Slashdot Mirror


Ted Cruz Drops Out Of The Republican Presidential Race (washingtonpost.com)

rmdingler writes: Ted Cruz drops out of the presidential race after losing in Indiana. Donald Trump has become the presumptive nominee before Hillary has locked things up versus Bernie. This is huge. Cruz's decision to drop out came after losing significantly to Trump in the Indiana primary. "I said I would continue on as long as there is a viable path to victory. Tonight I'm sorry to say, it appears that path has been foreclosed," Cruz told a small group of supporters Tuesday night. "Together we left it all on the field in Indiana. We gave it everything we got, but the voters chose another path." He said he would "continue to fight for liberty," but did not say whether or not he would support Trump as the nominee. The exit comes soon after he announced former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina as his running mate in a desperate move to keep his candidacy afloat.

17 of 879 comments (clear)

  1. And Carly Destroys Another Organization.... by sconeu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Namely "Cruz for President"

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:And Carly Destroys Another Organization.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh come on, the org was already doomed before she was on board

  2. Re:Checkmate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pretty much. Clinton is delusional if she thinks after all the insulting things she's said about the Bernie supporters and the various dirty campaigning practices that she's going to get all of us to toe the line. I for one will not vote for that woman. If that means President Trump, then so be it. We can survive 4 years of Trump, I'm not sure we can survive the precedent of letting somebody as pathologically dishonest as Clinton to win.

    Just the other day it came out that she's been using the Hillary Clinton Victory fund to funnel donations well above and beyond the legal limit into her campaign coffers. Roughly 99% of the money that was donated, ostensibly for the party and other Democrats has been funneled back into her campaign.
    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/clinton-fundraising-leaves-little-for-state-parties-222670

    Is that really better than what Trump can do for us? I doubt very much that he really believes most of the inflammatory rhetoric.

  3. Wait, wait by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wait a second...

    Rafael Cruz AND Glen Beck both said Ted Cruz was "anointed by god" to be the next president. How could god have gotten it so wrong??

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  4. Re:"Huge" isn't what I'd say by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The only reason for super delegates is that the parties are private clubs and make their own rules. Geez, even the Republicans don't have them.

    I'd put super delegates after the electoral college on the list of insults to democracy. One person - one vote isn't a radical idea.

  5. Wrong mate by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Trump is literally going to plaster the walls with Hillary, after the first debate that all become apparent even to you... I doubt Hillary will do more than one open debate, and then where will the reclusive sulking get her? Exactly nowhere.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Wrong mate by Marginal+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think one thing we've learned from all this is it's not about money, it's about airtime. And if you can get that for free, it no longer matters which side the Koch brothers are on - which somehow is kind of reassuring, despite the obvious negative consequences in this case.

      I've watched a lot of CNN throughout all this, and they're clearly biased against Trump. Yet they've fueled his campaign with the wall-to-wall free airtime they give him. (And yes, as a CNN viewer, I'm part of the problem.) In fact, on their "Reliable Sources" program the other day, someone mentioned that CNN's ratings were up dramatically throughout all this, which isn't surprising. It's a win-win for both: Trump gets airtime, CNN gets ratings. I guess we could call that the "media-troll complex."

  6. Re: Checkmate by blind+biker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Regardless of how self serving or fraudulent you may think she is, the odds of Hilary accidentally plunging the whole planet into world War three due to ineptitude seems significantly lower than with Trump.

    The great majority (if not all) of wars was caused by self-serving leaders, and never by incompetence. Psychopatic minds only interested in their own benefit, financial and political, have been the motive force behind practically all wars in recorded history.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  7. Re:Hillary vs Trump by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suspect you will see his policies shift, but not in any way that allows for easy categorization. But there is one thing that Trump is very very good at which is he is a mainstream media prediction killer. From pretty much day one every prediction about him by the mainstream media has gone up in smoke. The initial prediction that I read about his campaign was that it would last just long enough for him to promote his show or a book.

  8. Re:Hillary vs Trump by Wycliffe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Exactly. It's kindof scary that the most likely next president is hated by 75+% of the population. At least with Sanders or Kasich, the other side of the aisle tolerates them. I'm a republican/libertarian and disagree with most of what Sanders believes but I still think that he is a decent human being. I can't say the same about Hillary or Trump. If it was Kasich vs Hillary, I would vote for Kasich, if it was Trump vs Sanders, I would vote for Sanders, but Hillary vs Trump and I have no idea who to vote. We're either going to have one of the highest turnouts or lowest turnouts in voting history and most people are going to be voting *against* a candidate instead of for a candidate.

  9. Re:Can Trump win over all? by Alomex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like her husband, she can't seem to do anything without breaking some type of law.

    Except that in 25 years of accusations not one has stuck. At some point a rational person has to start wondering if there is anything there there. Or you can continue parroting partisan talking points that as I said, haven't panned out in 25 years.

  10. Re:It's a trap by shanen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Again, I wish I had a funny mod point to give you.

    Anyway, as bad as Trump is, Cruz would have been worse. The Donald's primary identity is "con man" or "salesman" and he doesn't believe most of the crazy stuff he says. He's just saying those things because the suckers want to hear them. In contrast, Cruz's primary personal identity is "religious fanatic", supported by a secondary identity as "technically skilled liar", and he sincerely believed all of the crazy stuff he said, and some more besides.

    Trump's nomination actually gives me some hope for the future of America. The so-called Republican Party has become a travesty of itself. Just an insane brand hijack of the actual Republican Party of Abe Lincoln and the pragmatic if overly business-friendly GOP of Ike and Teddy. It is overdue to follow the Whig and Federalists Parties into oblivion so the American political system can have a REAL choice. Yeah, the Democratic Party will win too easily, but it's not like they've ever been able to figure out what they want to do with political power even when they have it. I doubt the new challenger will be the Libertarian Party, but the election of 2018 may reveal which way things are actually going. Hey, it's even conceivable the so-called Republicans can reform themselves enough to earn their own name again.

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  11. Re:Hillary vs Trump by suupaabaka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's funny that the American version of "extreme leftist" looks somewhat centrist from a European/Australian perspective.

  12. 3rd party by bangular · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If those that dislike Hillary and Trump voted for a single 3rd party candidate, they'd probably win. I'm a Bernie supporter that has decided to vote 3rd party. I've heard "you're wasting your vote" every time I've mentioned it. I don't care at this point. It's the only way we'll ever buck the current two party system.

  13. Re:Hillary vs Trump by dbIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bernie is so far to the left he makes Hillary look like a Republican

    Richard Nixon was so far to the left that he would have made Hillary look like a Republican!
    I wish it was a joke but with the EPA, his health care proposals and a few other things he would be called a Communist by some Republicans if he was pushing such things today. That was of course before Koch and other similar donors made the demands that shaped current politics.

  14. Re:It's a trap by Malc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a foreigner who doesn't even live in the US, perhaps you could help me understand how the "evil" of Clinton will damage the country? From here it looks like Trump is already causing damage in international relations and domestically in terms of fuelling bigotry and hate. I suppose with Clinton we should expect a presidency distracted by the GOP going after her for an impeachment like her husband (mail server instead of Lewinsky)?

  15. Re:Does the Donald stand for anything? by eam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would point out that the gullible trump supporters are somewhat more complex than that. They believe that Trump means the things he says that they agree with, and they believe that he does not really mean the things he says that they disagree with. They are absolutely convinced of his dishonesty, yet they somehow think he's on their side.

    NPR's This American Life did a segment about Alex Chalgren, an african-american, gay Trump supporter. In the segment, Alex explained that he supported Trump because Trump supported gay rights. Later when confronted by a statement from Trump saying that he would try to appoint judges to overrule the decision on same-sex marriage, he continued to defend Trump. He said that Trump only made the statement to get votes.

    Trump rejected the one issue that Alex chose him for, and Alex continued to support him.

    http://www.thisamericanlife.or...