Slashdot Mirror


Oklahoma Video Vigilante Uses Drone To Wage War Against Prostitutes and Johns (bbc.com)

HughPickens.com writes: Chris Baraniuk writes at BBC that Brian Bates, known in Oklahoma as the "Video Vigilante," is taking credit for Amanda Zolicoffer's conviction on a lewdness charge after being caught on Bates' drone mounted camera in a sex act in a parked vehicle last year. Zolicoffer was sentenced to a year in state prison for the misdemeanor while the case against her alleged client, who was released following arrest in December, is still pending. "I'm sort of known in the Oklahoma City area," says Bates . "For the last 20 years I've used a video camera to document street-level and forced prostitution, and human trafficking." Bates runs a website where he publishes videos of alleged sex workers and their clients. "I am openly referred to as a video vigilante, I don't really shy away from that," says Bates adding that the two individuals were inside a vehicle and the incident occurred away from other members of the public. The drone dropped to within a few feet of the vehicle where it filmed a 75 year old in the front seat of the white pickup truck. The duo separated after Zolicoffer, who was identified by her tattoo saying "Baby Gangster," saw the drone hovering overhead.

61 of 339 comments (clear)

  1. Going voyeur... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... to force your morality unto everyone else. Of course he's proud of his "successes."

    1. Re:Going voyeur... by cosm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... to force your morality unto everyone else. Of course he's proud of his "successes."

      It's not an issue of morality; it's an issue of legality. Being Jewish is illegal in most states. If you disagree with the law, you can write to your and suggest he/she vote to change the law. That doesn't mean you get to disobey it. This good German citizen was not breaking any laws. The Jews he caught were.

      You'd have been one of the first to slap on a brown shirt, wouldn't you?

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    2. Re:Going voyeur... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By putting them in the American prison system? Shooting them and their dependents in the head would be doing more for the prostitutes than this self-righteous twit is.

    3. Re:Going voyeur... by dbIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not really all of the different to taking upskirt photos with a hidden camera on a staircase and then charging those with no underwear with indecency.
      This is one of those laws designed to reduce offence to people and going around taking a close look at those a long way away from others who could take offence is a bit pointless and nasty.

    4. Re: Going voyeur... by hackwrench · · Score: 2

      You sir have a very unique definition of violence. All law is enforced by violence.

    5. Re:Going voyeur... by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      The only reason there is a law against it is that it offends the sensibilities of some people's imaginary friend.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Going voyeur... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's a collective action problem. To get prostitution legalized requires gross injustice that can't be ignored. A little bit of injustice can be easily stomached. This activist is making the problem uncomfortable enough to motivate a change in policy.

      Next time you hear about a cop going to prison for rape: think of all the prostitutes who got picked up for solicitation and let off in exchange for some quid pro quo.

      The way things are leaves prostitutes vulnerable. A lack of discretion in enforcement is exactly what is necessary for the greater good. Not much consolation for the individuals that play the matyrs, but I was never concerned with their welfare in the first place. I'm indifferent enough with their plight to express a rational detached opinion on how this will have to play out for people to care.

    7. Re:Going voyeur... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This drone operator was not breaking any laws.

      There is no fucking way someone could fly this many drones, over this much municipal area, coming this close, to this many vehicles and property, and take this much video, of pornographic/voyeristic nature, and upload it to the internet (with ads?) without breaking enough laws to have them playing poker with Bernie Madoff for the rest of his days at least.

      This guy is a whackjob with fetish for stalking hookers with drones. He's the poster child for everything that's wrong with the drone "community", and one of the reasons drone owners will all be tarred as creeps and assholes within the next ten years.

      Take your aerial shots while you can. The drone party will be over soon.

    8. Re: Going voyeur... by arth1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've obviously never heard of jurt nullification.

      The old Mongolian saying that what happens in the jurt, stays in the jurt?

    9. Re:Going voyeur... by arth1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Vigilantism is when people take the law into their own hands and try to punish people themselves. All this guy is doing is gathering evidence and turning it over to the police. That's not illegal.

      Seeking out criminal actions is, indeed, illegal in most states. Depending on the state, neighborhood watches, for example, can patrol an area, but not look for crime. And PIs can be restricted to having to abort investigations and report to the police if they have reasonable belief that there is a crime, without being allowed to gather evidence of it.

      And there's little doubt that a private individual who actively goes looking for crime with the intent of getting people punished is indeed doing vigilantism, acting in the capacity of law enforcement without the authority.

    10. Re:Going voyeur... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some states also have very strict laws against investigating suspected animal abuse in the meat industry - the lobbying is strong on that issue. After a series of scandals in which horrific conditions in farming and slaughtering food animals were exposed, the industry responded by pushing for 'ag-gag' laws to deter any further activists from trying to sneak a camera in.

    11. Re:Going voyeur... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To get prostitution legalized requires gross injustice that can't be ignored.

      What gross injustice? The fact that something that has been around since the earliest civilizations and is legal in multiple countries is illegal in the US? You mean that gross injustice?

    12. Re:Going voyeur... by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yet he didn't choose to use his drone to catch people breaking domestic battery laws or illegal hunting laws or animal abuse laws and so on -- he chose to catch people breaking that one law that's strikes a nerve in him somewhere. That nerve was almost 100% likely pinched by his sense of morality and the sexual issues he has like most people do (an exception may be if prostitution was causing fights or something in his neighbourhood, doesn't sound like it), so the parent was quite likely spot on.

    13. Re:Going voyeur... by mi · · Score: 2

      It's not an issue of morality; it's an issue of legality. Prostitution is illegal in most states.

      No that simple. Various laws against certain sexual practices were abolished on the argument, that enforcing them requires police to violate people's privacy. For example, in the Bowers vs. Hardwick — last heard in 2003 — a Supreme Justice accused his fellow justices (back in 1986) of (emphasis mine):

      almost obsessive focus on homosexual activity and an “overall refusal to consider the broad principles that have informed our treatment of privacy in specific cases.

      See? The States could choose to outlaw certain kinds of sex — the only obstacle for them to overcome is the citizens' privacy, that's protected from police. With drones and private vigilantes operating them, that hurdle is gone and those laws could come back...

      (Yes, I know, that this particular "crime" took place on public street, but everything would've been the same, had the accused man brought the accused woman into his private bedroom.)

      That doesn't mean you get to disobey it.

      So, no oral sex with your spouse, until your state abolishes "anti-sodomy" law?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    14. Re:Going voyeur... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This might shock you, but outlawing prostitution actually makes a lot of sense. A non-trivial portion of prostitutes are not willing.

      That's a separate crime that has nothing to do with the sex work. Human trafficking and slavery are already illegal. No reason to make consensual sex workers criminals too.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    15. Re:Going voyeur... by wvmarle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did you even read TFS? Because you apparently missed this part:

      Bates runs a website where he publishes videos of alleged sex workers and their clients. "I am openly referred to as a video vigilante, I don't really shy away from that," says Bates

      So he's not just turning over evidence to the police, he's actively publishing it, presumably to name and shame people he thinks are involved in an illegal act of prostitution. He doesn't investigate whether it's actually prostitution, or whether it's just a loving couple. Then he happily agrees to being a vigilante himself.

    16. Re:Going voyeur... by CaptainDork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This.

      This motherfucker wants one thing: Attention.

      He'll get it by way of violence or litigation.

      People have expectations of privacy. How many videos does he have of people NOT having sex in a vehicle?

      A victim's lawyer is going to file for discovery and get every piece of fucking technology under this asshole's control and lock him up for every minor he's peeked at.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    17. Re:Going voyeur... by Flozzin · · Score: 2

      So what you are saying is in order to get prostitution legal you have to jail hundreds maybe thousands of people? Yea, that is a good method.

      --
      "Cowardice in a race, as in an individual, is the unpardonable sin." --Teddy Roosevelt
    18. Re:Going voyeur... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      +1

      Wish I had mod points. In areas where they have made prostitution legal or at least decriminalised it, statistics have shown lower rates of domestic abuse, violent crime, and STD's. Plus, they enjoy an increase in tax revenue because a formerly illicit occupation can have its workers brought into the mainstream economy to pay taxes. The degree to which some people are so concerned about others' genitals is most irrational.

      Concerning your enlightened comment about conflating prostitution and sex trafficking, the same logical fallacy is committed with regards to homosexuality and paedophilia. In the minds of many, someone who is gay must be a raving child molestor who has designs on their young kids. The vast majority of homosexuals are of course as equally horrified by child molestation as most heterosexuals are, but moralists can't be bothered with facts and logic. And I suspect that moralism is an example of psychological overcompensation to mask some repressed tendency in the one passing judgement on others.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    19. Re:Going voyeur... by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      He's not going to find one, he probably doesn't even know about Phoenix Jones.

    20. Re:Going voyeur... by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 2

      See, I used to think the same as you and was supportive of legalised prostitution in my country (Australia). Which they have done. The problem is that it doesn't work. There is still sexual slavery, and indeed it's much worse than before and operates within legal brothels (not because of legalisation you understand, but simply to demonstrate that legalisation seems unrelated). There are just as many unfortunate, desperate men and women in prostitution to support a drug addiction (amongst other reasons). Often these people can't work in a legal brothel due to the regulations, and are hence just as vulnerable and exploited as they ever were. Meanwhile the price has gone down (which is bad for the desperate) the profile has gone up, and brothels continue to be centres of organised crime. Nothing good has come of it unfortunately. I now think the Nordic model is probably best (it has the best objective outcomes).

    21. Re:Going voyeur... by ultranova · · Score: 2

      Not much consolation for the individuals that play the matyrs,

      They aren't martyrs, they're your victims. A martyr is someone who sacrifices themselves, they were sacrificed by you.

      I'm indifferent enough with their plight to express a rational detached opinion on how this will have to play out for people to care.

      As you demonstrated above, people who claim to be indifferent about the consequences of their actions - in your case promoting such a nasty idea - are usually just lying to themselves about what they're doing. Bonus points for doing so under the guise of rationality.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    22. Re:Going voyeur... by edittard · · Score: 2

      If he generates one cent of revenue then it's commercial use. That usually requires extra permits/qualifications, which I doubt he has.

      In any case it's only a matter of time before he pisses off the wrong person and ends up with various body parts being shoved into the rotors.

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    23. Re:Going voyeur... by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's more to the story with a police arrest record which isn't mentioned in the news stories:

      FEBRUARY 9–An Oklahoma man who has gained national exposure for his “video vigilante” campaign to expose street prostitution in his hometown was arrested yesterday for allegedly paying hookers to ensure that they serviced customers in an area where he could easily film the illicit trysts.

      According to the below Oklahoma City Police Department report, Brian Bates, 34, orchestrated the public encounters so he could peddle the resulting videotape to media outlets (some of Bates’s surveillance tapes are offered for sale on his web site).

      In his dealings with prostitutes, Bates was choosy, investigators contend.

      For example, if a john was a “regular,” Bates asked prostitutes to give “specific signals” so he would know not to bother rolling tape. Investigators also noted that, like any good auteur, Bates “gave direction to the prostitutes on how to complete the act with a high probability of success,” as well as tips on how to spot an undercover cop.

      Bates was hit with a felony pandering charge and a misdemeanor count of aiding in prostitution. The pandering rap, which is usually reserved for pimps, carries a minimum two-year jail term, and a maximum of 20 years in the stir.

      The more you know about the true story behind a reported news story, the more you learn the "news" is typically at best clueless and at worst 100% in the wrong direction.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    24. Re:Going voyeur... by Gussington · · Score: 2

      How about "citations" proving all the bold counter claims?

      You made the claims bub, don't try and weasel out now...

      I'm not saying that the idea was a bad one, I'm saying that it didn't bloody work. a reference

      You didn't even read the your own citation did you? In your own citation it actually says it went down in developed countries such as Australia.
      If you read past the headline, it went up in undeveloped countries like China and Pakistan, and their numbers skew the global average. But based on your study that you cited, legalised prostitution has lowered trafficking rates in countries like Australia, NZ and in Europe.

      Show me evidence to the contrary and I'll re-evaluate.

      Your own citation. Maybe you want to read it fully before you embarrass yourself further.

      Attitudes like yours really piss me off.

      What attitudes are they, the ones that question people who tell lies or can't read?

  2. nothing better to do, huh by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    used a video camera to document street-level and forced prostitution, and human trafficking.

    One of these is not like the others.
    I doubt he caught a lot of human trafficking or forced prostitution on camera. The article certainly doesn't mention any.

    1. Re:nothing better to do, huh by wbr1 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      A thousand times this. Most (not all, as in severe rape and snuff kink and underage) human trafficking will go away if prostitution were legal. However, street level prostitution happens in plain view, the others do not. They are just added by someone for PR purposes.. "look at this guy doing good against teen prostitute traffickers..." When in reality all he has caught are likely some drug addicts feeding their addiction.

      But, like the war on drugs, the prohibition favors the entrenched interests.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    2. Re:nothing better to do, huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most (not all, as in severe rape and snuff kink and underage) human trafficking will go away if prostitution were legal.

      No, that's not substantiated. It's actually the opposite.

      https://orgs.law.harvard.edu/lids/2014/06/12/does-legalized-prostitution-increase-human-trafficking/

      Countries with legalized prostitution are associated with higher human trafficking inflows than countries where prostitution is prohibited. The scale effect of legalizing prostitution, i.e. expansion of the market, outweighs the substitution effect, where legal sex workers are favored over illegal workers. On average, countries with legalized prostitution report a greater incidence of human trafficking inflows.

              The effect of legal prostitution on human trafficking inflows is stronger in high-income countries than middle-income countries. Because trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation requires that clients in a potential destination country have sufficient purchasing power, domestic supply acts as a constraint.

              Criminalization of prostitution in Sweden resulted in the shrinking of the prostitution market and the decline of human trafficking inflows. Cross-country comparisons of Sweden with Denmark (where prostitution is decriminalized) and Germany (expanded legalization of prostitution) are consistent with the quantitative analysis, showing that trafficking inflows decreased with criminalization and increased with legalization.

              The type of legalization of prostitution does not matter — it only matters whether prostitution is legal or not. Whether third-party involvement (persons who facilitate the prostitution businesses, i.e, “pimps”) is allowed or not does not have an effect on human trafficking inflows into a country. Legalization of prostitution itself is more important in explaining human trafficking than the type of legalization.

              Democracies have a higher probability of increased human-trafficking inflows than non-democratic countries. There is a 13.4% higher probability of receiving higher inflows in a democratic country than otherwise.

  3. Re:Not so much about morality by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most prostitutes these days are virtually, or literally, slaves. They are often kidnapped or trafficked into the US. They are then beaten into submission by their pimps until they no longer resist, and then sold to men on the streets.

    You can provide some references beyond hysterical news stories? My guess that there is some of this, but far more is drug addiction related. As well, if you read Dan Savage, you probably know that there are willing "sex workers" as well.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  4. Re: Human Trafficking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And attention seeking self righteous moralizers trying to put people in jail solves what, exactly?

    Let's assume for a minute that everyone who works as a prostitute does so unwillingly (which is bullshit). The people committing the crimes of slavery, violence, etc. are not the ones caught up in this vigilante's stupid campaign.

  5. Re:Not so much about morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most prostitutes these days are virtually, or literally, slaves. They are often kidnapped or trafficked into the US. They are then beaten into submission by their pimps until they no longer resist, and then sold to men on the streets. Regardless of your views on the morality of prostitution, I would hope we can agree that sex-slavery is evil.

    I find real sex slavery to be as morally objectionable as other kinds of real slavery. That's why I don't like the laws against prostitution or the wretched pricks like Brian Bates that help to enforce them. Note that there are basically no slaves in the sex industry of The Netherlands, even if you throw in bullshit qualifiers like "virtually".

  6. Re:Not so much about morality by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most prostitutes these days are virtually, or literally, slaves. They are often kidnapped or trafficked into the US.

    Tony, that's just not true.

    http://www.alternet.org/story/...

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. Re:Not so much about morality by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I suppose if you keep telling yourself that then you think there is no reason to check to see what reality is doing. While what you mentioned is a problem a bit of a conversation with a charity dealing with such things would reveal that it is not as universal and simple as you suggest. Are those girls paid by lobbyists to service your elected representatives in Vegas and other places slaves?

  8. What gives him or the video legal standing? by Amigori · · Score: 2
    None of the articles list him as a police officer. Was there a crime committed? Perhaps, but that doesn't necessarily give him or his videos legal standing. Here are a few of the many ethical, reasonable, or otherwise questions to be asked:
    1. What is the expected privacy of the people in the vehicle?
    2. Was the privacy of the people in the vehicle breached? But what if this was on private land instead of public?
    3. Was this evidence lawfully obtained? The court put her in jail, so under the current laws, apparently so.
    4. How long until laws banning this type of "citizen surveillance" are enacted?
    5. How were the police notified? Did he call in the illicit activity, then handed over the video?
    6. Could I use this same technology to record speeding vehicles on the highway, texting and drive, failing to stop, or tailgating, then call the cops and use my video as evidence? Knowing full well that my "evidence" cannot be checked for accuracy (MPG, location, time, etc.). "But darn it! They're committing a crime!!"
    --
    "The quality of life is determined by its activites."--Aristotle
  9. Re:Not so much about morality by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Most prostitutes these days are virtually, or literally, slaves.

    Not true. Most prostitutes work because they need the money, and are not otherwise coerced.

    They are often kidnapped or trafficked into the US.

    False. Only a near-zero number of sex workers are "trafficked" into the US. "Sex trafficking" is mostly hysteria used by law enforcement to justify bloated budgets. It is nearly non-existent in America.

    They are then beaten into submission by their pimps

    Wrong again. Prostitutes with pimps are less likely to be victims of violence. They also make more money, even after paying their pimp, than women working solo. Some groups of prostitutes will team up and hire a pimp, boosting both their safety and income. Source: SuperFreakonomics.

    Coercion, violence, trafficking, etc. are not reasons to make prostitution illegal. They are the result of making it illegal.

  10. yet another reason to never set foot in Oklahoma. by nimbius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Zolicoffer was sentenced to a year in state prison for the misdemeanor

    For those reading the BCC in native UK, its hard to comprehend this being more than a sensible chuckle. However, in the united states, a conviction resulting in a prison term can prohibit you from ever getting a job. ex convicts are barred from social services in Oklahoma in many cases, cannot vote in elections, and are frequently required to pay restitution for their incarceration.
    what Bates did was to issue biblical retribution for a victimless crime.

    Bates runs a website where he publishes videos of alleged sex workers and their clients.

    You'd better be very, very certain of what youre doing. impoverished sex workers and 9-5 johns dont fight back too hard. Trying this stunt with a C level for a major multinational however will earn you cancelled credit cards, ruined credit, and foreclosed homes.

    the two individuals were inside a vehicle and the incident occurred away from other members of the public.

    So you went out of your way to play Batman for the day. Its worth remembering though, that batman has an alter ego. People you have publicly destroyed now know your full first and last name. For many of them, there may be very little standing between them you.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  11. Give a man a fish... by tgibson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Give a man a porno, and he can pleasure himself for a day, teach a man to fly a drone and he can pleasure himself for a lifetime.

  12. Relax. That problem's gonna solve itself by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At some point, some John's going to get pissed enough about this because he's getting divorced and loses everything that he rids the world of the asshole and everything's back to normal.

    Remember kids: If the law fails to solve problems, people will.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Relax. That problem's gonna solve itself by kackle · · Score: 2

      If the law fails to solve problems, people will.

      I think you jumped right over the irony puddle there. The law apparently wasn't taking care of the illegal prostitution enough for this guy, and he (one of the people) took action to "solve" the problem.

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Re:Not so much about morality by jrumney · · Score: 2

    Which would be why the prostitute in this case was immediately charged and sent to prison while the client is out on bail waiting for the DA to decide whether to prosecute, and the pimp is nowhere to be seen.

  15. Re:Not so much about morality by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can provide some references beyond hysterical news stories? My guess that there is some of this, but far more is drug addiction related. As well, if you read Dan Savage, you probably know that there are willing "sex workers" as well.

    No, likely they can't. It's because the core point of their statement is false. Most prostitutes are women from within the country they live in, and have lived there all their lives. Not saying that it doesn't happen, it does, but in those instances where the women and men are in those circumstances they usually operate out of a bawdy house or something along those lines.

    Something that a lot of people don't understand either is that you'll find prostitutes very law abiding at least here in Canada. If they're picked up, they'll have their surety posted as soon as they know what it'll be and they'll show up for their court cases. They'll also snitch on other prostitutes and pimps who are selling drugs or engaged in other things in those lines.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  16. Re:Not so much about morality by Etherwalk · · Score: 2

    It is incorrect to conflate prostitution and human trafficking. Even if every street-prostitute could be shown to be willingly engaged, that does not mean that there isn't a separate market for people kidnapped against their will. I doubt I could back this up with statistics because of the nature of the crime. People get estranged from their families and disappear into cults like scientology and EST/landmark-education never to be heard from again. I lived in a house where the owners were involved in EST and one of them went missing, abandoning her dog and belongings in Texas. She was spotted in NM and the only evidence afterward was cryptic blog post about "finding her new home". Case unsolved.
    http://www.inquisitr.com/50063...
    There are reports about attempted kidnappings of children every couple days in LA. What do you think the purpose of those kidnappings is?

            I have run into 'traveling magazine sales vans' since I was a teenager hanging out in places that I probably shouldn't have. I once told them I would join up and had them give a ride across town. I just jumped out and bolted into the woods instead of going to pick up my stuff like I had told them. I knew it was some scammy shit but I thought I was invincible at the time, so I was just trying to get a free taxi ride. These people learn to spot victims that have fallen through the cracks of society.
    http://america.aljazeera.com/a...
    http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_s...

            The most valuable thing for a good portion of humanity is sex, especially for people who already have plenty of money. I have heard stories from Mexican girls in East LA about being sold back and forth between gang members for thousands of dollars. They don't even try and report it to the police because they think no one will believe them. Gangs or cults have made it into a profession to control every aspect of a person's life. The street term for someone marked for sale is a "barbie doll". There is a lot more to the criminal underworld than what makes it to the police blotter.

    They are conflated--trafficking is a source of women who are prostituted against their will and don't see a way out. It is common for men to purchase sex with trafficking victims and never have a clue the person is coerced.

  17. It's "cheaper" to give people AIDS in Oklahoma... by denzacar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...than sex. Or porn. Or to swear.

    http://statelaws.findlaw.com/o...

    A. Every person who willfully either: ...
    3. Writes, composes, stereotypes, prints, photographs, designs, copies, draws, engraves, paints, molds, cuts, or otherwise prepares, publishes, sells, distributes, keeps for sale, or exhibits any obscene or indecent writing, paper, book, picture, photograph, motion picture, figure, form of any description or any type of obscene material; or

    4. Makes, prepares, cuts, sells, gives, loans, distributes, keeps for sale, or exhibits any disc record, metal, plastic, or wax, wire or tape recording, or any type of obscene material or any other kind of sound recording of any obscene or indecent language, poetry, or songs, or who speaks any words by means of a telephone to any person which are offensive to decency or are calculated to excite vicious or lewd thoughts or acts, or who speaks any other communicable words which are offensive to decency or are adapted to excite vicious or lewd thoughts or acts,

    shall be guilty, upon conviction, of a felony and shall be punished by the imposition of a fine of not less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00) or by imprisonment for not less than thirty (30) days nor more than ten (10) years, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Persons convicted under paragraphs 3 and 4 of subsection A of this section shall not be eligible for a deferred sentence.

    A. It shall be unlawful for any person knowing that he or she has Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) or is a carrier of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and with intent to infect another, to engage in conduct reasonably likely to result in the transfer of the person's own blood, bodily fluids containing visible blood, semen, or vaginal secretions into the bloodstream of another, or through the skin or other membranes of another person, except during in utero transmission of blood or bodily fluids, and:

    1. The other person did not consent to the transfer of blood, bodily fluids containing blood, semen, or vaginal secretions; or
    2. The other person consented to the transfer but at the time of giving consent had not been informed by the person that the person transferring such blood or fluids had AIDS or was a carrier of HIV.

    B. Any person convicted of violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Corrections for not more than five (5) years.

    So basically, someone could get 10 years for describing a dream in which he/she gives AIDS to someone through sexual intercourse - but only 5 years if it was not a dream.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Re:Not so much about morality by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here are some references. The US State Department estimates about 21 million human trafficking victims, of which about 20% are forced into the sex trade.

    https://blogs.state.gov/storie...
    http://www.unicef.org/protecti...
    https://www.dhs.gov/blue-campa...

  20. Re:Not so much about morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Here are some references. The US State Department estimates about 21 million human trafficking victims, of which about 20% are forced into the sex trade."

    So 80% enter it willingly? I think you need to look up the definition of "most".

  21. Re:Not so much about morality by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here are some references from reputable sources. The US State Department estimates about 21 million human trafficking victims, of which about 20% are forced into the sex trade.

    That's worldwide, Tony. We're talking about the United States here.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  22. Re:yet another reason to never set foot in Oklahom by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    If I were him I'd be a lot more worried he videotaped the wrong meth dealer/cook, it being Oklahoma and all.

    You are right that Batman keeps his identity shrouded for a reason...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. Prostitutes are his target? by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bankers broke US' economy throwing into misery hundreds of thousands, but he thought he'll make justice by putting in jail people who actually work for their money, people who actually provide a useful service to the community?

    Americans' moral compass is just whack.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  24. Re:yet another reason to never set foot in Oklahom by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

    So you went out of your way to play Batman for the day. Its worth remembering though, that batman has an alter ego. People you have publicly destroyed now know your full first and last name.

    His full first and last name has been plastered all over the place for years now. He's been very visible and public in his campaign. Nobody has taken any action against him.

  25. Re:Not so much about morality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think you need to reread that. Of the 21 million human trafficking victims, 20% are forced into the sex trade. What happens to the other 80% - whether they're forced into domestic service, as labor elsewhere, or turned into soylent green, is not specified.

  26. Re:yet another reason to never set foot in Oklahom by n0ano · · Score: 2

    a conviction resulting in a prison term can prohibit you from ever getting a job...

    Close, but not exactly. This is where the distinction between misdemeanor vs. felony comes into play. Misdemeanors (jail time up to 1 year) typically do not result in forfeiture of civil rights (you still get to vote) but may result in loss of privileges (as in losing your taxi license from a misdemeanor recless driving conviction). Felonies (any jail time over 1 year), on the other hand, you are absolutely right, these result in significant penalties (loss of job opportunities, can't vote, ...) long after the sentence has been served.

    This explains old TV shows where I didn't understand why the judged sentenced someone to `a year plus a day'. That extra day turned the punishment into a felony.

    --
    Don Dugger
    "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale
  27. Re:Not so much about morality by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 2

    Coercion, violence, trafficking, etc. are not reasons to make prostitution illegal. They are the result of making it illegal.

    +1, wishing I had mod points.

    As Ed McMahon would say, 'You, sir, are correct!' Most people make the logical fallacy of flipping causality. They forget the lesson of Prohibition in the US. Alcohol was forced underground, making much of it poisonous swill that made imbibers go blind or suffer other maladies, as well as causing a vast increase in organised crime. Making prostitution legal would deny criminal syndicates of a bunch of money, and its regulation would cause an increase in welfare both for the prostitutes and their customers (in the form of compulsory prophylactic use and regular STD tests, for example).

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  28. Re:Not so much about morality by gweihir · · Score: 2

    Interestingly, evidence from western countries where prostitution is legal, says exactly the opposite: Almost all prostitutes are free agents working for themselves. Ones that are forced into the trade by others are so exceptionally rare as to be virtually non-existent.

    Please keep your deranged fantasies to yourself.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  29. Re:Not so much about morality by gweihir · · Score: 2

    "Estimate", my ass. "Guesstimate informed by religious" fanaticism is more like it.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  30. Re:Not so much about morality by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

    That's because prostitution is illegal in too many places. This is no different than the violent crime spawned by the War on Drugs. You seem to have cause and effect confused; just as the morality police want you to.

  31. Re: Not so much about morality by Dog-Cow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When the demand is illegal, the supply will be illegal. This is something so obvious that even you should be able to comprehend it.

  32. Re:Not so much about morality by Gussington · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can provide some references beyond hysterical news stories? My guess that there is some of this, but far more is drug addiction related. As well, if you read Dan Savage, you probably know that there are willing "sex workers" as well.

    I live in a place where prostitution is legal. I'm a regular customer (it's quite normal here) and you'd be surprised how normal a lot of these women are. Uni students paying their way through school, Divorcees paying the mortgage, young girls earning extra money for a big holiday overseas etc.

  33. Re:Not so much about morality by Gussington · · Score: 2

    Here are some references. The US State Department estimates about 21 million human trafficking victims, of which about 20% are forced into the sex trade.

    That is globally, most of which is in the poor countries, not the US. I'm a regular customer because where I live it is legal and regulated. Because of this, the shops are mostly well run, safety and health is paramount, and the girls can easily go to the police if there are problems. In fact, because of the regulations, each business is registered, and police can turn up at any time for visa checks and questioning, making it extremely difficult to run any sort of slavery business (although there is the odd case from time to time). You don't get those checks and balances when prohibition pushes it all underground.

  34. Re:Not so much about morality by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Why do you keep referring to the person you're replying to by name?

    Simple politeness. I learned it before there was an internet and it's a hard habit to break.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.