Facebook Is Building A Standalone Camera App To Encourage Its 1.6 Billion Users To Share More (theverge.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, Facebook engineers in London are working on a standalone camera app with a big live-streaming component. Similar to Snapchat, the app would open straight into a camera to foster immediate capturing and posting of photos and videos, as well as letting users stream via Facebook Live. With billions of smartphones in the world and near-ubiquitous high-speed data connections, Facebook sees a huge opportunity to get its 1.6 billion users sharing more than ever before. A camera app may help the company do that, and better compete with Snapchat at the same time. Facebook has recently rolled out a major live video update allowing anyone to post live streams of themselves to their timeline. Previously, only celebrities and public figures were allowed to use the feature. With this new Facebook Live update and standalone camera app reportedly in the works, the only thing holding Mark Zuckerberg back with his plan to triple the size of his social network is affordable internet.

Comments

Voyeurism is getting old

[ugen]

I think the self-exposure trend is running its course. Even my more narcissistic FB contacts are posting fewer selfies in exotic locations and strange and unusual foods. FB is trying to keep it going, but nature takes its course and every fad will eventually go away.

I wonder what's next? Hopefully something less obnoxious.

Re:Voyeurism is getting old

[TheGratefulNet]

I hope this fad does fade. its really boring and I'm tired of everyone always assuming you have a fb account.

I was talking to a recruiter and she mentioned an opening at fb. I told her I don't have a fb account - would that be a showstopper for working there (I assume it would be, even if not explicitly stated). she was shocked to hear this and actually asked me WHY I didn't have a fb account.

the fact that someone thought it was unusual to NOT have one, this is why I hope it dies soon. I have zero need for such things and the sooner it runs its course, the sooner we can get back to normal things again ;)

Re:Voyeurism is getting old

[rsborg]

Even my more narcissistic FB contacts are posting fewer selfies in exotic locations and strange and unusual foods.

This is what I'm seeing. I used to navigate to FB once in a while to essentially gawk at some of the more, uh, exhibitionist contacts, but recently it's all about spamming for Hillary or the outrage du jour (some of which are pretty depressing) and the occasional "really old woman out-dances young guy" sort of thing.
I haven't logged on in months.

Everyone I know is posting less pix online, and less information about themselves. Not just on FB, but G+, LinkedIn, etc.

If Facebook really cared about it's viewership, it'd adopt some of the snapchat like features with timed-archival of photos, etc, and maybe, just maybe, make it really difficult for HR dept. and school investigators and the like to find embarrassing content on workers/students (a high-profile case like where Apple said FU to the FBI would be really nice).

Maybe people are just done being "dumbfucks"? Maybe everyone is realizing that social media is also a problem vector?

Re:Voyeurism is getting old

[TheGratefulNet]

you hit on a key issue; the fact that employment is judging you based on your 'social media' posts - that sure puts a kibosh on any desire to truly express yourself in anything that is not vanilla-tame.

we all realize that HR are bastards and will use anything they find against you. we all need jobs and most of us are not going to be company owners, so we WILL end up working for someone else, mostly the rest of our lives.

who wants to worry about being out of work due to some social media post?

the more the 'authorities' want to track us, the less we are interested in feeding their voyeurism.

Re:Voyeurism is getting old

[toonces33]

I know a number of people that don't have FB. And for that matter I don't have it myself.

I can't help but wonder what fraction of the accounts are spammers and bots.

Re:Voyeurism is getting old

[bill_mcgonigle]

who wants to worry about being out of work due to some social media post?

Who wants to work for a place that would care? It's quite a favor to the market, really - businesses that treat their employees this way *should* be driven into the ground by losing all their top talent.

And, to be clear, almost all the top-talent people 'misbehave' in their free time.

I don't think this is going to fly

[Jeremi]

Half the fun of Facebook is presenting yourself to your friends as a much cooler person than you actually are. How am I going to manage that when there's a live video feed showing them all my dorky self doing the talking?

Re:But their content is all gunk anyway

[plopez]

Stored your image data where it will be held securely and privately to prevent others from using it to train face recognition software [*]

[*] Fine print. Facebook, its parent company, subsidiaries, or business partners may from time to time share such information for quality purposes or for preparation of special offers for your delight. In addition FB et. al. will comply with any legitimate court orders of the country of origin, destination, storage, or transferal including any secret courts as needed to combat terrorism. In addition FB will comply with any treaty obligations concerning such information including edicts of unelected arbitration councils, courts, or enabling legislation. So don't worry, your information is safe from prying eyes.