Slashdot Mirror


Flexible Floating Football-Field Sized Solar Panels (digitaltrends.com)

mdsolar writes: Offshore wind farms are growing in popularity as energy providers look for different ways of harvesting power from the sun without using valuable land resources. One unique idea being developed by engineers at Vienna University of Technology is a floating platform called a Heliofloat that would function as a sea-based solar power station.... an open-bottom, flexible float as large as a football field and covered from edge to edge with solar panels. Heliofloats can operate as standalone platforms for smaller operations with moderate energy requirements. Multiple heliofloats also can be connected together, forming a floating solar-harvesting power grid.
Each heliofloat is 100 meters long, reportedly cheap and easy to build, and may eventually be used to power desalination plants and biomass extraction.

70 comments

  1. Offshore what now? by flopsquad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Offshore wind farms are growing in popularity as energy providers look for different ways of harvesting power from the sun without using valuable land resources.

    Which is why coastal states are now experimenting with offshore nuclear reactors, to harness the geothermal energy derived from burning coal.

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    1. Re:Offshore what now? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Offshore wind farms are growing in popularity as energy providers look for different ways of harvesting power from the sun without using valuable land resources.

      Which is why coastal states are now experimenting with offshore nuclear reactors, to harness the geothermal energy derived from burning coal.

      WAT? no wind powered cold fusion?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Offshore what now? by Adriax · · Score: 1

      That's a complete myth. One of those power generation methods pulled directly from science fiction with no basis in reality.
      No one has ever been able to replicate the wind power experiments of the 80's.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    3. Re:Offshore what now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would you suggest? Background checks? Auditions? Sign a paper stating "I promise not to troll most of the time"?

    4. Re:Offshore what now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The submitter is trying to be clever. Wind is indirect solar power in the sense that wind is caused when energy from the sun heats the atmosphere (or heats the surface which in turn heats the atmosphere).

      As far as offshore wind growing in popularity, that's a tenuous claim, at least in the United States. Other than small scale experiments, there are no permanent offshore wind farms in the US. There are a few planned projects, but NIMBYs may yet kill them off.

    5. Re:Offshore what now? by flopsquad · · Score: 1

      Is this guy from a competitor site? While he might think that's funny, this is a very serious subject and the whole point of having a registered user is lost if he/she can troll more freely than ACs. That's why people say /. is not working...

      Lolwut? Are you saying I'm being too hard on the editors by gently ribbing them for missing an error in the second word of a submission, one that misidentifies the entire subject of the article?

      Or that a competitor news site created this user account, undertaking a years-long campaign posting a mixture of sarcasm and legal/political commentary, slowly building a reputation of no particular significance, in order to subtly undermine* the credibility of the Slashdot editorial staff by occasionally taking a humorous turn on a typo or editing gaffe?

      Or that a slashvertisement** for solar pontoons is simply too solemn and important a subject to joke about?

      Or are you trolling me and I fell for it? Dammit I fell for it! Well I wrote all this out I might as well post it now.

      *Very, very subtly

      **From TFA: Researchers found the Heliofloat technology to be so promising that they created a spinoff company to develop the platform idea for a range of industries. “Heliofloat platforms offer new possibilities for desalination plants and biomass extraction processes for salt water,” said Dr Roland Eisl, a Vienna University of Technology graduate and director of Heliofloat GmbH.

      --
      Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    6. Re:Offshore what now? by sumdumass · · Score: 0

      He's not suggesting anything of the sort. He didn't notice the mistake and understood your comment to be different from what he wanted to hear and got upset.

      Now please move along and not bring reality into their safespaces any more than it has to enter them.

  2. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something constructive and useful instead of an anti-nuclear rant. I never thought I'd see the day.

  3. California and Oceania by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

    Desalination is an ideal use for fluctuating power sources, so long as you can find enough sheltered bays and estuaries to float them. Hawaii has a particular problem finding a carbon-free power source that will work on scattered islands, and has quite a few locations where these panels could be located.

    But the real potential for this idea would be the atolls of the south Pacific. These places rely on diesel generators now, and generally have a small number of users who have no need for an industrial baseload.

    1. Re:California and Oceania by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Offshore wind is done only because of the favorable winds, not because of land costs or availability. Solar doesn't need to go offshore, it only adds to the cost. If you've ever been around ocean mist, you know how quickly it covers clear surfaces with deposits.

    2. Re:California and Oceania by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I think if you calculated the amount of water that could be desalinated from a football size array of solar panels, you would be surprised how little it it.

    3. Re:California and Oceania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you forgot about the NIMBYs. Smaller installations aren't really an issue but the second you go up to industrial scales the kooks come out of the woodwork to stop it using any excuse they can. By moving it offshore you get rid of most of them and the costs of land, you still have to deal with the enviro fundies and red tape but they're probably a bit easier to shrug off.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/solar-farm-suck-up-the-sun_us_566e9aeee4b0e292150e5d66

    4. Re:California and Oceania by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      It's cute. I have to give it that. And no argument that desalinization should be a well matched load for intermittent power sources. (So is pumping water around the countryside -- which is done a lot in areas like the Western US.) However, I expect that this scheme will encounter a zillion problems if anyone tries to actually implement it. Everything from wind blown salt spray which is corrosive and also coats the solar cells with salt to breaking up in strong storms. Remaining upright isn't all that useful if it is upright under 25 fathoms of water.

      I'd think that a solar installation installed on something solid -- like ground for example -- would be cheaper to build and cheaper to maintain.

      Maybe I'm wrong. Hope so.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    5. Re:California and Oceania by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      I'm not claiming that solar desalination would satisfy the needs of California, but that it would be a good usage match for intermediate-scale wind and solar as power sources. A number of California coastal towns are already building small desalination plants for their own water supply. Once the culturally influential coastal population gets used to desalinated water, the idea will spread inland. This will require a new generation of large baseload power plants. More nuclear jobs for Arizona!

    6. Re:California and Oceania by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      There's an interesting economic issue with desalinization. It's kind of expensive. So you take a region that gets a reasonable amount of rain/snow fall a lot of the time, natural precipitation -- being a cheaper water source -- will be the preferred source. Except during droughts. When users will turn to the desalinization plant. (Boy are we glad we built that. We are very clever, no?) But water from the largely unused desalinization facility is going to be much more expensive than was projected because maintenance and debt service costs are continuous, but revenue is only generated during droughts. And the costs can only be serviced when there is revenue.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    7. Re:California and Oceania by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I'm not claiming that solar desalination would satisfy the needs of California, but that it would be a good usage match for intermediate-scale wind and solar as power sources. A number of California coastal towns are already building small desalination plants for their own water supply.

      Just be aware what it takes. I did a quick calc and for a town of 20,000 using water conservatively, it would take 6 football field size solar arrays to supply water for personal use. That doesn't include any other water needs, like fire fighting, industry, etc.

    8. Re:California and Oceania by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "I think you forgot about the NIMBYs."

      No, in fact I think it's glorious that renewables advocates are getting hit by these cranks too. This is our best chance to finally get NIMBYs laughed off the political stage.

    9. Re:California and Oceania by rgbatduke · · Score: 2

      I think if you calculated the amount of water that could be desalinated from a football size array of solar panels, you would be surprised how little it it.

      You mean, compared to simply building a solar distilling plant with the same floating plastic? Could it possibly be less efficient to collect solar energy at a penalty of (say) 90% and use that energy at an additional penalty to desalinate water no matter how you try to do it than it is to take close to 100% of the energy -- including the infrared and UV -- and simply heat up a black sheet with a thin skin of water over it and use cooler water circulated up from depth by a very small solar power to condense the water vapor cooking off of the top so it can be collected?

      Solar stills have been around for a long time. You can buy them online. They often are included in life raft equipment. A 24" floating solar still can produce around 1.4 L of fresh water in an overcast day, more than that on a sunny day, and doesn't even use cooler water from under the surface layer to enhance the condensation rate. If we assume 1 foot in radius per 1.5 Q, that's pi square feet per 1.5 Q. A football field is 300x300 \approx pi x 30000, so it should produce 30,000 x 1.5 q = 45,000 Q/day in cloudy conditions, more in sunny ones. That' a bit over 10,000 gallons/day, and needs solar cells or alternative power only to pump the resulting water from the collector to somewhere else.

      Now, is that only a "little"? Depends on what you want it for. That's enough for quite a few houses or people. Not enough to do much irrigation in a very hot climate, but it is not nothing, either. But there are a lot of football field sized areas in the ocean, and a direct side effect of this is the cooling of the ocean underneath, which can have either good or bad ecological effects but in moderation probably mostly good.

      rgb

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    10. Re:California and Oceania by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "I did a quick calc and for a town of 20,000 using water conservatively, it would take 6 football field size solar arrays to supply water for personal use..."

      Think of San Luis Obispo as a possible location. The solar arrays could be sited in the sheltered arm of Avila Beach, feeding a pipeline run up Hwy 101 into town.

    11. Re:California and Oceania by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Having a desalinization plant out in the open water is kind of stupid, IMHO. Its much easier to have the equipment on land, it doesn't take a lot of area, and piping in the water requires little infrastructure with minimal piping actually in the water. And you can more easily connect to land base power sources for backup if needed.

    12. Re:California and Oceania by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      If you assume 50 G day per person, that is only enough water for 200 people.

    13. Re:California and Oceania by phayes · · Score: 2

      Open water desalination plants would avoid a two major blocking points that no-one has mentioned up to now:
      - Land based plants in the South Pacific are difficult because they have very little unoccupied horizontal land.
      - Placing the plants near shore would kill the already fragile coral reefs.

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
    14. Re:California and Oceania by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If you assume 50 G day per person, that is only enough water for 200 people.

      If we're still talking about that town of 20,000, 200 is exactly 1%, or all who matter. The rest of us looters can drink our bootstraps.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  4. Let's combine different sources by Henriok · · Score: 1

    This is excellent. I think they should combine a plant like this with wind turbines and wave plants as well. They won't hinder one another, and they could reuse a lot of infrastructure and space.

    --

    - Henrik

    - when the Shadows descend -
  5. Flat panels by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    On the single picture the panels are mounted flat.

    That probably makes sense because of strong winds that would be dangerous for traditional tilted panels.

    On the other hand: if the panels where tilted to wards the sun, you could turn the whole platform to follow the sun very easy, two simple sails would be enough.

    Benefit would be: you get a decent increase of solar input not only by pointing towards the sun, but also by reflections from the sea.

    Everyone who ever got a sunburn close to the water knows the difference.

    Of course bottom line you look more at costs then at "efficiency" ... no one wants a system that has multiple options for failure when a simple flat "raft" already gives a good enough yield.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Flat panels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's sufficiently cheap to make large, flat panels then it may not be worth angling them, given the additional complexity of power cabling required to harvest the power and the extra maintenance required. Not least it would complicate the of simply chaining several dozen together in a grid.

    2. Re:Flat panels by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I don't see anyway this will ever be cheaper than southern facing rooftop solar.

      How much daytime demand do they think there will be if all the southern roofs are already covered?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  6. Interesting, but untested design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its an interesting design, but I don't know how effective it would be. The sea is a pretty torturous place, and that thing looks pretty close to it. Add to that all of the talk about "flexible" pieces and parts, something you don't generally see in maritime engineering and it sounds a little iffy. A more proven design might be a submerged pontoon design (like an oil platform). Because of the much lower weight it wouldn't need to built nearly as heavily and on long enough pylons the solar panels would be kept far above the waves..

  7. The measurements by rmdingler · · Score: 0
    When we see football fields or Olympic swimming pools used, it usually means we're attempting to peak the interest of American minds...

    Unfortunately, this unconventional measurement only works for the rest of the world's football pitch.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re: The measurements by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, all the gold ever mined on the world fits into two olympic swimming pools.

      Even if you don't know how big such a pool really is, you get the idea that the amount of gold is extremely low. And from that it is easy to conclude that gold based/backed currencies are completely impossible in our days. The gold in your SmartPhone would be worth thousands of dollars if mega trillions of commerce on the planet would be done with gold based currencies.

      I'm to lazy to look up how big a football field is and convert feet or yards into graspable dimensions ... but I know it is a bit bigger than a soccer field (which actually has no fixed size, but a range of allowed length and width).

      So, I have a good idea how big the floats are.

      Anyway, I appreciate that you only were ironic. Just wanted to give a thought to the other readers.

      I mean if I write about a man high Buddha statue that I discovered in the south american jungles it is quite likely that it is not 2.30m nor 1.45m but somewhere in the middle :D transforming that into feet and inches is left as an exercise for the reader.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re: The measurements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True true. But 'pique' not 'peak'. This use is directly from a french word meaning pricking, so the meaning is more like a sharp jab that gets one's attention. We actually get 'peak' from the old english 'picked', which probably comes from the same old French. But 'piqued interest' didn't come to us that way.

      (Sorry to be a slight grammarnazi, but you seem like the sort of person who'd want to know!)

      Captcha: Teacher. OK I'll shut up now

    3. Re: The measurements by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      As an American I can tell you the proper word is "pique" not "peak".

    4. Re: The measurements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we see football fields or Olympic swimming pools used, it usually means we're attempting to peak the interest of American minds...

      Unfortunately, this unconventional measurement only works for the rest of the world's football pitch.

      The word you're looking for is pique.

      And I can't imagine why you think using "football fields" is targeted at "American minds," whatever that is. Are you trying to imply that Americans don't know how big 100m is, so an analogy is needed? Srsly?

    5. Re: The measurements by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      An American football field is pretty close to the size of a typical soccer (as we Americans call "football") field. Roughly 109mx48m. Typically we don't use the full 109m length when soccer is played on the same field because running into the permanently mounted football goal posts by accident hurts.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    6. Re: The measurements by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      'Football fields' is pretty universal. Even if we're talking about different sports.

      What is the area of Aussie rules? I bet it's 'close enough'. Likely a little bigger, but that's fair, some of it will be infested with venomous creatures.

      A better sign that this is directed at American minds is that it's a terrible idea. But then again, 'people are stupid' is also universal.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    7. Re: The measurements by HiThere · · Score: 1

      My thought was that it's a sign that solar panels have gotten a lot cheaper. If they're cheap enough it might be a good idea...though not for every purpose. (I mean the floating solar generator plant, not the desalinization idea. I haven't thought that one through. It seems like a floating desalinization plant shouldn't use that much power, since it would probably be based on solar evaporation.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    8. Re: The measurements by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      Or, I meant

      "it usually means we're attempting to peek into the interested American mind(s)..."

      I was thrown off because I just couldn't decide if I could place an asterisk after the plurality option without explaining the joke, which as we know, ruins the darn thing.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    9. Re: The measurements by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Most of water on the Earth is salt water, salt + electronics = bad, salt + solar panels = bad (it will QUICKLY coat the panels and reduce their usefulness)

      I don't see how this could possibly work on any ocean as it would need major maintenance on top of the solar panel costs.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  8. a solar article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm amazed. True to his name, Mdsolar posted an article that's actually pro-solar instead of anti-nuclear.

  9. Environmentally friendly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't this darken the environment bellow its self pretty substantially? A few of them wouldn't be a problem but wide spread use would be problematic.

    1. Re:Environmentally friendly? by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Correct. And when they broke up in the first moderately sized storm they would spread poisonous debris everywhere when the chemicals in the solar array.

    2. Re:Environmentally friendly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you park a bunch of them right over a vulnerable habitat I don't see how this is going to be an issue. Last I heard a single county in Utah (about 800 square miles) covered with solar panels would provide enough electricity for the entire US (ignoring the storage issues of course). If that's true you'd only need about 4,000 square miles of solar panels to power the entire planet, or about 0.001% of the oceans surface area. Even if human power needs expanded by a factor of 10 you'd still only need 0.01% of the oceans surface.

    3. Re:Environmentally friendly? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Poisonous debris like silicon? You know, the stuff sand is made of?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  10. What about pests growth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With all the barnacles and sea weed/algae growth? Wouldn't they make the platform too heavy after a while?

  11. Hydropower reservoirs by Framboise · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A good place to put such floating panels are the hydropower reservoirs.
    Large surface is available, of little use, power lines and converters are nearby, and the wind is less strong at the bottom of these lake than on sea.

    1. Re:Hydropower reservoirs by mdsolar · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is happening. Another advantage is that evaporation is reduced, conserving water.

    2. Re:Hydropower reservoirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed. I find it hard to believe that PV could provide enough power to make the addition cost and efficiency loss of pumping water anywhere near practical.

      Pumped water storage really only makes sense when you already have a good flow of water and need a bit more for peak generation

    3. Re:Hydropower reservoirs by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      Not getting your point....

    4. Re:Hydropower reservoirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you get the boaters to be ok with it though? Would need a way to solve that too...

    5. Re:Hydropower reservoirs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You claimed that "A good place to put such floating panels are the hydropower reservoirs." is already happening. I questioned where it's happening, especially since TFA describes an idea that doesn't appear to have ever been implemented anywhere.

    6. Re:Hydropower reservoirs by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      Oh, OK, I'd already linked to the largest so far elsewhere. The other stuff still puzzles me.

  12. Whew. by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    It's a good thing wind and weather are never a challenge at sea!

    --
    -Styopa
  13. Floating solar already common by mdsolar · · Score: 2

    Floating solar is already common. Here is a large example. http://spectrum.ieee.org/energ... Putting solar on reservoirs also helps to reduce evaporation and conserve water. The novelty here is the resilience to rough water using the modular open base float system. It is notable also that sea based solar could replace fossil oil for liquid fuel production since the Navy has already patented a way to turn seawater into fuel.

  14. Easier sabotage targets by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 0

    Now, an attack on the electrical grid will only require a small rowboat!!!

  15. Phelps effect by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    Because only Americans can win at the Olympics.

    1. Re:Phelps effect by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Except you keep getting upstaged by Australians.

      Yes, I know you were being facetious.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  16. Ocean going solar by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    You are right that sheltered waters have been sought. This rig sounds as though it is more seaworthy though. In the doldrums, a Swiss company was developing a solar island that had a single open floatation chamber. This effort seems to anticipate temperate waters with more storms.

  17. What are the consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would take a lot of solar energy out of the natural ocean energy cycles, has anybody thought about the negative consequences of this kind of energy harvesting?

  18. fast ocean freight by mdsolar · · Score: 1

    A chain off these recharging flow battery electrolyte could power a container based fast automated ocean freight system. Might allow Amazon to source more from direct overseas suppliers.

  19. What's the point? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    I can see the use case for offshore platforms using such a thing for energy, but other than that, what is the point?
    I mean, how is this better than putting a crap ton of cells in the desert where there is almost never clouds? Not to mention land based installations are really pretty simple.
    I am sure I am missing something, but I do not see why this is a worthwhile endeavor when there are other plans floating around like covering the Sahara with solar.

    1. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, how is this better than putting a crap ton of cells in the desert where there is almost never clouds?

      Not a lot of desert in Vienna....

  20. Huge floating solar energy arrays by kheldan · · Score: 1

    One question about this: How does everything living in the ocean feel about this? I don't need to be a marine biologist to understand that completely blocking the sun over huge areas of the ocean probably isn't good for it or the lifeforms living in it.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    1. Re:Huge floating solar energy arrays by walterbyrd · · Score: 0

      If you are too close to the shore, it should not matter. In the middle of the ocean, far from any land, there is no marine life depending on sun light.

  21. Yes please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about using some of that solar energy to extract plastic particulates and other man-made substances from the sea before every ocean on this planet turns into a toxic stew? Without healthy oceans life on this planet is going to get ugly in a big hurry.

  22. Talk to a few boat owners by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey, all you people who think it's such a great idea to build stuff to use all that open space on the ocean: Talk to a few boat owners first. You'll quickly come to understand that between wave action, salt water spray getting into every crack and crevice, corrosion, and biological fouling (both below from crustaceans and seaweed, and above from bird and seal droppings), you're constantly fighting to keep the damn thing from falling apart within a few years.

    Just save yourself a lot of heartache and build the thing on land, or even on top of freshwater reservoirs. Anywhere but the ocean. You don't put structures there unless you have to.

    1. Re:Talk to a few boat owners by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I think is it better to just spell out the acronym that boat stands for. Break out another thousand. Yup, these things mentioned means a lot of people will spend a lot of money maintaining their boats and it will seem like the more it is in use, the more it costs.

  23. Off of the Austrian Coast? by anachronous+diehard · · Score: 1

    You can tell that Vienna University of Technology doesn't have a naval architecture department. The picture with the caption "The platforms remain steady - even when the sea is rough" shows ripples that a blue-water sailor considers "dead calm". Also, the statement "When the air tanks are correctly dimensioned, the waves rise and fall under the Heliofloat without making any significant impact on the platform" can only be true for a limited range of wave frequencies. The deck will need significant stiffness, or lots of flex joints, to deal with all other conditions.

  24. Data centre and sea water for cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about utilising some of these platforms as floating data centres and then use the sea water for cooling (I have read about the idea of using sea water for cooling data centres some years ago) and suddenly you end up with quite a few synergies. A proportion of the power generated from the solar platforms will go into the grid during the day and energy from the grid will power the data centre at night.