Report: US Government Worse Than All Major Industries On Cyber Security (reuters.com)

schwit1 quotes a report from Reuters: U.S. federal, state and local government agencies rank in last place in cyber security when compared against 17 major private industries, including transportation, retail and healthcare, according to a new report released Thursday. The analysis, from venture-backed security risk benchmarking startup SecurityScorecard, measured the relative security health of government and industries across 10 categories, including vulnerability to malware infections, exposure rates of passwords and susceptibility to social engineering, such as an employee using corporate account information on a public social network. Educations, telecommunications and pharmaceutical industries also ranked low, the report found. Information services, construction, food and technology were among the top performers. And we are supposed to trust them with healthcare? This report comes after President Obama recently unveiled a commission of private, public and academic experts to bolster the U.S. cyber security sector.

Comments

You want quality, you need to pay for it

[Minupla]

... And I'm not talking about writing large checks to companies that want to sell you something. They don't have your best interests at heart.

The issue is that anytime Joe Q Public hears of government employees making 6 figures he goes ballistic. He does this without any thinking or research about what a comparative job in the private sector pays.

People work in infosec in govt long enough to be attractive to $BigGovtContrator and then bail, get the real salary from the contractor and cash in. That's the game. There's probably a few honest folks who are trying to make things better, but they'll be undercut by the ones trying to give big sweet contracts to $BigGovtContractor in order to pad their parachute.

If we want govt to be effective we have to stop losing our pressure valve because someone working for the government is making more then we do.

And this is pretty much without respect to which country we're talking about. I'm not American but I work in infosec and I won't take a govt job here either. Tried it for like 6 months, saw the game and ran for private sector (no, not for $BigGovtContractor).

I know, not what you want to hear, and I expect to get modded down, but sometimes the truth hurts :)

Min

AstroTurf

[Frosty Piss]

I always look at "reports" like these with a very skeptical eye because usually they have been produced for some company looking for a contract. As a 20 year DoD employee, I can tell you that neither my SIPRNET nor NIPRNET has been owned by anyone. Except the Chinese, but that's normal, right?

Re: Can we turn the hyperbole down to 10?

[damn_registrars]

One, it is pointless because it won't happen. Two, it is a pointless claim because there are no democrats currently in Washington who are willing to propose anything that even slightly resembles an initiative to "give control of healthcare to the government".

I have two words for you: "Bernie Sanders"

So which do you understand less well then, healthcare control, or Bernie Sanders? Clearly you don't understand either very well that you try to place the two in the same boat.

Let's establish an important fact here - especially since your comment is woefully lacking in facts. Single-payer health care does not mean the government tells your doctor what to do. It does not mean there is a bureaucrat in the office with you second guessing every decision your physician makes. What it does mean is that everyone has the same base level of care (which is currently a completely alien concept in the US) and the government sets the rates they will pay for certain things. You want other things? You can go buy them yourself.

More to the point though, Sanders can't pull off single payer, at least not any time soon. If the DNC would allow him to be the nominee (which they won't) he would wipe the floor with any GOP candidate in the general election (as every single national poll from every single polling group or company has shown). However, President Sanders would still encounter too much GOP opposition in congress to pull off single payer. He can't make it happen simply as a product of his own will.

The ACA is just the government doing what the government does best, fucking up

The ACA is the largest corporate handout in the history of government, period. With the ACA the federal government gave the health insurance industry a license to print money and made us all obligate consumers of their shitty products.

And no, this is about security, not physician choice

Indeed the article here is about security. However in classic slashdot conservative spin, the editor here editorialized it into a baseless attack on the government. The government gets plenty wrong without people making shit up out of nothing.

They also suck at bureaucracy

I'm going to conclude from that statement that you don't actually know any health care providers first hand. Every provider in the US right now spends a huge chunk of their time dealing with bureaucracy. They mastered it in med school - if not sooner - and they face it nearly every hour of every day now as a provider.

and also at not charging an arm and a leg for their services.

If you would set down your kool-aid for a moment and think about this problem you would realize that the physicians have little to do with what is charged for their services. These rates are mostly set by the health insurance industry and various costs that come from dealing with them.

Yes, we trust them with healthcare

[Sir Holo]

FT-Summary: And we are supposed to trust them with healthcare?

The largest data-breach in American history was of Anthem(TM), a private health-insurance company.