Slashdot Mirror


Europe Is Going After Google For Anti-Competitive Behavior With Android

Google now faces more competition charges in the European Union. The EU has accused Google of skewing the market against competitors with its Android mobile operating system. The 28-member state bloc's antitrust commissioner concluded in a preliminary decision that the search giant has abused its dominant position in the market by imposing restrictions on Android device makers. "What we found is that Google pursues an overall strategy on mobile devices to protect and expand its dominant position in internet search," said Margrethe Vestager, the EU competition chief. "The commission is concerned that Google's behaviour has harmed consumers by restricting competition and innovation," she added. "Rival search engines and mobile operating systems have not been able to compete on their merits. This is not good." Google has three months to respond to the aforementioned charges. The New York Times reports: Europe's antitrust charges might not necessarily lead to financial or other penalties against Google. If it is found to have broken the region's rules, though, the company may face fines of up to 10 percent of its global revenue, or roughly $7 billion, the maximum allowable amount. Google denies that it has broken European competition rules, saying that its dealings with cellphone manufacturers like Samsung and HTC, among others, are voluntary, and that rival mobile services are readily available on its Android software.According to EU, Google has breached antitrust rules by:1. requiring manufacturers to pre-install Google Search and Google's Chrome browser and requiring them to set Google Search as default search service on their devices, as a condition to license certain Google proprietary apps; 2. preventing manufacturers from selling smart mobile devices running on competing operating systems based on the Android open source code; 3. giving financial incentives to manufacturers and mobile network operators on condition that they exclusively pre-install Google Search on their devices."The joke in Google's cafeteria today will be "let them use bing," said Andrew Parker, VC. "So disappointing that browser dominance on Android is the only thing that the EU can get worked up about," Blaine Cook, co-founder of Poetica noted. "The European Commission's statement of objections against Android lends further credibility to Oracle's $9B copyright claim," Florian Mueller, the founder of FOSS Patents blog wrote.

9 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Ironic by danbob999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given that Android is the only mobile OS that actually allows phone manufacturers/carriers to change the default search engine or browser.

  2. Bing Bong by fluffernutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In all honesty I've tried to use other search engines but none of them come close to Google results, especially when searching on development terms, error messages and the like. Don't even get me started on Bing, it clearly steers the results towards something it can sell you. There seems to be a funny philosophy that Bing was made with.. it seems to be orientated to people, places, and things rather than point me to the actual answer to a development question that is buried in an internet comment somewhere.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  3. Re:Google has a browser? by Sique · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You got it in reverse. Because (beside other things) the EU forced standard Windows installs not to bundle Internet Explorer, but to leave the choice of a browser to the consumer, other browsers could compete on their merit. And now we have several viable browser alternatives.

    Apparently the logic of the EU regulators had the desired effect.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  4. Re:The EU has fucked up antitrust laws by NotInHere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    claiming that low prices were predatory

    Low predatory pricing is *the* tool against destroying competition that's smaller than you. You are the big one, you have the capital to keep the price low (even if it's not profitable for you!), for as long as you want. You just wait until your small competition either gets no customers because their prices aren't competing with your's or they go bankrupt because they used up their much smaller capital much faster than you.

    Then, after all small competition is ruled out, you can rise prices again and make much more money than you spent on the aggressive predatory pricing.

  5. Re:Vote Leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How did the UK ever bail out the rest of the EU? You seem to be confusing the UK and Germany.

  6. Did I read that correctly? by deadwill69 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Rival search engines and mobile operating systems have not been able to compete on their merits. This is not good." I don't even know what to say about this! If you can't compete on your own merits then where is the problem? Give me something better and maybe I'll try it. WebOS was pretty good, but it couldn't compete on it's merits either. We all see where it is. Make a better product. Google and Apple did and they are winning. On their own merits.

  7. Re:Vote Leave by jandersen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know if the brits leave the EU, that's a good thing. They were the major stopgap hindering to get real work done against the banks in the late 00's banking crisis.

    Sadly, this may well be the case. To all those in UK who are for brexit because 'EU limits the sovereign power of Parliament': is that really such a bad thing, when you think about it? Would it really be sensible to put more power into the hands of the likes of Osbourne, Cameron, ...? And they are actually at the more decent end of the spectrum, as Tories go. EU has brought a lot of benefits to UK, quite apart from the economic gains.

    Don't get me wrong - I am very much a Eurosceptic, as most sensible people would be, but I think even in its current configuration, it is still the right thing to stay in EU and work to change it from within. I don't buy into the 'passionate' arguments for or against, I have much more respect for level-headed reasoning and balanced views. So far in the debate, the leave side sound far more emotional in their arguments than the remain side - and especially Jeremy Corbin's pragmatic views ring true, exactly because he so clearly doesn't like EU much, but on balance has to concede that it is in fact better to stay in. That's how I feel, and I think a lot of people agree.

  8. same rules for everybody by jandersen · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...requiring manufacturers to pre-install Google Search and Google's Chrome browser...

    If it is wrong for Microsoft to do it, then it must also be wrong for Google, even if their practise isn't unpopular (yet).

  9. Re: The EU has fucked up antitrust laws by zennyboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, your internet and TV services are some of the cheapest in the world. Oh, wait... Healthcare? Insurance? As they said, Breaking Bad would have been a very short series in the rest of the developed world...