Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Asks: What Do You Think Is The Most Influential Gadget Of All Time? (macrumors.com)

TIME has published a list ranking the 50 most influential gadgets of all time, from cameras and TVs to music players, smartphones, and drones. Can you guess what was the number one most influential gadget on the list? That's right, the Apple iPhone. "Apple was the first company to put a truly powerful computer in the pockets of millions when it launched the iPhone in 2007," according to TIME. "The iPhone popularized the mobile app, forever changing how we communicate, play games, shop, work, and complete many everyday tasks."

There's a lot of interesting gadgets on the list that have had a profound impact on mankind in some form or another, for better or worse. Do you agree with TIME's number one choice? What do you think is the most influential gadget of all time?

61 of 397 comments (clear)

  1. the gun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the gun

    1. Re:the gun by xevioso · · Score: 2

      The gun is a tool, not a gadget. It's like a hammer.

      Also, this list is a list of specific gadgets. So if you really wanted to make a point, you would have said something like a Spencer Repeater, a Colt 45, or a Winchester Model 1873 "The Gun that Won the West". Not just "a gun."

    2. Re:the gun by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2
      You need to look up the definition of gadget:

      a small mechanical device or tool, especially an ingenious or novel one.

      Both the gun and (my first choice) hammer qualify.

      The knife beats both. Self-defense and attack, killing and skinning and cutting supper into bite-size chunks, It would later be lengthened into short swords and incorporated into rifles (bayonet). The needle is right up there, allowing for piercing animal skins so they could be laced or sewn together, allowing humans to spread much further than would have been possible with just loose animal furs, and making the first boots.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  2. Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A Refrigerator. Next crap question.

    1. Re:Thanks! by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Refrigeration in general, which includes both refrigerators and air conditioning.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Thanks! by xevioso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A refrigerator is not a "gadget" in the traditionally understood use of the term. it's an appliance. if we allow appliances, then we must allow the air conditioner, which is could easily be argued as more important. A TV is also an appliance, which is why I don't understand #2 on this list.

    3. Re:Thanks! by TWX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The electric motor is not strictly necessary. Automotive air conditioners rely on power taken from the crankshaft to turn the compressor.

      It probably has never been built, but it should be possible to build pneumatic-start into a mechanical-injected diesel truck, with a full-time, clutchless, belt-driven AC compressor, and with a belt and shaft-driven cabin fan, with a belt-driven compressor to recharge the compressed-air tank to drive the starter.

      Obviously there isn't a benefit in doing this, electrical technology is ubiquitous enough to where we generally can get away without having to go nuts to avoid it, but we could if we really, really wanted to.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    4. Re: Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Neither of you have ever seen a gas operated fridge? No motor or electricity required. We used to have a kerosene fridge and lights.

    5. Re:Thanks! by ancient_nerd · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but refrigeration is possible with no electricity and no moving parts, using a heat source (e.g. gas flame) instead. Look up "Absorption Refrigerator" on Wikipedia.

  3. Zune. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Zune.

    1. Re:Zune. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      For that answer, you deserve one

  4. Easy by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Air conditioning. Made possible the industrialization of the south, and the popularity of Arizona for retirees, so basically A/C has triggered mass migrations of people to hotter climates, with an accompanying huge energy cost. Also made possible modern architecture, which is basically huge glass greenhouses with no opening windows -- try working in something like that without A/C!!!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Easy by swm · · Score: 4, Informative

      with an accompanying huge energy cost

      Actually, no.
      Air conditioning the desert seems extravagant, but it needs less energy than heating in northern climes.

    2. Re:Easy by Holi · · Score: 2

      i would say the refrigerator over AC.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:Easy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A/C set us back a long way. We already had ways to manage temperature in buildings, we just wanted inefficient architecture (like the greenhouse buildings you describe) and A/C compensates. A/C also has a number of down-sides compared to passive cooling, like the chill factor if you are too near to it, and of course the running cost.

      Refrigeration for food, now that was a big step forwards.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  5. The wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The wheel would have to be the most influential gadget of all time. Certainly more influential than some phone.

    1. Re:The wheel by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. The 4 most influential gadgets have been:

      * Wheel
      * Gun
      * Printing Press
      * Computer

      How would one even begin to quantify "how much" influence they have had though??

    2. Re:The wheel by xevioso · · Score: 2

      I don't think the wheel counts as a gadget. There's a fine line between a gadget and a tool, and the wheel is the latter, just like a hammer.

      This list is one of SPECIFIC versions of objects that had already existed, but which were the best examples of their class; the Walkman and the iPhone were just very good examples of gadgets that had existed in one form or another already.

    3. Re:The wheel by SeaFox · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed. The 4 most influential gadgets have been:

      * Wheel
      * Gun
      * Printing Press
      * Computer

      I'd like to note the irony of a magazine not mentioning the printing press anywhere on their list.

      They would look far less stupid if they had simply limited the list to the last 50 years (which is where almost all their items come from).

    4. Re:The wheel by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I don't mean to get all semantic, but a printing press is not exactly a "gadget"...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    5. Re:The wheel by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Flint, that started fire. Best gadget ever. Also the fire starting kit made of a couple of sticks and piece of string.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:The wheel by Nethead · · Score: 2

      The indoor toilet would be my choice. It even takes care of some of the issues of not having refrigeration. I think you could call John Crapper's invention a gadget.

      Plumbing (sanitation) and refrigeration are my two main things I'm thankful for having been born in this era. To think it took the earth 4.5Gy to come up with hot showers and cold beer. Add electricity into the mix and we're golden-age.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    7. Re:The wheel by postglock · · Score: 2

      * Wheel

      I'd replace that with the second wheel.

    8. Re:The wheel by narcc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Rather than go with "most influential" and to avoid a lot of bickering over "gadget" (by conforming to the most cited criteria here) I'll offer a few items more influential than the iPhone, in no particular order:

      • The walkman
      • The transistor radio
      • The pocket watch
      • The slide rule
      • The pocket calculator
      • The mobile phone
      • The consumer GPS receiver
      • The microwave oven

      I could easily go on. The point, of course, is that the iPhone (or any specific smartphone) shouldn't even make the top 10.

  6. Here's another totally meaningless question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey Slashdotters!

    Which is the most influential letter in the alphabet of all time? Not just the one that's had the most impact through the years, but the letter whose combination of style, utility, and inspiration will take us through the early part of the 21st century and beyond!

    My pick? You might think it's going to be a vowel, but I'm going to surprise "u" and go with... "C". A little "controversial", maybe, but hey, I think it's a "classy" "choice"!

    Well, now you know my pick. What's yours?!! And don't forget to tell us "y"!

    1. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by NotInHere · · Score: 2

      So the K in KDE stands for "Krap" after all?

    2. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by transami · · Score: 2

      But C is for Cookie.

      --
      :T:R:A:N:S:
    3. Re:Here's another totally meaningless question... by narcc · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's good enough for me.

  7. List by 20-somethings? by FrankSchwab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As much as I admire the quality and intentions of the iPhone, I don't see it as being that important. People were texting, calling, and (gasp!) yes, even browsing the web before an iPhone ever showed up. The locked-in experience of the time was vastly inferior to what the iPhone brought to the game, which is of course the main reason that it did so well. But, without the iPhone, the smartphone market would still have developed, and people still would be carrying tiny but powerful little computers in their pockets.

    --
    And the worms ate into his brain.
  8. The printing press by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the gun

    Seems to me that the printing press has probably brought down more governments and effected more change that the gun. Indeed if it had not been for the gun it would probably have done this with fewer people dying.

    1. Re:The printing press by quenda · · Score: 3, Funny

      But no gadget has brought as many click-throughs to a dying publisher as the iPhone.

    2. Re:The printing press by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Indeed if it had not been for the gun it would probably have done this with fewer people dying.

      The question is, what is the most influential, not the most beneficial.

      I vote for the flint firestarter over the iPhone.

    3. Re:The printing press by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The question is, what is the most influential, not the most beneficial.

      ...and I would still argue that this is the printing press. Part of the reason I would say that it is far more influential than the iPhone is that it has been around for longer which has given it more of a chance to influence society.

    4. Re:The printing press by kenj123 · · Score: 2

      I agree with printing press. I think the modern era began with the printing press. it was the basis of both the Reformation and Scientific revolution. Before the printing press, ideas circulated so slowly it was looked a more as reference material. After the printing press ideas spread so quickly that ideas became a collaborative effort, almost a conversation between people that never met.

    5. Re:The printing press by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      Even their reasoning for choosing the iPhone is faulty.

      Before the iPhone there was the Palm. While Palm OS was a bit funky, some of the later (still pre-iPhone) devices like the Tungsten were definitely full-blown pocket computers. You could get apps for them, read and write MS Office documents, spreadsheets, and databases, and even play Bejeweled 2 in high-res. full color with good sound. And browse the Internet.

      Before the Palm was the HP programmable calculator. The HP 28S was definitely a general-purpose pocket computer, back in the late 80s. I/O was a bit of a problem... I was only keyboard and O was only screen or portable printer... but it was definitely a computer and I wrote many programs for it. The language is/was a lot like Forth. It had a multi-line alphanumeric screen and fit in your shirt pocket.

      I understand them liking the iPhone, but it was nowhere near the first viable pocket computer. Not even the first good one.

    6. Re:The printing press by nukenerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People voting the iPhone in this reminds me of a similar poll for the worst film of all time. They came up with ones like "The War of the Worlds" (Tom Cruise version), "Terminator", "Forest Gump" etc. In other words they voted for films they had seen recently and did not happen to like themselves. They showed their complete ignorance of just how bad films can really be, such as "Plan 9 from Outer Space", "Manos, the Hands of Fate", and "The attack of the 50 foot Woman". These iFans have got their noses too close to their little screens.

    7. Re:The printing press by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      I understand them liking the iPhone, but it was nowhere near the first viable pocket computer. Not even the first good one.

      Their rationale was that it was the first successful pocket computer (i.e. in the pockets of millions), but even that is somewhat debatable. A lot of the success of the iPhone came from launching it just at the time when the technology was ready. Capacitive touch screens made a huge difference to the UI (being able to use your fingers and not just a stylus). Screens big enough and processors fast enough that you could run a real web browser (not WAP crap) and have it actually be useful made a big difference (I had a Nokia N80 that had a real WebKit-powered web browser, but having to scroll around the page with a tiny screen meant that it wasn't that useful). Newer WiFi chipsets that meant that you could leave WiFi on all of the time meant that you could actually use the device as a computer even when data tariffs are insanely expensive. Cheap flash (and Apple gets some credit here by using the iPods to drive up the demand for flash enough to make it cheap) meant that you could store a reasonable amount of music on the device and use it to replace a separate music player.

      The iPhone came out just one year after the N80, and at a similar price. The difference between the two was huge. The iPhone wasn't unique in that regard - several other manufacturers had similar devices out at around the same time - but the combination of technology from further up the supply chain made phones from that generation very different from earlier devices.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:The printing press by KGIII · · Score: 2

      > These iFans have got their noses too close to their little screens.

      They're looking to see if they can still pick out individual pixels.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    9. Re:The printing press by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 2

      The original Palm Pilot did make the list, though not at #1. It was influential, but ultimately was a device and a category of devices that wasn't quite good enough to achieve the kind of mass acceptance that the smartphone has.

      And no, the iPhone is not the first smartphone. Various Palm and Windows-based devices, the BlackBerry, and Nokia's Symbian phones preceded it. But it was the first one to be accepted by more people and used as a smartphone by more than just a small tech-oriented elite. Lots of Symbian devices were sold but most of them weren't really used in a way that we would recognize as smartphone use; they had either no apps installed or a handful of lightly-used ones at most. Palm devices were used in a more smartphone way, but not by enough people.

    10. Re:The printing press by gmiller123456 · · Score: 2

      Indeed if it had not been for the gun it would probably have done this with fewer people dying.

      The question is, what is the most influential, not the most beneficial.

      Pointing a gun at someone can be very influential.

  9. Inspector Gadget by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 3, Funny

    Although in terms of influence, Penny and her pet dog did most of the work.

  10. Kind of depends on what the definition of "Gadget" by gtwrek · · Score: 2

    The two most influential inventions that affected more people (for the positive), by far, would be indoor plumbing, and vaccines. Could argue either way which one's first.

    Don't know if those are "gadgets"...

  11. Firearms and refrigerators by mi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Firearms have forever changed both warfare and personal security. You can say, bow and arrow had a similarly dramatic effect — Spartans captured by Athenians 2500 years ago complained bitterly, that reed (from which arrows were made) does not distinguish between the brave and the cowards. But arrows weren't useful against fortifications and bow was not a good short-range weapon.

    Now, refrigerators have dramatically altered the way we buy and prepare food... I'd nominate them if only because they tend to be underappreciated these days.

    Railroads, airlines, personal cars — not sure, if you can call them "gadgets". Telegraph and telephone — sure!

    And then cellular phone, followed by "smart" phone. But I think, telephones were more revolutionary than these next stages.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  12. Oh god. List by idiots by Harlequin80 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel like my brain just got dumber reading that list. The Wii? Fit bit? Oculus rift? Nest Thermostat? Roku Netflixs?

    None of those things should even make the top 10,000 let alone the top 50. Initially I thought they were limiting it to post 1970s stuff and then they throw in an 1850s record player.

  13. PR stunt by krkhan · · Score: 2

    This is pointless click-bait, made even more obvious by putting iPhone on the top. Why isn't the QWERTY keyboard the most influential gadget of all time? The beloved iPhones still use QWERTY, no? Why isn't telephone itself at the top? That's what connected the world, no? How about telegram, the precursor to both internet and telephone? "Gadget" and "most influential" are both loosely defined terms. The sole purpose of this article was to somehow get iPhone to the top.

    1. Re:PR stunt by FrankSchwab · · Score: 2

      Remarkably, no airplane made the list. If there's one thing that's made the world smaller and influenced everyone's life, it's been cheap air travel.
      I'm guessing they put this list together in 45 minutes one day after drinking at lunch.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
  14. **piff** by transami · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everybody knows it's the TOWEL.

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
  15. A Matter of Perspective by Rollgunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My grandmother, who before passing away not too long ago at the age of 99, felt that despite seeing automobiles, computers and television all come of age, the microwave oven was the thing that made the largest impact in her life as a housewife. Her husband was a doctor, and with his irregular hours, it was nearly impossible to have a hot dinner ready for him when he got home, but the microwave changed that completely. It was a revolution in the production of hot meals, which is something most of us take for granted.

  16. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm sorry but PalmOS and even Windows Mobile did all of this way before the iPhone even hit the drawing board. There were even mobile phone versions in the the form of the Treo and Tungsten C.

    The only revolutionary thing about the iPhone is it broke out of the techie niche that previous devices had been trapped in and brought it mainstream, but I suspect the biggest reason for that is fashion rather than technical.

  17. Re:Seriously? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

    Maybe because it's duct tape?

  18. The iPhone is the first toy smartphone by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    The iPhone was a total joke when it came out. It was pretty and different, but there were no applications for it other than what it came with (!), you couldn't even download files or copy and paste text. It was a few years before it got within reach of the capability of the Treo 650 I had at the time, which was my second smartphone more capable than the original iPhone and not even the best smartphone available at the time. Even then, the iPhone was and remains a toy to enable consumption, not a real computer. A real computer puts you in control of what it can do, allowing you to write and run your own programs on the device and download and run applications at will.

    The iPhone's success damaged computing itself more than any device or event in history by popularizing curated computing in place of general-purpose computing.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  19. Re:The iPhone was actually quite a revolution by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 2

    2) You could download apps for all sorts of things, and you could write your own apps.

    A lot of people forget, but you could NOT originally write 3rd party apps for the iPhone. Apple originally intended to write all the apps for it, and figured any 3rd party applications would be web-based. It was only after tremendous pressure did Jobs finally relent and open up the SDK to external developers. Any success you attribute to the original iPhone really can't have anything to do with 3rd party apps - although it certainly contributed to later successes.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  20. The iPhone was a triumph... of marketing by Nonesuch · · Score: 3, Informative
    The first iPhone was launched January 9, 2007, a full year after the LG Prada (and 15 years after the first touchscreen phone). LG's Prada included many of the UI, design, and functional elements claimed as iPhone "firsts".

    I'm sorry but PalmOS and even Windows Mobile did all of this way before the iPhone even hit the drawing board. There were even mobile phone versions in the the form of the Treo and Tungsten C.

    The only revolutionary thing about the iPhone is it broke out of the techie niche that previous devices had been trapped in and brought it mainstream, but I suspect the biggest reason for that is fashion rather than technical.

    Exactly. Multi-touch aside, the iPhone wasn't particularly innovative technologically, but it was the first mainstream non-techie smart phone.

  21. Plough, stirrup, wheel, boat, sail, steam engine.. by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Plough, spear, cooking pot, shoe, clothing, stirrup, wheel, compass, boat, sail, steam engine, sextant, knife, lightbulb, refrigeration, fishing hook, vacuum cleaner, broom, roof, walls, toothbrush, doors, scissors, calculator, windows, saw, axe, lathe, printing press, telescope, telegraph, slide rule, mirrors, drill, screw, radio, TV, to name a few.

    I was reading for example that the bicycle literally changed the DNA of England in a measurable way when people could now find mates a few villages over. The train would have had a similar type impact but might not qualify as a gadget.

    As for the iPhone (which I have one of) they will be something quaint we find in yard sales in 10 years. Basically like having a kickass VCR in 1982.

    I would say that the iPhone mostly just shook up the complacency of the telcos more than anything else. The iPhone was one of these technological developments that was inevitable. Just like ever improving battery technology makes the electric car inevitable. Tesla may very well move things along a bit more quickly but the electric car pretty much completely depends upon modern processors, batteries, and brushless motors.

  22. Toilet paper. by dsmatthews9379 · · Score: 2

    Do I really need to explain why?

  23. REally... All of you turn in your geek card. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    #1 Gadget that changed the world.

    Radio.

    90% of everything you use today depends on that first radio invention that was a gadget and curiosity.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  24. Re:not the gun, but close by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Penis.

    No wonder you posted anonymously. A gadget is a small tool.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  25. Fourdrinier papermaking machine by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Without low cost paper of consistent quality, none of the other gadgets could have been designed.

    My first choice would have been the pencil, but I thought again and realized that pencils are not very useful without good paper.

  26. Transistor. by random_ID · · Score: 2

    Everything on that list requires them. Can you imagine an iPhone made with vacuum tubes?

  27. Smartphone was gonna happen anyway by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

    I had a PDA back in those days. It was obvious to most everyone (except Microsoft, who completely missed the boat) that PDAs and phones were going to converge. The only question was if PDAs were going to pick up phone capability, or if phones were going to pick up PDA capability. Microsoft was in a position to make the former happen - they had vanquished Palm and controlled most of the PDA market with Windows CE/Mobile/their name of the year. But even when HP tried to make a WinCE PDA which could also make phone calls, Microsoft didn't lift a finger to help them.

    Blackberry ended up taking the first step to adding general-purpose computing to a phone. Once they opened that floodgate, it was a race to see who could make their phone the most general general-purpose computer (except Microsoft, even though that was exactly what they were trying to do with PDAs - trying to port the Windows API to PDAs).

    The only real contributions of the iPhone was lack of a physical keyboard - everyone else (except LG) was using a Blackberry-style keyboard, or a sliding keyboard, or a Palm Graffiti-style writing space. That was a huge bet by Apple, and the iPhone served as the proof of concept which green-lighted everyone else's touch-only on-screen keyboards most of them were already playing with in R&D. (The app ecosystem - instead of a handful of apps baked into the phone by the manufacturer - came later). A lot of the form and functionality people attribute to the iPhone actually came out first in the LG Prada, indicating the industry was already moving in that direction even when the iPhone hadn't yet seen the light of day.

  28. Some of My List From Most Important... by BrendaEM · · Score: 2

    Plow
    Spear
    The Knife and Sword
    Fire
    Cloth
    A House
    The Bed
    Bandages
    The Refrigerator
    Hammer, Anvil, and Chisle
    The Saw, Hewn, Chisel, and Plane
    Bow and Arrow
    Matches and Lighter
    Spinning Wheel
    Button and Zipper
    Toothbrush, Toothpaste, and Floss
    Cotton Gin
    The Grain Mill
    The Compass
    The Pen, Paper, and Pencil
    The Boat and Ship
    Steam Engine and Locomotive
    Penicillin
    Generator/Alternator
    Electric Light Bulb
    The Microwave Oven
    Gas and Diesel Engines
    The Umbrella
    The Washing-machine and Dryer
    Bicycle
    The Internet
    Telephone
    Record Player
    Television
    The Personal Computer
    The Motorcycle and Automobile
    The Airplane
    The Rocket
    The Neodymium Magnet
    The Space Shuttle
    The Integrated Circuit
    The Transistor, Capacitor, Inductor, Wire, and Printed Circuit Boards
    Currency
    The Light Emitting Diode
    The Cellphone
    The Amplifier and Speaker

    Gadgets by definition are supposed to be things we don't need.
    To state that there's an important gadget is a contradiction.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM