Slashdot Mirror
US Begins Dropping 'Cyberbombs' On ISIS (nytimes.com)
In what appears to be a significant shift in its tactic to battle against the terrorist organization, the U.S. has begun launching cyberattacks against ISIS (non-paywall link). The New York Times reports that the Department of Defense's Cyber Command unit is mounting cyberattacks against the terrorist organization. The Cyber Command unit aims to stop the organization from spreading its message. The Times reports: The goal of the new campaign is to disrupt the ability of the Islamic State to spread its message, attract new adherents, circulate orders from commanders and carry out day-to-day functions, like paying its fighters. A benefit of the administration's exceedingly rare public discussion of the campaign, officials said, is to rattle the Islamic State's commanders, who have begun to realize that sophisticated hacking efforts are manipulating their data. Potential recruits may also be deterred if they come to worry about the security of their communications with the militant group. "We are dropping cyberbombs," Robert O. Work, deputy secretary of defense said. "We have never done that before."
Via the New York Post:
Finding God in a Dog
Just wait until they start attacking US websites. It doesn't even have to be sophisticated, DDOS attacks can be quite a bother already. But I wouldn't rule out actual hacking, I mean, it's not like the US government and certainly US companies haven't been hacked before, is it? They have more than enough money to rent some botnets or buy hacking kits. And many of them actually have a university background.
I'm not sure it was a good idea to make so much publicity about these cyberattacks, it might have been a better idea to do them in silence.
Start dropping fast food on them. Destroy their health, destroy their ability to fight. Lots of American Idle too - the combination will be impossible to resist - it's worked on y'all, it can work on them too.
Requiem for the American Dream
More from the interview with Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert O. Work:
"We've developed a wide array of cybermunitions that fill various roles in our Comprehensive Cybercombat Arsenal (CCA). We can drop cyberbombs that selectively destroy the enemy's Information Superhighways and Network Bridges. We can keep out hostile cyberforces by putting up a very tall firewall and, if need be, surrounding the perimeter with cyberexplosive charges--our Minecraft is very strong. "
The Deputy Secretary leaned in conspiratorially, "Our most powerful cyberbombs can even level entire GeoCities."
He raised his eyebrows, nodded once, and finally leaned back in his chair, folding his arms with what can only be described as supreme confidence.
Nothing posted to
So they are infecting ISIS machines with Microsoft Clippy?
No good deed goes unpunished.
Here's a clue: The first amendment applies to americans living in America. Not american and not in America? Not covered.
UN declaration of human rights has it too.
"Article 18.
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
Article 20.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association."
But article 30 handles that:
"Article 30.
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein."
> Get real, this is bullshit. Anybody who has or uses an AK47 is not someone who stores meaningful data on a computer.
The armed forces of about 60 countries have and use the AK-47.
ISIL has about a billion dollars. They acquired $429 million when they took over the Mosul branch of the Central Bank of Iraq, and they now run retail bank branches in the territory the occupy. They "govern" a population of about 4 million, roughly half the size of Switzerland or Israel, and a bit larger than Barcelona or Houston.
ISIL has captured Syrian MiG-23 fighter jets, and demonstrated the use of Mohajer 4 drones captured from Syria and Iran. They have the M1A1M Abrams tank captured from the Iraqi army.
ISIL is a quasi-government, with not only a significant military administered by computers, but civil infrastructure as well - a tax system, payroll for 200,000 employees, etc. If you thought ISIL was a few guys riding around on camels, that's not quite true.
Here's a clue: The first amendment applies to americans living in America. Not american and not in America? Not covered.
Bzzzt, wrong! The 1st Amendment recognizes a natural, pre-existing right to freedom of speech (among other things) possessed by all human beings. It prohibits Congress from passing any law which would infringe on the freedom of speech—anyone's freedom of speech, not just the freedom of speech of Americans or of people living in America. Directing or authorizing (or funding) any branch of government to infringe on anyone's freedom of speech would constitute passing just such a law.
"The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
Well, when China stops "engag[ing] in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein", I guess we'll know that anyone gives a shit about the UN declaration of human rights.
Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
Try deleting the NYT cookies, you should get through. Works for me.
Or just stop reading the NYT altogether to show paywalls are not acceptable.
Like Stuxnet, any attack that the government launches has the potential to affect computers that are not owned by ISIS terrorists (or in Stuxnet's case, Iranian centrifuges).
The more success that Cyber Command has, the more comfortable they will be with with launching cyber bombs. At some point there will be significant collateral damage.
Bzzzt, wrong! The first Amendment only applies to the United States, and not just citizens but any person within its borders. How do I know this? I read the damn thing.
Here is the opening to the Constitution:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Note the last twelve words: do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Nowhere is it said our Constitution applies to everyone everywhere. It is solely for those within the United States.
We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
... is, don't confirm you're dropping cyberbombs!
Dang... yeah, I read the article, but still, making Daesh doubt the security of their computers a bit more pales into importance with them trusting compromised computers a bit more. How much is going to "go dark" now that the current administration decided to grab some headlines with this stuff that never should have seen the light of day? (At least, until after Daesh has ceased to be a threat to anyone.)
Or is it all disinformation? We can't compromise their computers, so make them think we have. If so, I could approve of that.
Or perhaps get a subscription and stop stealing their content?
Absolutely untrue. Check out this story:
http://www.wired.com/2016/03/hack-brief-isis-data-breach-identifies-22000-members/
"You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design