Slashdot Mirror


Despite Lean Space Budgets Russia Is Headed For the Moon (blastingnews.com)

MarkWhittington writes: Thanks to the collapse of oil prices that has ravaged the Russian economy, dependent as it is on fossil fuel exports, Russia's space program is facing draconian budget cuts... Still, the country that lost the race to the moon still has ambitious plans for Earth's closest neighbor... The Russians even have hopes of landing cosmonauts on the lunar surface by the end of the 2020s.
New evidence of subsurface ice helped fuel their interest in human moon landings, according to Science magazine, which reports that Russia is first planning five robotic missions to the moon over the next nine years. Three of these will be conducted with the European Space Agency, including one which will drill for underground samples in the new areas of the lunar surface, and the director of Russia's space agency says "the next decade will be quite busy for us."

108 comments

  1. Oh my ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now what sanctions are we going to impose for this one? Putin must be stopped!

    1. Re:Oh my ... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Now what sanctions are we going to impose for this one? Putin must be stopped!

      Freeze his assets in Siberia! (and in the Arctic and on the Moon and in the future on Mars and ..)

  2. I bet $20 they will find Yutu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do You have any idea how boring it is not working doing what I like to do the most? (porno movies lol)

  3. Room? by Schmorgluck · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm feeling too lazy to look it up, but is there enough room on the moon to fit the whole of Russia?

    --
    There's nothing like $HOME
    1. Re:Room? by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1
      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    2. Re:Room? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Russia: 17 million sq km

      Moon: 38 million sq km

    3. Re:Room? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm feeling too lazy to look it up, but is there enough room on the moon to fit the whole of Russia?

      Depends on how badly you want it to happen?

  4. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They hate science.

  5. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The moon is closed for remodeling.

  6. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look the the bright side... The epa brought us toilets that have to be flushed 4 times to work properly...

  7. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kennedy sent us to space. The republicans sent us to ground.

  8. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the republicans supported the space shuttle which was a deadend for space.

  9. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The space shuttle, and their support of it, destroyed science.

  10. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And kept us there.

  11. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took money from real science.

  12. Reversal by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

    In America, spacecraft land on moon. In Russia, moon land on spacecraft. *crunch*

  13. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 2

    Actually, they are backing the Europa mission, which is far more useful than landing on the moon in my opinion. http://arstechnica.com/science...

  14. You Have No Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    You have no idea about the situation in Russia. As citizen of one of the neigboar country of Russia, I am sayng that Russia is f#cking impery of evil. They occuppied and enslaved most of the neigboars. They are just like old mongols. What science are you talking, big part of thear citizens does not know reading/writing in their own language. They think that all other world is enemy for them, they hate you, yes they dreaming to destroy USA, and.not only it.

    1. Re:You Have No Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So in conclusion Russian space agency is going to contract a lean, mean Moon machine, with texts written in traditional Chinese script all over the space vehicle.

  15. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just a deadend for space, but a deadend for all science.

  16. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they used their CIA to try to stop it.

  17. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never have I seen a more accurate description of a republican.

  18. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stopping all science is their goal. They want to go back to the dark ages.

  19. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The space shuttle kill our country's hope for space exploration.

  20. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For their kind, anything beyond LEO is sacrilegious.

  21. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just how they be.

  22. A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Russia has big problems right now and the expense of going to the moon has nothing to do with it. Their military is getting old, their Navy needs an upgrade, and there is a battle between Russia and the West over Ukraine. Considering the Russians just announced a budget cut to their military for the first time in decades, and with no end in sight to low oil prices, this will all just remain a statement of intent but will not likely come to anything concrete.

    1. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely uninformed.

    2. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. I would even say that it's a pure propaganda aimed at gullible Russian laymen. Most of the money will end up in offshore companies, and Russian public will be fed with some other propaganda stuff, like going to Mars or even to Alpha Centauri. Just imagine how much money can be stolen from a budget for going to Alpha Centauri!

    3. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely uninformed.

      We get that you're uninformed, but why did you bother to post and come tell us about it, and how is that relevant to an informed post about Russian financial and geopolitical affairs?

    4. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by guacamole · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sounds like you have been out of touch with the Russian military, as the description you give corresponds to the 1990s or early 00s. Russian military has been undergoing a massive structural reform during the past 10 years, and it has been acquiring and renewing its weapons systems at a very fast pace. Just to give you an idea of the scale of the upgrades, like last year Russian air force received about 200 new 4+ or 4++ generation fighter jets. Currently they're testing, a 5th generation fighter jet and a next generation tank and IFV platform. Yes, Russian navy is the most neglected of all Russian military branches. Russia being more of a land power, has historically spent less money on its ships. But even in the Navy, there is quite a bit of new things happening. For example, the Black Sea Fleet is in the middle of receiving six new diesel submarines, three frigates, a number of corvettes and other ships. It's not a lot, but once you compare this progress to the fact that Black Sea fleet has not received any ships in the previous 20 years, this progress is obvious.

      Also observe Syria. Before Russian military got involved there, Assad's government was basically on its last ropes. After Russians came, Assad's forces with Russian help reconquered much of Aleppo, Hops, and Palmyra. The "moderate" rebels begged for cease fire, and Assad is now advancing west onto ISIS held territory.

    5. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by guacamole · · Score: 2

      PS: Oh yeah, and forget Ukraine. The Ukraine conflict is basically over. The ball is mostly on the Ukrainian side, where they have yet to confirm whether they will conform to the "Minsk" peace agreement protocols that their president already signed.

    6. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are ignorant - Russian military is hindered by lack of economic support. The ability to field small units with the best equipment is no measure of the preparedness of their remaining (~99%) forces. Collapse of the Russian military from inadequate training and even nutritional support is immanent.

    7. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is pretty outdated. Their 5th generation fighter? It is so under performing with respect to stealth and various things, that their only major purchaser, India, is pretty much dropping the contract (even when they dont have a choice of another 5th gen fighter, other than their home made one which is atleast a decade or two away). If India drops it, it will not go to production; it will be suspended, until oil prices improve and Russia can hold their own weight. The T14 is a great tank (Russia in general makes great tanks), but it is hardly current generation compared to the west. The reactive armor is pretty weak. Thermal signature is not well reduced. No export potential at all, everyone has these type of tanks. Ditto for the IFV, not modern.

      Russian military has been under funded for sometime now, had to take a serious cut this year. And about Syria, Russia pretty much wanted to get rid of their old arsenal, old missiles, old non-smart bombs. Nothing Russia used in Syria was modern and they did not have spend any significant money on the expedition (with Assad pitching in when required).

    8. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have been out of touch with the Russian military, as the description you give corresponds to the 1990s or early 00s. Russian military has been undergoing a massive structural reform during the past 10 years, and it has been acquiring and renewing its weapons systems at a very fast pace. Just to give you an idea of the scale of the upgrades, like last year Russian air force received about 200 new 4+ or 4++ generation fighter jets. Currently they're testing, a 5th generation fighter jet and a next generation tank and IFV platform. Yes, Russian navy is the most neglected of all Russian military branches. Russia being more of a land power, has historically spent less money on its ships. But even in the Navy, there is quite a bit of new things happening. For example, the Black Sea Fleet is in the middle of receiving six new diesel submarines, three frigates, a number of corvettes and other ships. It's not a lot, but once you compare this progress to the fact that Black Sea fleet has not received any ships in the previous 20 years, this progress is obvious.

      Also observe Syria. Before Russian military got involved there, Assad's government was basically on its last ropes. After Russians came, Assad's forces with Russian help reconquered much of Aleppo, Hops, and Palmyra. The "moderate" rebels begged for cease fire, and Assad is now advancing west onto ISIS held territory.

      Russia has made great strides in modernization, but the money is running out and they were getting all of their ship turbines from Ukraine. Ukraine really isn't in the mood to sell them any more so they have some setbacks there. The economy is still very poor so that is another big problem. It will continue to be poor as long as oil prices are low (Russia's pre-2015 budget was ~40% funded by oil or something like that). Now that most of the gulf states are fighting each other, secretly and not-so-secretly, oil is going to stay low for some time. The navy was the last service scheduled to modernized and things aren't looking so great now.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    9. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Not all of new Russian ships rely on the Ukrainian turbines. Among the most notable ships that need Ukrainian engines are 11356Ð Admiral Grigorievich frigates. Only six were meant to be built, but Russians already got the turbine engines for three of them, and the ships will be heading to Black Sea soon. The other three do not have engines, and there was a rumor that they would be sold to India, since Ukraine may sell the turbines to their navy.

    10. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by guacamole · · Score: 2

      When I read comments like yours, I always start wonder if you're on the payroll of Lockheed Martin. I mean seriously, what exactly does an armchair expert like you know about the Russian T-50 fighter jet or the Russian T-14 tank or what exactly does anyone know about T-14 armor? Both of these projects are still in testing stages (the Indian FGFA will be based on T-50). India just agreed to continue investing in the FGFA project development to the tune of 4 billion USD.

      As for the T-14 tank, you can't really argue that it's behind the western tanks. It has a crewless fully autonomous turret, an armored crew cell, a very extensive electronic counter measures suite, and a design that's meant to accept a higher caliber gun in the future, all of which make it, at least on paper, a step or two ahead of all of western tanks.

      Here are a couple of link with beautiful images of the T-50 and T-14 just from days ago:

      http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1841727.html

      http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1834857.html?thread=180674921

    11. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by guacamole · · Score: 2

      I don't know where you get the idea about the under funding of Russian military. First of all, no military will have enough money for all it wants, ever. Look, Pentagon is getting $600 billion USD a year, which in my opinion still an absurdly big figure, and yet lots of people in the military, and a certain party are already screaming bloody murder. Russian military budget had doubled in the past 3-4 years, and now they will be getting something like a 10% cut this and the following years. No major procurement programs will be stopped.

      As for Syrian involvement, it shouldn't really matter how much that operation cost. Some political opposition figures argue that the cost was actually pretty high, while the official line is that the cost was low, and the military did not even need additional funds for Syria. But that's not the point. The point is that when called in, the Russian military went into Syria and has done its job. They changed the course of war. Assad is now advancing, while a year ago everyone was predicting he was losing.

      I am really puzzled at the armchair experts who are fuming angrily that Russia used dumb bombs (not always). And what should Russia use when bombing basically what's already a bunch of stone age ruble? Russians have plenty of precision weapons, but unlike Americans they will not use a 150K USD missile to take out every ZU-23-2 gunner or a technical.

    12. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1, Interesting

      India has been flip flopping on T-50 based 5th gen. It is public knowledge that they are not at all satisfied with the radar and thermal signature. The fact that they have been even considered dropping the contract, when they have no other option for decades should tell you enough about them.

      T-14 has been in production for a while now, and Russia has been trying to find a market for it. Number of countries have tested, none went for it, because it did not live up to its hype. It is not unusual for the Russians to underdeliver. May be the Russians will prove them wrong and deploy them in battle against a well equipped adversary. I doubt the perception is going to change, until then.

    13. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That 10% cut and the budget was proposed with an expected average oil price of $60. Guess what, so far the average has been in the 30s, and it is expected to continue for the near term.

      Operation costs shouldnt matter of course, I agree with you on that. They came in help of an ally and they succeeded in getting their ally a very good seat in the negotiation table. But it should be not used as an example of abundance of russian military funding, because it it not.

      I find it funny that you find it puzzling that amrchair experts are fuming that Russia used dumb bombs, when none of the arm chair experts including you have said anything remotely close. You must be projecting your own views on dumb bombs in this discussion. My point was again, this should not be considered an example of abundance of russian funding. It just russians getting rid an aging end-of-life stockpile (of both smart and dumb bombs).

    14. Re: A statement of intent is not an actual plan by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      In Syria we have seen that even the T-90 reactive armour holds well against a TOW

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    15. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Also observe Syria. Before Russian military got involved there, Assad's government was basically on its last ropes. After Russians came, Assad's forces with Russian help reconquered much of Aleppo, Hops, and Palmyra.

      Against an enemy with no airforce and very little air defence, that's hardly an achievement.

      Belgium could have probably managed it, and without hitting quite as many hospitals.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re: A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russian 'success' in Syria has nothing to do with technology and everything to do with indiscriminate brute force.

    17. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    18. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by dbIII · · Score: 1

      This is pretty outdated. Their 5th generation fighter?

      How does it compare to the Joint Strike Fighter?

      Yes I know that isn't funny at all - it's a tragedy because we are paying for the thing.

    19. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter how good you think Russian jet fighters are because none of them can outperform the air to air missiles launched from an F-22. The Russians can't defend against something they cannot see. Stealth fighters and bombers also neutralize the effectiveness of Russian SAM's. They would most likely have to adopt Iraq's spray and pray targeting and that didn't work very well. But none of this really matters because the US is not going to be invading Russia because Russia has enough nuclear missiles to prevent that. Plus the state of California has a higher GDP than Russia so they lack the economic tools to compete with China or the US. It's also funny that the US and Russia have never faced of with each on the battlefield. Of course they have used proxies over the years but the US and Russia have never directly faced each other in war. The US and China relationship is pretty much identical but China has nuclear weapons and the economy to compete on the world stage. Nuclear weapons are the only thing stopping these countries from waging wars they think are "winnable" when in reality the non-nuclear weapons would destroy the world albeit with no radioactive fallout.

    20. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by aliquis · · Score: 2

      Russian military has been under funded for sometime now, had to take a serious cut this year. And about Syria, Russia pretty much wanted to get rid of their old arsenal, old missiles, old non-smart bombs. Nothing Russia used in Syria was modern and they did not have spend any significant money on the expedition (with Assad pitching in when required).

      So why haven't superior USA spent much more and solved the issue?

      Yeah, that's right, because democracy, human rights, self-rule and dictatorships doesn't necessarily matter all that much as long as the relationship of those in rule and the US is a good one.

    21. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a battle between Russia and the West over Ukraine

      Somebody apparently forgot to notify the West about this. So far, our method of "helping" Ukraine has been to impose an arms embargo on them, send them broken Hummers and a few military trainers, and force them to effectively give up their land, and refrain from fighting to get it back (Minsk 2 agreement).

    22. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS: Oh yeah, and forget Ukraine. The Ukraine conflict is basically over. The ball is mostly on the Ukrainian side, where they have yet to confirm whether they will conform to the "Minsk" peace agreement protocols that their president already signed.

      That's either shocking ignorance or willful dishonesty - Russian troops are storming Avdiivka as we speak, and over the last few days, there has been very active fighting in the Western front of the Donetsk region. According to the OSCE, almost all ceasefire violations are coming from the Russia/DNR side. Ukraine cannot, and should not, fulfill the political aspects of the Minsk 2 agreement until Russia stops fighting, removes its troops and mercenaries from Ukraine's territory, and returns control of the border back to Ukraine, as they agreed to do. Russia always negotiates in bad faith, and the only way to stop this war is to send more "volunteer" (as the Russians disingenuously call their soldiers) bodies back to Russia.

    23. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by guacamole · · Score: 1

      First of all, T-14 is certainly _NOT_ under series production. A bunch of T-14 were made for testing purposes. That's it. Nobody outside of Russian military knows much about T-14, besides its basic architecture. You have no basis to argue that T-14 was offered for sale, because so far T-14 has not been taken to any international weapons shows. And in fact, nobody wants to buy a product that hasn't been adopted yet by the motherland's military. So basically, Russians will test and adopt the T-14 first, fix its child diseases, and then maybe start offering it for export. We're looking at 10-15 year long window because this does not happen very fast.

      You also have no basis to mock the T-50 yet. The T-50 is not the final product. The Indian FGFA will be based on T-50, so we're still many years away from the FGFA. Indians may have criticized the FGFA progress, but they continue investing into it billions. The western archair FGFA "experts" are really blowing things out of proportion, specially considering that no fifth-generation fighter jet project has attracted more criticism than the American F-35. There have been incidents of US pilots giving interviews and arguing that canning the F-35 program even at this point, and restarting F-22 would be a lot more preferable.

    24. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by guacamole · · Score: 2

      Yes, exactly that one. I don't see a reason why Russia wouldn't agree to it. As far as the implementation is concerned, the party that delaying it is Ukraine, and that's not according me but according to the western diplomats who keep the Ukrainian state under a constant pressure to implement the constitutional reforms and other political they promised.

    25. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Belgium could have probably managed it, and without hitting quite as many hospitals.

      Please don't make people laugh by bringing Belgium into the discussion. A few weeks ago, after the horrific terrorist attacks in Europe, Belgium suddenly was compelled to send a grand total of ONE F16 fighter jets in support of the western coalition against ISIS. Now, that's some serious firepower. Moreover, not even US allies have the smart weapon's munitions to drop on ISIS:

      U.S. Allies 'Borrowing' Munitions To Drop On ISIS As U.S. Stockpiles Are Also In Question

      Against an enemy with no airforce and very little air defence, that's hardly an achievement.

      Strangely, the fact that ISIS does not have either air force or air defense hasn't prevented the Iraq and the USA-led coalition from being bogged down for YEARS with no real progress against ISIS. At least Assad has already started advancing to the east onto ISIS, and liberating significant towns.

    26. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS: Oh yeah, and forget Ukraine. The Ukraine conflict is basically over. The ball is mostly on the Ukrainian side, where they have yet to confirm whether they will conform to the Minsk "peace agreement" protocols that their president already signed.

      FTFY.

    27. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      For one the US did not have the support of the UN recognized govt. That makes all the difference in international law. I agree, US is just serving their own interests, just like Russia is, I wouldnt expect either of them to do otherwise.

    28. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      For the T-50, you dont iron out stealth issues over time. That is not how radar signature or stealth signature work. They are design time decisions. The US criticism is of cost and range. Stealth is generally considered part of the definition of 5th gen. No one has questioned if the F-35 is really 5th gen. I agree the Indian are going to continue to invest in it, mostly because the deal includes tech transfer, which they badly need. It is funny they are still threatening to drop it.

      T-14 were part of Russian arms expo. Here is one of those http://sputniknews.com/militar...
      It is also certainly in production, though not widely acknowledged. http://nationalinterest.org/bl...

    29. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by aliquis · · Score: 1

      US is just serving their own interests, just like Russia is, I wouldnt expect either of them to do otherwise

      I'm from Sweden.

      http://www.viewsoftheworld.net...
      http://www.viewsoftheworld.net...

      2005-2013: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpb... 2013: https://warewhulf.files.wordpr...
      Beginning of 2014: http://gatesofvienna.net/wp-co...
      Beginning of 2015: http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/6...

      Can't find a similar image for 2015 (that's what I'm googling for but yeah.. it didn't become prettier.)

      Our "elected" "leaders" and "representatives" of "the people" and the "nation" currently focus mostly on trying to get Sweden into the UN security council or whatever it is and then I guess they focus on trying to make it into EU or UN politics. Fuck the Swedes for all they care, it's all about what they can force the Swedes to do for the citizens of any other country.

    30. Re:A statement of intent is not an actual plan by aliquis · · Score: 1

      .. as such the expectations may be that US act in the interest of the world / act like world-police and trying to fix the world and not in its own interest.

      It's what the Swedish government would had done if they ruled USA (be happy they don't.)

  23. Re:There was no "Race to the Moon"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Russia is also the country American astronauts must beg for rides into space. The American manned space program was a short term unsustainable, while the Russians went there for the long haul. They have better reliability of their manned launchers and most importantly, they can still go and they have never been without the ability to.

    Say what you will about the Russian space program they get thigns done and are very practically oriented.

  24. By the end of the 2020s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not the end of the 2050s? Or 2100? Or 2200?
    Why has nobody been back to the moon yet? The computers required for the spacecraft could be bought for $5 tops, instead of the millions of dollars they cost in the 1960s.

  25. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do law enforcement officers have to do with space?

  26. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Low Earth orbit you stupid Republican.

  27. The found 2 billion hidden in a cello. by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 2

    Nobody knows how it got there but it should buy a lot of rocket fuel.

  28. Oh look more Putin news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this another attempt by Putin to make his Orwellian failure seem relevant to the rest of the world?

  29. Re: There was no "Race to the Moon"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that all you've got ?

    There are multiple errors in the post.

    Phone + haste + spell check off = errors.

    You really are a fucking simpleton, aren't you ?

  30. Re:There was no "Race to the Moon"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russian reliability is based on the launcher that is almost 60 years old (first two stages of Soyuz launcher is the R7 that put the first Sputnik into orbit in 1957). And there is nothing to replace it in the foreseeable future. So when in couple years US will be able to send its astronauts on its own ships, there will be no use for the the Russian ones. Oh well, Russia will still be able to send its cosmonauts in the ancient and claustrophobic Soyuz ships up until its economy collapses, which may take quite some time.

  31. Ice on the Moon... by TexasDiaz · · Score: 0

    By 2020, the moon might be the closest place we will be able to find ACTUAL ice. Thanks Global Warming! #SarcasmRocks

  32. Good luck, Cosmonauts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish more of the world's wealth was focused on space exploration! Humanity needs another home for safe keeping.

  33. Re:Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. A large grain of SALT by Dorianny · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh sure and they are also building the Russia Alaska Superhighway, A fleet of Supercarriers. In the Real World Russia shrank the defense budget by %10 in 2015 and still Russian Reserve Fund running empty

    1. Re:A large grain of SALT by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Ten percent of a lot that was unsustainable unless the oil price stayed high.

  35. Re:Sad to see how the Republicans... by jrmcferren · · Score: 2

    BULLSHIT! Donald Trump wants to expand the space program. Trump 2016.

    --
    sudo mod me up
  36. Re:Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This needs the coveted +5 Troll moderation

  37. hey by superwiz · · Score: 0

    Russia never saw a bad idea it didn't like. They are probably planning to fake the moon landing because they think they can get away with it.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    1. Re:hey by superwiz · · Score: 1

      I'd like to thank whoever modded me as a troll. I should have known better. Not only can Russia not go to the moon in 4 years. I should have known better than to say that they can stage a moon landing in 4 years. They don't have the technology.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  38. Hillary Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...conspires with the enemy of our civilization so that hundreds of thousands of them can immigrate to the U.S.

    http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2015/apr/20/reince-priebus/hillary-clinton-took-money-kings-four-countries-go/
    https://www.rt.com/usa/338864-680000-green-cards-issued-muslims/

    Stop listening to the lefty propaganda and read the Mohammedist's "holy book". You will find that they are commanded to cheat you, to tax you excessively and to eventually kill you - so that Mohammedism will one day rule over all of humanity.

    No other thoughts allowed by the Caliph - enforced by fire and sword.

    ISIS just realizes what that book commands them to do. Turkey, Saudi and Pakistan support them in all possible ways, covertly.

    Clinton surely knows and takes the money and helps them.

    1. Re:Hillary Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear, hear.
      www.prophetofdoom.net

    2. Re:Hillary Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you're probably one of those people for whom Islam represents the "evil other" but for whom Christianity is perfectly acceptable. How likely do you think Christians are to start following all the things the bible commands? Will they bring back slavery? Will they start murdering their children for disobedience? Will they make rape legal as long as the rapist pays a fine? Will they murder adulterers? Will they make women completely subservient to their husbands and allow for them to be beaten.

  39. Hello Adolf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is it going in your Langley Cellar ?

    Did they not feed you the normal dogfood ration tonight ?

  40. Muhaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I suggest you look at one of the Topol-M and S-400 launch videos on youtube.

    They have top notch technology in both solid and liquid fueled rockets. Their thrust-vectoring technology probably is still leading edge, second to none. America currently depends on Russian technology from the 70s to launch heavy satellites. And Russia currently develops a new liquid fuel rocket.

  41. More Than Good Enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to smoke out ISIS. Unlike NATO and they Wahabist BribeMasters.

    Also, they develop lots of new stuff:

    * ELBRUS CPU
    * S-500 Air Domination Missile Complex
    * Long Wave Radars to detect Stealth Aircraft reliably at long range
    * a new generation of the already most advanced road mobile ICBM and all support systems such as ground decoys
    * a new supersilent diesel submarine
    * the new armata tank
    * the PAK FA stealth fighter
    * supersonic cruise missiles

    and many more items.

  42. LMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and even nutritional support is immanent."

    It seems more that you Langley folks don't have a proper Paper Budget since 1999. You drones operate on some very outdated rap sheets.

    Your asset Jelzin had foot shortages while he himself was supplied with a bottle of Vodka by Toyota, BMW and the like.

    Russia is by now a major wheat exporter - look it up. Surely they can feed their soldiers. This is also the reason you cannot have Russia at the balls as you had the Soviets. Modern day Russia is not the concrete-head bunch of commie functionaries any more.

    It seems to me that the western lefties have now taken over the role of concrete-head.

  43. Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You suggest Russia cannot replace components supplied by a bunch of corrupt people who can at best be compared to the equally broken Greek ?

    I venture to say that 99% of Ukrainian technology was due to Moscovite financing and management in the first place.

    The Moscovites will simply replicate what they did in Ukraine in the 50s-80s somewhere in Nishni Novgorod, Novosibirsk, Voronoezh or Irkutsk. Of course it costs money, but unlike Ukraine, Russians have the same human energy and truthfulness as exists in all other nordic nations.

  44. Russian Food Production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that Russia is already a Land Of Plenty, when it comes to food production:

    http://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/industrie/russlands-landwirtschaft-die-erben-der-kolchosen-seite-2/3460312-2.html

    (use translate.yandex.com for translation)

    This just demonstrates the nasty effects of NATO propaganda. It is making people dumb as hell. In this special case, NATO propaganda made the poster above think that there is still hunger in Russia.

  45. Just Check American Officer's Statements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of them call Russia "the biggest threat of the U.S.". This implies that Russia has a serious military, including serious hardware.

    What it REALLY means is that Russia cannot be corrupted by the London, NY banksters and their globalist friends. And it means Russia has the weapons and soldiers to defend itself from becoming a victim to said people.

    Russia has been recapitalizing her defense for at least 10 years now. And some weapons actually just need a minor "upgrade". For example, the soviet-era Mig31's performance is still top-notch. All it needs is to upgrade the electronics/radar and maybe the missiles. Which it already got. The basic airplane is so good, it will be leading-edge even in 2060.

    Aviadvigatel just completed a new engine, which will be the foundation for all midsize and large Russian turbine engines from heavy helos to transport aircraft. With these engines, the Il 76 airlifter will be modernized at low cost.

    Similar things can be said about the famously powerful Russian SAMs (see Vietnam), about the SU35 fighter and many more systems. The Russian state has done his homework, indeed.

    1. Re:Just Check American Officer's Statements by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Yes. Russian corruption is incompatible with Western corruption. The Western style isn't based on donkey carts and village idiots.

  46. Re:There was no "Race to the Moon"... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Russian reliability is based on the launcher that is almost 60 years old (first two stages of Soyuz launcher is the R7 that put the first Sputnik into orbit in 1957).

    Not blowing Russia's trumpet here - I'll leave that to guacamole(24270) - but so what? If it works, it works.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  47. especially Moon Science. Soapbox please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VietnamWar loss related problems.
    Economy problems.
    Achievement and morale problems.

    I know... let us go to the....irs!write-offs for Trust 72! No! Let us goto the Moon! That is easier than that harder goal! And lets give Americans a Kubrick style of photography but give them black and white from a mission control projector. Also we need to give more than half the Moon budget money to other companies that didnt contribute. Ignore that badwar press! Looook! We were first on the Moon! Disneyland is near an airport too!

    Runnin low on monies? I have another idea! Lets open up trade with no-civil-rights slave labor nation! Lets send DickNixon over to do it since he is halfArmenian and halfChinese so they will accept him as a distant relative! He looks too nice in traditional commie garb:kick him out later on!

    Skip George Bush jr presidency... hey he was an adopted Argentinian, Chinese blood like Nixon! Send him over to China andthey will accept him like a distant relative!

    Ahh they cant get a 6ft5 sandman in Assgassistan... i know who they will pick! And i know who will samewise be a best candidate to ask the House of Sahd for money help! Lets elect Al Gore! What he doesnt advocate petro products? Hmmm. Oh how about we elect a closett muslim who can relate better to the question and make a better presentment to the House of Sahd... where is that Indonesian Kenyan friend of moi? Golfing? I thought he only golfs at work! Lets fudge up the sports and entertainments so he will follow the trend of those crazy millenials. We need a Chinese basketball player, a white rap musician, and a black golfer bwaaahhhhahaha. Nah we can pass up on the lgbt jock news until later on to encorage stemm cell research.
      (Man-eye-ackle laff-ing)

  48. Promises...Promises...Promises... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    We've heard these noises from Russia before. I can't help but think at this point the Russians are just shouting whatever they think might sound the most appealing into the microphone. In the near (~5 years) the US is going to stop relying on Russia to get Astronauts to the ISS. Once that happens hundreds of millions of dollars are suddenly going to stop going into Russian coffers.

    This combined with a much more robust and inexpensive launch options (Space X, ULA, Blue Origin, Skylon?, etc) is going to further squeeze the already cash strapped Russia Space Agency/Industry.

    I'll be happy to see them do it, but at this point it's just talk. Once I get past my budgetary issues, I'm going to be setting up a colony on Ganymede. All I need is to develop a launch vehicle, a survivable transit vehicle and a viable habitat...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:Promises...Promises...Promises... by dbIII · · Score: 0

      This combined with a much more robust and inexpensive launch options (Space X, ULA, Blue Origin, Skylon?, etc)

      Most of those use rocket motors that are purchased from Russia.

    2. Re:Promises...Promises...Promises... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Most of those use rocket motors that are purchased from Russia.

      Besides ULA's ATLAS V rocket, who uses Russian engines ?

    3. Re:Promises...Promises...Promises... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      More to the point, to show you are paying attention, who doesn't :)
      What ULA and a couple of the others are doing is enough to make my point isn't it?

  49. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great website ! I will help spreading this URL. Maybe there is a small chance we can avoid the Mohammedization which our elite plans.

  50. Russia didn't exactly lose the race to the moon by billmarrs · · Score: 2

    Russia's Luna 2 probe got to the moon first in 1959. Luna 3 (also 1959) was the first to photograph the far side of the moon. Luna 9 soft landed on the moon and sent the first pictures from the surface back in 1966. Yes, the Apollo program put a man on the moon first (1968), but I think Russia deserves credit for many previous firsts (beyond Sputnik and Gagarin).

    1. Re:Russia didn't exactly lose the race to the moon by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Their Venus landings were the most impressive achievement, even with some of the craft failing. Operating equipment in 864 degree F (462 C) environment and 90 earth atmospheres of pressure is amazing.

  51. Re: There was no "Race to the Moon"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was this comment modded down ?

    Every word of it is true.

  52. Re: Sad to see how the Republicans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look the the bright side... The epa brought us toilets that have to be flushed 4 times to work properly...

    This is more about Americans needing to re-invent the wheel and frequently making it square in the process. When the US started pushing water-saving toilets, other countries had perfectly viable water-saving toilets of various types (at the most simple, the ones with a light flush and heavy flush button). In the US, most of the water-saving toilets they were selling were just the same old design with a smaller tank.

  53. Re:There was no "Race to the Moon"... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

    So what if it's old? It still works!

    The Dragon capsule is the most likely next american manned device. I expect that the ULA effort will fizzle or turn into such a blatant porkbarrel that it'll be killed.

  54. Moonshot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I have a lot of differences with Russia these days, in terms of their space program... go Russia!

    They have a long and distinguished history with their space program. The Russians can bring real expertise to this mission. The main problem they have is that Russia has also been announcing a lot of ambitious plans that few think they can actually achieve. They just don't have the resources in most cases.

  55. Won't happen by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    The more countries that have space programs the LESS likely anyone will land on the moon or anywhere else.

    The 1960's US was a rare place where people cared about contributing at work and not just haranging Congress for more funds.

    This is just bragging about a (dubious) future accomplishment.