Slashdot Mirror


Reddit Launches New Block Tools To Help Temper Harassment (mashable.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Reddit users can now use the new "block user" feature to better deal with harassment. The new feature was announced Wednesday and while the site has had [a "block user"] feature for quite some time now, the new tool allows users to block other users from replies and comments in addition to private messages, which was what the old tool was limited to previously. If users click the "Block User" button when viewing a reply in their inbox, it will remove replies, comments, messages and posts from that user from your view. Admins will however still see all the messages and replies, and if you're a moderator, you can still see content from users who are blocked on the subreddits you moderate.

221 comments

  1. Slashdot needs this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    To stop all the abusive AC posts!

    The apps guy *TRIGGERS* my bad memories of using an Android phone 5 years ago!

    1. Re:Slashdot needs this by Flavianoep · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, I hate apps. My next phone will run Windows, as now it can play Ogg Vorbis files.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    2. Re:Slashdot needs this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you were too dumb to install the libvorbis decoder previously?

    3. Re:Slashdot needs this by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      No, because when I researched there was none.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
  2. Typical Response from Mental Midgets by clonehappy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Lalala, I can't hear you, lalalalalala, I can't hear you!"

    People who can't defend their positions usually try to shut you up, and when that doesn't work they stick their fingers in their ears. You know, like a 5-year old would do.

    1. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by RogueyWon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The headline could just as easily have been "Reddit Launches New Block Tools To Help Reinforce Echo Chamber".

    2. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's funny. I was expecting that clonehappy would get Frist Psot on this thread with some trollish comment about "Mental Midgets". I wonder whatever happened to that clown.

    3. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's just your opinion and a wrong one at that.

    4. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be 12. Block objections tossers, wankers and complete cunts has been on the Internet since the early days of Usenet via kill-files.

    5. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha! I see what you did there...

    6. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by ComputerGeek01 · · Score: 2

      Although there is a facsimile of technical sub-reddits, most of that site is just mindless garbage so there really isn't a position to defend with any real facts. There used to be a very different definition for the "Reddit Effect"; it was that the fastest to digest and most pedestrian content would be promoted to the front page the fastest whereas any technically involved content will taper off into obscurity. Someone appears to have hijacked the term, but this hasn't changed at all. People on that site don't want to "discuss" anything, they want a place where they can go to feel popular or accepted, regardless of any actual social ability. So posts and comments are geared to what the hivemind will upvote, which if you apply the previously mentioned theory, is nothing ever thought provoking or informative.

    7. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term you're looking for is "Echo Chamber."

      You can still find some decent sub-reddits specific to some topics, but the front page is just a waste of time.

    8. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      It's just a personal block filter, you're not preventing anyone else from reading posts by the user you've blocked.

      I have a few people blocked on Facebook, because they've repeatedly reduced themselves to name-calling and outright harassment. Now that I've blocked them, I don't have to view their insulting posts, but others are free to view them, if they please. And of course, they cannot contact me directly either, which is a necessity for an anti-harassment block filter.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    9. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      Why is it an echo chamber reinforcement, when it is only a personal block filter, you're not blocking anyone else from seeing their posts. You're just filtering out their posts and preventing them from contacting you directly.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    10. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Thanshin · · Score: 2

      "Lalala, I can't hear you, lalalalalala, I can't hear you!"

      People who can't defend their positions usually try to shut you up, and when that doesn't work they stick their fingers in their ears. You know, like a 5-year old would do.

      So, in the real world, if a drunk hobo starts talking to you about being Jesus Christ Reborn, you feel it's your responsibility, as an adult, to hear him out and respond with clear and well constructed counter arguments until, under the accumulated evidence you've presented, he understands the wrongness in his assertion?

    11. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by gizmo2199 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "it was that the fastest to digest and most pedestrian content would be promoted to the front page the fastest whereas any technically involved content will taper off into obscurity."

      Also the fact that you can't sort by lowest rated comment, and are artificially restricted to the first 500 comments (on top of the fact that when you 'load more' it only loads like the next 20, so you can't even navigate to the downvoted comments quickly) adds to that hive mentality. It makes seeing dissenting or unpopular comments next to impossible, by design.

      --
      This Sig does not Exist.
    12. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I foresee coming from this is exactly what Twitter has enabled through the same functionality: publicized block lists used to silence dissent.

    13. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      What a stupid post. Basically, you're saying that I should read all of APK's drivel, as well as all the other countless trolls, such as the loser AC on here who keeps posting about "n****rs". No, I don't need to waste my time reading such garbage.

      Slashdot desperately needs this feature, as well as banning ACs.

    14. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by KGIII · · Score: 2

      I don't have any experience with Reddit so I don't really know what they'll consider harassment or whatnot but I don't see anything particularly egregious about this tool. Not really, at least not in my current thinking - someone's welcome to try to change that. I don't see why this has to be an echo chamber.

      It's possible to hold dissenting opinions and to discuss any topic without being offensive. It's possible to have a conversation that remains civil, regardless of the positions held. I know this is true, I do it nearly every single day. In fact, you might say that my current post is contrarian. I have held meaningful, civil, discussions - even debates, with all sorts of people. Some of those people were the least favored folks on the planet. Some of them have held beliefs that are truly ignorant but the conversations remained civil throughout.

      Of course, not every conversation is going to turn out that way. In fact, I'm guilty of being uncivilized in my responses. But, the thing is, it doesn't *have* to be that way. It doesn't have to be an echo chamber. I voice contrary opinions on a regular basis, probably nearly every single day. Hell, I don't even mind systemd (legitimately, I do not mind - it even has come in handy) and I share and defend that position politely. Some of the spittle flecked responders lack the capacity for civil discourse but they're an exception and not the rule.

      So, perhaps Reddit is different than every place I've ever been in the real world or online. I'd not know, I've never posted there. I've been there a couple of times but I don't think I've read a full thread there. There is a "KGIII" there but they're not me.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    15. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Although there is a facsimile of technical sub-reddits, most of that site is just mindless garbage so there really isn't a position to defend with any real facts.

      Oh please, that's a bunch of crap. There's over a quarter-million subreddits last I heard, and most of *every* site is just mindless garbage, this site included. But with that many subreddits, it's easy to find interesting conversation, and about specialized topics. There's a subreddit about my car, for instance, if I just want to chat with people about that; a lot of posts are fairly useless, but there's some real gems here and there. It's just like anyplace else: "95% of everything is crap." (Sturgeon's Law)

      People on that site don't want to "discuss" anything, they want a place where they can go to feel popular or accepted, regardless of any actual social ability.

      Oh, BS. You're looking in the wrong place. Maybe you were browsing /r/HillaryClinton. Yeah, if you say anything negative about her on there, you'll be banned immediately. Go someplace else like /r/politics and you'll see all kinds of debate (and frequently not friendly...).

      Every subreddit is different. They have different mods, different topics, different rules. Some are complete drivel (like Hillary's fan club subreddit), some are full of nasty arguing (/r/politics, but that's understandable given the topic and what's at stake), some are just places where people post pictures of stuff, some are really silly (like /r/PhotoshopBattles) but fun if you're into that kind of thing.

    16. Re: Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like these groups of people will make and share block lists to inforce their echo chambers...

      Because that's not what the internet was made for right? Sharing only the information others approve of first.

      How beauteous mankind is! O brave new world that has such people in it!

    17. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Yep, and not only that, if another drunk hobo starts telling you how he was abducted by aliens, you have a responsibility to hear him out and determine if you think he's telling the truth too!

    18. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by MrLint · · Score: 1

      In the degenerate case, the echo camber is between ones ears.

    19. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by tibit · · Score: 1

      Conversely, there's plenty of mental midgets who won't listen to any sort of reason, so you have no recourse but stick your fingers into your ears when you're near them. Elsewhere, we call it hearing protection, and I'll be damned if it doesn't work wonderfully.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    20. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      "95% of everything is crap." (Sturgeon's Law)

      Sturgeon was an optimist. :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    21. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Many forums, including Slashdot (via the friend/foe system) have similar features and don't become echo chambers. I mean, Slashdot can be pretty bad at times, but there are usually enough dissenting voices for a few of them to get past the mod-bombing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re: Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was only some way to make a list of all the problematic people online.

      Maybe we could put a Big Gold Star next to their names so we could tell them apart from the good normal people.

      Then we could gather them up, and put them all in camps.
      Better make sure those camps have large showering faculties too, don't want them to be uncomfortable or unclean!

    23. Re: Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends if they are a minority with less privilege, cause you'd better check yours you ignorate racist cis scum.

    24. Re: Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      you ignorate racist cis scum.

      HA! You showed your true colors! A True Feminist would know that raCISt already implies CIS!

    25. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drivel that you can't manage to validly technically disprove? See the post about Mental Midgets (you are one) https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    26. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Though it can be abused to block anyone with a different opinion than you, the real purpose of this would be if someone is being abusive or who is entering a forum for the sole purpose of annoying as many people as possible. Someone who is acting abusive won't care about your carefully crafted arguments. He'll hurl insults and vague threats back at you, ignoring all of your points. If an abusive user does it right, they can stay just inside of the site's acceptable use guidelines and be abusive while not getting kicked off.

      The person who comes into a forum to intentionally annoy will keep spouting their garbage no matter how many arguments a person puts forth. As an example, there's another forum (not Reddit) I frequent where any conversation about Netflix or cord cutting results in this one user insisting that Netflix will soon start raising prices like cable companies do, that Netflix will flood their streams with ads, that Netflix will ban binge watching, and that cord cutting will make cable companies raise their Internet rates to $200 a month. No matter how much it is pointed out to him that there aren't indications for any of this, he insists it's true. I don't want to avoid these discussions on that forum because of one guy, but his posts have long ago passed the line into annoying. If I could use a tool like this to stop seeing his posts, I would. I wouldn't use it for anyone who insists that cable is great and cord cutters are missing out. (Yes, I've encountered those people too.) It would be used sparingly.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    27. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      No, this is a lot more like being able to prevent somebody who wants to join your soccer game from just kicking the ball out into the street out of spite.

      Having standards doesn't make you 5 years old. There are plenty of people who deserve to be filtered out of a discussion, especially in so far as it's clear that often time the goal of a person is to simply derail or make discussion impossible in the first place.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    28. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's possible to hold dissenting opinions and to discuss any topic without being offensive. It's possible to have a conversation that remains civil, regardless of the positions held. I know this is true, I do it nearly every single day. In fact, you might say that my current post is contrarian. I have held meaningful, civil, discussions - even debates, with all sorts of people. Some of those people were the least favored folks on the planet. Some of them have held beliefs that are truly ignorant but the conversations remained civil throughout.

      Exactly. The block feature wouldn't be for "I disagree with you and here are my reasons why." It would be for "you're an idiot if you believe X and just to reinforce this I'll track down every post of yours and make and insulting reply." There's a small, but vocal, group in pretty much any forum who thinks that the way to win an argument is to make threats and insults until the other side is driven out of the forum. Then they win. The best tactic against these people is to ignore them. This tool simply makes ignoring them easier.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    29. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Oh please, that's a bunch of crap. There's over a quarter-million subreddits last I heard, and most of *every* site is just mindless garbage, this site included. But with that many subreddits, it's easy to find interesting conversation, and about specialized topics. There's a subreddit about my car, for instance, if I just want to chat with people about that; a lot of posts are fairly useless, but there's some real gems here and there. It's just like anyplace else: "95% of everything is crap." (Sturgeon's Law)

      Also, what one person considers a garbage conversation, others might find very interesting. I'd probably be bored if I wandered into a car repair subreddit. It's just not something that sparks my interest. However, I'm sure there are subreddits that I find very interesting that you'd roll your eyes at. Everyone's different and has different interests so that 5% of "actually useful/interesting content" varies from person to person.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    30. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by mattventura · · Score: 1

      I think this is actually a good thing. It's much better (and less damaging) to put power in the hands of end-users, rather than in a central moderation authority. Ignoring a viewpoint is a much better idea than censoring it from everyone. The problem with harassment is that one man's disagreement is another man's harassment, so rather than have moderators try to decide if something is over the line or not, just let people decide for themselves. Yes, people sticking their fingers in their ears when someone disagrees is bad, but calling for censorship is even worse.

    31. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it doesn't *have* to be turning it into an echo chamber. There's no reason that it has to end that way - at least not in the majority of cases. For those who want one, well... Let 'em have it.

      I don't block anyone here. I read at -1. There are other sites where I'd consider it but I usually don't. I could understand blocking the idiots that don't contribute anything but that doesn't mean that you'll be stuck in an echo chamber. How you use it is up to you.

      I'm not sure that I'd block anyone here. I do have some sort-of pressing issues to figure that out, however. I'm in the process of starting a site (or a group of them) meant for civil discourse which is why the subject makes me curious. We will be blocking those who can't remain civil but that will be via moderation. You can discuss anything and be civil about it. I know because I do it. I know because I've had lots of civil conversations with people who had very different opinions/beliefs than I.

      Heck, one of the people who's been kind of helping out (at least keeping me motivated) is a Mormon. Yeah... We have fine conversations. I'm a secular Buddhist and not even a *good* Buddhist. I'm sure as hell not a monk. Nah, we get along just fine.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    32. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      I don't even mind systemd

      Blocked. We don't take kindly to your type around here. Why don't you just move along sir. *Block intensifying*

    33. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't need to technically disprove it. I can dismiss it as drivel and move on; it's my right, just as I don't need to technically disprove that the drunk hobo on the corner wasn't really abducted by aliens.

      Fuck off, APK.

    34. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by lgw · · Score: 2, Informative

      What I foresee coming from this is exactly what Twitter has enabled through the same functionality: publicized block lists used to silence dissent.

      Twitter went further than that, giving a group of people like and including Anita Sarkeesian--self-identified social justice activists--the right to ban people they don't like. Within a couple weeks, most prominent critics of their beliefs were banned. Badthought right down the memory hole.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    35. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Triklyn · · Score: 1

      yes.. because mormons, as a people, are known to be raving lunatics.

      as a people, they're belief system is mad as hell, but they're all so amiable it's maddening.

    36. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm. It really does look like you can't prove him wrong unlike that hobo which would be easy to do and this is your bs to cover that fact, especially from your profanity giving you away raging as you are now.

    37. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You're not fooling anyone, APK. You really should seek mental help.

    38. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not fooling anyone, Grishnakh. You really should prove APK wrong. It's obvious you can't and his program affects your personal agenda adversely somehow! Advertiser, Malware Maker, or webmaster: Which are you?

    39. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The options to sort comments are: Best, Top, New, Controversial, and Old

      Otherwise, yes, I agree with you

    40. Re: Typical Response from Mental Midgets by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      The point is that it's a personal list, you don't share it with anyone. You just use it to cut out the bullshit idiots from your online life, so you can go about doing the things you actually want to do, instead of having to deal with idiots.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    41. Re: Typical Response from Mental Midgets by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      It's not different to the things people already do to reinforce their echo chambers, eg. creating new subreddits or entire websites where dissenters are banned.

      This anti-harassment blocklist implementation doesn't change any of that.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    42. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1, Insightful

      By "critics", you mean "basement-dwelling shut-ins who can only achieve erections by sending death threats to people they disagree with".

      --
      Eat the rich.
    43. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, if it's a legitimate debate, anyone who blocks a user will just be taking themselves out of the conversation. I think it's awesome. All the crybabies can have their precious safe space and everyone else can get along with their lives without having to listen to their whining.

    44. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by lgw · · Score: 2

      No death threat here. These were very public figures, not anonymous, and their "harassment" was only disagreement.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    45. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      So, since foe works in a similar way, that means you can't even see my responses?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    46. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      There's a small, but vocal, group in pretty much any forum who thinks that the way to win an argument is to make threats and insults until the other side is driven out of the forum. Then they win.

      Are we speaking of Reddit Trolls or APK?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    47. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The thing is, no matter how often you are proven wrong, you keep coming back with the same arguments. You don't care about how wrong you are, you care about spamming everyone everywhere with your horrible hosts file solution.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    48. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      How horrible of you, you would ban someone from a soccer game for being bad at it? block... :)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    49. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't use the score modifier feature myself.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    50. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coren22 apk's torn you apart using facts vs your errors every time like https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... and https://slashdot.org/comments.... and https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... and you've the nerve to equate him to trolls? You're the troll. Your post history today shows you stalking him or talking behind his back like the bitch you are today. He's destroyed you and you're still butthurt obviously.

    51. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 0

      By "disagreement", you mean "rampant misogyny".

      --
      Eat the rich.
    52. Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets by lgw · · Score: 1

      That is what people like Anita often call "disagreement", yes. Though it would be more traditional to call them "blasphemers", since the offense is "disagreeing with what I've arbitrarily decided is the inarguable truth".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  3. Good by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good. Maybe this will limit the microaggressive behavior some cisgender white males and help keep Reddit a safe place so everyone else can express their more valid opinions. They also need to add a hugcircle feature.

    1. Re:Good by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, some of you may say that my previous comment wasn't even a proper sentence. Just remember: everything is relative and there is no "right" or "wrong". So stop your microaggresive thoughts right there Mister!

    2. Re:Good by Bengie · · Score: 2

      While I don't actively participate in Reddit, it seems to be a large enough community to have stalker trolls. Being a troll is one thing, but if you stalk someone, you've targeted someone.

    3. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only do macroaggressions.

    4. Re:Good by halivar · · Score: 1

      Well, Slashdot doesn't have an "edit" button, so them's the breaks.

    5. Re:Good by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not adding you to my hugcircle!

    6. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This thread is violating my safe space!!! I'm a VICTIM!!!!!

    7. Re:Good by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      I'm a bit surprised they didn't have this feature already. It seems kind of basic functionality to be able to ignore posts from people you don't like and can be easily implemented. I never ignore anyone because I enjoy all the frothing at the mouth of all my enemies.

    8. Re:Good by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      Edit buttons are for pussies.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Good by wardrich86 · · Score: 1

      [Triggering intensifies]

    10. Re:Good by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      The feature isn't as useful as it sounds considering that anyone can just make a new account and they've essentially circumvented any blocking. I suppose the admins can start IP banning people at that point, but any really dedicated troll is probably already using a proxy or VPN. Normally that would be where you turn matters over to police, but they tend to be horribly inept when it comes to dealing with internet crime or the troll is located in a country that doesn't give two shits about what someone in the U.S. or some other country is complaining about.

      I suppose it stops the low effort trolls, and if that's 99% of the trolling on reddit it's probably sufficient, but I don't think it does much of anything for the really egregious cases.

    11. Re:Good by fey000 · · Score: 1

      I sure hope so otherwise you'd be the worst stalker ever.

    12. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      weak

    13. Re:Good by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You know, you can use the Slashdot friend/foe system to do something similar. Just mark someone as your foe, set foes to -6 here and you won't even see them unless you browse at -1.

      It's a pretty basic feature for discussion forums. Personally I don't use it though. Imagine if someone doxed you but you had them on the ignore list, you wouldn't even know it happened. I'd prefer to know so I can do something about it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you need a safe space from these articles, sorry that being a white male is so hard for you, dude.

    15. Re:Good by Bongo · · Score: 1

      Coylehd t agree more.

    16. Re:Good by KGIII · · Score: 0

      Is it really that bad, to you, if someone follows you around on the 'net and calls you names? 'Cause I have had that happen and I really didn't find it all that traumatizing. Hell, they then went on to say they were going to moderate all of my posts down. Well, I make a whole lot of posts. Needless to say, they were unable to do that. Eventually, it appears that meta-mod got them here - I don't think they get mod points at all any more.

      At any rate, yeah... They followed me around and were quite aggressive for a while. It didn't actually bother me at all. It meant that I was the one in charge. It meant that I was the one controlling their responses. They were giving me their most precious asset - their time.

      And no, I didn't lose sleep. I didn't worry. I didn't care except to be amused by it. They've kind of stopped posting while logged in now. Hell, I even invited 'em to dinner once. They didn't come. They were not the best of stalker and they gave up way too early for my taste.

      Does it really bother you if someone calls you names online? Does it matter if they "target" you? 'Cause, I've had this happen and it wasn't much more than a great ego boost. They dedicated a whole bunch of time to me and my doings. I kind of miss 'em.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    17. Re:Good by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And they never notice how labeling something as a micro-aggression is itself a micro-aggression. As are "safe spaces" (saying that whole classes of people can't be trusted with other classes of people) and "trigger warnings" (about as useless as writing ***SPOILER ALERT***, it just makes people more curious).

      Political correctness needs to die.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    18. Re:Good by Halo1 · · Score: 1

      Good. Maybe this will limit the microaggressive behavior some cisgender white males and help keep Reddit a safe place so everyone else can express their more valid opinions. They also need to add a hugcircle feature.

      You seem to have a really intense fixation on the terms "hugcircle" and "microaggression". I'm not sure what the problem is with a feature that allows you to hide comments from idiots. Killfiles have been around for ages for usenet and email (long before those words ever were a thing), so why should it be different for a random web based forum?

      --
      Donate free food here
    19. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like the solution a social hindrance warrior would come up with.

      A true SJW would need to punish the people that disagree with them, because how else will they repent and admit their privilege?

    20. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, how else can you rally your like minded echo chamber SJWs against your foe in order to ruin their life for not agreeing with you?

      Yes, I can see how blocking someone's comments from your view would prevent that.

    21. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why the hell did you get all triggered and post about hugboxes and shit?

      Oh, you're just a sack of shit who thinks he's cool every time he misuses the word cisgendered.

    22. Re: Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't misuse a made up word.

    23. Re:Good by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Personally I wouldn't care either. I've only had something like that happen to me once, and the person doing it made it pretty easy to find out who they actually were, so it only took one email to them to get them to stop. I really only knew the person in passing so I wasn't really sure if they were a troll and I just happened to be the person to annoy that day or if I had previously said something that set them off.

      However, not everyone is emotionally mature enough to handle situations like that. I imagine that if the same had happened when I was much younger, I wouldn't have taken it as well. There was also the (in)famous case where an older woman harassed a young teen girl until she eventually committed suicide.

      This feature isn't something for you or I, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have a place. I don't need littering laws to keep me from throwing trash on the ground, but not everyone gets that idea apparently. On further reflection, I almost wonder if this is a feature that's less about the users and more about the admins not wanting to deal with all the petty shit that goes on between users.

    24. Re:Good by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      "cisgendered" isn't even a real word.

    25. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the "following around and calling you names" so much as the "following you around and threatening all-day-every-day to rape and murder you and/or your family"

      I can see how that shit takes a toll on someone, so yeah a block list is a solid idea.

    26. Re:Good by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      I have no problem with it. Do you? The word "killfile" I find offensive though. You should join our hugcircle and check your privilege.

    27. Re:Good by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I am really a cisfemale who identifies as a male transsexual. Check your privilege "dude"!

    28. Re:Good by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Brilliant idea, given that the cardinality between users and IPs is m:n.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    29. Re:Good by Halo1 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I already figured that was the kind of non-answer I'd get. You might want to figure out why you are so obsessed with it though (or maybe you already know, and this is your way of dealing with it).

      --
      Donate free food here
    30. Re:Good by cmseagle · · Score: 1

      "Political correctness needs to die" is an overly broad statement. It's not a bad thing that we live in a society that considers it inappropriate to use racial or homophobic slurs.

    31. Re:Good by rhazz · · Score: 1

      As someone who watches things like The Walking Dead on Netflix which is a season or two behind, I very much appreciate SPOILER ALERTs.

    32. Re:Good by rhazz · · Score: 1

      ***Canadian Netflix.

    33. Re:Good by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      How are we defining "real word" here? Typically I see people suggest that it need to be in "the dictionary", and by that definition cisgender/cisgendered certainly qualifies (given its inclusion in the Oxford English Dictionary.) http://www.oxforddictionaries....

    34. Re:Good by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      Your lack of gender neutral pronouns is triggering me

    35. Re:Good by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      With political correctness running rampant, it is harder to identify the assholes. That being the case, it's also harder to hold them publicly to account. Would you rather someone told you to your face that they hated you, or just spread stories behind your back while taking advantage of your good nature?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    36. Re:Good by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      So you must really hate re-runs if you only watch stuff that you don't know how it ends :-) Or the election process of our southern neighbors, because you know that no matter what, it ends in a fricking disaster.

      It was the best of times,
      It was the worst of times
      And they're working hard to make it
      The biblical end of time.
      Burma Shave

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    37. Re:Good by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Wow, marked troll for making a joke...I wish I had mod points to correct this egregious insult!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    38. Re:Good by KGIII · · Score: 1

      There's a whole lot of faux outrage and victimization as a sport going on. At least it's only a blocklist at an individual level.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  4. Decline Is Imminent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Nothing exemplifies an online community approaching the event horizon like implementation of blocking and filter tools to be used against the community members.

    The so-called harassment that this will be used to block will simply silence the community or largely clueless, inexperienced, wannabe SJW. I guarantee you that it will quickly spiral into a bunch of dingbats talking to themselves, as everyone else will be blocked. At that point, the community ceases to exist and the site is of no interest.

    This tool marks the beginning of Reddit's slide back into obscurity. I wonder what the next "big thing" site will be?

    1. Re:Decline Is Imminent by Teancum · · Score: 2, Informative

      In other words, Reddit is now nothing more than a poor imitation of Facebook.

    2. Re:Decline Is Imminent by Sigma+7 · · Score: 2

      I guarantee you that it will quickly spiral into a bunch of dingbats talking to themselves, as everyone else will be blocked.

      That's already happened.

      If you post in a few certain subreddits, you get blocked from OffMyChest, me_irl, and others that subscribe to the same style of automatic blocking - well before the "block user" feature was added.

      Also, abusive moderators are a greater threat to reddit than abusive users, as just one moderator can cripple a community by the simplest of changes (whether performing a hostile takeover, or slowly boiling the frog by making subtle changes over time.) The abusive users can be handled by standard whack-a-mole practices, along with ways to make it harder for non or new users to get a list of what a given user posts.

    3. Re:Decline Is Imminent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This tool marks the beginning of Reddit's slide back into obscurity.

      I wonder if you get the irony of posting this on Slashdot.

    4. Re:Decline Is Imminent by houghi · · Score: 1

      Facebook? It reminds me of the killfilter feature of Usenet.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    5. Re:Decline Is Imminent by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Did this also happen to Slashdot when it implemented friends and foes?

      I mean, yeah, Slashdot eventually faded into relative obscurity, but I'm pretty sure that was a decade or so after friends and foes were implemented.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:Decline Is Imminent by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I guarantee you that it will quickly spiral into a bunch of dingbats talking to themselves

      Isn't that better then said dingbats talking to everyone else?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re:Decline Is Imminent by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      The worst abusers of this are the powermods, those are the ones that moderate hundreds of subs. There's no shortage of them, and there's no shortage of subs that they've taken over either. It's very rare that a sub that gets someone like that in a position of power is able to recover from it either. The only one off the top of my head that has is /r/canada, and even at that it's still suffering from when DavidReiss666 was there.

      What's funny is that the users that follow these power mods around have a huge overlap in very specific subs, and once the takeover is complete you have a userbase that posts in all the same subs, and the content and quality simply hits free fall and eventually dies as people move to less authoritarian subs.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:Decline Is Imminent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I think of authoritarian idiots I think of /r/legaladvice

    9. Re:Decline Is Imminent by tsotha · · Score: 1

      Or even digg.

    10. Re:Decline Is Imminent by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 1

      " a bunch of dingbats talking to themselves"

      Actually Reddit has always tended to be that, other than a few little niches of sanity and openness.

  5. IF harassment = anything offensive by rmdingler · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Just about the time you ensure everyone has the right to feel warm, fuzzy, and never, ever offended by anything they ever come into contact with...

    Congratulations!

    You have destroyed everyone else's freedom along with your own.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just about the time you ensure everyone has the right to feel warm, fuzzy, and never, ever offended by anything they ever come into contact with...

      Congratulations!

      You have destroyed everyone else's freedom along with your own.

      Reddit is a private entity and has no obligation to maintain anyone's freedom of expression.

      Furthermore, while the citizens of many nations have freedom of expression, I'm not aware of any nation where there's an obligation for everyone else to listen.

    2. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reddit is a private entity and has no obligation to maintain anyone's freedom of expression.

      That's what my friend tells queers when they come into his restaurant. "If you want to suck cock, that's fine. But as a private business, I'm not obligated to serve you. So get the fuck out."

    3. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Does he tell them that AFTER they have sucked his cock, or before?

    4. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by fey000 · · Score: 1

      Unless Reddit explicitly stated that it was a platform for free speech, then I guess it has some sort of (moral) obligation to stand by that. Has Reddit ever said anything like that?

    5. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reddit is a private entity and has no obligation to maintain anyone's freedom of expression.
      True, but if they don't then they're kind of defeating the entire purpose of the place. At which point people move on to a different service, and those who remain turn it into yet another internet Echo Chamber.

    6. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting analogy. But, restaurants have to serve everyone, but they can throw you out if you scream obscenities. Likewise, Reddit can throw you out if they like, but they cannot prevent you from using the site if you are gay. Equal rights.

    7. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by halivar · · Score: 1

      Interesting analogy. But, restaurants have to serve everyone

      This is only true in states with public accommodation laws. Under federal law, a private secular institution may discriminate on the basis of race, creed, or color (or anything at all, for that matter). But under Colorado law (of the famous gay wedding cake), they may not. So it depends on your state.

    8. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by jimbolauski · · Score: 2

      Reddit is a private entity and has no obligation to maintain anyone's freedom of expression.

      Nobody is making the argument that private companies have a legal obligation to maintain everyone's freedom of expression. They are simply making the argument that it's bad practice for a forum built on public discussing to start limiting the public's ability to discuss. This falls into the "just because you have the right to do something doesn't make it right" category.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    9. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Are you sure about that?

      I guess, it might be different as they're a business but I'm not entirely sure that it is. I don't think it's been tested anywhere and things default to legal and not illegal?

      I'm almost completely certain that I can start a site that bans anyone who discloses they're gay - and only bans those who discloses they're gay. Obviously, I'd have no way of telling if they're gay. I guess I could have a 'real name' and 'sworn affidavit' policy. But yeah, I'm pretty sure I don't have to let people use my site if I don't want to. Is Reddit publicly traded or anything?

      Heck, I could probably start a site and say, "NO WHITE PEOPLE!" if I wanted. Or, maybe, one that disallowed black people, Jewish people, gays, and Gypsies. I kind of want to do something like that now and see what happens. I'm thinking a good test would be a site that disallows women and a sibling site that disallows men. Then we can see which one gets more hate mail or who takes what to court.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    10. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Has Reddit ever said anything like that?

      Yes, up until Pao became CEO. Last year, when they suddenly decided that they'd ban people and subs to protect users feelings, even if the content wasn't illegal. Then they fully double down on the "reddit isn't about free speech." Even though it has self-styled ads to create your own subrredit like "....because everyone wants a voice" "...and for free speech" those are still out there to this day. Roughly two years ago they were shadowbanning users if they didn't believe in global warming.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by vel-ex-tech · · Score: 2

      As it should be.

      I fucking hate it when I go somewhere and get shit service or else have the cops called on me after I've fucking paid. Your friend is doing it right. Of course, I'm free to give the response, "If you're a delusional idiot who doesn't want my money, that's fine. But as a private individual, I'm not obligated to give you any money. I'll even tell everyone I know you don't want LGBT customers just because I'm such a nice person. Have a nice fucking day."

      It would be even better if he posted on the door and advertised his position.

      I'm being absolutely serious. You can't legislate against stupidity. It's best to let the market sort it out.

      I don't want to give my money to your friend. Your friend doesn't want to cook for me. Everybody wins.

    12. Re:IF harassment = anything offensive by Aerokii · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that your point is essentially irrelevant. This isn't even about Reddit as an entity blocking anyone/anything, it's about users choosing to block people for whatever the reason might be.

      Can this be used for people to ignore opposition and differing opinions? Yes- but by that token, so can "just not reading the post." Don't need a block feature built in for that. However, "not reading the post" isn't so useful when someone starts following and harassing you online. That's where the block feature starts to really shine.

      In the hands of the users, the way the block tool will be used will be a reflection of Reddit's community, rather than the company of Reddit itself. A prime example of this is the upvote/downvote system. It can indeed be used as a method of saying what posts contribute to discussion and what do not- but many times it ends up being used as a "agree/disagree" button that ends up silencing anyone sufficiently with an opinion that is sufficiently unpopular. Sometimes this happens to trolls and bigots... other times to people who call out that same bigotry.

      People love to complain about how Reddit is no longer an open platform for free speech... but with systems like that? It never was, despite what Reddit itself claimed.

  6. Almost a full step in the right direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what about just autoblocking for messages that contain a certain level/frequency of keywords?

    1. Re:Almost a full step in the right direction by Z80a · · Score: 1

      Who picks the keywords?

  7. About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some subreddits have big problems with high karma trolls who never get banned for their bullshit. I can just block them all now. Thanks reddit, about time.

  8. Ban the Block by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nobody has the right to not pay attention to me, so I am against this tyrannical form of Reddit sensor sheep.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Ban the Block by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your use of double negatives is a perfect example of microaggressive behavior. Off to the reeducation camps for you!

    2. Re:Ban the Block by Deagol · · Score: 1

      Muh safe spaces!

    3. Re:Ban the Block by halivar · · Score: 1

      Pointing out bad grammer and spelling aggresses me.

    4. Re: Ban the Block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does one, point out spelling?

    5. Re:Ban the Block by Ian+A.+Shill · · Score: 1
      Your repeated belittling of the aggressions of others triggers my latent feelings of inadequacy, you insensitive clod.

      Your use of double negatives is a perfect example of microaggressive behavior. Off to the reeducation camps for you!

      --
      For hire.
    6. Re:Ban the Block by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Pointing out bad grammer and spelling aggresses me.

      It's only bad grammar if it's not what you meant.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:Ban the Block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ur rite, my speeling an grammer dun matter at all an less trolls u need rite? RITE? WRITE?

  9. Way to make you forget about the dead canary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never believe people that say they have you in their best interest

  10. just now getting block/ignore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Reddit is just now getting block/ignore? IRC has had /ignore for quite a while. Facebook has block. Even on Slashdot, I can designate different UIDs "enemies" and apply a massive negative score to them.

    I don't get the anti-sjw whinging above. Is IRC a hugbox because of the /ignore command? Does IRC's /kick or /ban commands (yeah, technically /mode #channel +b somemask iirc) make IRC a hugbox?

    You're all dipshits. This is pretty much all the Slashdot and Soylent communities have to offer any more. Reactionary dipshits who think they're hip because they duckspeak the word cisgendered.

    1. Re:just now getting block/ignore? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hugcircle is a better term than hugbox. In a circle everyone is equal distance from the center. Plus there are no sharp corners so it is safer than a box. In the future please use the term "hugcircle" instead so we can be more inclusive of everyone.

    2. Re:just now getting block/ignore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm triggered by circles!!

    3. Re:just now getting block/ignore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP here. 110010001000 yet again proves himself to be a complete fucking idiot who is incapable of understanding anything. Did you even read what I wrote, you fucking moron?

      Good lord. Can you possibly troll harder?

    4. Re:just now getting block/ignore? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      cisgender is a bullsh*t term coined 20 years ago to replace "normal." The same way that transgender became a much more inclusive term to include cross-dressers and everyone else under the protective umbrella of transsexual, Hint: cross-dressing is a sexual fetish; the majority of "transgenders" are purely lifestyle choices, not treatable medical conditions.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:just now getting block/ignore? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Union, hugbox circles you!

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:just now getting block/ignore? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I didn't bother reading what you wrote, because you never write anything worth reading.

  11. Re:A more efficient solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think a "Block Anyone Who Disagrees With Me" button would be a lot simpler.

  12. While this WILL be used to reinforce hugboxes... by Z80a · · Score: 1

    It is a local solution, which means it can't be actually used for censorship, but just isolating snowflakes from the community.
    It would be dangerous if for example reddit banned people in too many lists or assigned people to put people on block for you, and this block was not removable.

  13. Re:While this WILL be used to reinforce hugboxes.. by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hugcircle is a better term than hugbox. In a circle everyone is equal distance from the center. Plus there are no sharp corners so it is safer than a box. In the future please use the term "hugcircle" instead so we can be more inclusive of everyone!

  14. When dissention is harassment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Hey, I'm all for stopping assholes from being assholes, and if you think hiding from it is protection, then go for it. I don't really have a better solution.

    But there's a similar problem I have with the greater Twitter population, where I feel the block feature can be abused and anyone with a dissenting opinion is harassing you. You become judge, jury, and executioner of their ability to participate in the conversation at all. Opposing views are eliminated and tweet chains become a support group. It's probably less of an issue for Reddit given the different format, but since discussion actually happens there I'd hate to see it die because you're an anti-Skub Republican and I'm a pro-Skub Democrat.

    I do like that it's a "hide it from me" solution instead of a "you can't post here" deal. I'd like to go one step further and be able to tell who in the thread is blocking someone else; let me see who is blocking for rape threats and trolling, and who is blocking all the Trump supporters. Actually I'd love that for Twitter even more; you block me, you don't see my replies, I don't know I'm blocked, everyone else can see it.

    1. Re: When dissention is harassment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have the right to express yourself.

      You do NOT have the right to an audience.

      Thems the rules, don't like it?

      Move to a dictatorship and seize power.
      Then you can force others to listen to you.

    2. Re:When dissention is harassment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do like that it's a "hide it from me" solution instead of a "you can't post here" deal.

      Except it isn't. TFA says only moderators will be able to see it.

    3. Re:When dissention is harassment by tsotha · · Score: 1

      The blocking stuff really got out of hand on Twitter when they went to block lists. There are large groups of people on twitter who will never hear an opinion they disagree with because they subscribe to such block lists. Blocking trolls makes a certain amount of sense, but there are a lot of people who think anyone who disagrees with them is a troll, and these are the people who tend to maintain the lists.

  15. What kind of pussies did the previous generation by pecosdave · · Score: 0, Troll

    produce that the current generation needs protection from that which makes us stronger and better adjusted?

    If it weren't for being harassed, made fun of, and being generally dragged through the mud I'm not sure I would have ever toughened up and become so well adjusted. It's like they want to make sure the next generation is even worse crop of spineless jellyfish than the current.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  16. "Welcome to the kill file" by idontgno · · Score: 1

    No, seriously.

    I hope Reddit doesn't pretend this is something new and innovative, since it's been around since the 1980s.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    1. Re:"Welcome to the kill file" by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      What did you expect from a site that basically re-implemented the Usenet on a WWW platform replacing the '.'s with '/'s?

    2. Re:"Welcome to the kill file" by KGIII · · Score: 1

      *plonk*

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  17. Does not go far enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tens of thousands of people want to block GallowBoob's submissions, but we can't block him unless he replies to one of our posts or comments.

  18. Re:What kind of pussies did the previous generatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's very tempting to rationalize wasted time as worthwhile because of the sunk cost fallacy - it "builds character"!

    These trolls aren't doing us a favor by "making us stronger". They're just being jerks on the internet, in a way they'd never have the courage to be in real life. At least in the previous generation you'd get your ass kicked for following someone around and pestering them.

    Sorry to interrupt your ageist rant, though. Those kids today are WORTHLESS! They're so terrified of Communists and terrorists that they gave away all the freedom we won from the Axis, to a bunch of bankers and businessmen no less!

  19. That's great news by Afty0r · · Score: 0

    Every echo chamber just got that much bigger. I'm sure this is a victory for centrism, moderation and social education, helping to bring people with radical opposing views back towards a healthier, humanist center. No wait...

    1. Re:That's great news by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      That's funny: every board I've seen where the users have no tools to manage what they see, it's the loudmouth vulgar fuckwits who drown out the conversation and turn the board into an echo chamber.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    2. Re:That's great news by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It is surprisingly how only a few few dedicated malcontents can completely poison a community. By being able to ignore them completely, the total level of idiocy is significantly reduced.

      Of course, some people will just block everyone they disagree with, but then it becomes a self-sustaining solution. The one-track fuckwits block everyone else, which in turn has the effect of blocking themselves off from the majority of the community. It's beautiful in its elegance.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    3. Re:That's great news by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Or you could just troll the trolls for your own entertainment while doing a public service. No need for censorship - put all the ugly stuff out in the open instead of hiding it in dark corners. Cockroaches don't like strong light They run away.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:That's great news by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I fully support people who want to annoy trolls and harassers, but I can't be bothered to fight that fight anymore, I have more interesting things to do.

      So I'll just block the shitheads, and the Brave Internet Warriors can continue to counter-troll them as much as they like.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    5. Re:That's great news by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean - I'd really like an app for that :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  20. Re:What kind of pussies did the previous generatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every generation thinks the next generation are spineless.
    Every generation makes stupid generalizations as they get old, and lose control of the future.

  21. Symmetric blocking for asymmetric friendship by allo · · Score: 1

    Looks like the same mistake, that twitter made.

    Good thing: You do not need to follow your followers
    Mistake: When somebody blocks you, you cannot read his tweets, either. Which is strange, because blocking in an asymmetric medium should just be an ignore list.

  22. Re:What kind of pussies did the previous generatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    protection from that which makes us stronger and better adjusted?

    It can't make you stronger if you aren't given the mental and social tools to draw strength from it. I'm not certain a software tool can replace that, but the same people aren't given the tools to know the difference.

  23. Reddit is Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reddit harasses me with its articles attacking everything I believe in: it's just not a safe place anymore.

    1. Re:Reddit is Troll by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      You can feel free to block Reddit.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  24. All Brazilian sites shoud have this too by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

    Truth be told, the majority of my fellow Brazilians have shit between the ears (is the origin of the "HUEHUEBR"), so a tool that allows me to take no notice of their comments is an absolute must. It is the best way to get rid of a troll: make his efforts useless, even the dumbest of the trolls will realize at some point that no one listens to him (for not even seeing what he's posting).

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    1. Re:All Brazilian sites shoud have this too by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Truth be told, the majority of my fellow Brazilians have shit between the ears (is the origin of the "HUEHUEBR"), so a tool that allows me to take no notice of their comments is an absolute must.

      They can't be any worse than the majority of my fellow Americans.

    2. Re:All Brazilian sites shoud have this too by lhowaf · · Score: 1

      The breadth of your knowledge of Americans is truly astounding.

  25. Digg 4.1 by sethstorm · · Score: 0

    It's not about the users, it's about appeasing the leftists that want "safe spaces" in the name of "civility".

    Let the alt-creation begin!

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  26. It balkanizes people. by sethstorm · · Score: 0, Troll

    It incentivizes people to only hear what they want to hear, from sources approved to hear.

    Never mind that it will be used by powermods to silence users.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:It balkanizes people. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      If moderators misuse their privileges, that will be problematic.

      But they could already do this by banning people normally, so it's really no different.

      And there is no guarantee of free speech on a private website. Their website, their rules.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re:It balkanizes people. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      If moderators misuse their privileges, that will be problematic.

      They already do misuse it, and ask for more when there's some edge case where the user has some advantage.

      But they could already do this by banning people normally, so it's really no different.

      The trouble is that it can be stacked with modmail mutes. It creates a wall between users and powermods.

      [hurr durr, private site excuse]

      That doesn't affect the validity of my statements thus far, and is generally a weak cop-out. Besides, Reddit was known for being the user-driven alternative to an authoritarian Digg; we now see them acting like the very Digg that drove people to Reddit.

      Reddit would do well if someone bought it up, purged the powermods, SOCJUS, narrative control tools, and other components that have negatively affected the site.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    3. Re:It balkanizes people. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      The open secret is that Reddit has always sucked. Dumbass users, dumbass mods, dumbass layout, dumbass policies. It's amazing that it's actually lasted this long.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  27. [Trigger Warning] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is so progressive. Feelings are much more important than the free exchange of ideas :^)

  28. Re:A more efficient solution? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

    With this tool, it sounds as though users would need to manually block each offending user.

    Indeed. The best-case scenario is that the feature is only used against the trolls, but that creates a situation where new users will need to block all the same people as the 'community' before they can get value out of the forum.

    So I propose blocking-collectives. Users can agree to group up and adopt each others block lists. They are free to join and leave these collectives at any time. Anyone can create a collective, and collectives themselves can adopt other collectives block lists.

    The consequences is one collective to rule them all, tho. We can call that collective 'moderator.'

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  29. Re:What kind of pussies did the previous generatio by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Are you saying that trolls don't teach "sticks and stones will break my bones but names will never hurt me?" And that people don't need to learn this lesson? And it's not better to learn it on-line where you can't get your face busted for retaliating?

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  30. Translation by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Reddit users can now use the new "block user" feature to better deal with harassment."

    TRANSLATION:

    "Reddit social justice warriors can now use the new "block user" feature to better shut down disagreement or speech they don't like."

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Translation by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yup.
      Reddit is an awful, awful place.

    2. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill yourself.

  31. Re:What kind of pussies did the previous generatio by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

    Reddit isn't doing this because people are getting PTSD from bad words. They are doing it because they are a commercial service and they want the maximum number of users because that equates to the maximum amount of revenue. Reddit got a really bad rep and a lot of people just moved on, because why put up with that shit? People go there to enjoy having a conversation or to read something interesting, not for some kind of Python-esque abuse clinic.

    Reddit was in the same bracket as 4chan for a while, the arse-end of the internet. Nothing wrong with the arse-end if you are into that, but it's not a very profitable place to be.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  32. Re:What kind of pussies did the previous generatio by Jahta · · Score: 1

    produce that the current generation needs protection from that which makes us stronger and better adjusted?

    If it weren't for being harassed, made fun of, and being generally dragged through the mud I'm not sure I would have ever toughened up and become so well adjusted. It's like they want to make sure the next generation is even worse crop of spineless jellyfish than the current.

    Well as somebody who has been on Usenet since before "Eternal September", this is no different Usenet kill-files. In any forum you get people who contribute to the debate in a civil and constructive manner (though you may not agree with them). And then you get people who are neither constructive nor civil, who just shout their own narrow opinions and shower gratuitous abuse on anybody who disagrees with them.

    Kill-files are a very effective way screening out the jerks while still seeing posts from people who have something useful to say.

  33. Re:While this WILL be used to reinforce hugboxes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please my friend, if you could refrain from using the term at all and just make a gentle hugging motion while spinning in a circle. The spoken word triggers some individuals.
    Thank you kindly.

  34. /. ALERT: KozmoStevnNaut = advertiser scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Advertiser scum trying to further HIS crooked personal full of lies agenda https://www.quora.com/profile/... who tells apk to shut up https://slashdot.org/comments.... as you're terrified of his hosts program that shuts YOU up advertiser. You're the small minded loser this post refers to https://slashdot.org/comments.... because you're too technically inept to validly technically shut him up since he's totally right.

    1. Re:/. ALERT: KozmoStevnNaut = advertiser scum by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      That's cute, but the person in the first link isn't me, by a long shot. My name isn't Stephen, it's Stevn. I actually live ~6300km from Toronto, and I do crossfit and weightlifting, not MMA. So stop with the pathetic wannabe stalker act.

      If you'd actually taken the time to read my comments, you'd know I probably hate advertising more than any other person in the world. I just prefer to use good blocking tools, rather than mediocre ones.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re:/. ALERT: KozmoStevnNaut = advertiser scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, advertiser. You're all known as liars and you're lying now.

    3. Re:/. ALERT: KozmoStevnNaut = advertiser scum by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Believe what you will, but that guy ain't me. And if you could actually be bothered to read my previous posts, you'd know my stance on ads isn't exactly positive.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  35. Comments I disagree with = harassment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comments I disagree with = harassment.

    Stop harassing me with your reasoned disagreements and polite counter-arguments. One time, an Anonymous user said something awful, so that means every single person who disagrees with me is technically making death and rape threats toward me. SMASH THE PATRIARCHY

  36. Re:A more efficient solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Collectives you say?

    http://www.theblockbot.com/sign_up/connect.php
    https://twitter.com/TheBlockBot

  37. Re:What kind of pussies did the previous generatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I'm saying exactly what I wrote. If you'd like to make a rebuttal then do so honestly, don't just make up crazy straw men and expect me to explain the difference to you.

    Public service announcement: BarbaraHudson wants to learn the same lesson over and over for decades, even when she's actively trying to learn something else. If she thinks the right response to trolls is to retaliate at all (feed them) then she clearly hasn't learned it yet.

  38. Re:What kind of pussies did the previous generatio by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Every generation thinks the next generation are spineless.
    Every generation makes stupid generalizations as they get old, and lose control of the future.

    Go ask one of the few surviving WWII vets if their parents thought they were spineless.
    Go ask one of the few surviving WWII vets about anything, and see if they're making "stupid generalizations" or not.
    Go ask yourself about making stupid generalizations about every generation.

  39. what a bunch of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    faggots

  40. APRIL FOOLS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    article seems dated wrong

  41. Re:What kind of pussies did the previous generatio by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    I have the privileged of having two WWII vets as in-laws. I will make certain I ask one in particular (the one who really likes to talk) those questions this summer.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  42. Loving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loving the predictable, knee-jerk reaction from the crowd here. Business as usual.

    Some of the many things that entertain me about the negative comments on this story:

    1. Acting like this feature (User A can choose to block User B -- no, User B's content is not deleted) is some shocking new instrument of censorship, when it's a fairly standard feature of, say, BBSes dating back two decades.

    2. Acting like harassment on the internet doesn't exist. Harassment is a real thing. It happens in the real world, with real consequences. It's silly to deny that it ALSO happens on the internet, albeit in mostly messages-sent-instantaneously-from-strangers-around-the-world form.

    3. Acting like Reddit is supposed to be some "bastion of free speech" -- maybe they tried at the beginning, but in recent years they have *explicitly stated* that they are not.

    4. Acting like a for-profit, corporate website isn't allowed to moderate its own content for its own demographics. Go tell Nissan they can't remove pro-Honda anti-Nissan posts from their website. Go tell Nickelodeon they can't remove adult topics from theirs.

    5. Getting upset and writing angry posts about a feature change on an entertainment website you claim to not like / not care about.

    6. The classic derogatory-but-knowingly-meaningless-so-it-can't-be-disputed name-calling (SJW, etc.)

  43. Digg 4.1 by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    It's not about the users, it's about the appeasing the leftists in the name of "civility". Modbombing doesn't change that a bit =)

    Let the alt-creation begin!

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  44. Reddit, Digg, what's the difference these days? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Reddit has gone above and beyond the dreams of Digg's efforts. Not only does Reddit get to do the purges, they didn't have to remove the comments.

    If anything, Digg's only mistake was that they launched too early. Had they still existed in their pre-4.0 form, they'd have faithfully followed Nick Denton's "Kassie Washington" request for vengeance - just like about every major forum (Reddit, Fark, various gaming forums) did in 2012-2014+.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  45. Re: What kind of pussies did the previous generati by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do believe you have just referred to yourself as a troll.

  46. Addons = inferior vs. hosts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can any SINGLE sold-out or crippled redundant inefficient addons do 16 things hosts do 4 speed, security, & reliability:

    1.) Protect vs. malicious sites (past ads)
    2.) Protect vs. fastflux botnets/stop C&C's
    3.) Protect vs. dyndns botnets/stop C&C's
    4.) Protect vs. DGA botnets/stop C&C's
    5.) Protect vs. downed DNS (4 reliability)
    6.) Protect vs. poisoned dns
    7.) Protect vs. trackers
    8.) Protect vs. spam
    9.) Protect vs. phish
    10.) Protect vs. caps
    11.) Get by dns blocks
    12.) Keep off dns request logs
    13.) Speed up surfing by adblocks & hardcoded favs
    14.) Work on anything webbound multiplatform.
    15.) Ez data control
    16.) Block ads better than addons more efficiently

    ?

    APK

    P.S.=> We'll see what's "good" or mediocre, as there's NOTHING in that list I can't backup with ease from reputable sources - I am going to make you 'eat your words' or RUN, "Forrest"... apk

    1. Re:Addons = inferior vs. hosts by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Does it protect against APK spam?

      --
      Eat the rich.
  47. Re:What kind of pussies did the previous generatio by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    I've always been under the impression that if you are "given" those things you're a cultist and not really stronger than when you started. I believe you have to develop those tools for yourself to be truly healthy.

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  48. KozmoStevnNaut = Mental Midget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: You told ME to 'shut up' in posts parent to the link I post now here? I shut YOU up, easily -> https://slashdot.org/comments....

    * Go for it, prove what's in the link's list totally wrong - it's impossible, as hundreds of trolls like you have tried only to fall flat on their faces, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> YOU truly fit the 'mental midget' description given in the parent post here to a tee... & it is going to be a PLEASURE shutting YOU up easily (as I can easily back what's in the 2nd link's list from reputable sources)... apk

  49. Re: What kind of pussies did the previous generati by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Don't be too harsh - this one likes following me around and trying to tick me off. Sad, really. :-)

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  50. Re:KozmoStevnNaut = Mental Midget by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    OOO can I?

    8.) Protect vs. spam

    Does it protect against your spam? How does it protect against email spam?

    9.) Protect vs. phish

    No it doesn't.

    10.) Protect vs. caps

    We all wish it would protect against your abuse of caps, but it seems to keep failing

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  51. Coren22 "eats his words" yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It protects vs. malicious payload links in them dumbass - the TRUE danger inherent in spam/phish!

    * The rest of what you wrote? Stupid bullshit, your usual (failing as usual) & the rest of my points are also, like those above vs. your crap NOW, inviolate...

    You're also a blatantly unskilled menial who couldn't produce a program of equal OR better value that does more for less either - you're a joke, proof of THAT is below from your past trolling of myself you useless fuck...

    APK

    P.S.=> Of course we also KNOW how many times you blew it against myself & ate your words before (keep it up - you'll DIE of malnutrition as eating your words != good nutrition, stupid) -> https://slashdot.org/comments.... - lol!

    ... apk

    1. Re:Coren22 "eats his words" yet again by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      It's actually kinda funny how you don't even realize that the worst enemy of your little host file utility is actually yourself and your method of advertising.

      Does your host file utility block nonsensical APK spam?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re:Coren22 "eats his words" yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funnier no advertiser enemy of us all like you https://www.quora.com/profile/... gets the better of him technically https://slashdot.org/comments....

    3. Re:Coren22 "eats his words" yet again by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Can you please explain why you think I'm that guy? We honestly couldn't be any more different, it's actually kinda ridiculous :-)

      You certainly haven't "gotten the better of me", and you never will.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  52. Coren22 saw your post history today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're stalking apk projecting how you fail against him. Some examples are https://slashdot.org/comments.... + https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... + https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... and you said what you did now after those, you troll? That's a laugh. You always start trouble trolling apk and he annihilates you for it. Don't you have any pride? I'd say not based on your trolling fake name online disgusting behaviour and the fact you're a do nothing compared to apk. He really got to you in those links and many others like them didn't he? Absolutely. It's hilarious, and you did it all to yourself.

  53. Funny many /.'ers disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    his hosts program is actually pretty good by xenotransplant

    his hosts tool is actually useful for those cases in which one does indeed want to locally block stuff outright while consuming minimum system resources by alexgieg

    I like your host file system by Karmashock

    I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech

    APK is kinda right. I've given up on JS based adblocking and gone to blackholing in /etc/hosts, just like it was back in the 90s. The computational load has gotten intolerable for any ad-blocking using JS. I've tried his hosts file generating software. It works by bmo

    APK is totally right on this count. Adblock Plus on Firefox mobile is a dog on older, or lower end, phones. A hostfile based adblocker makes for a much better experience in this context by chihowa

    I find your hosts file admirable by vel-ex-tech

    I've never tried to belittle (APK's) work, I've flat out said it's good by BronsCon

    I support APK's stand on the hosts file by Trax3001BBS

    APK

    1. Re:Funny many /.'ers disagree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, 9 whole people. Your mother must be so proud. Unless of course they're all just parachute accounts, which is more than likely.

      Does your host file utility protect against nonsensical APK spam? I'm not even remotely interested until it does.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  54. I've got more, /. restricts post size, &? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It's more folks than you've got saying you do anything useful or good, now isn't it? Yes, lol - just a fact (what destroys weak trolls like you)...

    * Fact: YOU lose/fail, advertiser (trust me, you're NOT the 1st I've caught @ it - probably like the 10th++ or more!)

    APK

    P.S.=> I think it's utterly hilarious you have to TRY (& fail) attack the messenger (me) vs. my message (impossible since it's nothing but fact)-> https://slashdot.org/comments.... - guess seeing so many trolls (like Coren22 who stalked me all thru here yesterday) fail has you resorting to your last resort - failing illogical off topic ad hominem attacks, "mental midget" (lmao)... apk

    1. Re:I've got more, /. restricts post size, &? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      You still haven't answered why you think I'm that random guy who works in advertising.

      Or for that matter, how in the world you could ever think I was pro-advertizing if you've read through my posting history.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  55. Ya got the best of yerself eating your words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject & this link: "Rinse Lather & Repeat" https://slashdot.org/comments....

    * I simply let other slashdotters do the talking for me against your weak 'mentalmidgetness' - that's all! You're outnumbered not only by MANY orders of magnitude against you, with folks praising my work doing them favors, but also by your own BIG mouth, lol...

    (Works EVERY single time vs. fools like you... lol, & even funnier is you dolts are ALL the same, repeating that error vs. myself, every time... 1 definition of insanity? Trying the SAME thing OVER & OVER, expecting different results!)

    * I must thank you actually - you make ME, look GOOD!

    APK

    P.S.=>. Top that off with the additional fact you can't validly technically prove this list wrong https://slashdot.org/comments.... ?

    LMAO, you lose bigtime. No doubt about it... apk

    1. Re:Ya got the best of yerself eating your words by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      You haven't answered my question.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  56. Where are your manners Mr. Henrik? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: It's not polite to talk with your mouth full as you EAT YOUR WORDS https://slashdot.org/comments.... Hahahaha! You blew your own ass away bigmouth. Priceless!

    APK

    P.S.=> Again, I also don't see ANYONE saying anything good about your works, now do I? Now, that's a question you HAVE to avoid, now don't you?? Absolutely - the price of being a "ne'er-do-well" troll, & YOU are paying it, lmao... apk

    1. Re:Where are your manners Mr. Henrik? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Hah, you talking about manners, that's rich.

      You still haven't answered my question.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  57. Mr. Henrik, still hungry (to eat your words)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Here's more to wash down what you had rammed back down your throat here already https://slashdot.org/comments....

    "No complaints from me, I like APK's spam. Reminds me to use a host file. Also, his stuff is free." by aaaaaaargh!

    "APK was right! Is it time for us to point Sourceforge to a non-address in our hosts files" - by wonkey_monkey

    "APK's monolithic hosts file is looking pretty good" - by Culture20

    "take a look at the APK hosts file engine"by SuperKendall

    "APK... Awesome to see he's still spreading the good word" by Molochi

    "dammit MS, you proved APK right" by lgw

    "you're right about hosts" by drinkypoo

    APK

    P.S.=> Want more? I'll be GLAD to oblige you (& nobody speaks well of your work, now do they? Nope, lol!)... apk

    1. Re:Mr. Henrik, still hungry (to eat your words)? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      You still haven't answered my question. Are you going to answer it? Or are you just going to continue spamming?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re:Mr. Henrik, still hungry (to eat your words)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After seeing you eat your words like apk made you do? You don't deserve even the piles of ridicule you deserve he's heaping on you for your blunder.

    3. Re:Mr. Henrik, still hungry (to eat your words)? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Eat my words? I'm eating mashed potatoes with a delicious chicken+tomato sauce right now, there are no words being eaten here.

      All I see is a pointless spammer who can't even answer a simple question of why he insists on mistaking my identity and motives.

      Oh well, I guess you won't come to your senses today, either. Have a nice one.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    4. Re:Mr. Henrik, still hungry (to eat your words)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're in clearly delusional denial but we see you eating your words here https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8962841&cid=51874031 and here too https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8962841&cid=51874939 and you certainly can't prove apk wrong technically here either https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8962841&cid=51867485