Slashdot Mirror


Can Quantum Entanglement Create Faster-Than-Light Communication? (mit.edu)

Slashdot reader StartsWithABang writes: If you were to send a space probe to a distant star system, gather information about it and send it back to Earth, you'd have to wait years for the information to arrive. But if you have an entangled quantum system -- say, two photons, one with spin +1 and one with spin -1 -- you could know the spin of the distant one instantly by measuring the spin of the one in your possession.
This "incredible idea to exploit quantum weirdness" for communication was the subject of a recent Forbes article [which blocks ad-blockers] as well as a NASA mission directorate. ("Entanglement-assisted Communication System for NASA's Deep-Space Missions: Feasibility Test and Conceptual Design".) And Friday MIT News reported a research team is now making progress toward capturing paired electron halves for quantum computing on gold film. "Our first goal is to look for the Majorana fermions, unambiguously detect them, and show this is it. "

This week even 85-year-old Star Trek actor William Shatner cited quantum entanglement in a discussion of Star Trek's transporter technology, arguing that "Although a lot of the concepts in science fiction are absurd to our Newtonian minds, anything is possible because of the new language of quantum physics."

3 of 238 comments (clear)

  1. FUCK ETHAN SIEGEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What in living hell is that dildo Ethan Siegel (AKA StartsWithABang) doing spamming his malware-ridden Forbes articles (which he gets paid foor here again?!?!?!

    Fuck you Ethan.

    Fuck your Stupid Beard.

    Fuck your self-aggrandizing blog.

    And oh, die while you are at it. Painfully if possible.

  2. Where to start with what's wrong here... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Slashdot reader StartsWithABang writes:

    Reader? Reader? I very much doubt StartsWithABang ever reads anything here.

    Can Quantum Entanglement Create Faster-Than-Light Communication?

    No, it can't. This has been known for years, and gets pointed out in every quantum story on Slashdot multiple times.

    If a headline asks a question, and the answer is known, I should think the last Slashdot could do is to put that well-known and proven answer in the summary.

    And Friday MIT News reported a research team is now making progress toward capturing paired electron halves for quantum computing on gold film. "Our first goal is to look for the Majorana fermions, unambiguously detect them, and show this is it."

    Does that have anything to do with the aim of FTL communication? Or did you just put it in because it had the word "quantum" in it?

    This week even 85-year-old Star Trek actor William Shatner cited quantum entanglement in a discussion of Star Trek's transporter technology

    And just when I thought it couldn't get any more tenuous...

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  3. Re:No by Vreejack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In this case it means: "Stupid headline; clickbait that will lie or disappoint." The only possible news here is that NASA is doing something stupid, but I cannot be bothered to check for sure.

    Information cannot be delivered faster than Einstein's constant even using quantum entanglement. The concept is well-understood. Would you read an article about how NASA discovered how to make your car run more efficiently by using tap water instead of gasoline?

    --
    "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe