Slashdot Mirror
Hacker Guccifer Claims He Easily and Repeatedly Broke Into Hillary Clinton's Email Server (foxnews.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Fox News: The infamous Romanian hacker known as "Guccifer," speaking exclusively with Fox News, claimed he easily -- and repeatedly -- breached former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's personal email server in early 2013. In the process of mining data from the Blumenthal account, Lazar said he came across evidence that others were on the Clinton server. "As far as I remember, yes, there were up to 10, like, IPs from other parts of the world," he said. From the report: "'For me, it was easy ... easy for me, for everybody,' Marcel Lehel Lazar, who goes by the moniker 'Guccifer,' told Fox News from a Virginia jail where he is being held. Fox News could not independently confirm Lazar's claims. The 44-year-old Lazar said he first compromised Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal's AOL account, in March 2013, and used that as a stepping stone to the Clinton server. He said he accessed Clintonâ(TM)s server 'like twice,' though he described the contents as 'not interest[ing]' to him at the time." Guccifer was sent to prison last month, which is when his potential role in the Clinton email investigation became apparent.
IMO this story is not quite as credible as the Bitcoin guy's claim earlier this week. How about some evidence other than some emails from Sidney Blumenthal's AOL account?
Have you read my blog lately?
The fact that he is in jail for accessing her server and she is not just free, but running for the highest office in the land speaks volumes to how corrupt the system is. Sorry, but "hacking" in the way this was done is not hacking, it was more like being a peeping Tom.
Considering the amount of Politicians and Appointees who have been immune to prosecution has far exceeded worry. I don't see how the Government is giving any options except for vigilantism.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
Pot makes you paranoid.
If you don't know how things work, starting points are based on Karma. A high Karma level will start posts at a default score of 2. Shills, Sock Puppets, and others who attempt to censor by mod generally rate things with a name to change the score, so the change in number will generally be accompanied by a label. E.G. "Troll" which gives a -1 score.
While there are certainly elements of Slashdot who are liberal progressives and use moderation to censor, there is also a strong showing of Libertarian/Conservatives who will balance things out. It's not perfect, because nothing is, but it tends to work well for political comments when presented without appearing to be a "rant".
There are subjects which are purely censored though. Vaccine debate and God/Atheism immediately come to mind where if you are not progressive you are a "troll" almost without question.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
The statement appears (to me) to be based on the belief (as I do) that she has gotten away with many crimes simply because she has accumulated political power. Those of us who believe she is guilty of crimes and gross fraking negligence don't think the people that would/could/should decide to press charges against her, will.
The general "neocon" if you will, thinking is : She's got someone in her pocket by either having dirt on them, or someone that wants the ear of the next president that owes them a favor on the level of keeping her out of prison.
If you google it enough, you will find the shady (whitewater) to outright tin-foil-hat stuff that suggests she has had numerous people murdered.
For me, it is simply enough that she allegedly had military uniforms banned from the White House during Bill's term.
I had a sucky sig.
Since when is Palin an "elite" in America?
She could see Russia from her front porch - that makes her an elite visionary.
#DeleteChrome
Yeah, because those intellectuals have done such a *great* job running our American economy. If I didn't know better, I might think they despised ordinary Americans and wanted to oppress them, all the while making loads of cash from moving everything overseas.
Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
Did you just propose socialism as a solution to illegal immigration? Do we have to pay protection money to all the world's poor to keep them from breaking our laws and flooding into the country? How is that working out for Europe?
Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
Of course there's a wee bit of a problem with your premise that Obama actually tried to destroy the US - or even supported any policy that would or could ultimately destroy the US. Just saying it (over and over and over) doesn't make it true. No - the Citizens United clowns on the SCOTUS came the closest to to destroying the US that anyone has come so far. Well, maybe McCarthy. Or the fools that seceeded in the mid 19th century...
Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...