Slashdot Mirror


Up To 35,000 Gallons of Nuclear Waste Leak At Washington State Storage Site (rt.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Over the weekend, thousands of gallons of radioactive waste have leaked at a nuclear storage tank in Washington State. One worker called the leak "catastrophic." RT writes, "The Hanford Nuclear Reservation was originally constructed in 1943 as part of the Manhattan Project." It produced plutonium for weapons, including the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki, Japan. The U.S. Department of Energy started removing what was left in the tank in March when workers discovered leaked waste had reached a depth of 8.4 inches. The Department of Energy calls the leak "anticipated," posing no threat to the public. Mike Geffre, the worker who discovered the leak, told King5 News, "This is catastrophic. This is probably the biggest event to ever happen in tank farm history. The double shell tanks were supposed to be the saviors of all saviors (to hold waste safely from people and the environment)." The double-wall storage tank AY-102 has been slowly leaking since 2011. It wasn't until March of this year that the U.S. Department of Energy began pumping the waste leftover in the tank.

8 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Facts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    3500 gallons (not 35,000) of water than contained some nuclear salts (not uranium, or anything else normally referred to as nuclear waste). People who break into the restricted area should refrain from licking the ground for a few decades. Everyone else has nothing to worry about.

    And it isn't surprising that a facility 70 years old, that can't get permission to rebuild, refurbish, or even empty because of ignorant Greenies, is falling apart. Maybe Greenpeace will allow the facility to build new holding tanks now, right?

    Nah.

    1. Re:Facts? by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some googling suggests that AY-102 is in fact high level waste, targeted for vitrification for ultimate disposal as HLV.

      That said, this hype (which, by the way is what one would expect from the sources, a local news station and the Russian propaganda outlet RT) is totally unjustified. And then the Slashdot story makes it even worse, turning 3500 gallons into 35000 gallons.

      It's 3000-3500 gallons, leaked from the interior tank into the exterior tank. That's it. It's a known issue that's been around for quite some time - not just since March. And the double hull is doing its job - catching the contents of the inner tank in the event of a leak.

      They do need to get the stuff out of there - there is no third hull, and the outer hull doesn't have the air scrubbing of the inner hull. But that's underway.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    2. Re:Facts? by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 3, Informative

      this hype (which, by the way is what one would expect from... a local news station...) is totally unjustified.

      I totally agree with your conclusion. But, just FYI, King 5 News is not "local". It is based in Seattle -- about 200 miles from Hanford, and a world apart in attitudes. For actual local coverage, see this story. It has more details and less hype than I have seen elsewhere.

  2. Other source by b0bby · · Score: 5, Informative

    A slightly less breathless account is at the Seattle Times:
    http://www.seattletimes.com/se...

  3. Leak? by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Informative

    It leaked out of the inner tank and was contained by the outer tank. As designed.

    Catastrophic?

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  4. Never let the facts get in the way of a headline by Etherwalk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Estimates place the leak between 3000 and 3500 gallons. They've been pumping out the tank, which held 800,000 gallons at one point, and 20,000 gallons are left in it. There are now about 8 inches that have leaked between the layers of the inner tank and outer tank, the vast majority since they started pumping.

    So they stopped pumping, to figure out how to deal with that.

  5. And more facts. by thesupraman · · Score: 4, Informative

    'None of the waste appears to have escaped from Tank AY 102 into the environment, the contractor, Washington River Protection Solutions, said.'

    The leak is between the inner liner and the outer liner, so actually ZERO has actually escaped.
    So, unlikely the retarded mdsolar style summary, the double shell tank has done EXACTLY what it was designed to.
    This is like complaining about a seatbelt and airbag doing its just after a minor accident where no one got hurt.

    Of course we cannot let facts get in the way of our good healthy radiation terror! All those years of duck-and-cover
    drills as the Reds rained nuclear death on our heads would have been wasted!

  6. Lots of FUD by shellster_dude · · Score: 5, Informative

    Until less than three years ago, I worked on the Hanford site. My father in law, still works on the site a regularly oversees and checks on tank levels. At least a couple times a year, there is a minor leak, and the media breathlessly goes screaming that the end of the world is nigh. It is rarely serious, but between the media's antinuclear stance, and the Hanford project's desperate need to drag out the project as long as possible, for jobs, these things get over-reported. At this point, all the waste has been relocated from single shelled tanks to double shelled tanks where it is waiting disposal at their vitrification plant that was recently finished. None of this waste actually leaked anywhere. What it means is that one of the innermost shells on one of the tanks has finally failed significantly. The waste is still contained. This isn't a surprise as even the double shelled tanks are getting old, hence the plan to vitrify (glassify the waste).