Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Solve One Of The Biggest Mysteries About How Water Flows On Mars (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Not only is water flowing on Mars, it's also boiling. This experiment published today in Nature Geoscience solves one of the major mysteries about the surface of the red planet. Gizmodo writes, "Researchers built a chamber simulating the conditions and atmosphere of Mars, then put ice in there to melt. The ice did melt and the water from it flowed -- but there was also a surprise. The surface of the water boiled as it flowed, and that boiling was strong enough to move not just the water but also dirt and debris surrounding the streams. Importantly, temperature was not the major factor in this boiling water, it was due to the pressure of the atmosphere." You may remember pictures of flowing water on Mars which surfaced last year. One would think the summer temperatures should be too cold for water to flow on Mars (as seen in the images), however, the water that flows on Mars is a salty-brine which lowers the freezing point of the water. So how does the water manage to carve out the landscape so quickly and visibly? Easy: the boiling water theory. Boiling water hits a boiling stage along its surface, where it kicks up dust and dirt and debris in the water's wake. The research team did see the boiling water move debris, but they also saw collapses along the sides of the flows. The boiling and disturbance it causes etches those lines on Mars clearly enough for satellites to notice them.

99 comments

  1. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So?

    It's not like your post had any meaning to it either so clearly that isn't a prerequisite for something to exist.

  2. Re:Simple question by GuB-42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You read the title, maybe even the summary. You then went through the trouble of writing a comment. Which means it did affect your life a little bit.

  3. Good for distillation by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well at least we can start working on apparatus for distilling fresh water from in situ martian brine...

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:Good for distillation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well at least we can start working on apparatus for distilling fresh water from in situ martian brine...

      With what has happened to Nasa since the glory days, I am willing to bet that the Chinese will be the first to set up distillation on Mars. Would be interesting to use Martian low pressure in the distillation of Scotch, if you have ever tasted Chinese Scotch you might think that they are already distilling it on Mars.

    2. Re:Good for distillation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am willing to bet that the Chinese will be the first to set up distillation on Mars.

      For their laundries, amirite?

      I'll go back in my hole now.

  4. goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not really a surprise that altering the composition of the solution affects when it vaporizes. A greater mystery, IMO, is just how much water Mars once had. If you evaporated all the water on the Earth, you might see topography not totally unlike Mars. The northern hemisphere of Mars is much lower, about 2 km, than the southern hemisphere. While not as clear cut on Earth, you'd find that the northern hemisphere is quite a bit higher than the southern hemisphere. The simple reason is that much of the southern hemisphere on Earth is an ocean. It makes me wonder if the northern hemisphere of Mars was once a massive ocean. There is evidence of rivers draining into it, which is fairly clear when looking at a topographical map. I hypothesize that Mars once had a large northern ocean.

    g to the oatse
    c to the izzex
    fo shizzle my nizzle

    1. Re: goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The causes of level differences on Earth are mainly plate tectonics, volcanoes and the spinoff known as the moon. Water didn't cause any of these. Actually water causes erosion that levels the terrain. It didn't cause the ocean floor to sink. You've got it completely wrong.

    2. Re: goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm not suggesting that water causes the oceans on Earth or caused the massive elevation difference on Mars. That, too, was likely due to volcanic activity, though the precise causes aren't known. I'm simply asking whether there was once enough liquid water to have a massive northern ocean, not whether the water causes the oceans.

    3. Re: goatse.cx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The causes of level differences on Earth are mainly plate tectonics, volcanoes and the spinoff known as the moon. Water didn't cause any of these.

      Actually, water plays a major role in plate tectonics and in volcanism. As for the moon, I have no idea. It's possible that the object that struck Earth to create the moon contained a significant amount of water.

  5. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does water flowing on Mars affect my life or anyone else's in a meaningful way? Can anyone give me an answer? I'm betting nobody can.

    What we learn about Mars may help us live on another planet one day. Really it's just an extension of our existence. The entire universe will cease to exist eventually and it will take our self-righteous asses with it.

  6. Ummm, downhill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or not? Gravity is weaker on Mars...

    1. Re: Ummm, downhill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It goes north to south there. Unfortunately, most of it fell off the bottom of the planet with no atmosphere to hold it in.

  7. Re:Simple question by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    There are some that think many of their fellow humans are crazy and dangerous and might just destroy the planet unless one of many of the possible and thankfully rare extinction events doesn't get us first. Watch a Trump circus or North Korean news reel if you think they are delusional. They are at least studying the feasibility of taking a few of our many eggs and putting them in another basket. Having water is the first key to survival. Knowing that human life on Mars can at least be possible should give you more hope for the long term future of mankind. This affects me in a meaningful way and it might have the same effect on you if you think about it.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  8. Re:Simple question by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    How does water flowing on Mars affect my life or anyone else's in a meaningful way?

    Your life doesn't matter. Neither does anyone else's.

    Only humanity matters. And its continuity strongly depends on its understanding of how other planets work.

    If you die tomorrow and that makes humanity advance a thousand-millionth of a day in its search for expansion, that would be a good net result.

  9. Re:Simple question by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    Humanity matters exactly as much as any single human. i.e. not at all.

  10. Ugh by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1
    From TFS;

    temperature was not the major factor in this boiling water, it was due to the pressure of the atmosphere

    Facepalm material.

    1. Re:Ugh by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Alright, that made me curious. Why are you face palming?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Ugh by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      because Temperature is inseparable from Pressure when determining the boiling point.

    3. Re:Ugh by KGIII · · Score: 1

      The person that you responded to said nothing about either of those two things?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Ugh by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      I facepalmed the quote from the summary, which I quoted.

    5. Re:Ugh by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Yes but that doesn't explain why you threaded it there. Usually there's some significance to where a comment is placed in a conversation - for a variety of reasons. ;-)

      It was (and that's an achievement in itself) the oddest remark in the entire thread - odd enough so that I scrolled *back up* to ask what was going on. In short, I was confused. In long, I was wondering if you actually had a point and if I was missing something as well as curious if maybe you'd threaded it there for a reason I didn't understand. Or, perhaps, if you'd threaded it there by mistake. I sometimes have hit the wrong reply button only to notice later, though I don't think I've done that in years.

      Ah well... It's a very odd place for your comment thus my confusion. Shine on, you crazy diamond, shine on.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:Ugh by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had some tangential thought in mind and just stuck in in there, but yes, it is out of place. My apologies.

    7. Re:Ugh by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't apologize to me. LOL It's all good - I was just sort of baffled. I've seen you post before and I'd tell you if I thought you were an idiot. So, I was actually wondering what the hell it was that I was missing. I read it (including the gibberish you responded to) a half dozen times in my effort to figure it out. I was wondering if I was missing something in the Ebonics. However, surprising though it may be, I'm actually sort of fluent in understanding (I guess I could speak it) a number of regional Ebonics dialects. I travel a lot and I find dialects and accents fascinating - I have also been "on the road" since September of last year (2015) so I've had the chance to get a bit of a refresher.

      Though, technically, I've been down in Florida since mid-December. Still, it's far greater exposure than I get back home in Maine. ;-) (There's not a whole lot of Ebonics in Maine but there are some young white folks who give it an effort. It's an amusing effort but at least they're trying... I'm an optimist today.)

      So, I decided I wasn't missing anything and that's when I figured I'd ask. I'm open to getting bizarre answers. I'm quite fond of them. Ah well... Hopefully the server's finished migrating and I can find another way to amuse myself.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  11. This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by tlambert · · Score: 1

    This is not intuitively obvious to people who memorized PV = nRT in grade school *HOW*?!?

    Who was this exactly a mystery *from*?

    1. Re:This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      This is not intuitively obvious to people who memorized PV = nRT in grade school *HOW*?!?

      Who was this exactly a mystery *from*?

      Well there's the submitter, who stated temperature wasn't a major factor in the boiling. So we've got one person.

    2. Re:This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not intuitive to the 90% of the people that didn't memorize it in grade school - or forgot it immediately following the test.

    3. Re:This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Roger Goodell, apparently...

    4. Re:This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is not intuitively obvious to people who memorized PV = nRT in grade school *HOW*?!?

      Who was this exactly a mystery *from*?

      Because it has nothing to do with the ideal gas law.

      They are talking about the saturation or vaporization curve of water which is a function of pressure and temperature. At 1 atm water boils at 212F. On Mars where the pressure is lower, it boils at a much lower temperature.

      This boiling behavior is not new or unexpected. What is new is the understanding about how this vaporization process can move sediments on Mars. That's the new science.

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    5. Re:This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      But actually that is not the boiling point equation, which is much more complicated because of different substance properties, but the major factors are still T and P.

    6. Re:This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, still, not at all surprising or unexpected.

    7. Re:This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other new science is that we now know why we haven't found any life on Mars. We all know that to kill bacteria you boil water. The water on Mars is already boiling . So it kills all the life! (And yes, that was a joke...)

    8. Re:This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you saying that for science to be worth while it must be surprising or unexpected? Please try to remember, just because the findings are intuitive and expected doesn't mean they're unimportant. It helps confirm that our model of things is in fact correct.

    9. Re:This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      But actually that is not the boiling point equation, which is much more complicated because of different substance properties, but the major factors are still T and P.

      I am aware of that. As is every halfway decent cook who has made pasta at higher altitudes than sea level, and added salt to raise the boiling point of the water back to 212F/100C so it cooks correctly, since unadulterated water boils at a lower temperate in Denver than it does at sea level.

      And since the baseline on the boiling point equation is water, and we are talking water, and the typical adulterant we use is salt, and we are talking about a brine...

      This is pretty stupidly obvious to anyone who has ever had an AP Chemistry or AP Physics class in high school, and dicked around with boiling points using a vacuum chamber to boil things at standard temperature but lower pressure as part of a class experiments.

    10. Re:This is not intuitively obvious... *HOW*?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am aware of that. As is every halfway decent cook who has made pasta at higher altitudes than sea level, and added salt to raise the boiling point of the water back to 212F/100C so it cooks correctly, since unadulterated water boils at a lower temperate in Denver than it does at sea level.

      Yeah... that's not at all why you put salt into the water to cook pasta. In fact, (I'm assuming you're an American here; forgive me if not) if you look at any typical package of pasta in America, the amount of salt they suggest you put in will barely do anything to the boiling point.

      Some numbers for you:
      30 g NaCl in 1 kg water will raise the temperature by 0.5 *C.
      There are about 3.5 kg of water in 1 gallon.
      So to raise the boiling temperature by 1 *C, you need 210 g NaCl for every gallon of water.
      NaCl has a density of 2.16 g/cm^3, so that's 97 cm^3, or about 6.5 Tbsp of salt per gallon of water.

      And that's just to raise it by 1 *C. Water boils at about 95 *C in Denver--you would need 2 cups of salt per gallon of water to raise the temperature back to 100 *C. Even a saturated solution can only raise the temperature by about 9 *C, so those poor people in Santa Fe can barely get their water to 100 *C, but may have to visit their family doctor after a meal.

  12. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humanity matters exactly as much as any single human. i.e. not at all.

    We are the bacteria of the universe. Objects that just happened to become animated.

  13. Then wheres the mineral deposits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If salty brine is part of the boiling water effect on Mars, then after the water disappears, there should be white streaks in the satellite pictures that show where the salt was deposited. The sat sensors should be able to pick up this mineral to confirm that the boiling water consists of a salty brine. I didn't see any white streaks to indicate the path of the water in the picture with the residual being the salt.

    1. Re: Then wheres the mineral deposits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting argument. Interesting question. Ever consider vapor pressure. A loose overcoat of the ices, provided by the dust storms of Mars would cover the subliminating ices. The idea being underground would be leaving their traces underground. Yet leaving the gas plume unseeable. Gee, I thought that was well expressed in the 50's, when I first heard of that opinion. And that was in my early chemistry classes.

  14. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it won't, because we never will. Not you, not me, not Elon Musk. Get over it.

  15. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone needs more evidence that Space Nuttery is a religion for misanthropic programmers, please bookmark comment #52034051.

  16. The important question is . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . which direction does Martian water flow when you flush the toilet . . . clockwise, or counterclockwise . . . ?

    How does water flowing on Mars affect my life or anyone else's in a meaningful way?

    This could affect your life if you are flying to Jupiter, and stop to take a dump on Mars.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  17. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have that backwards. Humanity doesn't matter, only individual humans.

  18. Re:Simple question by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    Humanity matters exactly as much as any single human. i.e. not at all.

    I disagree. I believe humanity has a tiny chance of transcending what we currently call the universe.

    I feel there would be meaning in that transcendence.

  19. Re:Simple question by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Ooh, get you, Mr Important. It affects you about as much as your inane post affects me.

    If you find it so aggravating to find your eyes assaulted with headlines about advances in planetary science, kindly piss off elsewhere, or at least STFU.

    Simpler question: why the hell did you post in the first place?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  20. The low pressure means the parachute couldn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... on the Curiosity lander...

    http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/nasa-faked-mars-mission-why-i-am-not.html

  21. Re:Simple question by Thanshin · · Score: 1

    You, him and Elon Musk, surprisingly enough, are not the population on which the importance of discoveries is based.

  22. Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was common knowledge for sometime that water on Mars would boil off.

    I'm sure there is much more to this research than the summary and the story bring to light. At least I hope there is. I know that the real meat of most research can't be displayed in such a format and this certainly wasn't the really important findings. It's "science" writing like this that leads the public astray from the relevance of most research.

    1. Re:Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like this is the first time they attempted to exactly replicate it. There's theorization and then there's observation, theorizing something is nice and all but even if all the math adds up you need to actually observe it (or results that could only happen due to it) to make sure that your theory is right. It also sounds like they observed an effect not widely known, that the brine solution itself would flow while a small boundary layer on top would boil off. Like someone who assumed that a drop of water would instantly vaporize when dropped on a hot plate might be surprised by the fact that it would instead (under some circumstances) skid across the pans surface for a time due to a boundary layer of steam insulating the water droplet.

  23. Re: Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah,one bad human, all humans are bad?

  24. Re: Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeezus, I just watched deep impact, and assumed no one was dumb enough to get their information from it. You sir, have proven me wrong.

  25. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depends what you mean by "meaningful". If you're a blue-collar type with very down to Earth preoccupations, it won't mean much.

  26. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because this is (supposedly) a science and technology based website, not a "how does this affect your personal life in any meaningful way" website, and this is definitely science.

  27. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be a Donald Trump supporter...

  28. Re:The low pressure means the parachute couldn't w by Punko · · Score: 1

    Great post! With the way you wrote that comment, I can't tell if you're posting that crap to make a humourous contribution or if you actually believe that conspiracy-theory nutter! Well played.

    Unless, of course, you were serious about your post. In that case, I pity you.

    --
    If only we could fall into a woman's arms without falling into her hands
  29. Re:Simple question by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Knowing that human life on Mars can at least be possible should give you more hope for the long term future of mankind.

    Or, it can allow you to rationalize further trashing this planet.

    What you're saying is basically, "Knowing that you'll get 27 virgins in the afterlife should give you more hope..."

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  30. Re:The low pressure means the parachute couldn't w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The term "conspiracy theory" was popularized by the CIA so that anyone who distrusts the government and its agencies is branded a psycho (it's a confirmed fact). Thanks for contributing to this propaganda and the continuation of this meme, I'm sure CIA is glad it worked so well on you. Turns out those who engage in conspiracies want you to think there is no such thing as a conspiracy. And thanks to their manipulation, you and others like you do their psy-ops for them.

  31. Re: Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeezus, I just watched deep impact, and assumed no one was dumb enough to get their information from it. You sir, have proven me wrong.

    I gave your mom a "deep impact". With my penis!

  32. Its weaker, not negative. by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    If you ever come across negative gravity where things travel uphill do be sure to let us know won't you.

  33. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We aren't talking about discoveries. Discover all you want; just don't start packing your bags for Mars just yet.

  34. Re:The low pressure means the parachute couldn't w by Viol8 · · Score: 1

    Keep taking the meds fella. I'm sure you next appointment with the doc is not far away.

    Course, in the meantime you might want to figure out how NASA are bouncing signals off mars too fool all those non governmental orgs and other countries who are picking up the signals too. Oh, wait! They must be in on it too! I bet its the Bilderberg Group eh??

  35. Re:The low pressure means the parachute couldn't w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half of the USA is on some kind of anti-psychotic medication due to heavy pollution and untested, carcinogenic petroleum-based products everywhere. The inmates are running the asylum buddy. Trusting the government over common sense is a sign of severe mental illness in itself.

  36. Re:The low pressure means the parachute couldn't w by Viol8 · · Score: 2

    I don't trust many governments. But I do trust in basic physics and the impossibility of virtually every country in the world with a science program being in on some conspiracy to fake a robotic mars mission that most of the public frankly don't give a shit about anyway. It would be harder to fake than actually go there.

  37. Re:Simple question by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    Don't forget to watch the loons trying to shut down trump rallies. I despises Trump but the anti-free speech, anti-freedom of assembly scum trying to shut down the events are many times worse.

    If there isn't freedom of speech then the only alternative is violence.

    "There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo. Please use in that order."

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  38. Re:Simple question by infernalC · · Score: 1

    He has a legitimate point. It's news for nerds, but perhaps not stuff that matters. "Stuff that matters" is pretty subjective though. It might matter to someone.

  39. Re:Simple question by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    I thought it was 72 Virginians.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  40. Living on Mars? Ridiculous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids. In fact, it's cold as hell.

  41. Re:Simple question by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    Yes, they asked Michael Faraday the same question. A magnet plunged into the middle of a coil of wire, triggered a response on a galvanometer. What's so great about it. Faraday shot back, "Whats the use of a new born baby?". Faraday's baby grew up to be the electric generator. It is what generating electricity in every nuclear powerplant, every thermal powerplant, every hydro-electric plant, every wind mill, in every alternator in every car. Except for the electricity created by the batteries and solar cells, every last joule of electricity used in the world comes by plunging magnets into coils, so to speak.

    We may have to wait a hundred or thousand years for this flowing water in Mars baby to grow up. Or it might not grow up. But you never know which baby born today is going to grow up like the mighty giant Faraday's baby grew up to be.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  42. Re:Simple question by shaitand · · Score: 1

    You do know the violence originates with the Trump supporters as a direct result of Trump publicaly encouraging exactly that, not the people who peacefully protest at his rallies.

  43. Re:Simple question by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

    How does water flowing on Mars affect my life or anyone else's in a meaningful way? Can anyone give me an answer? I'm betting nobody can.

    This news gives you a heads-up that once you move to Mars, you're going to have to make some serious altitude adjustments to your cake recipes.

  44. Re:Simple question by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    "How does water flowing on Mars affect my life or anyone else's in a meaningful way?"

    No, water flowing on Mars does not affect the lives of AC trolls in any meaningful way.

  45. Re:Simple question by TomGreenhaw · · Score: 1

    You might be right, but I think people who will trash the planet will find may ways to rationalize their actions.

    --
    Greed is the root of all evil.
  46. Re:Simple question by shaitand · · Score: 1

    Indeed it was Faraday's baby. But it took Nikola Tesla to do anything useful with that baby. Scientists always point at Faraday who found the physics that made Tesla's work possible but ignore that physics didn't enable much beyond pipe dreams until Tesla came along. Neil himself skipped right over Tesla in Cosmos.

    Nobody had the kind of intuitive understanding of the physics first seen by Faraday that Tesla did, and their true potential no just for AC current in wires but in the air, possibly nobody has since either.

  47. Picture?? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Those pictures are really amazing. You can see the channels grow in the sand as the snow melts off the mountains.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  48. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually 72 buck-toothed Virginians

  49. Re:The low pressure means the parachute couldn't w by shaitand · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't there is too much international collaboration in the space program and nobody is going to be willing to admit they are the country that couldn't detect the rover. All said though, yes it is much less likely than a conspiracy within our government and between it and official bodies and corporations.

    Anyone who doubts the possibility of a conspiracy in the US after the Snowden leaks is off their rocker not even so much because of what was leaked (although that was plenty bad) but because of the response after it was leaked. Including the bill passed that was supposed to put a stop to it but actually just legalized it.

  50. What a old story by Ektanoor · · Score: 1

    Somewhere about 2003 people took attention on these gullies. To many then it became clear that water still FLOWS in Mars. Its origin is clearly linked to certain horizons where pockets or small underground lakes can survive. While it is not clear how they survive there, two things are pretty well known:

    1. Regionally these pockets are frequently linked to a few horizons so they come mostly from one and the same levels above local ground.
    2. Most of them have a clear feature of bursting, nearly "exploding". The way they formed also suggested that liquid water didn't stay for long. They form and dry up fast not even reaching the bottoms of valleys or ravines.

    So there is no big discovery here. What is novel is that someone may have found in laboratory HOW these bursts happen and why they have the features we see. And probably he may be missing a few things. One is why landscape remains "wet" for quite long time. Second - why the dark streaks seem to become bright-grey in time. Third - why this happens seasonally.

    Anyway these questions will probably be answered in a few years from now, with fireworks and claims of novelity. This is how Science works in Mars...

  51. Re: Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've created some seriously cool stuff. Even if we wipe ourselves out the universe will miss us. Imagine how disappointed we are in the thought of life on other planets that doesn't go sentient. Do we really want that ?

  52. How was this water problem a mystery? by ThatBeDank · · Score: 1

    We know from experiments here on Earth that if you put water into a low pressure / near vacuum environment that it will boil off. No $hit temperature isn't a factor when the environment is so remarkably light on any sort of air pressure.

    This sounds like a bunch of researchers made up some convincing grant to pay their bills for a few months already answering a question we could have easily extrapolated from observable phenomena here on this planet.

    1. Re:How was this water problem a mystery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so I've got a phase diagram for water here, there's the triple point, there's the boiling point at 1atm, etc.

      Show me on this diagram where it says that ice at a certain pressure will melt and flow and the surface will boil off as it flows, disturbing sediment underneath the flow and creating tracks?

      observable phenomena here on this planet

      Yes, they deduced this from observable phenomena here on this planet. They didn't go to Mars to do this work.

  53. Re:Simple question by dave420 · · Score: 1

    And as Newton said, "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants". Tesla's early work wouldn't have been possible without the ground broken by others. His later work, where he claimed to have invented all sorts of bizarre contraptions without a single shred of supporting evidence, however, deserves to be ignored in all science texts, as it has nothing to do with science.

  54. Re:The low pressure means the parachute couldn't w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I don't subscribe to his lunacy on Mars, he is right about the CIA trying to discredit government critics with the "conspiracy theory" label.

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/...

  55. Re: Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless Ted Cruz gets to them first.

  56. Re:Simple question by shaitand · · Score: 1

    Fair enough but the man obviously road that line between sanity and mental illness. He did more than enough for AC, DC, and radio (of which he was the true inventor, Marconi simply stole his patented ideas and built a simpler prototype than Tesla was working on). Essentially all modern society is built on the work of Tesla and without him, even if someone else had eventually figured out what he did, it certainly wouldn't look like it does now. The entire human race would have been set back decades if not a century. We could be in the middle of the industrial revolution just now instead of the information age pondering what we will do now that AI is growing intelligent enough to put us all out of work.

  57. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything about Mars is exciting right? Water boiling on Mars due to the low pressure of its atmosphere!

    The other small detail about Mars everyone overlooks with visions of living in domes and running around on the surface growing vege gardens is that anyone who travels there will need to live about 6 feet / 2m below the surface to avoid the radiation from the solar wind and space that our thick Earth atmosphere and magnetic field shield us from. Also the soil is toxic, but don't let that stop you!

  58. Not NaCl by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 2

    The salts in question are perchlorates, not NaCl, so they may not have the white colour expected of NaCl crystals. In addition to the colour of the crystals, other contaminants like fine dust, trace iron salts (of which there might be a great deal if not the actual perchlorate salt) and other chemicals might serve to discolour the new crystals even further.

    --
    Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
  59. Re:Simple question by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I have not brought myself to the point of watching the new Cosmos - and I watch almost nothing but documentaries as a preference. I just don't want the series spoiled and I'm not a huge fan of Tyson. I think I'd have been more quick to watch it if it had had a different presenter - perhaps Cox or even Greene. Susskind or the black guy with the crazy hair (I always forget his name) might have been good choices. Tyson's always grated on me. Well, not always but since about the time when he was starting to get big on Nova.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  60. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watched a couple. I really tried hard to get into the series. I left it on my DVR for months. Finally, I decided that I simply wasn't the target audience for this particular version, and deleted it.

    I should go back and watch the original. See if it holds up, or if I would now find it boring because I already learned from it and internalized that stuff.

    sr

  61. Re:Simple question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I disagree. I believe humanity has a tiny chance of transcending what we currently call the universe.

    Except if we live in a simulation, in which case we'd be worth less than nothing.

  62. Re:The low pressure means the parachute couldn't w by KGIII · · Score: 1

    It's an improvement. For the longest time, they were running about claiming that the FBI had made up the term and were quoting a Wikipedia article about it. The article (and the cited sources) did not say any such thing. They said what the AC is now saying - that the FBI popularized the term and that it was for that specific reason.

    That, I can attest to. That is factual and confirmed in many sources - there's even a few (non-crazy) documentaries about it. The FBI did, indeed, popularize the expression. They weren't the first to use it or anything. See? Always a little truth to those sorts of things. I had the debate with, what I presume was, the same person a couple of times before they stopped repeating it. It was ruining their credibility! :D

    As for the rest of what they say... Well, that's up to you to decide what to believe. I'm pretty damned certain we've got rovers on Mars and we went to the Moon - when we said we went. I saw the broadcast live. Special effects were better than that. Sheesh. It wasn't the Stone Age or anything. Kubrick could have done better. I've read a few things about the folks who tend to believe in conspiracy theories. Life's too short for all that.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  63. Re:The low pressure means the parachute couldn't w by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I don't think anyone doubts the existence of conspiracies. I think we doubt the existence of long-lasting, nefarious, complex conspiracies. There are people conspiring all the time and doing so for varied motivations. Snowden's leak confirms that someone will always tell someone else and will do so for any number of reasons. Secrets aren't kept for long.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  64. Re:Simple question by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Cosmos is meant for popular audience, not for people who are nerdy enough to dig through science and history. I would watch it only to see if it has any cool animation of something that I already know. Carl Sagan's Cosmos... I was young and had not read that much, so it brought me so much new information. By the time Neil came along, I had read through Daniel Boorstein's series on history of science twice. At this point spending eight full hours watching the idiot box is simply out of the question.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  65. Re:Simple question by SumDog · · Score: 1

    Humanity has yet to master the atom. Not really. We can blow shit up, but we can't rearrange atoms. Not easily, not precisely and not without massive amounts of input energy.

    There are many scientists, research labs, companies and other entities that have been tackling this problem for decades. Some are looking at nanotechnology, others chemical 3d-printers ... but one day (if we don't go extinct), we'll hopefully figure out how to easily construct new material from existing matter with a reasonable amount of energy.

    Once we have a stable version of tech like that, imagine what we could do on Mars. This is the basic necessity technology to being able to send humanity to Mars. Water is essential in that, as well as understanding how water systems work on Mars.

    Either we make it to Mars (and eventually the rest of the solar system), or we go extinct. Looking past 10,000 years ... 50,000 years...a million years: those are the only two options for humanity. Mars research is some of the most important research for our civilization and humanity as a whole.

  66. Re:The low pressure means the parachute couldn't w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are conflating pressure with density.

    Drag, and therefore parachute performance, is proportional to density, not pressure.

  67. Re:Simple question by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    The other small detail about Mars everyone overlooks with visions of living in domes and running around on the surface growing vege gardens is that anyone who travels there will need to live about 6 feet / 2m below the surface to avoid the radiation from the solar wind and space that our thick Earth atmosphere and magnetic field shield us from. Also the soil is toxic, but don't let that stop you!

    Which you wouldn't know without the basic research being done like this.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  68. Re:Simple question by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Does it? I have seen only one case of violence that was perpetrated by a Trump supporter, and that was after the precious snowflake spit on the 70+ year old man. Do you have citations for any violence that was started by the Trump camp at a Trump rally?

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  69. Re:Simple question by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    Or a Hillary supporter, or a Cruz supporter, or a Bernie supporter. Any of them works.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?