Aperture ceases to be an option. I haven't warmed up to Photos yet primarily because I've not used it enough. It's another wait and see, hopefully it'll turn out like FCX.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    10. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If photography is ACTUALLY a hobby of yours, you still can't imagine paying $10 per month for the Lightroom + Photoshop subscription? Seems like a small price to pay as a hobbyist. If photography is not a hobby for you, then why do you even care enough to comment on this?

    11. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gimp has a better programming interface than Photoshop

      Perhaps, but PS has a better image editing interface. For most of us, that is all that matters.

    12. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by debrisslider · · Score: 1

      For those who don't read TFA, it also installs standalone versions of each plugin, so you don't need Photoshop, Lightroom, or Aperture. It doesn't play nicely with GIMP, but you can still import/export between them. Since most of these are color filters, you'd just do your cropping and retouching in GIMP or whatever, then open it up in Color Efex and add a graduated bleach bypass high contrast sunlight filter. For free!

    13. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Oh my.
      $LargeCompany has released, for free, a set of tools that work well with some applications that you do not wish to buy.

      Oh woe is you!

    14. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The reason Adobe hasn't closed this loophole is because CS2 is essentially useless to anyone with a modern camera who shoots RAW. Adobe have had a history of not supporting older Photoshop versions with the CameraRAW plugin needed to read files from new cameras. This is the same reason I had to upgrade my perfectly good version of Lightroom ... no more support when I upgraded the camera.

      There are workarounds such as doing a DNG conversion but many people would happily pay not to have that hassle.

    15. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Yes these are plugins for popular photo editors such as Photoshop, Lightroom and Aperture. The plugins were originally targeted at the professional photographer market. Pretty much all of us use at least one of those applications.

      It would be nice if Google, or if they open sourced the NIK tools, someone else could...port this over for Affinity Photo.

      So far, I've found Affinity Photo to be pretty much 99% of what Adobe Photoshop is...but MUCH faster. I think Affinity is well on its way to being a competitor to Photoshop, and it doesn't require monthly RENT, and the price is reasonable.

      Right now Affinity Photo is for OS X only, but a Windows beta is soon to be released.

      I've stopped with Adobe tools at CS6....I refuse to *rent* my software and I won't support companies that try to do that model. I'm quite happy with Affinity so far...the price is more than reasonable (about $70 I think)...and they are giving plenty of free upgrades as they put in new functionality.

      If you know Photoshop, you pretty much know Affinity too. I also bought Affinity Designer, which is to compete with Adobe Illustrator. I've not played with it as much and I don't know AI all that well, so, I cannot comment on its functionality vs the Adobe product, but if it is as good as Photo, I'd dare say it will be a valid competitor.

      I would like to see many of my plug-ins for PS be able to work with Affinity. I hope enough folks start supporting this alternate tool....and maybe try to get Adobe to back off the fucking rental model.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1
    17. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by RDW · · Score: 1

      At least some of them seem to work in Affinity already:

      https://affinity.serif.com/for...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    18. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      IMO, Lightroom is a pretty solid photo management option. Of course, if you buy it, you're trusting that Tom Hogarty will remain in charge of Lightroom development, and won't bow to pressure from on high to move it to a subscription model like the rest of their products. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    19. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Pixelmator is allright, but Aperture / Photos do something it doesn't (simple white balance anyone?) Between the two, you have 99% of anything most will do with PS. (Note, I'm not talking about pros using PS for things that us normal folks just won't ever be able to do:)

      I still haven't decided what to use for my photos once Aperture ceases to be an option. I haven't warmed up to Photos yet primarily because I've not used it enough. It's another wait and see, hopefully it'll turn out like FCX.

      Check out Affinity Photo!!

      It is truly the best competitor I've ever seen to Photoshop...it has about 99% of the functionality, and is MUCH faster too.

      Also, price is reasonable...and it NOT the rental paradigm that Adobe has adopted with CC.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    20. Re:Bah - they're just plugins, and no Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, don't lie.

  4. Opportunity by fyngyrz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Likely. However, as a photographer and image processing professional, I can vouch for both Viveza and DFine. Both are worthy of use in many situations. The rest aren't much, IMHO, but those two are exceptionally useful as often as not.

    Viveza is a somewhat-automatic region selecting modifier of basic image characteristics such as contrast, saturation and so on.

    Dfine is a reasonably effective noise reduction tool.

    Perfect, no, and I rather see them further developed as opposed to abandoned, as is quite possible due to Google's well known habit, but as they stand now, better to have them in the imaging toolbox than not.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Opportunity by fyngyrz · · Score: 0

      "I rather" s/b "I would rather"

      Sigh. No post-posting editing. Is it 1990 yet? Oh. Right. Slashdot. Sorry.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    2. Re:Opportunity by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I disagree; having them in a form that is almost certain to be abandoned soon is just practicing and developing short-term tool using skills instead of long-term ones. I'd rather be selecting regions by hand, because over time I get better at it.

    3. Re:Opportunity by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot. There are too many trolls for post editing to be easy. ;)

      My proposal is allowing postscripts to be added in an "edit" box below the post, but only for a few minutes. Then when you need a correction you can put s/foo/bar/ in the box, or whatever.

      It would take a couple hours to write the code, so I assume it would take slashdot a couple years to get it done. They wouldn't dare risk using volunteer labor. Too much opportunity for trolling.

      I'd also add a moderation: -1 Flipflop for people who want to add a postscript that flips the meaning of the post to troll people replying.

    4. Re:Opportunity by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

      Neither one precludes or reduces the quality of the other. And I assure you -- you can't do by hand what Viveza does by algorithm in any reasonably comparable length of time. I'm talking many, many hours to seconds. It's not just region selection. It's region selection with smart integration with other region selection, all of it cued to the varying characteristics of the region. It's like using a continuously variable region-to-region feather, along with a control-point-sensitive color key that does color and tone at the same time, while applying multiple types of non-destructive changes, which you can then drag around and the whole blinking thing re-calculates live.

      On second thought, you can't do this by hand at all.

      Look, I absolutely sympathize with skill building. I am very into photography, plus I have spent 20 years writing image processing algorithms, complex area selection tools, and unique (and all the standard) image layer modes. 70+ distinct modes to date. Non-destructive image modification is my specific "thing." I have to say that from my POV, Viveza is something I can't dismiss as "just another thingamajig I can replace with X series of by-hand operations. Could I do without it? Sure. But really, I wouldn't, given the choice. In fact, should it go away, I think I'd re-create it (and enhance it, heh) just for my own use. Only it wouldn't be a plug-in; I'd stick it right in my own software as an always-there and no-need-to-export-import tool.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    5. Re: Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. "I rather think ..." is a synonym for "I sorta think ..." "I rather see" is a synonym for both. No correction needed.

    6. Re:Opportunity by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      You can't do it by hand "at all" because you define "it" as being automated.

      I don't doubt that the tool is indispensable for you in your work flow. I've been doing photography since I was old enough to heft the camera. I started writing image processing tools in the 90s. It isn't my main work, but I do understand the tools.

      And I already understood the tools and types of algorithm when I said I'd rather do it by hand; I get good results. I don't finish and say, gosh, I just wasn't able to get that select the way I wanted. And that includes when it is complex; there are other ways to do it. There are in fact ways to paint the selection, and then merge those. The feature names are different in different apps, so I'm trying to stay generic in description.

      And in gimp if I need to base something on a calculation, there is a Perl interface and I can easily calculate and apply something by hand from a command line.

      Also, in my experience the longer you use a tool, the more you need it because you're used to doing it that way. That's why I think FLOSS evangelism is somewhat misplaced. People will only give alternatives a serious chance if they think their existing tool is falling short. If they're happy with it, why should they change?

    7. Re: Opportunity by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Sure. Unfortunately, however, that's not what I wrote.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    8. Re:Opportunity by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      And that includes when it is complex; there are other ways to do it.

      No. You can't do this by hand at all because in the work flow you are suggesting, you are either required to do as a correct operation the first time for each of the successive regional selections, or build them into distinct layers or scripted actions, and you can't conveniently, in fact trivially, modify anything/everything about those selections intuitively and interactively once they begin to interact with one another in any significant way. The effect of non-destructive change, when extended to multiple area selections computing blending set-logic/feathering/position/size as a live-and-change-anytime trivial user interface matter, is not something you can practically manage without this precise set of features, or better.

      I'll put it another way: What minor subset of what Viveza can do which can be done with the types of workflow you describe in, say, an hour, Viveza can pull off in seconds, and having done so, one is in no way committed to any aspect of that unless you want to be, no matter what else you do to the image within the context of Viveza.

      And in gimp if I need to base something on a calculation, there is a Perl interface and I can easily calculate and apply something by hand from a command line.

      Come on. Seriously now. Are you honestly thinking that is in ANY way comparable to real-time, non-destructive manipulation, trivial mousing of many complex regions with varying effects on and combination of brightness, contrast, saturation, hue, and a whole host of other variables? Because if you are, I can't possibly take you seriously. I've been writing Perl and Python since... well heck, about since they hit first release. I LOVE scripting. I make sure there is a scripting interface in every serious application I write. I am the primary author of what remains one of the most capable and complex image manipulation systems to hit the market to date (WinImages F/x+Morph), well beyond both Gimp and Photoshop in a very large number of capabilities from layering modes to live animation of everything from area selections to every setting of every one of a myriad of effects and processing options. Broad scripting support. I've designed and implemented a far more capable (and easier to use, and easier to write, and better integrated) plugin system than Photoshop/Lightroom has to offer. And WinImages is as different from Photoshop and Gimp as Photoshop and Gimp are different from each other, and not just because it's an older application, either. In addition, I'm building a similar vertical application targeted at DSLR image processing that I already can use more effectively than either Lightroom and Aperture, both of which I own, as well as having both the Gimp and Photoshop on the system, plus others. And I'm telling you, in that context, that there is NO way you can do, via scripting, what Viveza does, with those tools. Not without actually recreating the complete set of Viveza's high level features as a holistic system and then trivially launching that from the script itself.

      In my software, WinImages F/x (and my DSLR app, presently unreleased), there are layer modes that apply similar processes as to what Viveza does; Photoshop's "adjustment layers" can also do a (very) little bit of this. Once those layers are set up, you can (comparatively clumsily) shift those layer modifications around, and they wil re-blend, and they can be changed as to effect, feathering, etc., though it takes quite a few small steps to do when there's more than one of them.

      In terms of smooth and easy accomplishment of what you actually want to do, Viveza destroys that model of image manipulation with its specific paradigm. Just destroys it.

      If they're happy with it, why should they change?

      Happiness and c

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  5. Discontinued... for desktop, probably not critical by fyngyrz · · Score: 2

    Just keep in mind that "killed off" doesn't mean "I can't use it any longer" in the case of a desktop tool. I've been using these for years and will continue using them for years without any concern at all about what Google, or Nik before them, might do or not do with future versions, marketing, or availability.

    For web products, certainly. But these aren't that, or at least, the versions I have that I bought from Nik aren't that. I suppose they could have mutated?

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  6. Not really exactly by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    Nik isn't a photo editing suite, it is a suite of Photoshop filters (pro quality) that let you add effects to photos.

    Without Photoshop, they're useless.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Not really exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This isn't true. You can run the majority of the apps standalone from their exe files. I actually set up Picasa back in the day with custom buttons to send images to the Nik Collection for editing. It's a well propagated story that they need another app to run them, but it's not true.

    2. Re:Not really exactly by bricko · · Score: 1

      They work with Photoshop Elements and Lightroom

  7. Today... by s1d3track3D · · Score: 1

    Of course, since we are a larger corporation, we haven't notified everyone internally yet... http://imgur.com/WfJuPUw

  8. I don't see the problem... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    In other words, they dont want to support or develop it any more and now they can point to the Free price tag for justification.

    And what is the problem with this? You would prefer they keep it closed source even as their own interest in it ramps down?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:I don't see the problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's still closed-source. It's now free-to-use though.

    2. Re:I don't see the problem... by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      He didn't express a "problem" with it, he offered an analysis of the meaning that uses clearer words instead of PR-speak.

      Understanding should be among the first steps, and well before the formation of opinion.

  9. Re:Discontinued... for desktop, probably not criti by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Normally for mobile apps, which also run locally, google pushes out updates that lock in the eventual shutdown before they announce it.

    If you have an old pre-google desktop version... keep a backup. :)

  10. PhotoShop Plug-in support? by westlake · · Score: 1

    Which widely available, free or low-cost photo editors, will support these plug-ins with a minimum of hassle? I am thinking of programs like Paint.NET, Paint Shop Pro.