Slashdot Mirror


Senate GOP Launches Inquiry Into Facebook's News Curation (gizmodo.com)

Michael Nunez, reporting for Gizmodo: The US Senate Commerce Committee -- which has jurisdiction over media issues, consumer protection issues, and internet communication -- has sent a letter to Mark Zuckerberg requesting answers to questions it has on its trending topics section. The letter comes after Gizmodo on Monday reported on allegations by one former news curator, who worked for Facebook as a contractor, that the curation team routinely suppressed or blacklisted topics of interest to conservatives. That report also included allegations from several former curators that they used an "injection tool" to add or bump stories onto the trending module. The letter asks that Facebook "arrange for your staff including employees responsible for trending topics to brief committee staff on this issue." The letter was signed by Chairman for the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Senator John Thune (R) from South Dakota.

7 of 357 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What is the alleged crime? by Salgak1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Exactly. It's political theater. The classic case of which was the "Parent's Music Resource Council", where Tipper Gore got then-Senator Al Gore to hold a hearing on lyrics in top-40 songs. Testifying were Frank Zappa, John Denver, and Dee Snider. Fairly epic hearing, as I recall, and I also seem to recall a movie was made of it. . .

  2. Partisian nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The facebook contractors were told to block conservative stories (whatever that means these days) and these GOP Senators are making a big deal out of it - to get votes and continue the myth that the media has a Liberal (whatever that means these days) bias.

    And of course there is going to be a big chunk of their constituency that will fall for this complete and utter waste of Senate time.

    Idiocracy is a documentary you know.

  3. Re:FB isn't even a news source by geek · · Score: 3, Informative

    Look out, /. editors; you're next.

    Zuckerberg has stated manyy times that he wants Facebook to be your only news source.

  4. Re:So what? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why investigate Facebook for keeping with the low standards of everyone else?

    Because it's Congress and they can investigate anything for the sheer hell of it.

    Get the popcorn; it's political theater folks!

  5. Re:So what? by humptheElephant · · Score: 4, Informative

    I find that all of them don't report what the really important things. Slashdot at least will often have something important while most of the news is just a pitch for some product. I don't find it slanted to the left at all, MSNBC doesn't have the power that Fox News has. I find the supposed left wing MSNBC a little to the right, but we all have different opinions. We don't read much in the news of South and Central America and what our government has done to those countries. We don't get reporting on why Iran hates us so much because of Eisenhower's interference in a duly elected government back in the 1950s. We hear about Syrian refugees not being welcome but who in the hell caused them to be refugee? What about Iraq? It was our foreign policies that contributed to these problems.

  6. Re:So what? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Informative

    What I do know is that if there is a "credible" allegation of corruption (whatever that means) that Congress can and should investigate it.

    Maybe they can start with themselves.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  7. Re:False advertising? by coinreturn · · Score: 3, Informative

    I see no explanation on FB of what "trending" means.

    In denial much? Right bloody here:

    Trending shows you a list of topics and hashtags that have recently spiked in popularity on Facebook.

    This undeniably implies objectivity. Depending on how (un)charitable you wish to be, it also explicitly promises it...

    No it most certainly does not. You purposely ignored this particular line:

    The topics you see are based on a number of factors including engagement, timeliness, Pages you've liked and your location.

    It DOES not say anything like "objectivity." The "number of factors" gives them all the leeway to put whatever the fuck they want in there.

    just whining rightwingers claiming to be victims

    Well, they certainly were victims here. The only question remaining is whether this was legal or not.

    Nope, no victims. Just more whining.