Slashdot Mirror


Senate Passes Bipartisan Energy Bill To Develop New Technologies, Improve Cybersecurity (washingtonpost.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Washington Post: The U.S. Senate acted in a bipartisan fashion to pass a sweeping energy bill, touching on everything from cybersecurity for power plants to the future of the grid. The bill resulted from collaboration between Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Washington Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell. The bill, if it merges with House legislation and becomes law, would unleash billions in research and development on new energy technologies, including energy storage, hydrokinetic and marine energy and advancing the electric grid. Many of these initiatives have substantial aisle-crossing appeal, and some could, at least indirectly, help address the problem of climate change. The bill also reauthorizes the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and contains provisions promoting more research on the sequestering of carbon emissions from coal burning and hastening the approval of pipelines and liquefied natural gas exports. The bill, said Alliance to Save Energy president Kateri Callahan, "not only saves homeowners and businesses money and creates jobs, but it also has a huge environmental return by avoiding 1.5 billion tons of carbon emissions. Energy efficiency truly is a win-win-win for our country, making our economy more energy productive, protecting our environment and enhancing our energy security."

8 of 52 comments (clear)

  1. Go team! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 4, Funny

    The future is now, and simple "win-win" strategies are no longer good enough! We're only going to accept 110%... no make that 120% effort and "win-win-win" results. Of course, if other countries adopt "win-win-win-win" strategies, rest assured we'll be looking at future "win-win-win-win-win" initiatives even more closely. Energy bill bipartisanship FTWWW!

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    1. Re:Go team! by jandersen · · Score: 2

      Yeah - we're going to turn this country around 360 degrees!!

  2. Corrected Headline: by packrat0x · · Score: 3, Insightful

    US Senate passes bill creating a slush fund for campaign contributors.

    --
    227-3517
  3. Data Centers by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bothered myself to take a look for various reasons. It had a section on data centers. I swear I have never seen a more buzzword filled paragraph ever. It even had a section on "reducing water usage in data centers" that went on. Clearly they didn't get that data centers get cooler and more efficient by THEIRSELVES.

  4. Hopefully, they have something for gen IV nuclear by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Seriously, we need to get these companies going on building small reactors that can burn up nuke waste, and give cheap SAFE energy.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  5. Senate yes. The house, not so much by WindBourne · · Score: 2

    Seriously, the Senate tends to put partisanship aside. At least for now.
    OTOH, the house does not. And that is why this bill was passed by the senate and not the house.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  6. pipelines and exports by clovis · · Score: 2

    This bill was about exactly two things:

    hastening the approval of pipelines and liquefied natural gas exports

    Nothing else in that bill matters to our rulers, and nothing else in there will happen.

  7. No nuclear? by blindseer · · Score: 2

    In my mind any energy plan that does not include nuclear power is going to fail. This is especially true if this energy plan includes a desire to reduce carbon output.

    To those of you that claim nuclear power is too dangerous, too expensive, or too much whatever else I say that if this is true then global warming is not a threat. Besides hydro electric power nothing beats nuclear power on safety, price, availability, or reduction in carbon output. If global warming threatens the lives of billions then we can do nuclear power to save them even in the highly unlikely event that means another Chernobyl.

    Wind, solar, and whatever else that is "green" just cannot provide the energy we need. Any reliance on some future technology to make them viable again means that global warming is not a threat. If we can wait 20 years for fusion to come along, meaning we keep burning coal until then, means that global warming is not a threat.

    Since the US Senate has not passed a bill that includes support for nuclear power then they don't seem to believe that global warming is a threat. By "support" I don't mean subsidies, there are other ways to show support besides money. Requiring the US DOE to actually do their job and provide a path free from fossil fuels would be a start.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.