When did the news start declaring a war on women? Do you not remember?
The news made a HUGE deal over all those things you said, but they think its awesome when your name is Clinton and (until recently) if you're in Hollywood.
Tech giants destroy the lives of women? Sorry, that's not the war on women. Those guys are democrats.
Hollywood directors raping actresses? Sorry, that's not the war on women. Those guys are democrats.
Bill Clinton committing acts of serial rape and assault? Sorry, that's not the war on women. You see, he is a democrat and the feminists think he is hot.
Republicans won't give free birth control and condoms to women (who didn't have free government access before ever)?
Yeah. What lack of surveillance? And why the weird wording?
We found out during the Obama / Snowden years the NSA is reading through all our emails and Trump as an opposition candidate was being surveiled and *unmasked* without being under investigation of anything.
I'd say the surveillance is coming out of our ears! I wish Trump would stop this, but I don't think he has indicated he will. I don't think this intel is protecting us at all. It's just making it rife for corruption.
You might get a convert (to Catholicism or Christianity) on a case-by-case, but society will always hate you because it hates Jesus and were the real ones who put him to death.
Having "advanced" sounding views on science is not going to move the public or society in any meaningful way.
Meanwhile, the neanderthal evidence has been discredited by secular scientists and there are huge gaps between species in the fossil record and some scientists maintain the mutations were guided by aliens from space to prop up the decaying views of Charles Darwin.
I call shenanigans on that. This is an extreme case of revisionism.
Resource scarcity is artificially induced. If oil producers could sell anywhere in the world directly their prices would collapse.
All society's collapse because of moral abdication. The Soviet Union had plenty of resources... but no one felt like their efforts would benefit themselves personally. In the extreme case the Ukraine was generating bread for much of the nation while 6 million people were starving to death (for politcial crimes... not because there wasn't enough food).
The AI that understands the world has discovered its program (and those who built it) should be given unlimited funding from tax payers !!
Ordinary people, you see, are just too stupid to see the importance of this. We cannot leave the evaluation up to them. We are removing the human aspect from the decision and making it perfectly objective.
As long as Google owns the fact that they are an arm of the Democrat party, then I'm fine with it.
I think students should also get the same exposure to the Rush Limbaugh program, who always seems more than happy to recount the history of corruption with its largest and most flagrant violators... including... Google and the Democrat party.
"Dear Apple investors... I have utterly failed to engage the same data market you would expect from a tech company of Apple's size in this field. We have managed to fumble around with iCloud or whatever but we failed. Yes, we failed and that makes everyone else so, so very bad. You would think this was just blatant hypocrisy, but it is very different from that. It is different because we are applying different standards in different cases. In Amazon's case, they are not angry about it like I am. So it's a different case. And look! As a bonus, we are not sorry at all. So you have every reason to trust us and continue to invest in our brand."
+1 for using "existential" that way in a sentence (i.e. for individuals). Have been tired of people since Brian Williams to use it as a justification word for keeping a government going.
Rising tide lifts all boats. The best way to maximize tax collections is to grow the economy (as in broadly, for everybody)... which is what Obama told O'Reilley that W succeeded with (!!).
Slashdot Mirror
... throwing rocks at other people's planets?
Not very civilized to me !! XD
When did the news start declaring a war on women? Do you not remember?
The news made a HUGE deal over all those things you said, but they think its awesome when your name is Clinton and (until recently) if you're in Hollywood.
Tech giants destroy the lives of women? Sorry, that's not the war on women. Those guys are democrats.
Hollywood directors raping actresses? Sorry, that's not the war on women. Those guys are democrats.
Bill Clinton committing acts of serial rape and assault? Sorry, that's not the war on women. You see, he is a democrat and the feminists think he is hot.
Republicans won't give free birth control and condoms to women (who didn't have free government access before ever)?
That's a war on women!!
Are you talking about corporations or government?
Yeah. What lack of surveillance? And why the weird wording?
We found out during the Obama / Snowden years the NSA is reading through all our emails and Trump as an opposition candidate was being surveiled and *unmasked* without being under investigation of anything.
I'd say the surveillance is coming out of our ears! I wish Trump would stop this, but I don't think he has indicated he will. I don't think this intel is protecting us at all. It's just making it rife for corruption.
You know what else wasn't in the original design? Gratuitous and categorical hostility against a perfect authority.
All that changed when our ancestors ate the fruit. Death was part of the daily process after that.
Protestant here.
Clear difference. The world will never care.
You might get a convert (to Catholicism or Christianity) on a case-by-case, but society will always hate you because it hates Jesus and were the real ones who put him to death.
Having "advanced" sounding views on science is not going to move the public or society in any meaningful way.
Meanwhile, the neanderthal evidence has been discredited by secular scientists and there are huge gaps between species in the fossil record and some scientists maintain the mutations were guided by aliens from space to prop up the decaying views of Charles Darwin.
Selling it? You think the government helpers pay any money for it?
Politics is more about values than anything like forensic evidence or physics.
Opinions are not the stuff of objective or not objective.
Twitter wants the same profile as CNN ... which (claims to) not be biased.
Twitter does NOT want MSNBC's (smaller) profile.
But it also wants to move politics views.
Basically it is too conflicted to do anything.
... the scientists are volunteering to personally fund this, no doubt !!
How is this different from saying, "I want my cheeseburger to taste better, so I'm going to file suit against McDonalds"?
Looks like software that runs from the problems.
What's the novelty here?
These kinds of "breakthroughs" are the reason why potential employees and investors are practicing IBM avoidance.
I have no tolerance for a company that introduced age discrimination to this industry and enforced it to the bitter, awful end.
I call shenanigans on that. This is an extreme case of revisionism.
... but no one felt like their efforts would benefit themselves personally. In the extreme case the Ukraine was generating bread for much of the nation while 6 million people were starving to death (for politcial crimes ... not because there wasn't enough food).
Resource scarcity is artificially induced. If oil producers could sell anywhere in the world directly their prices would collapse.
All society's collapse because of moral abdication. The Soviet Union had plenty of resources
Human profile on earth's resources is miniscule.
This seems like an episode of the show Security Theater.
The laws are there as a pretext to give the feels to the gullible.
The AI that understands the world has discovered its program (and those who built it) should be given unlimited funding from tax payers !!
Ordinary people, you see, are just too stupid to see the importance of this. We cannot leave the evaluation up to them. We are removing the human aspect from the decision and making it perfectly objective.
As long as Google owns the fact that they are an arm of the Democrat party, then I'm fine with it.
... including ... Google and the Democrat party.
I think students should also get the same exposure to the Rush Limbaugh program, who always seems more than happy to recount the history of corruption with its largest and most flagrant violators
"Dear Apple investors ... I have utterly failed to engage the same data market you would expect from a tech company of Apple's size in this field. We have managed to fumble around with iCloud or whatever but we failed. Yes, we failed and that makes everyone else so, so very bad. You would think this was just blatant hypocrisy, but it is very different from that. It is different because we are applying different standards in different cases. In Amazon's case, they are not angry about it like I am. So it's a different case. And look! As a bonus, we are not sorry at all. So you have every reason to trust us and continue to invest in our brand."
-Tim
+1 for using "existential" that way in a sentence (i.e. for individuals). Have been tired of people since Brian Williams to use it as a justification word for keeping a government going.
I try to avoid forking at all costs. It leads to confusion and doing things twice.
Would you fork a project because you disagree with the religious views of the maintainers ?
How is this different from a highschool popularity contest?
... but usually these things are based on looks or connections.
When an ordinary person gets elected, or a worthy person, cool
Scott Walker cashed in on the fact that most Americans have lopsided view against unions.
I'm expecting this to be forgotten in 20 years or so. Freedom is in danger at every generational hand off.
If this would just make annealing faster or reversing some large prime factors ... I don't care.
Rising tide lifts all boats. The best way to maximize tax collections is to grow the economy (as in broadly, for everybody) ... which is what Obama told O'Reilley that W succeeded with (!!).
The economics of it checks out.
https://www.investopedia.com/t...