Slashdot Mirror
US Treasury To Feature Harriet Tubman On $20 Bill (reuters.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Harriet Tubman will become the first African-American woman to be featured on the face of U.S. paper currency in more than a century. Tubman was born a slave and went on to become an anti-slavery crusader. Ironically, she will be replacing Andrew Jackson, the seventh President of the U.S. and a slave owner. According to Wikipedia, "Jackson held as many as 44 [slaves] by 1820, and later held up to 150 slaves, making him among planter elite. Throughout his lifetime Jackson may have owned as many as 300 slaves." The decision to feature a woman on a bill started in part from a young girl's letter to President Obama about the lack of women on U.S. currency. A social media campaign "Women on 20s" then began pushing for a woman to replace Jackson on the currency early last year. Originally, the department announced it would feature a woman on the $10 bill instead of Alexander Hamilton. Now it's being reported Hamilton will stay on the front of the bill with a group of women on the back of it. Civil rights era leaders will reportedly be depicted in the new $5 bill.
why did they put Obama? At least he's a president.
Are we getting closer to being square with African Americans yet?
Waiting for the Youtube videos of store clerks looking wide-eyed at these new bills and proclaiming they're not legitimate currency. It'll be like $2 bills and golden dollars all over again *grabs popcorn*.
Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
I know it's ancient tradition and all, but it seems to me like people are probably one of the worst things you can put on your currency. No matter who you choose, it's going to piss off at least a third of the population immediately, and there's a good chance that in fifteen to a hundred years you'll figure out that, by modern standards, the subject committed multiple atrocities.
A few years ago, if you had asked the average citizen to decide who was the least controversial person in American history, someone that would never ever be considered a villain, they might easily have suggested Bill Cosby. Him, or the Stay-Puft Marshmallow man.
After Harriet's had her day, I say we switch over to a big "20" on there instead of a portrait. Or maybe "XX" if people want something a little sexier.
Smoke a little less ganja, and study a little bit more of your nation's history. (Alexander Hamilton wasn't President either.)
"I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
Well look at the progress. Now, to the elite in this country, we are all niggers.
An actual ruler (length scale) would indeed be useful.
I consider all people humans. Nothing more, nothing less. If you want to have specific conversations about race, you can provide context, but outside of that everyone should just simply be human. People use these terms as full-on identities, instead of the context sensitive terms they are. We talk way too much about race and not enough about simply being better humans.
Good-bye
You're going to have to explain why a white european thinks honoring Harriet Tubman is offensive to black Americans...
As for why replace Jackson- there was a push to get a woman on currency, so they'd have to replace somebody. Jackson isn't quite a founding father, and while he's made many great accomplishments for the nation, he comes with a lot baggage from owning slaves, personally killing several people, and arguably engaging in genocide against the native americans.
I am an ethnic Chinese, from China
To me, racial background of a person is not important - what is important is the content inside - the personality
That is why, till this day I cannot understand the sheer hatreds towards the 'White Men' as espoused by the Democrats and the 'liberals'
Is a non-White Man automagically 'better' than a White man?
Am I, a Chinese, better than any White man out there, just because I am a Chinese?
Is a Black woman better than a White man, just because she is a Black, and she is a woman?
How can anyone judge a person solely based on the racial profile and the gender of that person?
What kind of crap is this? I don't understand!
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
Said like a true brain washed Democrat. Republicans have never switched ideologies with the Democrats. That is a Dem deception that falls flat with everyone familiar with reality. Republicans still want as much freedom for each person as is reasonable within a limited government. We want no one to be a slave regardless of skin color (who is currently trying to infringe on the 1st amendment: see college campuses, the 2nd amendment: see every democrat currently in office, the list goes on). Democrats hate the constitution because it limits the power of government and by extension, their power madness.
On the other hand, many blacks (and other minorities) are now slaves on the Democrat welfare plantation (or other government handouts/affirmative action etc.). They are convinced by the Dems that they have no value, the world is rigged against them and that they can't succeed in life, but that for their vote every 2 years, the Dems will give them some table scraps from the Republic. It is a tragedy that so many blacks have fallen for this and in less than 200 years they are once again slaves to the Democrats whose forefathers were whipping their forefathers on the plantation. As recently as 2010 the Dem party had "former" kkk members as sitting senators (Robert Byrd). Say what you will, but there hasn't been a Republican senator associated with the KKK in any way for decades at least if ever in recent history.
The Republicans want to give each parent a voucher to take their child out of the failing schools, so that with a solid education that child can succeed. We want children to be taught responsibility and self control and delayed gratification so that they can avoid having babies in high school and go to college, which is the most determinant factor in household income. We want all children to grow up in stable, loving homes so that they have the best shot at a happy and fullfilling life. The problem with the Dems strategy is that they have run out of other peoples money, to the tune of $12,000,000,000,000 in the last 7 years and eventually everyone has to get a job and become self reliant or the economy will collapse. They are terrified that once minorities of all color get a real job and realize all the lies they have been fed, they will lose massive voting blocks. When the welfare recipient of today becomes the gainfully employed tomorrow and starts paying taxes, the lies they have been fed become readily apparent.
Because appearance is the FUNDAMENTAL point of personal knowledge. Before you know someone's name, personality, preferences or anything else about them, you know their appearance.
sig: sauer
Odd, given that it was white men who ended slavery, forcefully, across the world. Odd also given that white men and women were victims of slavery by the millions, at the hands of slave masters of all races.
I've been saying this ever since I first heard of the occupy movement. Why the fuck are we demonizing anybody who makes a lot of money? That reminds me of black neighborhoods that demonize success as "acting white". It's stupid and oversimplifies the shit out of the situation.
Besides, half of the so called 1% label themselves as liberal progressives.
By the way, using a label like "1%" or in the derogatory "a 1%er" is so fucking arbitrary it's beyond stupid. 1% of what? Recent circumstances have dramatically increased my income to ~80k USD per year, which according to globalrichlist.com puts me in the top 0.1% of income earners. Oh but wait, we're talking just the 1% of US income earners? Then why the fuck have I seen Europeans and Asians mention the 1%? And why is it the top 1% and not the top 2%?
It really truly is as arbitrary as labeling somebody based on the color of their skin.
The occupy movement are really just a bunch of bigots by another name, only because they supposedly represent the "underdogs" somehow, and for really no logical reason at all, it justifies everything they do.
Actually liberals (and everyone else) should hate wealthy, powerful people. That is the narrowest description for the group of people who have wreaked the most havoc, been the most cruel to the most people, etcetera. However, for some reason (I suspect because the winners write history) that has been deflected upon the much larger group called "white men." This is incredibly convenient for the wealthy because now everyone's hate is directed at a huge group of people who, mostly, had nothing to do with, and did not really profit from the sins of the wealthy. Were/are a lot of white men racist? Yes. Did a lot of white men actually own slaves? No. But those slave owners were able, through their power, to control the conversation and convince a lot of white people that Africans were subhuman, and thus it was OK for the wealthy to enslave Africans rather than pay those non-wealthy white people to work on the plantations.
Is racism bad? Yes. Do I think racists are assholes? Most vehemently! But i still understand that their racism is the result of a massive, multi-generational propaganda campaign instituted by the wealthy slave owners to rationalize their crimes against humanity: Not just against the slaves, but also against the poor white people who the wealthy put out of work and replaced with slaves.
Similar interpretations can be applied across the board. All these situations boil down to nothing but a massive campaign to both divide and conquer, and to serve as a distraction to keep us all from coming after the wealthy with pitchforks in our hands.
Odd, given that it was white men who ended slavery, forcefully, across the world. Odd also given that white men and women were victims of slavery by the millions, at the hands of slave masters of all races.
Totally. If I punch you in the face constantly for an hour, when I stop I am a hero and you should definitely thank me.
To me, racial background of a person is not important - what is important is the content inside - the personality
That is why, till this day I cannot understand the sheer hatreds towards the 'White Men' as espoused by the Democrats and the 'liberals'
It is a noble sentiment, and it would be a better world if everybody shared it. However, I think you misrepresent the situation to some extent; these initiatives are not born of hate to white people, but are attempts at rebalancing a society that is still institutionally stacked against certain groups of people. In this case, the lady in question has a background that represents the struggle against racism and slavery in America in a particularly poignant way, and I think it is a very sympathetic gesture with great symbolic value to put her on a bank note. I think many people will look at it and feel a little bit better in some way.
What kind of crap is this? I don't understand!
No, it is hard to understand, I suppose; especially if you are young and haven't grown up in Europe or America. In my lifetime I have seen the race race riots in the US on television, the anti-war movement in the 60es and the ground-in suspicion against the Germans, the USSR and China. And I have seen these things and many others change for the better in most cases. I can recall how we all were casually racist - we would laugh at jokes about black people, people would talk about the scandal of somebody marrying a black person and so on; our ignorance perhaps made this innocent in a sense, but the thing is, what is done, is done, and looking back, I wish it hadn't been like that. The injustices we took part in sholdn't have been, and the problem with systematic injustice like this is that it sticks around for generations; when a group of people is pushed out to the poorest end of society, they don't get education, and even if society changes and don't keep them out because of skin colour, they now keep them out because they don't have the right education, and so it keeps rolling on. That's why the job still is not done - we may be getting in the right direction, and I think we are, but there is some way to go, and it is right that we keep going.
If you punch me in the face for an hour, should your grandchildren apologize to my grandchildren for you being an idiot?
+5 Offensive
+7 True
There is no such hatred. You and others have made it up entirely. It's a US-only phenomenon, part of a delusion that was fostered by conservative US citizens when they realized that they cannot portray their country as the land of the good and free in light of overwhelming evidence to the contrary (Abu Ghraib, Iraq War, kidnapping, drone strikes, torture, etc.). It's a normal defensive reaction to find some cause and enemy in 'the others', no big deal and no need to bother as long as you keep your irrational feelings about 'liberals' halfway in check and remain reasonable.