Slashdot Mirror


All Belgians To Be Given Iodine Pills In Case Of Nuclear Accident (phys.org)

mdsolar quotes a report from Phys.Org: Belgium is to provide iodine pills to its entire population of around 11 million people to protect against radioactivity in case of a nuclear accident, the health minister was quoted as saying Thursday. The move comes as Belgium faces growing pressure from neighboring Germany to shutter two ageing nuclear power plants near their border due to concerns over their safety. Iodine pills, which help reduce radiation build-up in the human thyroid gland, had previously only been given to people living within 20 kilometres (14 miles) of the Tihange and Doel nuclear plants. Health Minister Maggie De Block was quoted by La Libre Belgique newspaper as telling parliament that the range had now been expanded to 100 kilometers, effectively covering the whole country. The health ministry did not immediately respond to AFP when asked to comment. The head of Belgium's French-speaking Green party, Jean-Marc Nollet, backed the measures but added that "just because everyone will get these pills doesn't mean there is no longer any nuclear risk," La Libre reported. Belgium's creaking nuclear plants have been causing safety concerns for some time after a series of problems ranging from leaks to cracks and an unsolved sabotage incident. Yesterday, a nuclear plant in Germany was reportedly infected with a computer virus.

192 comments

  1. ISIS much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I highly doubt the failure of a Belgian nuclear plan will come as an accident. They're afraid of terrorist attacks on their nuclear plants, and are preparing by handing out iodine pills instead of eliminating the underlying threat.

    1. Re:ISIS much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is belgium we're talking about. They don't do preventive maintenance, they only barely fix if something is broken.

    2. Re:ISIS much? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're afraid of terrorist attacks on their nuclear plants, and are preparing by handing out iodine pills instead of eliminating the underlying threat.

      You can never completely eliminate all threats. The potassium iodide tablets are a cheap and effective precaution. I have a vial of KI that cost me $2. If they buy them in bulk, they could cost far less than that. They can probably do this for less than a euro per household. So why not?

    3. Re:ISIS much? by dave420 · · Score: 2

      You are basing your doubts on guesses. If you would stop being so scared of ISIS and look at the safety records of the plants in question, you'd see it's not some scary ISIS guys they're scared of.

      You are indeed an anonymous coward.

    4. Re:ISIS much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not. If you can help quell unreasonable fears for a few bucks, just do it.

    5. Re:ISIS much? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The anger here is the complete disregard for sovereignty and proper management of the life cycle of nuclear power; from it's construction, maintenance, to the final decommission process. Indeed, the pills are cheap. Might as well throw in some antidepressants compounds in with them as well.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:ISIS much? by AchilleTalon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being afraid of a terrorist attack on a nuclear plant is an unreasonable fear. A nuclear reactor isn't a nuclear bomb. Suppose they actually access the plant, how are they suppose to turn it into an actual cataclysmic event? The amount of logistic, knowledge and luck required to turn it into an actual threat is higher than many other alternatives. This fear of a terrorist attack on a nuclear plant is again largely exagerrated and fed by the anti-nuclear activists. They want the mass to perceive the nuclear plants as a perpetual, constant and actual threat against the human kind.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    7. Re:ISIS much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can if you nuke saudi arabia

    8. Re:ISIS much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the real impetus for that fear is from the power companies, who want any excuse to perceive nuclear power is dangerous so they can implement measures that increase their profits.

      They realized power too cheap to measure would be a bad thing for their bottom line.

    9. Re:ISIS much? by NotDrWho · · Score: 0

      They're afraid of terrorist attacks on their nuclear plants, and are preparing by handing out iodine pills instead of eliminating the underlying threat.

      Yep, that was the first thing that occurred to me reading this summary too. Belgians have become such politically-correct pussies that they can't even acknowledge that their country has a serious terrorist problem anymore without everyone shitting their pants in fear of being labelled E V I L R A C I S T S ! !

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    10. Re:ISIS much? by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Why not. If you can help quell unreasonable fears for a few bucks, just do it.

      A stunt like this amplifies unreasonable fears, not quells them. Just like it did when the CD handed out iodine and dosimeters in the US during the cold war and those fears were much more reasonable.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    11. Re:ISIS much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Surely they are just safe guarding against a Trump election victory.

    12. Re:ISIS much? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It does have a problem, but they're not stupid enough to let their fear or ignorance lead them to a conclusion which will negatively affect hundreds of thousands of people just to make cowards like you feel better.

      Yes, if you make evil racist claims, get prepared to be called an evil racist.

    13. Re:ISIS much? by NotDrWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So to combat fear and ignorance, they're going to remain willfully ignorant of the very real problem they have with their immigrant Muslim population, because they're fearful of being labelled as racists if they point out the truth?

      Yeah, that makes sense.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    14. Re:ISIS much? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      And, I can only think this is a sop because whilst KI protects the thyroid from radioactive iodine, it is NOT an anti-radiation pill. Additionally if you're over 40 you're better off NOT taking it.

    15. Re:ISIS much? by fifirebel · · Score: 1

      Being afraid of a terrorist attack on a nuclear plant is an unreasonable fear. A nuclear reactor isn't a nuclear bomb. Suppose they actually access the plant, how are they suppose to turn it into an actual cataclysmic event? The amount of logistic, knowledge and luck required to turn it into an actual threat is higher than many other alternatives.

      Are you so sure?
      What if someone blew up the primary loop pumps and emptied or blew up the cooling pools?
      That's 2 bombs and then you have an uncooled pressure cooker full of fissile material and other nasty fission byproducts in a place that's become out of reach because of the massive radioactivity from the uncovered used fuel.
      It may not go full Tchernobyl, but it definitely may go Fukushima-style.

      This fear of a terrorist attack on a nuclear plant is again largely exagerrated and fed by the anti-nuclear activists. They want the mass to perceive the nuclear plants as a perpetual, constant and actual threat against the human kind.

      Agreeing with you here.

    16. Re:ISIS much? by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      All the expertise they need to trigger a meltdown is on site. Motivation to comply can be coerced. What happens next depend on the hostages, who will probably stall them any way they can considering they will die if they play along. That's not fool proof though.

    17. Re:ISIS much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It may not go full Tchernobyl, but it definitely may go Fukushima-style.

      And, if you take a look at the maps, you'll see that isn't even a big deal. The radiation levels there are generally lower than the radiation levels you can find naturally in Europe.

      If that's the best attack possible, this isn't even worth discussing, never mind worrying about.

  2. cost effective solution by frovingslosh · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    But it is much cheaper to hand out iodine pills rather than deal with the terrorists or even to properly maintain an aging reactor.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:cost effective solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      The reactor is fine & safe. Its cheaper to hand out the pills than to educate the public on the relative safety of the plant, and to quell the demand of those who want the pills because of the FUD they have been fed for way too long.

    2. Re:cost effective solution by Imrik · · Score: 2

      Won't handing out the pills just make the public think the plant is more dangerous than they thought before?

    3. Re: cost effective solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does.

    4. Re: cost effective solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reactor is fine & safe. Its cheaper to hand out the pills than to educate the public on the relative safety of the plant, and to quell the demand of those who want the pills because of the FUD they have been fed for way too long.

      This. It's all about perception.

    5. Re: cost effective solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it is.

    6. Re: cost effective solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And was.

  3. Both by mdsolar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    A couple plants in Belgium have bad safety records without a need for extra bad guys.

    1. Re:Both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They might be unreliable in regards to uptime, but until now, there has never been a serious nuclear incident at any of them. Obviously, even the tiniest issue in any system even remotely related to those plants is being magnified and overexposed and used as a bad example why nuclear is bad.

      Nuclear is bad because of the bad politics that surround it and Belgium is no exception. Those plants should've been replaced by newer plants about 15 years ago.

    2. Re:Both by CajunArson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, mdsolar, I believe anything you say about the safety records of nuclear power plants in civilized countries about as much as I believe a birther talking about Obama's citizenship.

      Interesting point for anybody about to come to MD's defense here: Ever once see him whine about all the nuclear power plants they are building in China? No? Maybe it's because his agenda really has nothing to do with "protecting" us all from the "evils" of nuclear power and maybe he's just out spreading propaganda for his masters.

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    3. Re:Both by chihowa · · Score: 2

      For a guy calling himself 'mdsolar', how many pro-solar power articles have you seen him post? He doesn't even seem to be pro-renewable energy or anti-fossil fuel, just solidly anti-nuclear.

      I'm convinced that he's actually an Eliza bot run by the coal industry.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    4. Re:Both by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      Here are a couple cool ones that did not get picked. Resubmit them if you like. https://slashdot.org/submissio... https://slashdot.org/submissio...

  4. Do not push this button by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Unless the pills come with a warning less than two sentences long in large print explaining WHY the instructions should be followed*, this will hurt more people than it will save. Some people won't trust advice like "do not take this except in the case of a nuclear accident." They'll take them for their cold. They'll take them to treat cancer. They'll take them to see it it gets them high. And if, God forbid, there is an accident some will take disastrously large doses leaving others without. You could publicly distribute clearly marked salt pills and expect 10 cases of salt overdose within the week.

    *and a huge public education effort as well

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Do not push this button by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Can you actually overdose on Iodine? I don't think so.

      Of course, there are also people who don't need these pills -- people who have had Thyroid cancer and don't have and remaining thyroid tissue.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Do not push this button by thesupraman · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can, around 10-20mg/kg is the LD50 in most animals, however these will not be pure iodine pills.

      Your take iodine to stop the body taking up radioactive iodine, which gets quite nasty due to its activity and retention.
      If your bodies iodine requirements are met already, the radioactive iodine will pass through you with little effect.

      For the general population, iodine supplements are highly beneficial, primarily to the brain development and function.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iodine_deficiency

      This seems like a low risk, low cost, if somewhat paranoid precaution.
      Iodine is not exactly a difficult thing to source in bulk if/when needed, but hey, why not.

    3. Re:Do not push this button by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      Since I know someone who went through thyroid cancer, including ablation using I-131, I was somewhat familiar, with the issues, including the effects of insufficient iodine.

      With no thyroid tissue (following radioactive ablation), the body won't retain any iodine.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:Do not push this button by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most people get enough iodine from table salt, since here in the west we've been adding it to that since the 1920's when they figured out it was a fast, easy and cheap way of fixing the problem. It's only the people who don't use salt at all that are really at risk. My mother had iodine deficiency as a kid(grew up in east germany), nothing like decades of problems with it and it's such a simple problem to fix.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Do not push this button by phantomfive · · Score: 1
      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Do not push this button by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, a link to a video as a reply - how postliterate of you!


      More seriously, one of my pet hates is links to videos without context but that's just me so I don't actually think less of you for it. I hate the trend for a long list of reasons, especially for those situations where someone tries to send me to an hour long TED talk when a single line comment about something I'm already aware of will do.
      I will follow that link some time later.


      Back on topic, I don't actually know how much damage the education funding cuts from Reagan onwards did but it looks like a hell of a lot. More typos in newspapers etc may just be due to staff cuts but the end result is hard to distinguish from idiocracy.

    7. Re:Do not push this button by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      More seriously, one of my pet hates is links to videos without context but that's just me so I don't actually think less of you for it. I hate the trend for a long list of reasons, especially for those situations where someone tries to send me to an hour long TED talk when a single line comment about something I'm already aware of will do.

      I'm so sorry, normally I would not have shared a video without a transcript, but this one just wasn't the same in text format.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Do not push this button by Kokuyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We live "near" two nuclear plants and a temporary storage and research facility in Switzerland. All households around here have these pills in storage. So far no major problems occurred with that. I expect in Belgium it'll be similar. In the US I couldn't say, although my prejudices are screaming at me to go all out ;).

    9. Re:Do not push this button by redmid17 · · Score: 0

      KIDS THESE DAYS, AMIRITE?!

      Prolly too busy emojiing Tinder to not text their BFFs while driving and praying for Bernie Sanders and TARP.
      DAMN THEM!

    10. Re:Do not push this button by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      ::: qnd nothing of vqlue zqs lost

      I meant "... and nothing of value was lost". My keyboard went all Belgian.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Do not push this button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, you could just solve the problem by taking out the whole country to McDonalds?

    12. Re:Do not push this button by LKM · · Score: 1

      Yep. I think the only confusion about the iodine pills in Switzerland is that people want to know how much they need to give to their cats in case of nuclear emergency.

    13. Re:Do not push this button by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      Most salts don't contain iodine.

      It is written on the package if it does. I usually salt with iodine but also simple sea salt, which contains all kinds of salts/minerals.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re:Do not push this button by Rei · · Score: 2

      Most salts in the "west" (what the person wrote - assuming they mean the US) are indeed iodized. Sea salt however has no added iodine (though it has its normal iodine levels). Pickling/canning salt isn't iodized either.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    15. Re:Do not push this button by Rei · · Score: 2

      Hmm, I can't seem to find an hour long TED talk describing how much I agree with you... so this "comment" will have to do. ((insert emoji of a sad chicken crying with its head in its wings here))

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    16. Re:Do not push this button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the pills come with a warning less than two sentences long in large print explaining WHY the instructions should be followed*, this will hurt more people than it will save.

      A few people may experiment with such pills, the worst effect of that will likely be that they no longer have them. Many more people will mislay them, so they won't know where their pills are when a reactor goes boom 25 years in the future. This would be much better handled by a law demanding that every pharmacy permanently stock a sufficient amount.

      Note that this is in Europe. We don't generally experiment crazily with our medicines. (And if some nutcase do, he can't sue anyone for the ill effects of his own stupidity.) Addicts abuse stuff, but even they know what gets you up, what gets you down, and that most pills have no 'interesting' effects for them. Iodine is just boring.

    17. Re:Do not push this button by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      It is always amusing when Eurotypes make fun of how Americans are so stupid on the American invented Internet, on their American computers on an American website.

    18. Re:Do not push this button by Minupla · · Score: 2

      Here's the site that they used in Ontario, not bad as far as public education sites go. I particularly enjoyed the "should I feed it to my pet" faq. Surely the result of a headdesk after too many people called the info line.

      https://preparetobesafe.ca/

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    19. Re:Do not push this button by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Consumer iodine-enriched table salt only has a small amount of added iodine. You'd have to eat quite a bit of salt to get enough iodine. Iodine-enriched salt that's used in the food industry has a much higher iodine level. Interestingly enough, most food sources are a poor source of iodine. Seaweed is a notable exception.

    20. Re:Do not push this button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually, the computer is British invention, (http://www.bletchleypark.org.uk/content/hist/ ) that due to political lack of foresight we gave to the Americans and then destroyed and hushed it up as secret for 50 years.

      The WWW is British too, so the internet as in webpages which most of your countrymen consider the "internet" isn't American either.

      Thank you for demonstrating the stereotype of Americans being stupid, you win the internet.

    21. Re:Do not push this button by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I suspect that slashdot might allow crying chickens before they get round to allowing thorns.

      U+1f4a9 U+0x308

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    22. Re:Do not push this button by judoguy · · Score: 2

      Back on topic, I don't actually know how much damage the education funding cuts from Reagan onwards did but it looks like a hell of a lot. More typos in newspapers etc may just be due to staff cuts but the end result is hard to distinguish from idiocracy.

      And what cuts were those? The US spends vast amounts of money on education. Typically around 1/2 of all property taxes go to local education. That's in addition to federal education spending

      Many will dismiss the link because it comes from the Cato Institute but they got the data from government sources. You're right that education sucks in America but it's not for a lack of spending.

      --
      Peace is easy to achieve, just surrender. Liberty is much harder get/keep.
    23. Re:Do not push this button by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, in most countries I have visited you get "normal" salt (without iodine), sea salt, and normal salt that has iodine additions. You can pick in any shop if you want iodined salt or not.
      If salt has extra iodine it is written on the package.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    24. Re:Do not push this button by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, it appears that margarita salt is not iodized.

      Well, that just ruins some of my "Farnham's Freehold" fanfic.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    25. Re: Do not push this button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why didn't you limeys do anything between the end of WW2 and 1990? And the internet derives from a DARPA projects. The closest yoorop ever got to the web was France's Minitel and that's sayin' something. Lol. Now get on your knees and do Obama's bidding as you've been ordered. :)

    26. Re:Do not push this button by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      The reason why here in the west(North America, most of Central America, most of Asia and most of Europe), we add iodine to salt is because goiter was such a wide spread problem at one point, that adding it fixed the problem. A lot of those countries you've visited, you'll find moderate to serious thyroid problems throughout the population.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    27. Re:Do not push this button by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      you'll find moderate to serious thyroid problems throughout the population.
      I doubt that.
      Especially as they have the alternative to by salt that has iodine in it. I just pointed out it is not mandatory to put iodine into it and it is not in every salt.

      You know: there are people that actually eat fish or other stuff with high enough amounts of iodine :D

      And I for my part never really use salt, except for cooking pasta and in my salad and boiled eggs (and that is either sea salt or salt with iodine, I don't buy salt without iodine).

      Most stuff you buy has already more than enough salt in it. Regarding iodine I don't know how much e.g. is in salted pork or salami etc. But in western countries and any country with sea food tradition lack of iodine is no issue.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    28. Re:Do not push this button by Rei · · Score: 1

      The thing that's silly is that Slashdot already allows multibyte characters - öæáéíóúýð etc. So there's no technical reason standing in their way. But it's like someone just handpicked a list of which characters to allow, and made it way too small.

      Just enable unicode, disable the controversial blocks (Miscellaneous_Symbols_And_Pictographs, Emoticons, etc, and add a blacklist for individual characters as needed. Job done.

      --
      "99 dead duelists of Dios on the wall. 99 dead duelists of Dios! Take one's ring, pass it around..."
    29. Re:Do not push this button by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Most people get enough iodine from table salt, since here in the west we've been adding it to that since the 1920's when they figured out it was a fast, easy and cheap way of fixing the problem. It's only the people who don't use salt at all that are really at risk. My mother had iodine deficiency as a kid(grew up in east germany), nothing like decades of problems with it and it's such a simple problem to fix.

      Do not forget the trend towards "artisinal" salts (whatever that means), "organic" salt (redundant), and other greenwashing. Usually those salt products do NOT contain iodine.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    30. Re:Do not push this button by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2

      Thesupraman has everything right and I'm just filling in background.

      What makes a radioisotope dangerous is
      1. A long enough half-life that it is still around when the plume reaches its first victims
      2. A short enough half-life to be intensely radioactive.
      3. A tendency to get stuck in the body by looking like something the body normally uses. Strontium-90 mimics calcium. Iodine is iodine.

      I've seen potassium iodide in mail order catalogs.

    31. Re:Do not push this button by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The thing that's silly is that Slashdot already allows multibyte characters - o:aeaeiouyd- etc.

      Aren't those all ISO 8859-1? They let the GBP sign appear albeit in a mangled form, and that fits the bill too. Do they allow any that don't fit that rather ancient codepage?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    32. Re:Do not push this button by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Looks like one kid didn't get to learn much modern history :(

    33. Re:Do not push this button by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Typically around 1/2 of all property taxes

      Q: Half of a decreasing amount after being corrected for inflation is and increase or decrease?
      Looks like a kid didn't get what used to be expected with mathematics as well.
      The weasel trick of trying to shift things from absolute terms to a portion of a moving target however shows the kid probably spent a lot of time in the debate club being very busy with mass debating. Yes I really do think so little of you and your petty evasions.

  5. silly belgians... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

    You don't use iodine pills to commit suicide!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:silly belgians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      nope. you let a bunch of muslims in and they'll kill you.

    2. Re:silly belgians... by dave420 · · Score: 2

      Seeing as there are over 1.6bn Muslims and everyone is not dead, you are clearly wrong.

  6. mdsolar is a tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    The fossil fuel industry must be paying mdsolar a lot for him to post this much anti-nuclear bs propaganda.

  7. Can you actually overdose by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

    Yes, you can overdose. Heck, you can overdose on salt or even water, and they are not normally considered poisons. If you want to play it safe, or if you don't have an iodine pill, the best thing to do when your local nuke reactor goes critical is to grab the little bottle of iodine that has been in the medicine cabinet for ages and smear the iodine solution liberally all over you. Your thyroid wants iodine and it is going to do what it can to get it, The reactor just released some nasty radioactive isotope of iodine. So the best thing that you can do is get the hell out of there and expose your body to as much non-radioactive iodine as you can safely, so that the thyroid takes up that rather than the nasty radioactive isotope.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Can you actually overdose by swb · · Score: 2

      If you want to play it safe, or if you don't have an iodine pill, the best thing to do when your local nuke reactor goes critical

      I thought the best thing I could do was to slug a couple of shots of bourbon, grab a pistol and go settle some scores.

    2. Re: Can you actually overdose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can dance with tears in your eyes.

  8. Commutative rule by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Do I take radiation pills for an iodine accident?

    1. Re:Commutative rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you are an Australian in Soviet Russia.

  9. That seems a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They did this in Ireland about 10 years or so ago at a cost of a few Million Euro as Dublin is closer to the Sellafield Nuclear Power station in England than Leeds is. However the tablets had an expiry date of 3 years or so and it has never been repeated so that was a useful investment. :-)

    1. Re:That seems a good idea? by goarilla · · Score: 1

      Is that a real expiration date or just the maximum they can put on the label ?

    2. Re:That seems a good idea? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Potassium iodide isn't entirely stable in air(it's somewhat hygroscopic, so humidity isn't a good idea; and in the presence of carbon dioxide and oxygen it can gradually react to form potassium carbonate and elemental iodine; but unless your packaging and storage practices are unbelievably shoddy you should be able to get much more than 3 years of shelf life. Even if you don't flush with dry nitrogen before sealing, the oxidation products aren't excitingly dangerous so whatever air is left in the bottle would just degrade a portion of the product and leave a slightly impure but still almost full strength remainder.

    3. Re:That seems a good idea? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      I assume the pills are Potassium Iodide. per Wikipedia when Potassium Iodide is exposed to air, it very slowly oxidizes to Potassium Carbonate and Iodine. (It turns yellowish). Iodine is sort of nasty stuff. It eats holes in things. So, yeah, I guess it's a real date ... sort of ...

      However, If I were engulfed in a cloud of I-131 two days after the box expires, I think I'd chance the "expired" pill.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  10. They will be shut soon anyway - old plant by dbIII · · Score: 2

    Most of the "green" credit in politics here comes from shutting down stuff that has reached it's end of life anyway or getting close to it and getting free publicity for something that would be done anyway. Keeping that old plant going would mean serious rebuilds. Remember it's not just reactors - there's a lot of pipework under stress that doesn't last forever.
    The real decision was made years ago because you can't have a civilian nuclear industry without building a reactor every few years so that the skillsets are not lost - so the choice was made to halt and we're seeing nothing but the tail of what was. Outside India, China and Russia the civilian nuclear industry is effectively dead and would require a very expensive restart before anything better than early 1980s technology (AP1000) can happen.

    1. Re:They will be shut soon anyway - old plant by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The extra fun is the pipework inside the reactor: It's not much of a power plant if you don't have a heat exchange loop set up so that you can actually use the reactor's heat output to run the turbines; but anything short of unobtanium does not react well to being brutally irradiated; and (unlike the outer housing/shielding) space constraints don't let you use the "Yeah, so just make it thicker, idiot..." technique to make the piping last longer. Plus, you can't just send a plumber in to swap out a defective tube inside the reactor core.

      Barring other serious design flaws, this sort of piping failure isn't supposed to be a safety issue(the coolant loop that goes through the reactor isn't coupled directly to the steam turbines, since that would dump radioactive steam into the atmosphere, it instead is used to heat outside water that runs the turbines); but if enough pipes degrade and have to be sleeved or plugged you can lose substantial amounts of generating capacity, at which point it becomes harder to justify keeping the plant running(except in the 'if we run it just enough to claim that it isn't decommissioned; we won't have to pay for decommissioning" sense).

    2. Re:They will be shut soon anyway - old plant by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The extra fun is the pipework inside the reactor

      Oddly enough they are called creep voids, which leads to microcracking and then real cracks. I nearly wore my eyes out finding them by using a microscope to examine samples taken from high stress spots in the 1990s.
      Simply put, neutrons smash the shit out of everything they hit - sometimes leaving holes and more often making other stuff radioactive. Similar damage without the radioactivity happens in high temperature high stress situations to a lesser extent.
      Anyway, my comment above was to fend off the "just replace the reactor with a new one and keep the rest" types when the entire thing has hit end of life.

      this sort of piping failure isn't supposed to be a safety issue

      Eventually it's all failing.

  11. Belgium... by Cupps · · Score: 1

    is now going to be a nation of ghouls!

  12. But nuclear is magic by cyber-vandal · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's perfectly safe and anyone who disagrees is a tree-hugging enviro whack-job!

    1. Re:But nuclear is magic by thegarbz · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nothing's perfectly safe. But on the scale of safeness nuclear is headed and shoulders above most other forms of power generation which have both a higher headcount and higher environmental impact.

    2. Re: But nuclear is magic by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      Nuclear is far more immediately damaging than fossil fuels and the problems tend to be more notice and more damaging. I'm sure the people of Chernobyl would rather they'd lived next to an oil refinery or a coal mine. Their children wouldn't still be being born with deformities 30 years after an explosion in one of those. Nuclear waste has to be buried in concrete bunkers. Does oil or coal residue? How dangerous is solar or wind in comparison?

    3. Re: But nuclear is magic by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Care to reference any credible source about these deformities? In reality, they are having a hard time finding any adverse health effects to the populations around Chernobyl. I know, you will call that just a conspiracy and that all the deformities are kept secret, only to be revealed by some guy with a website.. right?

    4. Re: But nuclear is magic by AchilleTalon · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are an idiot. Coal and fossil fuel energy plants kill more people than nuclear plant, including the Chernobyl accident. Nuclear energy is safer than any other form of energy production, including hydro-electricity. A coal energy plant releases in the atmosphere more radioactive material than all the nuclear plants combined.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    5. Re: But nuclear is magic by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 0

      Coal and fossil fuel energy plants kill more people than nuclear plant, including the Chernobyl accident.

      Coal and other fossil fuel energy plants have killed more people than nuclear plants, even if you count the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings as "nuclear plants".

      A quick googling indicates ~7.5K deaths per year caused by pollution from fossil fuel plants in the USA. And that number is down dramatically from a generation ago.

      Chernobyl has, so far, produced less than 100 deaths due to radiation (the pollution from nuclear power) since it happened in '86. So, 41 deaths from nuclear radiation from Chernobyl, vs (far) more than 250K deaths from coal plants in the same period.

      Yeah, nuclear is MUCH more dangerous, isn't it?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re:But nuclear is magic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the mentality around here, I find it truly amazing that you weren't modded Insightful.

    7. Re: But nuclear is magic by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Nuclear is far more immediately damaging than fossil fuels and the problems tend to be more notice and more damaging.

      Tell it to the hundred thousand people who died when a hydro dam failed. Or the millions who were displaced and all the land which was made useless.
      Tell it to the people who lived next to the coal sludge spill in Hungary.

      I work next to a coal power station. I frequently travel to a place with a nuclear power station. I know which one I can smell before I even get close when the wind is blowing my way.

  13. Been happening in Switzerland for some time by umafuckit · · Score: 2

    This has been the case in Switzerland for some time. You get them when you first move to a "danger area". Then you rapidly forget where you've put them.

    1. Re:Been happening in Switzerland for some time by samuel.progin · · Score: 1

      Some time is to be understand in decades. It dates back to the eighties at least.

  14. hmm by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    Given that Brussels, where the EU bigheads find themselves fairly often, is in Belgium this would appear to include them as well.

    Wonder how long it'll be before the EU puts pressure on BE to actually make safe (however that needs to be done) the reactors in question.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  15. Mutants! by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    This must be the thinking of the early nuclear days of around 1945. Iodine pills will cause your thyroid gland to absorb the iodine from the pills, rather than radiated iodine from the environment (water, food, etc). That's great, because you don't want your thyroid going all super-mutant on you. But, radiation can have bad effects on you in more ways than messing up your thyroid! It would seem to me that if there were a nuclear incident, it would be better to evacuate, than to just sit there and take a couple of pills and think "OK, now I'm safe".

    1. Re:Mutants! by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But, radiation can have bad effects on you in more ways than messing up your thyroid!

      Most of the other radioactive elements don't bio-accumulate like iodine does. They also don't concentrate quite so easily. So the pills are to prevent you from picking the iodine while they get you out and perform the other necessary decontamination.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  16. Not in the US, though. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm usually in either Silicon Valley or western Nevada.

    After Fukishima, but before the fallout cloud got here, I tried to get some iodine supplement pills, to load up on non-radioactive iodine before the cloud arrived.

    Couldn't do it.

    There were no iodine supplements in the drug stores, or the health-food stores.

    Also no tincture of iodine, iodine-based water purification tablets at the camping stores (where it used to be available as a water purifier - and has since been replace by other chemicals, ultrafilters, and backpack-sized pressure-cookers.)

    (Even iodized salt was hard to find - and would have been poisonous at the necessary levels absent major iodine extraction.)

    A compounding pharmacy offered to make up some - for an exorbatant fee - but they didn't have potassium iodide or other iodine compounds in stock. They would have had to back-order it, and the pills would have taken a month (while the fallout cloud would arrive in a couple days.

    WTF?

    Turns out that it's a casualty of the Drug War. Iodine is used in some street-drug manufacturing process. So (like pseudoephedrine) the government has imposed massive red tape on sales to the general population. These make it unprofitable, so the major outlets have all dropped it and moved on to other things.

    Many months later I heard someone being interviewed on a conservative talk radio show, suggesting that the government should stock iodine supplements around the country and make them available on a moment's notice for protection from radiological attacks and other events - and for people to stock them themselves. He and the host were lamenting that the stupid bureaucrats wouldn't take such an obvious preventative measure. If I hadn't been on my way to work at the time I'd have called in and told them "It's the Drug War, stupid!"

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Not in the US, though. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      There were no iodine supplements in the drug stores, or the health-food stores.

      This website has iodine pills, and lots of other stuff: amazon.com.

    2. Re:Not in the US, though. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 0

      and by the time it gets here (assuming it isn't sold out) the fallout cloud has come, dumped, and gone, and the radioiodine is concentrated in your thyroid

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:Not in the US, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out that it's a casualty of the Drug War.

      What drug could you possibly make using iodine?

      The only one I know if, is the horrible 'krocodil' stuff Russians make with iodine, but it also require a supply of cheap codeine. We don't have easy access to codeine in the west, and heroine is both cheaper & safer. Anyway, krocodil is for the DIY addict so desperate for a fix, he really don't care if he loose a limb in the process. Anyone with the simplest underground lab can do so much better. The illegal manufacturer has time for a few extra filtration steps so his dope won't be seen as an instant-killer.

    4. Re:Not in the US, though. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      It isn't supposed to end up in the final product; but iodine is featured in at least one of the common methamphetamine synthesis methods(if memory serves, actually the original one used by Nagai Nagayoshi in the original synthesis of methamphetamine back in the 1890s). I'm not into that kind of cooking, so I don't know the details; but I believe that that is why the DEA is so touchy about people who go through more iodine than a good little consumer should need.

    5. Re:Not in the US, though. by Orgasmatron · · Score: 2

      That must be a California thing. Around here, iodine tincture is readily available in drug stores, Walmart, etc. Don't know about KI tablets or water purification tablets, since I've never bothered looking, but those are both readily available on the internet. I imagine they could have sold out during the panic, but if I ordered today, Amazon could get me either by tomorrow.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    6. Re:Not in the US, though. by bzn · · Score: 1

      Prime One Hour? Prime Same Day? Prime Next Day? Non-Prime Next Day?

      After all, if you're worried about radiation, expense is moot, no?

    7. Re:Not in the US, though. by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Just eat a bunch of seaweed.

    8. Re:Not in the US, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to check on a map how small Belgium is, compared to the Pacific Ocean. Now add to that that Belgium doesn't have just it's own reactors, but both the Dutch and the French built reactors near Belgium as well. Literally everyone is just a few dozen miles aways from a reactor, not thousands of miles. After Fukushima, Iodine supplements made sense in Japan itself but not even in Hawaii, let alone mainland US. It simply would have been diluted at that point, if not rained out.

    9. Re:Not in the US, though. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What are these things you speak of? Never heard a none American utter any of them. Shit normally packages from Amazon take about 2 weeks to get to me. Fortunately I'm no where near a fallout cloud.

    10. Re:Not in the US, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have plenty of time, since a fallout cloud will never arrive. And, due to lack of availability, you also avoided an unnecessary purchase.

    11. Re:Not in the US, though. by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      You should rather than shop for paranoid-tablets. It seems you urgently need them.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    12. Re:Not in the US, though. by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      What are you talking about? Iodine pills are readily available at every CVS and Walgreens. And there was no fallout cloud. Another nutjob.

    13. Re:Not in the US, though. by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Here is proof: http://www.walgreens.com/q/iod... Click on "Find in Store" button and you will see a list of stores near you that carry it. Nutjob.

    14. Re: Not in the US, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be glad you haven't called in. With that kind of remark you would have got a visit from the police at the very best. You should understand that in this day and age one must be very careful with what you say.

    15. Re:Not in the US, though. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      and by the time it gets here (assuming it isn't sold out) the fallout cloud has come, dumped, and gone, and the radioiodine is concentrated in your thyroid

      You should learn to plan ahead. The time to buy essential supplies is not in the middle of a crisis.

    16. Re:Not in the US, though. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      This is now

      That was then. I DID check the local Walgreens - more than one of them.

      Perhaps, after Fukishima, the drug warriors came to their senses. Or perhaps it's just, as another poster said, "A California Thing".

      Regardless, I'll give 'em another try now, and stock up if they're available. And if not, I'll try a Nevada store next time I'm out that way.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  17. Just follow the instructions: by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    here, and do not forget that, if you see a mushroom cloud, you have to pick up the phone and call the local police!

  18. It's not just about Belgium by Halo1 · · Score: 2

    Until now, everyone living within 20km of a nuclear power plant had to have immediate access to iodine pills. The High Council for Health (a scientific body responsible for giving advice concerning health regulations to the government) has advised to increased this radius to 100km, and the government has followed this advice. Everyone in Belgium lives within 100km of a Belgian, Dutch or French nuclear power plant. Hence, iodine pills for everyone.

    --
    Donate free food here
    1. Re:It's not just about Belgium by Framboise · · Score: 1

      Do the Dutch or French living within 20 or 100 km from Belgian plants get the delicious pills too?

    2. Re:It's not just about Belgium by Halo1 · · Score: 1

      That's up to their national authorities to decide.

      --
      Donate free food here
    3. Re:It's not just about Belgium by Lunanne · · Score: 1

      In the netherlands certain groups get pills, Everyone younger than 40 within 20km. For 100km it is pregnant women and people younger than 18. Also people living within 10 km of the dutch reactor get pills but this area overlaps with the other ones.

  19. Idiocy is universal by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    They didn't get the same "no child left behind" or "ebonics" cut-price education that would require what you suggest.

    One thing I've learned over time is that idiocy is pretty universal. Us Americans just like talking about it more.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Idiocy is universal by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Keep telling yourself that and see if that fixes the problem.

    2. Re:Idiocy is universal by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Keep telling yourself that and see if that fixes the problem.

      Well, it does in conjunction with other actions. No matter where you are, if you fail to account for idiots, any action with fail. Part of the problem in that you didn't actually specify a problem to solve.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  20. Authorities? Rather stupid leftist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those crying, leftist idiots, soon will be voted out by country population.

    1. Re:Authorities? Rather stupid leftist by goarilla · · Score: 1

      Belgium currently has a rather conservative "rightist" government.

    2. Re:Authorities? Rather stupid leftist by goarilla · · Score: 1

      Nevermind, my reading comprehension failed yet again.
      It seems you were discussing the neighbouring countries' governments.

  21. Re:Criminal court for Merkell by dave420 · · Score: 2

    Because she didn't destroy security for all Europe, or even Germany?

    Also, it's spelled "Merkel". If you can't even get that right, why should anyone listen to anything you have to say on the matter? Clearly you don't have a full grasp of the situation.

  22. Re:Stupid leftist commies by dave420 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Thousands of terrorists"? Are you really that scared? Or just massively ignorant? Either way you are not operating rationally, and seem woefully confused about reality.

  23. Just a precision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Belgian and used to live 5 km from the Tihange nuclear power plant as a kid. We never received those pills. Never.

    Anyway Belgium is tiny and has several power plants. Then there's one in France that's pretty much enclaved in Belgium (thanks, fuckers). If one of those goes Tchernobly/Fukushima, I doubt those pills would actually help anything.
    They'd better phase out of this shit, but instead of that, they keep prolonging them. OTOH, to phase out you need credicle alternate energy sources. With this stupid country's chronic inability to actually decide and invest fast, we're nowhere near having enough alternate sources. We're actually getting further from such a scenario with the on-going fiasco of home owners solar panels.
    Also: Germany is very concerned. They are phasing out of nuclear (by 2022), but what they don't want to be known too much is that they use coal plants to partly replace nuclear energy. Way to have a better environment, especially for neighbor countries. So yeah, maybe we should express concern about that too.

    TL;DR: we're so fucked in this stupid country.

    1. Re: Just a precision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As one would expect after so many years spent under the control of the PS.

  24. We won't actually get any pills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The verb "given" is slightly misleading since nobody will actually get any pills.

    The pills will be distributed to pharmacists in the country.
    Belgians will be able to retrieve (women and children first) their box of pills only after a nuclear incident has occurred.

  25. More anti-nuclear FUD from mdsolar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What a surprise!

    1. Re:More anti-nuclear FUD from mdsolar... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      It's the government that's distributing the iodine pills. It's a safe assumption that they have their reasons.

    2. Re:More anti-nuclear FUD from mdsolar... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The governments are also the people who brought you the TSA, infringe your rights in an ever increasing frequency, deny you due cause, and ring a constant campaign of manufacturing endless fear, spending billions on terrorism while letting people die from cheaper to prevent methods.

      I'm sure they have their reasons too.

    3. Re:More anti-nuclear FUD from mdsolar... by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Yep, they'd probably do more to reduce cancer by handing out free sunblock.

  26. Nuclear disaster will never happen in the media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those pills will be of no use. The Belgian media will just ignore it when a nuclear reactor explodes in order to not stigmatize pro-nuclear people. 'Constructive journalism' or whatever they call it. And weeks after the disaster, when enough people have complained about the colored media, they'll just claim that 'Nuclear power is save. This explosion has nothing to do with real nuclear power' followed by a crowd singing 'Imagine', lighting candles and a couple CEO's of the multinational energy companies who condemn disasters (that of course had nothing to do with nuclear power).

  27. There's a solution for that by mdsolar · · Score: 1
  28. New world order by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    Rueters urges all nuclear plants be under international security control. http://blogs.reuters.com/great...

    1. Re:New world order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Do you know what energy source kills the most people, and causes the most cancers? Answer = THE SUN. Compared to nuclear, solar energy has killed multitudes more people. But we are not afraid to go out into the sun, and yet some folks quiver in fear at the prospect of low dose radiation from a nuclear plant, even and accident. Chernobyl pales in comparison to those killed by solar energy.

    2. Re:New world order by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 2

      Do you know what energy source kills the most people, and causes the most cancers? Answer = THE SUN. Compared to nuclear, solar energy has killed multitudes more people. But we are not afraid to go out into the sun, and yet some folks quiver in fear at the prospect of low dose radiation from a nuclear plant, even and accident. Chernobyl pales in comparison to those killed by solar energy.

      Sadly, this is true. Its an interesting aspect of human behavior, fear things we are not familiar with.

  29. Airspace uncontrolled by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    There have been drone incursions as well. http://m.smh.com.au/world/dron...

  30. China by mdsolar · · Score: 0

    Chinese communists are old and no longer believe much in their own politics. That makes nuclear safety there somebody else's problem. There will inevitably be an accident at one of the cheap plants they are building, and it will topple the government, but probably not before these guys are dead.

  31. In case of nuclear terrorist attack.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There, fixed it for you.. This is all about dirty bombs, which terrorists are probably already in possession of.

  32. Re:Stupid leftist commies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It depends what you call a terrorist of course. Is a terrorist someone who blows himself up? Well we don't have thousands of terrorists. Is a terrorist someone who actively supports terrorists with logistics and money and safe houses? Well then we have a few thousand terrorist, but indeed 'thousands' seems to be an exaggeration. Is a terrorist someone who sympathizes with the radical ideology and sees them as heroes, without active support? Well then we have tens of thousands of terrorists.

    Terrorism is a spectrum. Not only those will kill or blow themselves up are terrorists. The entire system can be seen as a terrorist organization. It is up for debate where the boundaries of the system are.

    All those post-democratic problems are a symptom of a failing state. This article is about nuclear power. Although a majority of the population wants them gone, and that's a fact for over 15 years, the last government decided against the will of the majority, and didn't close them at the agreed date, but even prolong their existence for another (at least) 10 years.
     
    This decision was made by the industry against the will of the population. Practically all of the western democratic countries have the same post-democratic problems. In the US it's the same as in the EU. The US has Trump as anti-establishment, Europe has many more (less known because the EU is still a collection of smaller independent states). These politicians are all symptoms of the failing democracies.

    They are in fact a voice against the left wing liberalism, against the so called political correctness, the propaganda that diversity is only good, that multiculturalism is the only way forward etc. For me personally multiculturalism is the opposite, it is mono culture. Regional languages are disappearing and are replaced by mono cultural Americanism. From East to West, South to North, everyone watches television or youtube, everyone watches the same programs or plays the same games. Local cultural initiatives no longer survive. Small sport and culture clubs can't survive the high amount of bureaucracy and the infiltration of incompatible cultural elements (this last element is a non recognized but real problem, it is still a taboo to talk about this problem). Many people have had enough but politicians don't listen. And this is why extreme politicians become so popular. Instead of looking at the real problem and listen to how the people feel, the current people in charge decide to focus on the messenger and ignore what is on peoples mind.

  33. MDSolar vs. nuclear energy and /. by mi · · Score: 0

    A couple plants in Belgium have bad safety records

    How the fook is this bombastic claim a "+5 Informative" without even an attempt at a citation?

    MDSolar is, obviously, pushing solar electricity — which competes with nuclear he hates — but the rest of us, presumably, aren't so biased.

    Has /. been infected with sock-puppets upmodding the masters and downmodding opponents? That would explain the overall trend towards Socialism here — which, incidentally, MDSolar also shares.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  34. Maggie De Block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time I hear Europeans talking shit about fat Americans I'm going to show them her. She's as big as 3 Americans!

  35. Oh wait by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    If you read that, you'll see I oppose a carbon tax. So, your claim seems unsupported.

  36. sunscreen doesn't work against nukes by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    Different energy range and particle composition. You seem confused.

  37. Right by mdsolar · · Score: 0

    Cause only real men hide in white robes and murder the people they are scared of.

    1. Re:Right by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

      What the fuck are you talking about? Do you think that acknowledging that your country has a very real problem with an unassimilated immigrant population that has a propensity for committing terrorism is the same thing as RACIAL GENOCIDE?!?

      Do me a favor. I want you to call up your mother tonight and apologize to her for growing up to be a complete fucking idiot.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    2. Re:Right by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      So what is your final solution?

  38. Fossil fuels reduce internal radiation burden by mdsolar · · Score: 0

    You are completely wrong about radiation release from fossil fuels. https://slashdot.org/journal/2...

    1. Re:Fossil fuels reduce internal radiation burden by dave420 · · Score: 1

      That is not evidence. That is your guesswork dressed up with a link to Wikipedia. You're not really looking like someone who gives a shit about credibility.

    2. Re:Fossil fuels reduce internal radiation burden by mdsolar · · Score: 0

      No, it's just math.

  39. 60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by mdsolar · · Score: 2
    1. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You have such a nack for finding sources with great bias and no credibility. Of course, credibility isn't important when it comes to 'the cause'.

    2. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      Their math seem correct. Silly to claim bias when the math is right.

    3. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 0

      math may be good, but supporting evidence and science behind it are what really matters. But, hey, you have no standards when it comes to what you link to, we all know it here.

    4. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      My standard is getting the math right. Yours seems to be fantasy.

    5. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Good. Here is some accurate math. Number of bullshit nuclear related sources linked to by mdsolar > 10 x number of credible sources linked to my mdsolar.

    6. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Their maths might be correct, but they say the TORCH report estimates between 30,000 to 60,000, the WHO's at ~9,000, and "published estimates" between 14,000 and 30,000. The fact you picked the highest of the highest estimates, and pretended like that was the final figure with no doubt reeks of duplicity.

      Get a grip. We get it. You don't like nuclear. You'll find more friends if you stop lying to people.

    7. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      So you admit the math is right in this case. One down, nine to go.

    8. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      Look at why it is higher: tracks all the fallout, not just a portion. WHO would get the same number had they been more thorough.

    9. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      You can have your own interpretations...

    10. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I read your report. It does NOT say that there were 60K excess cancer deaths from Chernobyl. It says that we've PREDICTED that there MIGHT be that many deaths in the future attributable to Chernobyl. As to the number of deaths, it says about 60....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    11. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I too like spewing statistics from an accident that happened with 50 year old technology by an arse backwards country which decided to disable a key safety system and purposefully move the reactor to a known hazardous position.

      Tell me mdsolar, do you drive a car without seatbelts too? Do you handle elemental mercury in your hands for shits and giggles? Do you power your car with tetra-ethyl-lead?

      You have the internet so maybe you should research all the advancements we've made in the past 50 years. There's been a few.

    12. Re:60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      So fossil fuel use is now safer?

  40. Are you a Socialist, MDSolar? by mi · · Score: 0

    If you read that, you'll see I oppose a carbon tax.

    Only because you prefer "regulation" — which is even worse for its arbitrariness.

    So, your claim seems unsupported.

    But you would not deny being a Socialist either. Which is curious, because this would've been a perfect opportunity to do so. Instead, you chose to remain coy.

    Why wouldn't you simply state for the record, that you do not approve of Socialism?

    Your favoring of regulation to smother an activity you dislike certainly indicates that you are one. Modern Socialists have shifted from the Marx' "government must own means of productions" to the seemingly milder "government must regulate means of production". It is more convenient that way — being owners, government officials may be asked inconvenient questions about the failures (as is the case with public schools, for example).

    But when you regulate something to death (such as rail-roads, mortgage-lending, air-travel, or healthcare, or Internet-service, or indeed, the power-industry) the blame falls on the "evil KKKapitalists", who nominally own the banks, airlines, hospitals, ISPs, and electric plants. You can then "save" them with subsidies and bailouts, which, naturally, give you a right to attach additional strings and impose more regulation. Voila, government control of the means of production (and service-provision) is further solidified...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Are you a Socialist, MDSolar? by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      Regulation is what keeps free markets free. Where would we be without antitrust regulations? In a competition free zone of monopoly-only enteprise. Zero creative destruction. Stuck and sinking into a nazi hell. Your understanding of capitalism seems weak.

    2. Re:Are you a Socialist, MDSolar? by mi · · Score: 0

      Regulation is what keeps free markets free.

      Dodging the question confirms the affirmative answer. Thanks for playing.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    3. Re:Are you a Socialist, MDSolar? by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      You do seem silly.

    4. Re:Are you a Socialist, MDSolar? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      oh good, so you've completed your initiation into the McCarthy club so that now simply failing to deny or denounce is the same as an admission of membership.

      I used to think your clownishness knew at least some bounds.
      seems I was wrong.

      your choices regulated of topic also seem interesting....and ill-informed as usual.
      healthcare hasn't been regulated to death. it did it to itself.
      the same goes for internet service, which oddly enough is more robust in countries that DID regulate it in the public's interest creating the competition you crave so desperately.

      at this point you're no more intelligent nor insightful than a windup toy:
      say the magic word and you spout the same predictable BS.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  41. Re:Stupid leftist commies by dave420 · · Score: 1

    A terrorist is someone who uses violence or the threat thereof to enact political change. So no, you can't just say "it's a spectrum" and include anyone you want. Well, you can, but it's illogical and anyone with more than a fleeting familiarity with critical thinking knows you are off your rocker.

    So yeah, you are an Anonymous Coward par excellence.

  42. 60,000 excess cancer fatalities from Chernobyl by mdsolar · · Score: 0
  43. Nothing new here by thygate · · Score: 1

    We have had these pills for as long as i can remember, the only difference is that now everyone gets them, not just hose living close to the nuclear plants or research centers. But since this is a tiny country it's only a small part of the population that didn't already have them.

  44. They do accumulate by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    Just not as easy to fix. Cesium and strontium are both a problem https://vceenviroscience.edubl...

    1. Re:They do accumulate by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Note that I mentioned that getting people out was still a concern. But to address further, things get messy in the real world, and I'm not discounting other elements completely by any means. Consider this chart.

      Iodine and Tellurium make up almost 60% of the radiation the first day of the release. Barium and Lanthanum make up most of the rest. Cesium is relatively insignificant until a year later.

      Air release of Iodine 131 is estimated at 130 PBq, and Cesium-137 at 6.1 PBq. 21 times the iodine release? That's a bigger concern, don't you think?

      Cesium, well, we use it in radiation therapy. Half life of 30 years, it's not very radioactive, compared with the 7-8 days for the other substances, which is why it eventually comes to dominate the radiation % after a few years. 30 year half-life, but it's half life in the body is only 70 days. So the treatment for it would be fairly simply - make sure you're getting enough non-radioactive potassium and let it get flushed out of the system. And hey, what do you know, the most common method of giving Iodine to keep I-131 uptake low? Postassium Iodide!. So the same treatment that's used to keep uptake of I-131 low will also help keep uptake of CS-137 low.

      Strontium is an issue, yes, but no where near as large as the I-131, and as you say, there's not as much we can do about it other than making sure anybody exposed gets plenty of calcium to help displace it. It's biological half-life(IE how long, on average, until half of it's been eliminated from the body) is 14-600 days. Iodine-131 has such a short radiological half-life that it's biological half-life of 80-120 days isn't normally considered significant.

      Also, consider: Calcium intake is supposed to be 600-800mg. Iodine? 150 ug. Your calcium needs are 5,000 times as large. Potassium is even worse, with 4.5 grams/days being recommended. So you combine that Strontium/Cesium output is much smaller than Iodine output in nuclear disasters, combined with the difference in body proportions...

      So, to summarize: I stand by my statements. I-131 is more radioactive, more easily uptaken, and retained by the body longer than Cesium and strontium. More I-131 is released in a disaster, and it accumulates into a smaller portion of the body much more easily.

      Mdsolar, you might want to stop quoting blogs quite so much. The article you mentioned didn't examine more than skin deep at all, not considering the proportions released, the radiological half lives, the biological half-lives, etc... Cesium and strontium are a much lower concern than Iodine. I'm not saying that they aren't a concern, but that you can worry about them AFTER you've addressed the I-131 problem.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    2. Re:They do accumulate by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      I was distinguishing between accumulate and concentrate. In some ways strontium would be harder to flush. You can remove the thyroid.

  45. 100km is a COUNTRY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder Europeans/hipsters use Western Europe as a paradise for bike lanes/WiFi/carbon taxing. 100km wouldn't fit into some counties in the US.

  46. In other news... by marciot · · Score: 1

    US debates plan to hand out ice cubes in case of global warming.

  47. Nothing new - a fun fact from the eastern block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Poland, after the Chernobyl blew up, every child was given Lugol's iodine. It was a quick decision, very easy to execute.
    Why? Because, being a communist heaven and potential nuclear wasteland with places in nuclear shelters only for those "more equal", it was decided that in case of WW3 every survivor was to be given a dose of Lugol's iodine and because the government has made a reasonable assumption that some/most pharmacies were going to be destroyed, every pharmacy had to have a reverve of Lugol's iodine times 1000.

  48. Re:Stupid leftist commies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 millions young muslim bulls were let into Europe by leftist governments, skipping all identification procedures. Let's assume only 1% percent are ready to blow up yourself IS radicals. That is 10 000 terrorists.
    We have huge problem on our hands, because of irresponsibility of German politicians, Europe again is on fire.

  49. Not what the TV tells people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In common fictional TV shows, nuclear disasters ALWAYS end with a big flashy atomic mushroom cloud. Also, radiation kills people in about 5 to 15 seconds after giving them epileptic seizures.

    Due to the way certain news agencies presented facts, some people honestly believe that Fukishima had three atomic explosions that killed 10,000 people.

    And then they pray to there imaginary sky fairies for help. Sadly there are entire TV channels dedicated to just that specific retardation.

  50. Re:Criminal court for Merkell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The EU gang led by Merkel are too arrogant to accept that have goofed up over this uncontrollable surge of terrorism.
    I can see a civil uprising happening in Europe due to this mindless situation. We the Belgian people can see that we are losing our identity.
    In some areas of Brussels there are people on the streets confiscating alcohol and telling people how to behave. Worse than that, we encourage extremism-allowing discussions on Sharia Law, allowing places where Sharia Law can be conducted and allowing extremists to speak at our universities while banning others. VOTE OUT. VOTE TO KICK OUT ANY AND ALL EXTREMISTS!

  51. Re:Criminal court for Merkell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surprised? No! We are losing our Country and no one is listening , So sad for future generations as Benelux will be unrecognisable, thanks to the wretches who govern us.

  52. Re:Send Mother’s Day Gifts to Singapore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You rape little children.

  53. KI tablets are bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at a nuclear power plant. They don't hand out iodine tablets to us. You know why? Because the plants are safe and the dangers of living near one are overstated by a jittery public who believe everything they see and hear in the media. The iodine tablets are handed out by the local government to people living in a 10-mile radius of a plant as some false reassurance that it'll save them in the event that something happens at a nearby nuke plant. Pretty much a placebo affect.

    The real deal is that radioactive steam from a boiling water reactor is only radioactive for less than a minute (radionuclides in water and steam have a half-life of 7 seconds... we can walk up to the turbines as soon as the reactor is shut down).

    The other mass-media fallacy is terrorism at nuclear power plants. For starters they're very secure places - 25-30% of a plant's workforce is armed security. Very well trained and armed security with authorization to use deadly force to those who try to get past the physical barriers in place. The physical barriers include 20-ton concrete blocks interlocked around the entire fence line, razor wire / barbed wire, motion sensing equipment, and fortified security huts around the perimeter of the plant that are staffed 24/7. Not too different than what you see at military Q areas and maximum security prisons. Assuming a bad guy can get past all that without being turned into swiss cheese - he would need to know how to navigate through the maze of passageways to get to the reactor building - and someone's ID card with the appropriate level of physical access to the vital areas of the plant - all heavy fortified doors. Should he amazingly by some miracle make it into a reactor building alive - he'll find that the drywell / primary containment is sealed off by very locked and heavy doors (and even if he did get in - the heat and radiation would render him useless quickly). OK - so now he has to get up to the refueling floor. Oh - guess what - the spent fuel in the pool is 40 feet under water. Hope be brought SCUBA gear with him. Once he gets a fuel assembly up out of the pool - the radiation and heat coming from it will kill him pretty quickly. Getting to the reactor pressure vessel itself - the heat and radiation once you get the 8-foot thick concrete and lead shield plugs, drywell head, reactor pressure vessel head, and steam dryer up out of the reactor - then super hot deadly radioactive fuel assemblies are waiting to kill him as well. Good luck with all that.

    OK - so what about the fuel that's stored in casks outside. Again - they're within the secure boundary of the plant (inside the fence)... and assuming he can get in the sealed concrete vault and pull out the 100-ton cask stainless steel cask that's bolted and/or welded shut - then sure, he can grab the still highly radioactive fuel assemblies that will still kill him before he can do anything meaningful with it.

    Oh and finally, once word gets out that some terrorist is in the plant - the reactor operators (in another building away from the reactor) gonna scram the reactors and shut everything down anyway limiting any potential damage that someone can do.

    Oh and so far this year I've received less radiation than I get from my annual dental X-rays.

    So yeah - little to worry about there folks. Unless you're running a graphite moderated plant along a major earthquake prone fault line at sea level run by total retards in a plant with no security whatsoever - then maybe you might want to think about stocking some iodine tablets - just in case.

  54. Why not just say "LEARN TO SPEAK AMERICAN!" by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Why not just say "LEARN TO SPEAK AMERICAN!" and save me from sitting through a fucking advertisement before making it to some sort of joke as lame as mine above?