Slashdot Mirror


Google Fiber Drops Free Basic Service In Its Original City (engadget.com)

An anonymous reader writes: When Google Fiber first rolled out in Kansas City, it offered a free 5Mbps service if you were willing to pay a construction fee. As of recent, Google has quietly dropped that free tier in its first Fiber area, and has replaced it with a 100Mbps option that costs $50 per month. Anyone using the free tier has until May 19th to say they want to keep it. Note: Google will still offer the free service in low-income areas. Google Fiber customers in Austin and Provo still have the choice of the free internet option; Atlanta never had it to start with. Recode suggests this may reflect a broader change in strategy: Google has fiercer competition from incumbent carriers, so it may have to offer a fast-but-affordable selection to get those customers for whom the gigabit option is either too costly or sheer overkill.

3 of 98 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Can't have everything for free forever. by hvm2hvm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Obligatory "I live in Romania and I have a 1Gbit (up/down) connection for less than $15 a month.". And it really does work at those speeds. When I installed WoW it downloaded the client at 100MB/s, 19GB went so fast I thought I already had it installed previously.

    The thing is 3g/4g connections while cheap still have data caps which sucks.

    --
    ics
  2. Re:Can't have everything for free forever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is more analogous to paying for installation of a beer tap, but then having it dispense unlimited free beer (but at a slower rate than you might like). Google's saying that now you need to fork over $50/mo, but you'll get unlimited beer dispensed at 20x the rate. It's still a way better deal than anything the competitors are offering, especially considering how vital the beer is for getting any work done.

  3. Re:Can't have everything for free forever. by jma05 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, its the standard argument. But densely populated areas in US like New York still don't seem to have the same Internet value as Japan.