Slashdot Mirror


Court Stops FCC's Latest Attempt To Lower Prison Phone Rates (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Prison phone companies have convinced a court to halt new rate caps on inmate calling for the second time this month. The first stay was issued March 7 and prevented the FCC from implementing new rate caps of 11 cents to 22 cents per minute on both interstate and intrastate calls from prisons. But the stay -- which remains in place while the prison phone companies' lawsuit against the FCC is still pending -- did not disturb an earlier "interim" cap of 21 cents to 25 cents per minute that applied only to interstate calls, those that cross state lines. The order also didn't specifically object to the FCC changing its definition of "inmate calling service" to include both interstate and intrastate calls. Seizing on this ambiguity, the FCC decided that it could impose the interim caps on both interstate and intrastate calls. But prison phone companies Securus Technologies, Global Tel Link (GTL), and Telmate all asked the federal appeals court to stop the caps from being applied to intrastate calls. A court order issued Wednesday sided with the prison phone companies, saying that "petitioners have satisfied the stringent requirements for a stay pending court review." As a result, the interim rate caps will still apply only to interstate calls.

197 comments

  1. Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're allowed access to their finances? Does this create a rift in equality? Why don't they just get an allotment of minutes?

    1. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because the for-profit prison industry wouldn't make as much money that way.

    2. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      They probably work for 10-cents an hour making license plates...

    3. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Money? Just like on the outside, prostitution and drug sales.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because the for-profit prison industry wouldn't make as much money that way.

      When prisons are designed to be for profit, then humans are the fuel for capitalism.

      And an Orwellian society is the end result to ensure there is enough fuel to feed that fucking flavor of capitalism that should have never existed in the first place.

    5. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're allowed access to their finances?

      They are often able to call collect. When my brother was in prison (for assaulting a police officer) he called me collect several times. Inmates are usually able to work in prison industries for pay. Some prisons do manufacturing. My brother learned how to operate a metal lathe and vertical mill while doing time. Some prisons even run call centers.

      Does this create a rift in equality?

      Prison is already very unequal.

      Why don't they just get an allotment of minutes?

      Then the prison has no incentive to keep the phone system operational, and the inmates will have less incentive to work.

    6. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The rest are still "for profit" because inmate labor saves the states millions upon millions of dollars in wages every year. Litter cleanup, pothole crews, hospital laundry, furniture construction, all of this is done by prisoners. In some cases it's contracted out to private industry and the state makes good money, there are prison laundries that process hotel linens for example. The inmates are paid pennies per hour, if that, and the state reaps the benefits.

    7. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Informative

      Instead of a minimum wage, they have a maximum wage (around $4/hr average). But the average wage is 93 cents/hr and the lowest is 16 cents.

      So a cheap phone call at a discount rate of only $10/minute, they can talk to family for a few minutes a week. And that is only if they're not being extorted by other inmates for the money.

    8. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Replying anonymously because I'm modding in this thread.

      For my friend behind bars, she relies on friends to add money to her account through JPay, a convenient service that takes another 5-10% or more off the top whenever you deposit into the inmate's account.

      Until my friend was imprisoned, I had NO IDEA how pervasive rent-seeking and profiteering was in the prison system. It really is a nightmare.

    9. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by KGIII · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Replying anonymously because I'm modding in this thread.

      There's a reason why one doesn't post in threads they moderate. They list this reason - as I recall. (I stopped moderating a long time ago. I'd rather speak than decide what others should or should not read.) At any rate, they designed the system that way for a reason - I'd like to think it's a valid reason. Disrupting the game, by changing the rules, just seems low. I lack a better word. Low, lowly, pathetic? They all work.

      If you don't like the rules, don't play the game. Don't take it personal, you're not the only "sneaky" person.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by SumDog · · Score: 5, Informative

      They get some money from their families. There are limits on what they can give inmates. They can also earn money from working in programs. American Flags are made in women's low security correctional facilities where they are paid $2 an hour.

      Prison is the only form of slavery explicitly allowed by the US constitution. But it's not the only form of slavery. The other is a form of voluntary indentured servitude. It's called the military.

    11. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 1

      Oh. I guess that makes it all right, then.

      --
      Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
      Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
    12. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      I mean, the system is expressly designed so that one is allowed to post anonymously and not lose mod status on a post, so I'm not sure it's so underhanded. Personally, I do think that's enough of a barrier so as to prevent the negative outcomes of being able to moderate and be moderated in the same thread (aka the Reddit Effect). Anyways, their droplet of insight was appreciated, so I'm okay with it. All that being said, I do applaud your vigilance.

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    13. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by colinwb · · Score: 1

      From what I remember of the moderating system, if someone is logged in and has moderated in a thread and then tries to make a post in the same thread they are given two options:
      (1) make the post with their user name visible and all their moderation in the thread is cancelled
      (2) make the post anonymously leaving their moderation in the thread unchanged
      I assume it would be simple to (3) prevent a logged in user posting in a thread even anonymously, so if my memory about (2) is correct I conclude it is intentional to allow a moderator to post anonymously in a thread that they've moderated, perhaps because (4) from a practical viewpoint they can unlogin and post anonymously anyway.
      So I don't think it's particularly "sneaky" to moderate and post (anonymously) in the same thread, and it's arguably not sneaky at all if you're upfront about it, as the parent was. If you don't like it you can just ignore the upfront and anonymous comment, or you can treat it more or less as you would any other anonymous comment, that is on its intrinsic merits (or dismerits).
      Or you can argue for and convince the site administrators to implement (3) - if they have not already done so - and rely on the inconvenience of (4) to reduce its impact.
      (Aside, for what it's worth, I usually find your posts interesting, even if I were to disagree with one on the basis of personal expertise.)
      So, having said that, I'm now going to try to post this, and on this occasion (but not necessarily on all occasions) I'm going to choose option (1) if I'm given it.
      So: the first thing that happened is I get this message: "If you continue to post this comment, all moderations done to this discussion will be undone! Are you sure you want to post?"
      Which raises doubts in my mind as to whether I'm going to be given option (2) even if I don't want to use it.

    14. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by colinwb · · Score: 1

      Well, for the sake of completeness I was - I think - given option (2) of posting anonymously, so it's arguable that moderating and then posting anonymously while being logged in isn't breaking the rules, or at least the rules as implemented.

    15. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That's like saying it's not sneaking to steal a cookie from the cookie jar 'cause they left it open and unguarded. Sheesh.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    16. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Just like I said to the other one, that's like justifying taking a cookie from the cookie jar because someone was naive enough to leave it unguarded or not cynical enough to distrust the "honor system." Sheesh...

      It's like cheating at "Old Maid." Against a kid. While you're the adult.

      Well, maybe not that bad but still... You get the idea. Or not. Maybe not.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    17. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's like saying it's not sneaking to have a cracker instead of a cookie, if the sign says "both are free, but cookies are only for people who didn't have any chocolate" and you had chocolate earlier.

      I modded you down (because you're bogus, but also as a test), and am posting anonymously so I could see what the text looks like. It says "all moderation will be undone" but you can check the box instead and the warning goes away. It can only be intentionally designed that way; presumably the point is that ACs who can also mod can't mod themselves higher than the +1 they were going to have anyway. I'll mod myself up to check :)

    18. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And of course I forgot you can't mod in a discussion you've already posted in, so never mind.

      Point is... the people who designed moderation aren't stupid, and the system hasn't changed in a long time but still works great. I'm inclined to believe that any emergent property - such as this - is at least partly the reason for the system's success rather that something that can just be corrected. Nobody seems to be 100% why Slashdot's moderation system is so much better than anyone else's, and the few attempts I know of to pick and choose parts of it haven't worked well. I can only assume it's the whole thing.

    19. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by guises · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then the prison has no incentive to keep the phone system operational, and the inmates will have less incentive to work.

      Okay, this is just bullshit. They don't need extra "incentive" to keep the prison operational, that's their job. And dangling basics in front of prisoners and calling it "incentive to work" is just slavery by a different name. It's fine for prisoners to learn a trade, it helps a great deal with recidivism, but it's not something that you can force on a person.

      Not to mention that most of those prison industries aren't about teaching a trade at all, they're mostly just about the slave labor.

    20. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      The fix to this may be to stop paying attention to ACs. After all, they are cowards.

      Save for those who moderate and then post anonymously. They are cheats. You can figure out why that was frowned upon, and why it's impossible to stop.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    21. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Inmates have small accounts with the facility which they can feed from their 12-42 cent/hour jobs, or, if they're fortunate, with gifts from friends on the outside.
      They can spend the money on phone calls or items from the prison commissary, for example toothpaste, stamps, and vitamins.
      The last time I looked, the Federal system was charging inmates 6 cents per minute to make _collect_ calls. In other words, to talk to your children for five minutes, you'd have to work two and a half hours at one of the entry-level jobs, or most of an hour at a skilled trade.

    22. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      If you slammed a steel bar through your skull, you wouldn't care so much about the posting habits of others. And, if I should happen to be wrong about that, it's OK, because you'd be dead. It's a win for society either way!

    23. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Two dollars an hour is the rarefied elite of pay ranges. The Unicor factory jobs which pay that much have waiting lists of more than a year to get into one.

    24. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by uncqual · · Score: 3, Informative

      At least in the state I live, no prisoner is required to work. They choose to. Apparently even prisoners would rather work to keep themselves busy and to earn some luxuries. Seems like a win-win. Besides, it's career training for one of the many jobs for making license plates after they get out. Oh, wait...

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    25. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      They then split that 5-10% with the prison administration.
      See http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06...

    26. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by uncqual · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Making social phone calls is a privilege, not a right, in prison. It's not a "basic". Food is a basic, air is a basic, basic medical care is a basic. Social phone calls are not a basic, Snicker's bars are not a basic, TVs in cell are not a basic.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    27. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by penguinoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But odds are, encouraging socialization (such as by giving them free phone service), especially with non-prisoners, and their family and friends, would decrease recidivism. In which case free phone service for prisoners would pay for itself a thousand-fold.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    28. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a rule I only give serious consideration to ACs as everyone else is usually either a sycophant or a narcissist co-dependent with others of his ilk.

    29. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by ultranova · · Score: 2

      And dangling basics in front of prisoners and calling it "incentive to work" is just slavery by a different name.

      "Workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!"

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    30. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afaik, in prison work is not about learning trade. They are simple menial works that does not teach them anything practical, but gives them something to do and they earn a little money of it (I think they earn below minimum wage rate or something like that). It is better then being iddle with all the consequences that comes with people being too iddle for too long, but it is not learning trade.

    31. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by jargonburn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      decrease recidivism. In which case free phone service for prisoners would pay for itself

      And where is the incentive for the prison industry to decrease recidivism? I don't refer to the people "in charge". Politically, there are points to be scored by underlining successful reformations; however, there are so many more points to be scored through PROFITS.

    32. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      There's no reason to think that the powers that be want people to not post anonymously in threads they've moderated. The idea is simply to not give people their automatic +2 score visibility in threads they've moderated. If you want to post as an AC with a 0 score, then that's good, and you'll be modded up if your post is worth seeing.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    33. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Absolutely, in this day and age of free phone calls via skype over the internet, it would be trivial to allow skype calls for nearly free to home.

      $120 a month for a couple internet lines and a couple cheap tablets hard wired to only skype and watched over by guards.

      Our prison industry is sick. We have the highest rate of incarceration in the free world (and actually higher than most of the unfree world too).

      It's sickening.

      The prison industry pays (lots of) money to
      a) criminalize activites that were not illegal before.
      b) extend prison sentences
      c) keep things illegal which should be legal

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    34. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by johanw · · Score: 1

      "We have the highest rate of incarceration in the free world"

      Free world? The US is one of the more unfree countries in this world. This is one of the issues that makes the US unfree. Except when you have lost of money of course, but that holds for most countries.

    35. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by dywolf · · Score: 0

      oh that makes it ok then.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    36. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the prison has no incentive to keep the phone system operational

      Last I heard some prisons kept the phones close to failing. They billed for each started minute and got more money if the prisoners had a call interrupted several times or had issues understanding the other end. Bad service beats good service in this case since there is no way to switch provider.

    37. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you're adding an anonymous comment that gets modded to +4, I would say the anonymous reply added value. I'm a different AC for the same reason. I don't want to undo my moderation. The rule assumes that posting and moderating somehow creates a conflict of interest, but that's only true if winning an argument is more important to you than gaining insight.

    38. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      As someone with a family member who's been locked up in a place with one of these systems, I can tell you: It's a racket.

      A third party has to set up an account for the inmate, with a minimum deposit, usually $60+. They then have to provide one or more phone numbers that the inmate is authorized to call "collect," or what they call "prepaid collect." The rates seem to start at about $0.75/min. So for $30, which is about the price of an unlimited cellular calling plan, they get about 40 minutes of talk time. And I'll spare you the logistical nightmares of getting this all set up, but suffice it to say that it's probably easier to sneak in a cell phone.

    39. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by StikyPad · · Score: 2

      Hi, you must be new here.

      As per the Moderation page, the goals of moderation are:

      1. Promote Quality, Discourage Crap
      2. Make Slashdot as readable as possible for as many people as possible.
      3. Do not require a huge amount of time from any single moderator.
      4. Do not allow a single moderator a 'reign of terror'

      GP's anonymous post was clearly within those goals while, ironically, ours are driving the discussion off-topic.

    40. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They are cheats. ...or we recognize that the vast majority of conversation is not constructive to the point we're unsure of our own. If what we post is good content, it gets modded up, if not, no harm.

    41. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Inmates do not get the money for the calls - the person on the outside wishing to contact the inmate must make an account with a predetermined provider and prepay for the collect calls. There is no ability to chose a provider, you must give them significant personal information *including your SSN*, the cost is astronomical, and very much so is punitive to people at lower income levels. Ironic since the lower the income level, the higher the representation in the prison population.

    42. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work. Many people browse at +1 so they never see AC posts at all; you might as well not post AC because it just won't be seen.

      I have a simple solution for this vexing problem: I simply never moderate. The system is bullshit. SoylentNews fixed the problem, easily, ages and ages ago, using Slashdot's own code. You can't moderate in a *thread* you posted in, but you can still moderate and participate in an overall discussion simultaneously. Since every article's discussion can easily have dozens of threads, this more fine-grained approach is far more fair and seems to have completely eliminated all the complaints about this.

      As long as the system on this site remains unchanged, any complaints at all about "poor moderation" are invalid, AFAIC. You're reaping what you've sown.

    43. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference with military service (besides the fact that it's voluntary): it actually pays extremely well, at least for lower grades. You're not going to find a job in private industry that pays remotely as well as enlisting in the military, when you have only a high school diploma and no job skills. Heck, they even pay you extra for getting married!

    44. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      They do indeed have a "choice" between slavery and solitary confinement, but I don't consider that a real choice.

    45. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      We have the highest rate of incarceration in the world. No need for extra qualifiers, nobody else has ever matched our prisoners per capita in known history.

    46. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      It stretches into every aspect of the "justice" system. Just wait until your friend is on probation, they will have to pay for their probation officer, drug tests, and possibly an ankle monitor as well. Then if you fail a drug test you have to go to live-in rehab, which you have to pay for as well. Every aspect of the system is just another way to force you to pay more money to the system.

    47. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      They may not be required to work. But they are in a situation that is coercive by its very nature and they are offered incentives that make it appealing to work. Aside the fact that they get money for incidentals, they also get to escape a very boring prison life situation and at least do SOMETHING. And refusing work doesn't look good when you come in front of the parole board.

    48. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This should not be "Informative" - I am posting anon because I would for one of the mentioned companies. No facility has $10/min rates. Those do. not. exist.

      Now, some facilities are in states that allow commissions to be paid to the facilities - these calls are remarkably more expensive than calls from other facilities, but are typically in the $2-5 per /call/ (15-20 minutes typically) range (compared to 10 cents/min or much, much less at some DOCs).

      For perspective, my law-abiding daughter pays more per minute on her prepaid cell than inmates in some states pay.

      Calls where the inmate reverses the charges can be (sometimes much, much) more expensive, but this is also true if I call my family from a payphone at the airport collect.

      Be careful what you mod up simply because you like the sound of the rhetoric.

    49. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It's the internet... if there were some country... Outer Moldavia... that had a higher iincarceration rate, I was sure I'd here it.

      The way I phrased it, any correction would be more in the direction i wanted to go.

      on the internet, to find something out, never ask a question. The response will be crickets.

      Make a statement and people will rush to give you correct information.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    50. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Absolutely correct. Nothing wrong with moderating and then posting anonymously (or vice versa).

      Nothing sneaky about it either.

      And besides, from my personal experience it's an extreme edge case affecting less than 0.1% of my posts.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    51. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Pfft... That'd not kill me. I'm a superhero. I've even got my underpants on outside my pants to prove it.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    52. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you get these lines you draw between rights and 'privileges' (a term found nowhere in the Constitution btw)?

      Oh, that's right: You made it up in your head and argue it like it's self-evident to everyone.

      Typical statist.

    53. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by uncqual · · Score: 1

      Courts have ruled that medical care and nutrition in prison at the state's expense is required -- hence it is a "right" a prisoner has. Not so with social phone calls in most (any?) jurisdictions.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    54. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      How does that contrast with all the welfare people who will just do nothing if we give them a bare subsistence existence?

    55. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by uncqual · · Score: 1

      Court's have not declared that welfare is something that government must provide (i.e., that it is some sort of "right") to non-incarcerated individuals. We could wipe out all welfare, medicaid, the PPACA, SNAP, government rental assistance, Social Security, and Medicare etc. virtually overnight if the majority wanted to do so and there wouldn't be anything the courts could do about it if the legislation was carefully crafted (so there were no loopholes or ambiguities in the wording for freeloaders to exploit).

      Prisoners, being under the involuntary care of the state, do have additional "rights" to minimal living standards. Generally courts use the prohibition on "cruel and unusual punishment" to declare, for example, that a prisoner on death row has a right to a government funded liver transplant since he, obviously, can't pursue that medical care on his own on account of him being incarcerated.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    56. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by dywolf · · Score: 0

      I dunno.
      How do the laws of physics contrast with imaginary unicorns?
      (hint: your statement is the unicorn in this analogy)

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    57. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. I drew a good one out above though...

    58. Re: Where do inmates get money for calls? by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Let's not pretend we can do things the majority want. The majority would probably like to expand those programs, but we stuck by the crazy system that equates land with people when it comes to representation.

    59. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

      on the internet, to find something out, never ask a question. The response will be crickets. Make a statement and people will rush to give you correct information.

      So true.
      That does not, however mean that the information given is correct, but in this case I've looked into the numbers pretty thoroughly and am rather confident in my assertion.

    60. Re:Where do inmates get money for calls? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Yes... but your correction was more in the direction i wanted to go but was to tired to validate that as a true statement at the time.

      You have served me well, young padwan.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  2. I hear people need a service to relay calls.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Call this out of state number and it'll bounce back to your wife five miles from your current location!

    1. Re:I hear people need a service to relay calls.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Voice.

  3. State's rights is again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    used to enforce racism.

    1. Re:State's rights is again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Magic convenient solution that Liberals think is impossible: STOP COMMITTING CRIMES

    2. Re:State's rights is again... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Magic convenient solution that Liberals think is impossible: STOP COMMITTING CRIMES

      The best predictor of whether a child will grow up to be a criminal is blood lead levels. Black children have, on average, more than twice the lead levels as whites. Maybe we should be spending more on clean water and less on building prisons.

    3. Re:State's rights is again... by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about: stop making stupid things like drugs illegal? You want to talk conservative policies? Why does BIG GOVERNMENT get to come into my house and tell me what I can and cannot put in my own body?

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    4. Re:State's rights is again... by KGIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Black children have, on average, more than twice the lead levels as whites.

      Then stop shooting them! ;-)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    5. Re:State's rights is again... by geoskd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Magic convenient solution that Liberals think is impossible: STOP COMMITTING CRIMES

      Magic convenient solution that Conservatives think is impossible: STOP DEFINING RELIGIOUS TRANSGRESSIONS AS CRIMES

      Not everyone subscribes to your particular religion, and even if they did, making a crime out of drug use is actually making things worse by anyones definition.

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    6. Re:State's rights is again... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Has the Obama administration in any way reduced prosecution for drug trafficking or possession? He issues Executive Orders to refuse to enforce immigration laws, yet leaves federal drug enforcement intact.

      Is he somehow kowtowing to conservative policies?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    7. Re:State's rights is again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your "facts" have done more to disprove racism than mountains of SJW bullshit. +1 Interesting.

    8. Re:State's rights is again... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to prosecutors, yes apparently Obama is lax on drugs. He's also interfered a lot less in state-level legalizations of certain drugs than previous administrations.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    9. Re: State's rights is again... by rickb928 · · Score: 0

      But in what way is he lax on drug law enforcement.?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    10. Re:State's rights is again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that you don't exclusively associate states rights with racism. There's some who happen to believe that the tremendous growth of the federal government, at teh expense of the states, has upset the balance of power in this country.

      Here's an example: Donald Trump. Where will people's rights be when, in one swoop, a wanna-be dictator rides a wave of fear to the White House and, with a rubber stamp from a spineless congress, goes after Mexicans and Muslims?

      We let the federal government take all kinds of powers they're not supposed to have without widespread agreement and an amendment to the constitution. But nobody cares about that anymore, they'd rather ram their pet issue down everyone's throat with a 52 to 48% vote or even better a court case. It's not supposed to work that way. And I'm very afraid that one day we'll pay.

    11. Re: State's rights is again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are states where I can buy recreational drugs and yet there are no DEA agents arresting people for buying from these stores. That seems like the very definition of lax enforcement. If a parent knew their child was doing something illegal, but did nothing to stop it, wouldn't you call that lax parenting?

    12. Re:State's rights is again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck does this have to do with Obama?

      Dipshit.

    13. Re: State's rights is again... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      And it's your contention that Obama either instituted this policy or expanded it?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    14. Re:State's rights is again... by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      Maybe we need fewer laws to break. We can start by revoking all the victim less crimes, where they arrest you for hurting yourself.

    15. Re:State's rights is again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magical insight that never comes to authoritarian reactionaries: Criminals are humans too, and the worse you treat them, the more you exclude them, the worse they get, and the higher fences and more guards you'll have to pay for to protect your sick self and ill deserved gains.

    16. Re:State's rights is again... by currently_awake · · Score: 2

      American drug laws are not religion based, they are based on persecuting minorities by criminalizing their drug of choice. Alcohol and Heroin are comparable hard core drugs, but the drug commonly used by white skinned European ancestry Americans is legal.

    17. Re:State's rights is again... by fredrated · · Score: 1

      That's all, just stop committing crimes?
      Who knew. Next you will tell us to lose weight all we need to do is just STOP EATING.
      And to prevent abortions we just need to STOP HAVING SEX.
      God this is all so easy, why didn't anyone else think of this?

  4. Companies hate regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They really hate it when they get regulation on a 'captive' market.

    1. Re:Companies hate regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the free market in action. Tenders were invited, bids were made and contacts were signed. All perfectly legal.

    2. Re:Companies hate regulation by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it's not the free market. The people making the purchase didn't actually get to any involvement in choosing which service they got, and nor did they get perfect information about the choices available.

    3. Re:Companies hate regulation by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the people making the choice of provider are doing so with interests that are entirely contradictory to their own. Prison phone rates are one of the ways we fuck people over we've already incarcerated. And the best thing is recidivism rates go up the less contact people have with their families while in prison. So these polices increase recidivism.

      As an aside they are also a state contract that is VERY easy to turn into corrupt slush money with the selected contract phone company paying the selectors bribes. The entire prison phone system is corrupt and it should be regulated heavily with flat rate price limits based on independent studies of costs.

    4. Re:Companies hate regulation by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but then who said that prison was actually about rehabilitation?

    5. Re:Companies hate regulation by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      This is dictionary-definition cronyism, the exact opposite of a free market. If the market was free then the prisoners could get long-distance service from anybody willing to offer it and the rates for in-country calling would be pennies/minute or less.

      Wild guess - you're voting for Bernie. I've found people who don't understand basic economics tend to swing that direction.

    6. Re:Companies hate regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said prison was actually about justice?

    7. Re:Companies hate regulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prison may not be "about" rehabilitation, but as a society, we ought to think about it anyway. It's a lot cheaper to feed 20 prisoners than 30, after all. Every crime that isn't committed is one we don't have to investigate, try, and punish someone for.

      The goal of a justice system should be to prevent crime. Preventing escalation by retaliation of victims of crime is only part of it. Better if there wasn't an original crime to retaliate in the first place.

  5. Re:The religion of peace by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The "religion of peace" you're criticizing has 3 million followers in the United States. The people who argue with you know more about math than you do.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  6. Re:The religion of peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    So do Christians and Jews.

            Deuteronomy 17

            If there be found among you, within any of thy gates which the LORD thy God giveth thee, man or woman, that hath wrought wickedness in the sight of the LORD thy God, in transgressing his covenant; 17:3 And hath gone and served other gods, and worshipped them, either the sun, or moon, or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded; 17:4 And it be told thee, and thou hast heard of it, and enquired diligently, and, behold, it be true, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought in Israel; 17:5 Then shalt thou bring forth that man or that woman, which have committed that wicked thing, unto thy gates, even that man or that woman, and shalt stone them with stones, till they die.

  7. Marijuana, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This being the same "Interstate Commerce Clause" that the federal government has decided that it can use to regulate the growth and possession of marijuana for personal use "because there is interstate traffic in it and local production would impact that interstate traffic".

    Ha ha.

    AC

  8. These are not just inmates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In some areas like New York City, where, if one doesn't have the cash to make bail, they can wind up in jail for 2+ years waiting for a trial. This isn't hurting just the evil old convict that everyone loves to bash on, but people whose biggest crime is not making enough money. To boot, it doesn't just hurt the inmate, but family who has to keep cash on the books (and unless one is either gang affilated, or can kick ass, the first thing a new "fish" finds on entering Riker's is that he starts to owe people money because he is drawing air near them, and if those debts are not paid often, he gets a facial rearrangement or perhaps a few slashes or two to the face as a reminder who is in charge.)

    It doesn't take much to wind up in jail in NYC. Appearing a tad drunk can get one locked up, and by the time they appear in front of the judge, even the maximum punishment is already handed down via time served.

  9. Re:The religion of peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    38"This is the great and foremost commandment. 39"The second is like it, 'YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.' 40"On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets."

  10. Re:The religion of peace by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

    Neither math nor the number of Muslims living in the US has anything to do with this.

    Wanna bet?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  11. This is evil, and incompetence at so many levels by jopsen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Contact to family is important for prisoners, because reducing contact increases risk of ending up in prison again (this is a well documented fact)

    Prison administrators, state governments, all have interest in increasing prisons contact with family, why they allow this is beyond my imagination.
    Companies offering phone services really ought to not exploit prisoners who don't have any choices (it's simply plain evil - particularly when considering the risk they put those prisoners at).

    Why the FCC needs to be involved is beyond my understanding. Are all the prison administrators really that corrupt?

  12. Re:The religion of peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, not Gentile Christians. That is a very common mistake.

    "Therefore my judgment is that we should not trouble those of the Gentiles who turn to God, but should write to them to abstain from the things polluted by idols, and from sexual immorality, and from what has been strangled, and from blood." -- Acts 15:19-21

    See also: Noachide Laws

  13. Re:The religion of peace by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's a pretty strange slander-lation you got there. I went with a translation instead and found:

    And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah’s Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy.
    And if they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah. Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing.

    The context was that they were under attack and being threatened with death.

  14. Re:The religion of peace by Aighearach · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You must destroy it completely, both its people and its livestock.

    Nothing spreads evil faster than a goat who drank the sweet nectar of the Other Gods.

  15. working around the 14th amendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This country was founded on slavery and that damn 14th amendment put a damper on things, Thanks to the war on drugs, increasing prison sentences, and our privatized prison system, we're finally managing to make america great again!

    1. Re:working around the 14th amendment by merky1 · · Score: 2

      Huh, wah??? The country was in no way founded on slavery. It may have been a major consumer of slavery, but claiming a foundational need for slavery is a little odd, and pushing an agenda based on the talking points of a few self indulgent fat cats. If anything, you could move the needle closer to reality and consider the country founded on oppression, while not a "foundational" principle, it is how we have become who we are. From the indians, to slaves, to immigrants, the population is quick to take advantage of the weak, poor, and defenseless.

      If you want a better description, our country was founded by religious extremists exiled from their host countries. Kinda like ISIL, but with someplace unoccupied to go.

      --
      --WooooHoooo--
    2. Re: working around the 14th amendment by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      I mean, you even mention earlier in your comment that it wasn't exactly unoccupied . . .

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    3. Re:working around the 14th amendment by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The stupid in this comment hurts so much. I cannot believe that educated people hold these opinions, but here we are. I think a lot of what Leftists hate, they are just inventing themselves. It's a contest who can make the most ridiculous strawmen.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:working around the 14th amendment by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      I think a lot of what Leftists hate, they are just inventing themselves.

      Hyperbole, perhaps. However, the US has the higest prison polulation in the entire world by absolute numbers and the highest per capita at 700 per 100,000, i.e. 0.7%. If you compare to European countries you'll see rates clustered around 0.1%.

      Something is deeply rotten in a country calling itself "land of the free" that incarcerates very substantially more of its population than China.

      Make no mistake: the USAlike all other countries isn't perfect and this is one of it's most glaring flaws.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:working around the 14th amendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, neither Jefferson nor Washington were religious zealots however bother of the were slave owners and never freed a single slave during their lifetime. Jefferson even kept his own son as a slave.

      Our great founding fathers were slave owning assholes. As for slavery being acceptable at the time, the abolitionist movement was already under way, which is why the yankee states didn't have slaves didn't have slaves, and even had laws granting automatic freedom should a slave be kept in the state for more than a year.

    6. Re:working around the 14th amendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, the uneducated do tend to have a hard time following the educated.

  16. Re:The religion of peace by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    And the same God is worshiped by Christians, Jews, and Muslims. We're also not living in ancient Israel where the rule of law was weak and administered by kings or self appointed judges.

  17. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by chadenright · · Score: 1

    Yes, the prison administrators really are corrupt. These are the same administrators that already contract out convicts as slave labor.

  18. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the FCC needs to be involved is beyond my understanding. Are all the prison administrators really that corrupt?

    Yes. Anything they can do to make a buck. I've never done any time, and am generally law-abiding; but I think it's best to post AC because if I ever get in, no need to piss them off. Welcome to the land of the Free.

  19. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Greyfox · · Score: 3
    What? The whole POINT of the for-profit prison system is to maximize profits. Charging ridiculous rates for phone calls is clearly a win-win for them. If the prisoner happens to commit another crime and wind up back in prison, well, CHA-CHING!

    Don't like it? Well Bernie's promised to put an end to the for-profit prison industry. No one else seems to be campaigning on it.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  20. It's not a monopoly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if the prisoners don't like the phone company's terms, they can always vote with their feet. Oh, wait.

  21. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Companies offering phone services really ought to not exploit prisoners..."

    Why do you hate capitalism?

  22. Why is long distance still a thing? by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    Cellphones, VoIP, and even cable company's phone (albeit it is a monthly flat rate) have done away with pay per minute long distance. Why not these companies?

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    1. Re:Why is long distance still a thing? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because they are literally holding their customers prisoner and give them no choice in using the service.

    2. Re:Why is long distance still a thing? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Why not these companies? Err... The distinct lack of competition, perhaps? It's not like they can just meander down to the store and sign up for a better plan or buy a pay-as-you-go phone.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:Why is long distance still a thing? by SumDog · · Score: 1

      Correct, very correct, usage of the word literally.

    4. Re:Why is long distance still a thing? by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      No, somebody else is literally holding them prisoner. They're a captive market, but they're not the captives of the market.

      Having a monopoly over a market of captives, doesn't make you their captor.

      Furthermore, it is the prison administrators who restrict their choice to the one company, not the company. The company just won the bid, they don't have the authority to decide if there will be a bid that goes to only one company.

      In fact, while the main thrust of the statement is correct, each part of the statement is literally incorrect.

    5. Re:Why is long distance still a thing? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      It's called a captive audience with no alternatives. Ideal scenario for a monopoly phone provider (who's paying the warden and prison commission) and exorbitant rates that the captive audience has no way to resist..

    6. Re:Why is long distance still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for creating such a eloquent example for the word hypocrite.

    7. Re:Why is long distance still a thing? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to include an idea with your insults. You said the word "hypocrite," but since you didn't point to any hypocrisy, I can only assume you don't know what the word means.

      Oh, maybe you thought that knowing factual details means you're advocating for some similar political position? Yeah. No.

  23. reality time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone think of a reason calls shouldn't be FREE? It costs next to nothing to offer comms services these days thanks to the internet. Costs orders of magnitude less than lighting... costs less than that bleach they slop across the floor every night...

    1. Re:reality time by KGIII · · Score: 1

      > Can anyone think of a reason calls shouldn't be FREE?

      Yes.

      Any more stupid questions?

      Or did you mean can anyone think of a 'good reason' why calls shouldn't be free? That's a whole other subject, of course. There are also lots of reasons why they might not want to make them completely free - starting with the lack of availability, security, and things of that nature. If they're free then everyone will want to be on the phone all the time.

      Somewhere between free and fucking retarded (which is the current situation) is probably a reasonable number.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:reality time by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Those same companies use the excuse that they record all those calls and allow prison guards to listen in in real time or recorded. They probably also have some system to block calls and/or very specific lists of what numbers a given prisoner can call.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re:reality time by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Can anyone think of a reason calls shouldn't be FREE?

      Think about their poor relatives who would be under pressure to spend all their time talking to them. Some family contact is good, but a needy excess would push people away and lead longterm to abandonment.

      It might not be the best metering system, but it isn't hard to come up with a mediocre reason why it might be good; and that's a much higher bar than you asked for!

      And... you think they give prisoners bleach for cleaning the floors?! LOL yeah they probably get razors to shave with, too, and a healthy balanced diet. Sorry, gotta go, it is almost time for me to wake up from my nap...

    4. Re:reality time by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Free doesn't mean infinite. Calls should be free, but limited in duration according to monitoring needs and availability.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    5. Re:reality time by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Um, that sounded like sarcasm to me. Apart from those on suicide watch/psychiatric lockdown (and possibly supermax type facilities for the very violent, but I'm not familiar with them), prisoners do get bleach when they're on cleaning details, and do get razors to shave with*. Healthy balanced diet not so much, which is why those other two seemed like sarcasm. Inmates on work details sometimes even have access to [gasp] box cutters and knives.. it's almost like they're people instead of animals!

      * - and the one suicide attempt I saw, the dude didn't even use the razor, he took apart a handheld radio from the commissary and sharpened some of the electronics on the inside. It would have worked too if the CO didn't notice so quick, dude lost A LOT of blood (which, by the way, inmates then cleaned up with bleach and one of those deadly soap balls).

    6. Re:reality time by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Um, that sounded like sarcasm to me.

      It certainly doesn't apply to all prisons, but if it is true sometimes then it is true. I didn't say it is always true, or imply that. They don't all get those things, that is for sure. Many are issued a razor entering the shower and give it back when leaving. Others only get an electric clipper cut from the barber.

      Inmates in NY sometimes get access to power grinders, which is a known fact, but they're really not supposed to have them.

  24. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

    You're that ninja...

    --
    Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
  25. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by KGIII · · Score: 2

    > Prison administrators, state governments, all have interest in increasing prisons contact with family, why they allow this is beyond my imagination.

    Two things...

    You have a shitty imagination and they're not interested in reducing recidivism. Gotta keep those beds full, it keeps the budget justified and growing. (The whole for-profit thing is an aside and not really important, all told, those are only less than 10% and, while retarded, they're not the driving force.)

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  26. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Bernie's position is noble, its sadly just another of his false promises.. Prisons are a state issue and responsibility, which he, even if elected president, even with a majority in all the houses, would have little influence over.

  27. Re:The religion of peace by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's a pretty strange slander-lation you got there. I went with a translation instead and found:

    Not only was his translation slanderous (I found the exact quote from a white supremacist web site), but the the section of the Koran he quotes is from a section that deals with a code of behavior for waging war when war is being waged against you.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  28. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by SumDog · · Score: 1

    American Flags are made in prisons by people paid $2 an hour. You like having your flag that says "Made in the USA." Remember, it's still made my slaves.

  29. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by SumDog · · Score: 0

    Exactly! People forget Sanders also talks about arming Jordanians, giving the "war back to them" and all that other Clinton/Obama bullshit. He is a war monger just like his predecessors. Nothing will be different under him. Obama never closed Gitmo, still bombed the fuck out of eastern states, faked a Bin Laden assassination, created ISIL/ISIS, passed Romney-care (which puts all the profits in the hands of for-profit health care) and has generally be just as evil and corrupt as every person behind him.

    False promises are a part of the deal. When a candidate promises to be pro-life, you're an idiot for voting down that line because the only way to change Roe vs Wade has nothing to do with the president; it requires either a new supreme court decision or a constitutional amendment.

  30. recidivism rates by OrangeTide · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think if a particular prison's recidivism rates are too high, that they should not be permitted to charge more than 1 cent per minute.

    If a prison is successful, then they should be permitted more leeway in how they operate.

    Of course allowing prisoners to have more frequent contact with family members, has been shown to improve a convict's chances of staying out of prison when they get out.

    (excellent rates for recidivism would be anything under 20%, typical in a US prison is 70%)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:recidivism rates by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Rehabilitation is explicitly not part of the job of US prisons.

      A lot, maybe even the majority, of citizens have become confused about that; I blame television police and law dramas.

      In the old days, the citizens understood that the purpose was to punish people. There was never any change of law where it switched to rehabilitation. That never happened. And yet, people's perception of what exists shifted somehow. But the institutional goals did not.

    2. Re:recidivism rates by Firethorn · · Score: 2

      In the old days, the citizens understood that the purpose was to punish people. There was never any change of law where it switched to rehabilitation. That never happened. And yet, people's perception of what exists shifted somehow. But the institutional goals did not.

      Actually, rehabilitation was always a design goal. The founding fathers even developed a number of prisons that, religious focus aside, would have been considered progressive even today. We're talking about things like each prisoner being assigned a 'counselor' to work with the prisoner, and each counselor having no more than 3 prisoners assigned to him. There were education opportunities - both basic and occupational.

      Much of this was lost in the 70-80s time period as crime rates skyrocketed and subsequently prison populations exploded as not only did we start sending more people to prison, we sent them for longer periods of time. It didn't help that, with the loss of what reform programs we had, that recidivism rates shot up and we got this brain bug that these people couldn't be 'saved', IE reformed.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:recidivism rates by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It's not cost effective to operate a system that only punishes people and lacks any way to break the cycle.
      Wasting money because that's how things were always done is not a good reason to keep doing the same thing.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    4. Re:recidivism rates by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The idea was that punishing people would cause them to "learn not to do it" because of being punished, but that doesn't mean that it was a design goal to "rehabilitate" the prisoner.

      As far as the founding fathers go, they didn't actually do anything other than ban "cruel and usual punishment." But lets be clear; that in preference of standard punishment, not some other thing than pure punishment.

    5. Re:recidivism rates by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Right, right, but unless somebody goes and changes all the laws and regulations about how to run prisons, then it is neither cost effective or realistic to want or expect them to be run differently.

      Wasting money because the law says so it entirely sustainable, regardless of efficiency, because they are given money to operate. They aren't asked to break even. How can people even tell the difference?

    6. Re:recidivism rates by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Okay, first. The founding fathers were important politicians of their day. They did far more than write and sign the constitution.

      Second, even in their day, they knew that vocational training helped. Please note that if you read the links that 'reform' in this case is often more pushed by the desire to do better than the knowledge of how to actually do so.
      Auburn system - "Whigs favored this system because it promised to rehabilitate criminals by teaching them personal discipline and respect for work, property, and other people.", developed during the 1820s.
      Benjamin Rush was an advocate for prison reform.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    7. Re:recidivism rates by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Right, right, but unless somebody goes and changes all the laws and regulations about how to run prisons, then it is neither cost effective or realistic to want or expect them to be run differently.

      There is no evidence to support your position.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    8. Re:recidivism rates by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      "The Auburn system (also known as the New York System) is a penal method of the 19th century in which persons worked during the day in groups and were kept in solitary confinement at night, with enforced silence at all times."

      "Rush deemed public punishments such as putting a person on display in stocks, common at the time, to be counterproductive. He proposed instead private confinement, labor, solitude, and religious instruction for criminals. In addition he opposed the death penalty."

      Right. None of that contradicts anything I said.

    9. Re:recidivism rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It costs about $25k a year to keep people in Jail, Solitary runs upwards of $75k. Are you telling me this is the best way to spend funds?

      We would in most cases be far better off just giving them the money.

      Sir, for stealing food to support your crack habit, I give you:
      -$25k dedicated income till your cleared by a medical Doctor of your habit and have established one year of gainful employment
      -Free Vocational training and/or College
      -Paid community service (see point 1)
      -Free medical care

      This is a system I can trust in!

    10. Re:recidivism rates by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Rehabilitation is explicitly not part of the job of US prisons.

      Hmm...maybe it should be?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    11. Re:recidivism rates by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my own personal opinion is that some sort of "re-education camp" is a good idea if it is being used for real criminals.

      The places that send political prisons to that sort of place has given the whole idea a bad name.

      But it seems like 10 years of brainwashing them to be a better person would be more useful than just 10 years of punishment, victimization at the hands of their peers, and the resulting hardening of their attitudes and personalities.

      I'd want to reduce the guard tower setup, reduce the unstructured personal contact, increase the monitoring, and put a real focus on having psychologically trained staff monitoring the details of their interactions and life and trying to figure out what brainwashing they need.

      And I'd also want to take the drug addicts out of the prison in many cases, and use a civil process to put them in an inpatient hospital instead. And maybe just give them free drugs, but they can't even apply to exit the facility unless they've got some amount of time clean. If they're violent, they get sent back to the prison and no more free drugs. That would keep security costs fairly low, if done right.

    12. Re:recidivism rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if anyone is stealing food to support their crack habit. They are usually stealing things to trade/sell for crack or more commonly meth.

      If getting off drugs and having a stable jobs means they aren't as likely to go back to prison that sounds pretty good. If they make enough money they might even have to start paying taxes too.

    13. Re:recidivism rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is rehabilitation if not learning not to behave so badly that the rest of us need to cage you for our protection?

  31. beware dahak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MSG version:

    If you find anyone within the towns that God, your God, is giving you doing what is wrong in God’s eyes, breaking his covenant by going off to worship other gods, bowing down to them—the sun, say, or the moon, or any rebel sky-gods—look at the evidence and investigate carefully. If you find that it is true, that, in fact, an abomination has been committed in Israel, then you are to take the man or woman who did this evil thing outside your city gates and stone the man or the woman. Hurl stones at the person until dead.

    This passage surely describes the evil one.

  32. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    American Flags are made in prisons by people paid $2 an hour. You like having your flag that says "Made in the USA." Remember, it's still made my slaves.

    Wow! They have an exclusive contract for all American flags made in America? And such a terrible thing not to pay murderers and rapists union wages. IT'S A TRAVESTY!

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  33. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Is it corruption if the money goes to the institution and not into the administrator's pockets? The firms that gouge prisoners offer "facility commissions" to share their revenue with the prisons.
    JPay has been reported to entertain wardens lavishly, but I haven't heard of actual bribery.

  34. Re:The religion of peace by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whoosh.

    The OP pointed out that the Qur'an has passages that call for a violent response to non-believers. The GP was pointing out that the Old Testament/Torah have passages that call for the same thing.

    There are billions of followers of the three major Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam.) Only a tiny (and IMHO, deluded) fraction of them subscribe to violence as a way to advance their cause.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  35. Re:The religion of peace by davester666 · · Score: 0

    You drank it too? Man, that stuff tastes GREAT! Where can I get more?

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  36. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When a candidate promises to be pro-life, you're an idiot for voting down that line because the only way to change Roe vs Wade has nothing to do with the president; it requires either a new supreme court decision or a constitutional amendment.

    Who appoints supreme court justices?

  37. The elephant in the room by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see nobody has any actual experience dealing with prison calls. It's all the usual claptrap that people have heard somewhere online and are repeating. Long ago I used to work for a company that collected past-due phone bills. It was mundane work, just call them and remind them they're overdue, will be cut off from the carrier if they don't pay by a certain date, etc. Nothing threatening or weird. Once in a while we would get a batch of jail calls, all made collect from the jailhouse phones. The reaction on these was different. Usually the person who answered was a woman, and more than once she was relieved that we would be cutting her off from these calls.

    She couldn't pay for them anyway, and the man inside didn't give a shit. He was bored, or controlling, and would call again and again. I had the call records and the guy would call for 15 minutes, get automatically cut off, call again, and again, and again. Day after day after day. Something the "they neeeed to talk to their faaaamilies!!!" crowd apparently has totally failed to consider. Maybe their families don't want to talk to them because they're horrible manipulative evil people who belong in prison.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:The elephant in the room by wbr1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      These women have the choice and freedom to decline the calls. I was in virginia prison for a decade. There are people who prey on a caring wife/mother etc wasting money with constant calls. These are a small portion and your view is biased by your job in only seeing those that went to collection. I knew far more people that called rarely due to high rates, or sent some of their extremely low inmate pay to family to!cover costs of calls. In Virginia formexample inmate pay was 0.23 to 0.45 per hour inluess youhad an industry job. Those could go up to 2 per hour and were very limited, IE hard to get.
      As for myself, I almost never called as my main contact, my mother, moved to England, and international calls were not allowedexcept from a staff phone, prepaid with supervision. I didn't care!about the supervision, but none of the staff knew or were willing to help with this
      Make no mistake, prisons phones arema profiteering racket, so is prison medical, commissary, industry.. Corruption is incredibly rampant, so is regulatory capture and more...

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    2. Re:The elephant in the room by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      They don't have the freedom to decline the calls. Women were relieved that I was cutting them off. I could see the bill details - totalling hundreds of dollars, calls day after day. If she cut him off, there would be consequences. But if I, the evil bill collector did it, it was out of her control and therefore OK. I think you need to check your misogyny and do some reading on feminist issues.

      Who said anything about it not being a screwjob? Obviously it is, jeez stick to the topic.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:The elephant in the room by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Long ago I used to work for a company that collected past-due phone bills.

      So the details you remember from long ago support your political beliefs. How strange.

      Once in a while we would get a batch of jail calls, all made collect from the jailhouse phones.

      You do realize you could simply disallow or limit collect calls from jail?

      The elephant in the room is GOP. It's the right wing that's causing this problem, and most others.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    4. Re:The elephant in the room by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do. You always have the option of declining a collect call. I never once received a call from my brother when he was in prison that wasn't collect. I asked him why and he wasn't able to make any other kind of call. No problem. I never realized he was also getting charged for the phone call on top of what I was paying. It makes a lot more sense now why the calls were so rare.

      It seems as though you're implying someone would somehow "enforce" her acceptance of the calls. If so, that, like the previous poster said, is a very small portion of the calls being made. As previous poster said, yes it probably happens but it's far from the normal situation no matter what your experience with it is.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    5. Re:The elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have the freedom to decline the calls. Women were relieved that I was cutting them off. I could see the bill details

      Most likely the women were just part of an abusive relationship and needed an excuse to cut contact. There are better ways than forcing huge bills on people with working relationships.

    6. Re:The elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phrase 'had no choice' is used as incorrectly as 'literally' these days.

      They absolutely have the freedom and ability to decline calls. They may not like the repercussions it's likely not an easy choice - but the choice is most definitely theirs. This has nothing to do with misogyny or feminist issues and everything to do with someone pressing 1 to accept or 2 to decline.

      If that's too hard, I don't care what gender you are but you need to learn to adult better. To further underline my point, you didn't excuse any men who had large charges from inmate collect calls. Apparently men are expected to do this but women aren't?

  38. Re:The religion of peace by vux984 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Grow the fuck up.

    That's Quran 8:59-60. (and a very 'opportunisitic' transalation too,
    Quran 8:61 (ie... the VERY next sentence)

    "And if they incline to peace, then you (also) incline to it, and put (your) trust in Allah".

    Talk about twisting a passage to suit your bullshit.

    It essentially says "if you are attacked muster all your forces to defend yourselves, but make peace with those that come in peace".

    Seriously... that's about as American as apple pie.

  39. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . Nothing will be different under him.

    What? You think the Jordanians and Syrians are going to stop fighting because some rich people, on a different continent, elected a new leader? The US already funds the rebels in Syria; as always to help the militants they like, kill the militants they don't like. What's the alternative: Desert the country and hope some Taliban or ISIL/ISIS faction doesn't take power? It's a "dammed if you do, dammed if don't" situation, requiring a flexibility in diplomacy the USA has never understood and can never achieve.

    ... passed Romney-care ...

    It was a shitty deal that was better than the alternative. How about you blame the Democrat politicians who supported privatization more than uniform healthcare, or the Republican politicians who blocked every political policy he offered?

    Obama never closed Gitmo ...

    Obama never had that power, so once again, blame your politicians. More important, Obama never promised to end the water-boarding , it was just assumed. He also never promised to give prisoners their day in court. It was a feel-good promise that didn't help the prisoners, and in reality, he couldn't effect.

    ... False promises are a part of the deal.

    So whining about it won't help. What the USA needs is a tool to move the political discourse away from vote-buying,corporate subservience and screaming "Nazi" every time a politician disagrees with the politically conservative dogma that has ruled the USA for the 70 years.

    ... requires either a new supreme court decision ...

    The US supreme court also doesn't offer a lot of flexibility in their job. They tend to make one-size-fits-all mandates even when the outcome is nonsensical. The politicians have moved past this decision, although you are free to make it a election issue.

  40. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Senate.

  41. Re:The religion of peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how many of them would prefer Shari'a to be the law of the land?

    All muslims are terrorists when none speak against the so-called "evil minority."

    but hey, nothing to lose your head over, right?

  42. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    I agree that it's in the interest of authorities to make it as easy as possible for these guys to communicate with family, both for eventual rehabilitation, but also for law-enforcement intel gathering.

    "really ought to not exploit prisoners who don't have any choices"
    Well, their first choice was not to commit a crime and go to prison, don't you think?

    --
    -Styopa
  43. family gets burner phone from next state over by yodleboy · · Score: 2

    seems if family went to next state and got a burner phone with an out of state number, then inmate could call that line and save $$. At the jacked up rates for in-state calls, it would probably pay for itself in 5 minutes.

    1. Re:family gets burner phone from next state over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. Re:The religion of peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job on quoting only part of something and completely failing to understand it.

    Meanwhile, later in the Bible...

    Colossians 2:13, 14:

    13 Furthermore, though you were dead in your trespasses and in the uncircumcised state of your flesh, God made you alive together with him. He kindly forgave us all our trespasses 14 and erased the handwritten document that consisted of decrees and was in opposition to us. He has taken it out of the way by nailing it to the torture stake.

    The Jews proved long ago that they were unwilling to follow the law, which is why they were rejected by God. Jesus fulfilled the law, so it no longer applies. That means Christians are under no obligation to that law. The Mosaic law, however "silly" you think it was, is not an actively observed code of conduct by anyone anymore. Unlike the Koran, which has millions of active followers for the insane things it actually says.

  45. re: prisons / slavery by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I don't know that I agree with equating prison with slavery?

    First off, if you're paid *anything* as compensation for doing a job, it's not slavery anymore, by definition. Second, I'm not sure that prison has a requirement of doing these jobs? It sounds to me like they're voluntary .... with inmates waiting in line for opportunities to do them because they'd rather have a little bit of money than nothing at all.

    None of this means I support the high cost of making phone calls from a prison. Personally, I suspect that's just legal extortion on the part of the companies who came up with the whole system -- and eventually, it will get overturned by the court system. (There's no free marketplace here where prisoners can choose their favorite phone carrier to get the best rates. It's clearly a monopoly, and as such, needs to be regulated to ensure it's not charging above a fair market price for the service rendered.)

    But just saying .... it's disingenuous to label prison labor as "slavery". Every one of those inmates was original a citizen with all of the rights and freedoms that came with it. They did things to violate the rights of others around them in order to wind up where they are, with many of those rights stripped away.

  46. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope.

    The President nominates, and with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoints Supreme Court Justices. It's in the Constitution, dude. Read it.

  47. Watching America fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In America, if you are the type of person living paycheck to paycheck, you are penalized for your poverty by what's called bounced check fees. In the dark ages, people would write paper checks to draw on their bank accounts. Since their was no technical means for the validity of that check to be verified, banks would punish people who write bad checks with a fee that would cover the cost of processing such checks. At first it was a service fee, then it was a punitive fee, then it became a very profitable means of gouging poor people.

    In the 21st century, with the advent of debit cards, if a poor person visits a store and swipes their card and there isn't enough money, the account is instantly verified for funds and the card user is penalized a bounced check fee even though no transaction took place and the bank is simply punishing the card user for being poor.

    Since the poor person can't afford legal representation, the bank can start what becomes a downward spiral for that person. Wealthier people who have proper credit cards almost always can have the charge removed if they make a mistake after a phone call.

    It's a vicious tax on the poor which has caused many people to lose hope and simply forgo any hopes of ever breaking even.

    On another note, America does not have a correctional system like civilized countries do.

    1) America has a penal system, not a correctional system.
    2) Americans don't seem to care that it takes the accumulated tax paid by 10 people in America to imprision one person. Since over 2.4 million people are in federal or state prisons at a time in the U.S., 24 million people have to work and pay taxes to keep those 2.4 million people in prison.
    3) Once a person is in prison, systems are implemented by opportunists like these phone companies to run up extreme profits on phone calls to and from the prison. This means that since the prisoner is unable to work and pay taxes, it becomes the burden of the tax payers to provide funds to the prisoner via their spouses' welfare checks. This probably adds an entire extra tax payer per prisoner to the equation.
    4) Americans can't understand that while prison is no picnic, it hurts the honest tax payers substantially to take revenge on people who commit crimes.
    5) America is the only country in the world who believes that punishment is an effective way of handling crimes. While people want to hurt the people who hurt them, the prisoner will spend 2-50 years locked up draining the tax payers. They will establish a life for themselves behind bars and since they will not likely ever get a decent job again, they will keep going back and burdening the system more.
    6) Corrections facilities are designed to move prisoners to a higher social class and prepare them for a more productive life. While the victims of the crimes will not feel a sense of satisfaction and will feel cheated, at least the masses won't have to foot the bill of clothing and feeding and watching the perpetrator indefinitely.

    There is simply no good solution to managing crime and prisons. But America seems hell bent on biting their noses off to spite their own faces.

    There are far too many people in American prisons and it's almost completely because of this sickness Americans having to get revenge.

  48. Cheaper calls for relatives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting anonymously since I've been moderating.

    Family members looking for a cheaper solution: Set up a in-state forwarding number, as described here: http://wiki.diamondcard.us/pod...

    I have no relations to the company other than as a customer, and I haven't tried out their idea. Looks like you still pay the prison phone company, but not that much anymore. If you have any experience with this setup, please share.

  49. Re:The religion of peace by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    They claim that, but their religious practices are so vastly different as to stretch the claim past the breaking point.

  50. Re:The religion of peace by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    That's because they're all doing their religions wrong. The fundamentalists have it right, because they actually read their holy texts and do what they say.

    If you're non-violent and follow one of these religions, maybe you should try reading that book that you claim to believe in. Then decide for yourself, "do I really want to promote this? Do I want to be part of a belief system that advocates violence this way?"

    There's nothing "deluded" about that fraction of believers subscribing to violence. What's deluded is trying to claim that a religion based on violence, and which explicitly endorses and calls for violence in its holy texts, is somehow peaceful. Pointing this out with the 3 major religions is a great example of the emperor having no clothes.

  51. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    "Hey, Warden! 'member that one guy seven years ago who called prison officials corrupt on Slashdot? The one among dozens? Well, we've tracked him ever since and he just got thrown in here for misuse of medical cocaine!"

    "Finally! (emits a laugh, but it's more of a Renfield-like heheh heheh heheh than a muahahahaha)

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  52. medieval Islam is a threat to Liberty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The attempt to revive medieval Islam is a threat to Liberty.

    Medieval Islam was a religion of conquerors. A system of belief to justify the violence needed to create an empire. The people using Islam today are doing so with the same objective as those over a thousand years ago... to spread the Islamic way of life by whatever means are necessary.

    This medieval Islamic movement is every bit as much of a threat as was Russian Communism or Nazi Fascism.

    The people of free societies need to decide if our way of life is worth fighting for.

  53. Re:The religion of peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pointing this out with the 3 major religions is a great example of the emperor having no clothes.

    Christians are usually taught that the Old testament is there to contrast with the new covenant in the new testament. Citing old testament scripture does not implicate Christian beliefs. Christians believe in the new testament teachings of Jesus which preached non-violence and it is those beliefs that establish a new covenant with God.

    Certainly the history of Christianity is filled with the same types of violence towards various people that all societies exhibit regardless of belief. But violence towards non-adherents is clearly more prevalent in core Islamic teachings, including the Al-Hadith, than in core Christian beliefs and teachings.

  54. Prison phone providers are scum by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Completely. Look at the rates they're charging. Do any of you know how that works? The prisoner gets one person (it may be more in federal, but this is how it was when I had someone in jail in Brevard Co, FL), and that person needs to prepay the company - $50, please, at least), and they get to call specific numbers, and no one else. And they've only got certain hours... usually, when most folks are at work.

    Studies show that the less the contact with the outside world, the higher the recidivism rate. So the "service providers" are assuring their profits....

                      mark, who'd like all their management behind bars"

  55. Court Stops FCC's Latest Attempt To Lower Prison P by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

    Get busted for smoking Marijuana and suddenly you are a master criminal. You have to be punished by not being allowed a cellphone or access to a telephone at a cent per minute rate or even free. Need to talk to your child and it will cost you $0.22 per minute.
    That is a real miscarriage of justice, as is "for profit prisons". That telephone is a major profit centre.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  56. Re: prisons / slavery by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

    First off, if you're paid *anything* as compensation for doing a job, it's not slavery anymore, by definition.

    Your definition of "slavery" is excessively narrow, to the point of non-existence. Even the worst examples tended to offer some pay, even if it was only in the form of room and board. If offering some token compensation was all it took to avoid a charge of slavery there would be no slavery.

    If you risk corporal punishment, confinement, or loss of property for failing to carry out a task assigned by someone else, that is slavery—not counting the repayment of debts you voluntarily agreed to, or contractual penalties, as you chose to give up that property of your own free will when you went into debt and/or entered the contract.

    The prison case is a bit odd, of course, since the inmates are going to be confined either way, with all their basic subsistence needs met. They aren't compelled to do the work; if they receive anything for their labor it will be strictly in excess of what they would otherwise receive. One could also argue, at least in some cases, that enslavement would be a reasonable and just punishment for their offense, perhaps more so than mere confinement.

    --
    "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  57. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Ichijo · · Score: 1

    This is why prisons should be penalized for recidivism, and paid not by the prisoner per month but by the prisoner rehabilitated. Let's make the profit motive work for us!

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  58. Re:This is evil, and incompetence at so many level by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Well Bernie's promised to put an end to the for-profit prison industry. No one else seems to be campaigning on it.

    Actually, Hillary takes a lot of money from the for-profit prison industry in "campaign donations", so we can assume she'll do everything she can to help improve their profitability.

    So it's not a matter of the other candidates being neutral on the issue; Hillary is downright pro-private-prisons.

    And Republicans are always promoting privatization of government services, so I think it's safe to assume they'd be friends to the private prison corporations too.

  59. Re:The religion of peace by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

    Nope, most Christians are virulently anti-homosexual, and the basis for all that is straight from the Old Testament. Also, there's a passage where Jesus specifically said he didn't come to overturn Mosaic Law.

  60. Why any charge at all? by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

    The real question is why prisoners are getting charged for phone calls at all. The incremental cost of calls to anywhere in the US on any reasonable phone plan is now zero, so that should be the price that the prisoners pay. The entire system of charging for calls is a throwback to the days when using the telephone was expensive.

  61. Lower the rates to ZERO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by eliminating prison phones. Convicted criminals in prison have no right to a telephone. Our prisons used to have pay phones that individual inmates could be escorted to use to make just the required phone call to a lawyer, or to a family member, who would then be able to contact a lawyer.

    EVERY item of any value that is provided to a prisoner becomes something that can be bartered and thus in-turn becomes a source of potential corruption of the prison system as people smuggle things in/out of prisons for trade and eventually end up bribing prison workers. Rapists, murderers, thieves, arsonists, etc are supposed to be rotting in a cell, not watching TV, playing sports, chatting on phones...

  62. Re:The religion of peace by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    Religious practices define what deity is worshipped? Compare Pentecostal snake handlers to Egyption Copts - both Christian, same god, same basic religious texts, but extremely different religious practices. Islam includes much of the new testament of the Bible as holy scriptures, they refer to the God of Abraham as their own, they accept Jesus as a major prophet who just doesn't happen to be the last prophet. They're really not much further away from Judaism and Christianity as Mormonism is.

  63. Re:The religion of peace by ZeroConcept · · Score: 1

    Where is the Christian / Jewish counterpart for http://www.oxfordislamicstudie... (Dar al-Harb)?

  64. Re:Where do inmates get $ for calls? - They Don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You (the friend or relative on the outside) call the ripoff phone service and deposit money that goes only from you to these people with the phone service monopoly. What the inmate gets is the ability to place calls.

  65. Re: prisons / slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you risk corporal punishment, confinement, or loss of property for failing to carry out a task assigned by someone else

    Your defintion of "slavery" is likewise excessively broad. The policeman ordering me move so that he can keep me in his line of sight can certainly confine me for failing to comply. Am I the slave of the policeman?

  66. Re: prisons / slavery by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

    The policeman ordering me move so that he can keep me in his line of sight can certainly confine me for failing to comply. Am I the slave of the policeman?

    Yes. If you haven't done anything else that would justify confinement and you're being punished simply for failing to comply with his command, that would be an example of slavery—albeit a minor one.

    --
    "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat