Slashdot Mirror


The World's Largest Renewable Energy Developer Could Go Broke (huffingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Huffington Post: There is a "substantial risk" that SunEdison may file for bankruptcy, the world's largest renewable energy developer said in a regulatory filing on Tuesday. The company's fall isn't a referendum on the solar industry as a whole, as much as it is on SunEdison's aggressive growth strategy fueled by excessive debt and financial engineering, analysts say. SunEdison "just thought they were smarter than everyone else," said David Levine, the founder and CEO of Geostellar, a solar energy marketplace that has done deals with the company.
SunEdison loaded up a total of $11 billion in debt to develop or acquire renewable energy projects. The company's shares have fallen steeply since they hit a high of $30 in July. They were at just $1.26 before the filing. The stock immediately dropped another 40 percent when the market opened after the filing, and the company was trading at just $0.59 by Tuesday lunchtime.

4 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. Talk about a coincidence! by kenh · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hey look, in other news, the largest solar install is proving unworkable:

    Here’s the story so far. Ivanpah:
    - is owned by Google, NRG Energy, and Brightsource, who have a market cap in excess of $500 billion.
    - received $1.6 billion in loan guarantees from the Department of Energy.
    - is paid four to five times as much per megawatt-hour as natural gas-powered plants.
    - is paid two to three times as much per megawatt-hour as other solar power producers.
    - has burned thousands of birds to death.
    - has delayed loan repayments.
    - is seeking over $500 million in grants to help pay off the guaranteed loans.
    - burns natural gas for 4.5 hours each morning to get its mojo going.

    Source: http://dailysignal.com/2016/03...

    --
    Ken
  2. Re: Regardless of the reasons... by KGIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have solar and wind. I do not have them as a cost saver. I have them because I like electricity. My home is in NW, Maine. I am not shitting you when I say that my mains connection is a backup. Come winter, it's not usual to go as long as a week without power. There's nothing important past me and, even though I'm not far from the fat pipes of juice that come in from Canada, I'm pretty much out of luck until every other person gets their power back.

    I was not in that specific area during the Ice Storm of 98 (January, I believe) but I've been there for two since. The longest was almost two weeks without power. During the 98 episode, they didn't have power for almost a month.

    In fact, about six miles beyond my house is a guy who has still has no power. Of course, he's never had power. The lines go by his house and he still doesn't want power. He does have dial-up internet, I do believe. He was not interested in DSL. Curious sort of guy. Bad hygiene, I guess he was doing post-doc work when his brain kind of snapped, and he's been living off the grid in a cabin that his family owns since the early 1970s. Smart as all hell. He has some solar and a generator. Mostly survives off the land. Cuts a bit of my wood and hunts my deer and fishes my fishies. I'm quite okay with it. He's been over more than once - I've owned the new house since 2008. I was in for Christmas.

    At any rate, I make more than enough electricity to push some into the grid. They only give credits for the power - not money. I can sell, trade, or gift the credits. I can donate them to a charitable organization or to a State organization (of some types) and get a reduction in tax burden. As it was just updated with extra panels and a second turbine, I'm going to wait a full year and then I'll donate the credits to the local elementary school. I like 'em. The kids call me Mr. David. As some of them are getting to be adults now, I find it rather amusing to hear the young adults call me Mr. David.

    They use a piece of land that I own, it's an old and nonworking sandpit for their keg parties and for shooting. They police their brass. They even came and borrowed my truck, trailer, and tractor once year - they went out and cleaned up all the junk that people had left there over the years. They cleaned up old fridges, cars, burnt out cars, and (oddly) a giant (ocean going) lobster boat that was sans-trailer. I have no idea how the boat got there, it was there when I bought the place and nobody has fessed up yet.

    At any rate, that's enough of a novella. ;-) I didn't buy solar to make money back. I don't care that it isn't the cheapest. That I have turbines, and really good ones, you can guess that money was not the objective. I did it because it was the right choice for me to make. I like having electricity and the wind, so far as we know, has never quite stopped where the turbines are. It's all automated, I don't need to worry about a thing. You could say I did it to be green. Sort of? Not really... I just like having electricity. It's not even remotely uncommon to lose power there.

    (I am not there. I will be there within the next month, probably.)

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  3. Re:Regardless of the reasons... by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "As an electrical engineer that works for a company that installs solar systems, they don't work."

    Yea, no wonder you posted as AC. Your systems must be absolute fucking garbage.

    Meanwhile, people that listen to me enjoy no power bill for about a two year's worth of power bills off the bat. Most of them get loans from the bank, pay off their loans in five years, and enjoy (for their purposes) limitless power.

    No subsidies. Just good sourcing, proper testing, and proper engineering. Something you fail at if your systems don't work and can't be done at a reasonable price.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  4. Re:Regardless of the reasons... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since the take-over I've had two stories posted as AC. Both times I submitted under my username. The first time my name was changed to AC and the second time the editor just deleted the author attribution altogether.

    I'm wondering if the editors sometimes remove names to prevent ad-hom attacks on the story (I should consider that next time) or if it's just the usual editing cock-up that Slashdot seems to somehow encourage.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC