Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Updates Model S With New Front-End, Air Filtration System, Faster Charging (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Model S has received several new features and improvements to help it stay relevant with the newer Model X crossover and recently released Model 3 electric vehicles from Tesla. It has a new-look fascia and adaptive LED headlights that hew closely to the design found on the Model X crossover which debuted late last year. In addition to a couple new interior finish choices, the Model S is receiving a version of the Model X's cabin air filtration system as an option, which promises to filter out "99.7 percent of particulate exhaust pollution and effectively all allergens, bacteria and other contaminants from cabin air." The Model S now has a 48-amp charger standard -- up from 40 amps -- which Tesla says will enable faster charging when connected to higher-amp outlets. Tesla's design language is trending toward a grille-less front end, possibly in an effort to squeeze as much aerodynamic efficiency out of the car as possible. What's missing in the update is the rumored 100kWh battery, which would improve the vehicle's range.

5 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Get rid of the side mirrors by crow · · Score: 5, Informative

    If the NTSB agreed and the various state laws that specifically require a side mirror (not camera) could be changed, then yes. The prototype Model X had cameras, but the lawyers made them switch to mirrors.

  2. Re:$101,250 with the options I'd want by Hadlock · · Score: 4, Informative

    It also greatly reduces the number of configurations you have to support, both mechanically and software side of things. If everything is ala carte, you quickly run in to tens of thousands of configurations, which you have to test for. Multiply that by recalled and unrecalled cars, different model years, etc and testing to avoid serious failures quickly reach nightmare levels.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  3. Re:Coal Powered Cars Are Awesome. /s by mspohr · · Score: 5, Informative

    A Tesla charged with electricity solely generated by coal is still cleaner than a petrol car. However, average electricity from coal in the US is only 33% (and dropping) so not an issue.
    Tesla has already solved your four challenges with battery recycling, supercharging, longer runtime. I can drive my Tesla anywhere with stops at convenient superchargers.
    There is already sufficient electric infrastructure to charge more electric cars than will be produced in the next 5 years. Electric utilities currently have a problem with too much electricity at night (in Texas they give away free electricity at night)... precisely the time when most people charge their electric cars. This may change in 5-10 years but that's plenty of time to make the necessary investments.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  4. Re:Coal Powered Cars Are Awesome. /s by fnj · · Score: 4, Informative

    Electric Vehicles are just playing a sly shell game with gas & particulate emission, shuffling it across town to the coal fired electric plant

    No, actually that is incorrect. As of 2015, 31% of all electrical power generated in the USA was generated by zero emission sources (nuclear, hydro, wind, solar, and geothermal). Another 33% was from natural gas, which generates very little particulate emissions, substantially reduced CO2, and reduced NOX. Only 34% was from coal and petroleum.

    Petroleum's share is actually down to a minuscule 1%, and coal is shrinking all the time.

    So gas and particulate emissions are greatly cut for every car converted from gasoline or diesel to battery-electric.

  5. Re:Coal Powered Cars Are Awesome. /s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thank you, you save me some typing.

    Another point to remember, it is far easier to clean the air coming out of a few hundred generators than it is to clean the air coming out of a few million cars.

    If I improve a generator's exhaust by 20%, it might be worthwhile, but if I proposed doing that for all the cars in a city, the retrofitting costs would dwarf any cost at the generator, and odds are you wouldn't have half of them done in a year.