Slashdot Mirror


After 150 Years, the American Productivity Miracle Is 'Over' (qz.com)

An anonymous reader shares an article on Quartz: Economist Robert Gordon has spent his career studying what makes the US labor force one of the world's most productive. And he has some bad news. American workers still produce some of most economic activity per hour of any economy in the world. But the near-miraculous productivity growth that essentially transformed the US into one of the world's most affluent societies is permanently in the country's rearview mirror. In his new book, The Rise and Fall of American Growth, the Northwestern University professor lays out the case that the productivity miracle underlying the American way of life was largely a one-time deal. It was driven by a flurry of technologies -- electric lights, telephones, automobiles, indoor plumbing -- that fundamentally transformed millions of American lives within a matter of decades. By comparison, Gordon argues, today's technological advancements -- Uber, Facebook, Amazon.com -- will touch the productivity of the American economy lightly -- if at all. And a combination of demographic factors, such as the aging of the US population, and sociological problems such as growing inequality and educational performance that's worsened in comparison to many other rich nations, will stymie economic growth for the foreseeable future.For those not following Gordon's work, he has been expressing these views for quite some time now. Here's his TED talk from 2013 It shouldn't come as a surprise that many strongly disagree with Gordon's views. Kevin Kelly wrote in 2013: I think Robert Gordon is wrong about his conclusion: According to Gordon growth has stalled in the internet age. This question was first asked by Robert Solow in 1987 and Gordon's answer is that there are 6 'headwinds' six negative, or contrary forces which deduct growth from the growth due to technology in the US (Gordon reiterates he is only speaking of the US). The six 'headwinds' slowing down growth are the aging of the US population, stagnant levels of education, rising inequality, outsourcing and globalization, environmental constraints, and household and government debt. I agree with Gordon about these headwinds, particularly the first one, which he also sees as the most important. Where Gordon is wrong is his misunderstanding and underestimating of the power of technological growth before it meets these headwinds. First, as mentioned above, he underestimates the value of the innovations that the internet has brought us. They seem trivial compared to running water and electric lights, but in fact, as billions around the world show us, they are just as valuable. [...] So the 3rd Industrial Revolution is not really computers and the internet, it is the networking of everything. And in that regime we are just at the beginning of the beginning. We have only begun to connect everything to everything and to make little network minds everywhere. It may take another 80 years for the full effect of this revolution to be revealed. In the year 2095 when economic grad students are asked to review this paper of Robert Gordon and write about why he was wrong back in 2012, they will say things like "Gordon missed the impact from the real inventions of this revolution: big data, ubiquitous mobile, quantified self, cheap AI, and personal work robots. All of these were far more consequential than stand alone computation, and yet all of them were embryonic and visible when he wrote his paper. He was looking backwards instead of forward." You might also find Freakonomics' Stephen J. Dubner views on this interesting.

14 of 431 comments (clear)

  1. False premise by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Uber, Facebook, Amazon aren't technological advancements. Christ, people are stupid.

    1. Re:False premise by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well I could argue that Facebook influences the general productivity of Americans greatly. Just not in the positive direction...

    2. Re:False premise by mjwx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Uber: order an illegal taxi.. but online.
      Facebook: Gossip circle... but online.
      Amazon: going to a warehouse... but online.

      None of these are innovations, apart from Amazon, none of them are even successful. This is why American innovation is failing, you cant just add "but online" to something that already exists and call it new. Uber and Facebook are feats of marketing over technology and hard work and if you ask me, that is exactly the problem.

      First off, dont get me wrong, the US still produces a lot of innovative products, just not from people you normally think (Apple, Uber, Facebook, none of them innovative, yes fanbois, its true and you know it so bite me). Think of things like VMWare NSX, the thing is, things like that are built with global talent. That has really been the only thing keeping the US ahead of the game, the fact that you used to be able to attract the best scientific and engineering talent... So what happened.

      Well I said commonly cited "innovations" are nothing but marketing circuses and there in lies the problem. Being seen as an innovation is more important to a modern American company than actually being innovative. Science and engineering jobs are not respected, they're seen as cost centres, necessary evils and punished when engineering cannot produce what marketing has promised. As such, STEM jobs are now low paying and have appalling conditions. Long hours and low pay in lay terms, why would anyone want to go to the US for that, you can have shit wages in your own country and often better conditions than the US (20-28 paid holidays a year sound nice)?

      Add to this, the patent and copyright minefield that has been created. The US became big by deliberately ignoring the patents of other nations, now seeks to viciously defend its own. Property that has no tangible value is defended more vigorously than people who can actually develop and build new technologies.

      Whilst engineers have always been happy to work long hours for their craft, they've traditionally been rewarded for it, this is the kind of thing that made NASA, Boeing and IBM giants. Now the marketers are more important and get the big wages, the lawyers, instead of being told to solve problems for the engineers are now forcing engineers to solve problems for them. Laws have become anti-innovation and anti-technology. Appearance is now more important than reality. Am I the only one who sees the problem with this?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. Totally wrong by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    There may have been a pause but with us all being on the cusp of so many different breakthrough technologies, like 3D printing, self-driving cars, advances in AI, and lots more exotic stuff coming to fruition in materials research we can easily have another such burst of productivity.

    Don't let the pessimists get you down, greatness is always incomprehensible to them and they cannot see it coming even if beaten over the head with it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Totally wrong by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not going to argue about advancements in AI with what is plainly an AI judging by your username.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  3. Greed happened by chipperdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When a MBA degree became desirable than an engineering degree, Americans became more interested in imaginary wealth than creating and improving things

  4. I see it in the PC vs. the smartphone by RobinH · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While companies are busy measuring smartphone sales as some proxy for how well the industry is doing (and calling the PC market dead), I see a difference between PCs as machines used to do things, and smartphones as ways to waste time. Obviously this isn't exactly true, but in general it is. This is why smartphones have replaced PCs in popularity - people would rather waste time than do work. The media is so focused on getting our "attention" rather than helping us get things done, and we're so connected to that media now, that in my opinion it's obvious why productivity is falling. People aren't really working when they're "working" anymore. They're just distracted.

    Also, don't discount the importance of air conditioning in US productivity, especially in the southern US.

    That said, there could be a new jump in productivity as better technologies are developed. What if we counteracted smartphones with a drug or a widget that could make you focus?

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  5. Re:Well, see, what happened was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A rising tide lifts all boats, and that is exactly what has happened. You can't tell me the average worker today isn't better off than the average worker 100 or 150 years ago. Especially when you include the value of all the semi-socialist programs that are in place and funded by payroll taxes - things like social security, unemployment taxes, or medicare. The real problem is people just don't realize how well they have it these days because they were not around back then to understand how bad things were.

  6. Re:Well, see, what happened was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The truth is, there are no rewards for working harder or smarter, except perhaps survival.

    The rewards only come from making other people work harder and smarter.

    That's best done via threats, empty promises and reducing the number of available jobs while increasing the number of people.

  7. Interconnection by war4peace · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The "problem" with interconnection is that it propagates outside of just Internet and device-to-device linking.
    During the last few decades it has become increasingly easier for people to not only communicate but to travel and work together (or fight), no matter where they are.
    This means:
    - Salaries across the world are slowly trending towards a midpoint. This will suck for more developed countries and will boost lesser developed countries.
    - Productivity will likewise even out: countries where people work 6h a day will no longer be able to sustain that work style. Similarly, countries where people work 12h a day, 6-7 days a week will slowly roll down to less than that.
    - Cultures will clash. They already do and it's not pretty. Some countries' culture is 500 years back: they will have to go through a deep transformation to reach present time, or they will bring down more evolved cultures - and then productivity will be the least of our worries as a species.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  8. Re:Sigh... by 110010001000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Breaking news: older generation deems younger generation to be shiftless and lazy.

  9. The "average American worker"... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is more and more likely to be made of silicon and steel. Automation is rendering the productive capacity of individual human beings less and less relevant. With production efficiencies at historic highs and still increasing rapidly, we should ALL have a great standard of living and a great quality of life - lots of time for creative pursuits, and friends and family, without working our fingers to the bone. But NO - workweeks are getting longer, more people have multiple jobs, and average incomes, (except for the elites), are dropping. Why do you think that is?

    Fuck the "headwinds" - the clear and present danger to a healthy, happy future for most of us is extreme-and-still-growing wealth concentration. We need to tackle the truly Herculean task of re-engineering our social institutions, our cultural and historical and religious biases, our mass propag.., er, media infrastructure, and our fundamental outlook on social hierarchies. All the pearls of wisdom from all the pundits in the world are just more circuses - distractions from the job of building sane and fair societies for ourselves and our children.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  10. Re:Media plays a large role in this by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "In tonight's special, we'll examine how we have smartphones and Xbox and super-safe cars now, and how these easily make up for the fact that you'll have a vastly harder time than your parents or grandparents did making the money to pay for these things, or getting the job that could let you pay for these things, or paying for the ridiculous level of education that could let you get the job that could pay for these things, or the house you might want to own in which to put these things and maybe raise a family at some point.

    Quadcopters! Netflix! And the minor annoying quibbles they totally overshadow, on tonight's EVERYTHING IS AWESOME!"

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  11. Re:Well, see, what happened was... by Deadstick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A rising tide lifts all boats

    Which is great if you can afford a boat.