Slashdot Mirror
Zika Virus Officially Causes Rare Microcephaly Birth Defects, CDC Says (cnn.com)
An anonymous reader writes: The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Wednesday the Zika virus causes microcephaly and other birth defects. "This study marks a turning point in the Zika outbreak. It is now clear that the virus causes microcephaly," CDC director, Dr. Tom Frieden said. The CDC previously said it was likely the virus in pregnant women was the cause of the rare birth defect that results in an underdeveloped brain and that more evidence and research were needed to conclusively say it is causal. "We started using criteria about a month ago to see which ones had been met and which ones had not been met. We wanted to do this in a systematic and calculated way," said Dr. Sonja Rasmussen, lead author of the New England Journal of Medicine special report. There's was also no alternative explanation to account for the increase in these congenital defects among women who had the Zika virus during pregnancy. The CDC says they are not yet ready to conclude the virus causes Guillain-Barre syndrome. The World Health Organization (WHO) has reported more than 1,000 cases of microcephaly and other fetal malformations believed to be associated with the Zika virus from six countries.
At the beginning it was all very fuzzy and cases very uncharacteristic for viruses of the same family, but the research that has been done in the last few months is admirable, it is now completely clear that, even if it was unexpected, Zika acts like its mild fever type of related virus in adults (like Dengue and Yellow Fever) but becomes much more like the neurocentric cousins of the family in embryos (like West Nile and Japanese Encephalitis). Anybody that is following the reports, even if only the titles, was expecting this conclusion from the CDC and WHO.
We need to put screen doors in the wall on the southern border to keep the mosquitoes out.
And make Aedes aegypti pay for it.
You are welcome on my lawn.
I have an office in Singapore and I do spend part of my time in South East Asia
Zika is no stranger to South East Asia - and in fact, when Zika was first discovered in Uganda in the 1970's, a 'discovery' followed, testing human blood from other tropical regions all around the world and it was found that (back in the 1970's) that human blood collected in the South East Asian region already showed signs of Zika immunity
True, in the South East Asian region (from the Philippines to Thailand, from Indonesia to Vietnam), there were babies born with signs of microcephaly born from time to time - but because there were no 'sudden increase' of the number of babies born with microcephaly, there was no concerted effort looking for the microcephalic babies
In other words, the thousands of babies born with microcephaly in South American countries could largely be caused by the lack of natural immunity to the Zika virus of the people living there
Perhaps 100 or 200 years from now the number of 'Zike Babies' would drop, as more and more people acquired the immunity of the Zika virus via natural means
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
I am not virologist or a neuroscientist or immunologist, or even a medical professional.
No need to mention that, t was obvious from the rest of your post. Certain viruses are able to attack stem cells, some of them cause miscarriages, some just damage the cell and cause severe defects. Google is your friend, anti-vaxxers are not your friend.
Replying to my own post!
They have updated the page.
http://www.cdc.gov/zika/pregna...
According to the last Q:A after the virus has cleared from the blood you appear to not be at elevated risk for birth defects.
Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
They're still trying to figure this sort of thing out. Likewise it is sexually transmissible from men to women but they don't really know for how long. Current recommendations are to use barrier prophylactics for 6 months, but they're just guessing. Once a vaccine is available it would be likely (although perhaps not certain) that being vaccinated and having occasional boosters would prevent any latent infection from blooming.
It would be true if he had said "malaria"
Someone forgetting that malaria was common in North America as far north as southern Quebec up until 100 years ago when swamp draining and spraying became the norm. Simply because you don't think it's actually a problem or "a real dangerous pandemic" doesn't mean it won't cause serious problems for general healthcare.
Om, nomnomnom...
I seem to remember that it's use is still allowed in some places as kind of "shock treatment" -- used briefly, before much adaptation can occur to knock back insect populations significantly, while applying more sustainable control methods which on their own take a long time to reach peak effectiveness.
IIRC, the big problems with DDT were rapid adaptation in target populations and the negative effects to birds of persistence in the food chain. Used in a very controlled manner, these negatives I think are less of a problem.
I think the larger problem is that it's so effective in the short run that they don't want to stop using it.
Umm no Potsy it is not safe: "EPA states that DDT exposure damages the reproductive system and reduces reproductive success. These effects may cause developmental and reproductive toxicity"
Gotta love dumb-asses...
Yeah because mosquitos don't become resistant to it *eye roll* Also, "...better malaria control has generally been achieved with pyrethroids than with DDT." So no. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Abortion is the only smart choicefor a woman who finds she's pregnant and positive for Zika at the same time.
It would be true if he had said "malaria"
Trouble wit DDT at base is that it is just another 'cide. While the tinfoil hat and chemtrail crowd hold it up as some sort of magic cure-all, we would have done is killed off birds, and insects would have developed resistance.
DDT isn't majick, folks.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
i wonder why Columbia, the second biggest hotbed of Zika has no increase in birth defects.
http://crofsblogs.typepad.com/h5n1/2016/04/zika-in-colombia-week-13.html
Tin Foil Hat Trigger:
also i still don't like that the area where Zika is prevalent in Brazil was putting pesticides (pyroproxifen) in the drinking water.
https://mauihawaiitheworld.wordpress.com/2016/03/22/zika-virus-controversy-is-it-a-scam/
Yeah because mosquitos don't become resistant to it *eye roll* Also, "...better malaria control has generally been achieved with pyrethroids than with DDT." So no. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
As well, There is a substance called BT, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... which is a natural substance, and pretty specific in what it kills. We use BT tablets in our pond, and while nuking the mosquitos, the fish, and especially the frogs, are not bothered a bit. Narrow spectrum heaven.
While the target insects over time can develop immunity, it appears that BT can be fine tuned once a group has developed some immunity. Not perfect, but what is.
The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
Release those GMO mosquitos that eliminate the species spreading Zika