Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Oracle Seeks $9.3 Billion For Google's Use Of Java In Android (computerworld.com)

Posted by BeauHD on from the everyone-wants-a-piece-of-the-pie dept.

angry tapir quotes a report from Computerworld: Oracle is seeking as much as $9.3 billion in damages in a long-running copyright lawsuit against Google over its use of Java in Android, court filings show. Oracle sued Google six years ago, claiming the search giant needs a license to use parts of the Java platform in Google's market-leading mobile OS. The two companies first went to trial in 2012, but the jury was split on whether or not Google's use of Java was protected by "fair use." Now they're headed back to the courtroom for a new trial scheduled to begin May 9, where Oracle's Larry Ellison and Google's Eric Schmidt will be present. Currently, the sum Oracle is asking for is about 10 times as much as when the two companies went to trial in 2012.

4 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. Re:pure profit by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to the public documents at the time of the purchase they purchased SUN primarily for the hardware division, they apparently valued the software assets very little.

  2. Re:Google Legal Fund by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Second trial always favors the defendant. They knows the plaintiffs strategy and what influenced the jury.

  3. Re:pure profit by somenickname · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Perhaps. But, the point still remains that my name stands on patents that seem to cover things like addition, complex numbers and even the general idea of algorithms. My name is literally on a patent that could be used to sue someone that had the audacity to add two numbers. That's how fucked up our system is.

  4. Re:One more reason... [OSS] by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Agreed, but the problem is that there is no alternative statically-typed ("compile-y") language out there that seems ready in terms of being road-tested and not too different from other common production languages.

    C# is too MS-tied with a similar legal-greed risk, and C++ is too low-level to replace Java and C#.

    Object Pascal? Ada? too complex. Eiffel? too much like Pascal such that you might as well go Pascal.

    Python, Ruby, Php, etc. are dynamic languages. They have their place, but for certain classes of applications you need a static/strict typed language.

    Object-Fortran? :-) I dunno
       

    --
    Table-ized A.I.