Slashdot Mirror


Parents Could Be Sued By Their Kids For Posting Pictures of Them On Facebook (theguardian.com)

Next time you share pictures of your children on Facebook, you will want to take their permission before doing that. French authorities have warned parents in France of fines of up to $50,000 and a year in prison for publishing intimate photos of their children on social media without permission. From a Guardian report: It's a development that could give pause for thought for many parents used to sharing details of their children's lives across social media. A 2015 study by internet company Nominet found parents in the UK post nearly 200 photos of their under fives online every year, meaning a child will feature in around 1,000 online photos before their fifth birthday. [...] "In a few years, children could easily take their parents to court for publishing photos of them when they were younger," Eric Delcroix, an expert on internet law and ethics, told Le Figaro. "Children at certain stages do not wish to be photographed or still less for those photos to be made public," he added.It may seem like an absurd law to many, but think about the potential consequences of putting a kid's picture on social media. Among others, we've seen plenty of pictures becoming meme on the web.

5 of 122 comments (clear)

  1. Really? by fyngyrz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really? One wonders how a child would give permission in any manner that meant anything in a legal sense.

    Perhaps the summary isn't presenting this clearly (what? WHAT?) but yes, it does seem pretty absurd.

    Then again, the US certainly hasn't been slacking in stepping into the role of parental choice / decision-making.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Really? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are simply pointing out that if you post embarrassing photos of your kids on Facebook the worst possible scenario is that they go viral and they end up hating you so much they sue you for damages and violation of privacy. It's unlikely but the law allows for it in extreme cases, where the child can show that they have been (psychologically) injured or lost money (e.g. was forced out of a job).

      Basically they are just reminding everyone that the law applies to children too and parents should think before posting every moment of their little darling's life on Facebook.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Really? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Therefore, claiming that a parent needed their child's permission to post something is meaningless.

      Regardless of the legal code, the ethical reasoning is very muddled.

      The most workable construction is that, while, yes, a child is born with inherent rights, the child is initially incapable of exercising those rights. Nobody says that a toddler should be free to head off to a rave downtown - it's expected that a parent will appropriately curtail the child's rights.

      Over time, the parent(s), the custodian of those child's rights, will slowly cede the rights back to the child, as his brain matures. By time the child turns 18, he's legally recognized as an adult with full rights (excepting Prohibitionist nonsense).

      The French here seek to punish a parent for exercising the rights over which he has moral custody, which is, in effect, exercising his own rights.

      Sure, some parents will make bad choices, but most will not, and having a government suing parents for sharing pics of their kids is far, far, more dangerous to the society than the occasional lapse of judgement.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  2. clean slate by leomekenkamp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I grew up in a world where the internet did not really exist for most people. My first direct contact with it was in 1989. This means I have had the opportunity (although at the time I was not fully aware of that) to influence what pieces of information about me were put online.

    When I became a father it seemed only logical to extend this same opportunity to our offspring. And my girlfriend feels the same on this issue, so it is very difficult to find anything on our children online.

    My hope is that they will see the value in this and abstain from putting things online that might work against them in their future life. Puberty for them is still some odd years in the future, so I hope there is time enough to get this into their firmware.

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
  3. Re:Wait, Wait, Now Hear This . . . by Coisiche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The moral here is never accept friend requests from family. Requests from work colleagues are also best left unaccepted.