Slashdot Mirror


Google Chirp To Rival Amazon Echo

An anonymous reader writes: Google is working on a competitor to the Amazon Echo, the smart speaker that has proved to be a sleeper hit for Amazon. The device, which will resemble an OnHub router, has not been officially named yet but is internally known as the Chirp. It has long been suspected that Google was working on a voice-controlled speaker that could integrate with Nest, since Google acquired Nest two years ago. While the Chirp isn't ready for release at next week's Google I/O developer conference, it will most likely receive honorable mention as the conference will highlight voice control, personal assistance, and virtual reality.

100 comments

  1. Smart speaker, a sleeper hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That must be why I never heard of that thing before today!

  2. If you haven't heard of the Amazon Echo... by jerk · · Score: 1

    ...you must be the one sleeping. Under a rock.

    1. Re:If you haven't heard of the Amazon Echo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...you must be the one sleeping. Under a rock.

      I was sleeping under a rock, but the echos kept waking me up.

    2. Re:If you haven't heard of the Amazon Echo... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      ...you must be the one sleeping.

      My friend uses his Echo as an alarm clock. A very expensive alarm clock.

    3. Re:If you haven't heard of the Amazon Echo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're out of touch, that's all. Reading Slashdot every day will not make you an informed person; It might even misinform you, and make you paranoid and afraid like watching Fox does. You shouldn't blame other for your own failure.

    4. Re:If you haven't heard of the Amazon Echo... by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      I use mine as an alarm clock, to control my lights, for hands-free music playback while taking a shower, and to check the news and weather while getting ready for work. I also use a Tap to bring my music out to my patio. These things are very useful.

    5. Re:If you haven't heard of the Amazon Echo... by Krojack · · Score: 1

      I use my hand-me-down $600 Nexus 6 phone as my alarm clock after getting a newer phone.

    6. Re:If you haven't heard of the Amazon Echo... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      My friend uses his Echo as an alarm clock. A very expensive alarm clock.

      I bought mine a year ago for $149, so it is not that expensive, and it can do way more than just sound an alarm. But there is room for improvement, so I am happy to see Google launching a competing product. Echo gets confused if you ask it a complicated question, and Google should do better at that. It also needs a separate bridge interface for IoT (Zigbee, ZWave, etc.), so a built in hub to control lights, locks, thermostats, motion sensor, and other devices would be nice. I currently have a Samsung SmartThings, but that costs an extra $100, and the link from the Echo to the SmartThings is flakey.

    7. Re:If you haven't heard of the Amazon Echo... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I got a TPLink smart plug and it works really well with the Echo but I so want an SDK for it. I wish the smart device people would understand that an API would make their products more popular.
      That being said I hope that Google adds some features that are missing from the Echo like the ability to use it as a multi room speaker system and as an intercom.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:If you haven't heard of the Amazon Echo... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      It also needs a separate bridge interface for IoT (Zigbee, ZWave, etc.), so a built in hub to control lights, locks, thermostats, motion sensor, and other devices would be nice.

      My friend uses Blumoo and Echo to control the TV by voice commands. A pain in the ass to program.

      http://www.blumoo.com/

  3. Sleeper hit? by BitZtream · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What? Sleeper hit? I don't know anyone that owns one outside of my office, the one we have in the office is for testing and it sucks. I hear them talking to it all the time and continually repeating themselves trying to get it to figure out what they actually mean.

    Voice 'activation' or 'recognition' SUCKS currently. These types of devices ride a VERY SHORT hype train just like Siri did, and then no one at all cares. I suspect that the general public doesn't give a flying fucking about any voice recognition anymore.

    Now tell me ... WHY DO I NEED a voice controlled speaker to integrate with my thermostat and fire alarm ... two things that I NEVER touch. You set the temp and you leave it, it heats or cools the house as needed, if you have a good thermostat (note, the Nest devices are actually pretty shitty as far as 'smart devices' go.) it has sensors in each room that detects occupancy and temp and adjusts the temp based on the rooms people are in.

    No one cares about voice recognition in its current, almost absolutely useless state. Its nothing more than a broken toy. The only people who are telling you Amazon has a 'hit' is Amazon.

    Stop slashvertising and get a cluepon. Echo isn't impressive, if you can find anyone with one of these 'sleeper hits' for more than a week, ask them how much they use it ... and then I dare you to find me the person who doesn't regret wasting the money after the first month is over.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Sleeper hit? by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Exactly. These "stories" are posted by people trying to hype up amazons Echo. There have been a couple of them posted here, disguised as "news". The Echo has failed miserably in the market, along with the FireTV/Fire Tablet lines.

    2. Re:Sleeper hit? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually I have one and I am getting a dot for my workshop.
      I have a smart plug on my bedroom lamp and it is really handy to open the door and tell the lamp to turn on when I get home at night. It is also handy to turn off the lamp by telling it to turn on.
      I also find it nice to check the weather and news as well as use it to play music and as a BT speaker.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Sleeper hit? by jerk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Echo isn't impressive, if you can find anyone with one of these 'sleeper hits' for more than a week, ask them how much they use it ... and then I dare you to find me the person who doesn't regret wasting the money after the first month is over.

      Okay, I'll bite. My girlfriend and I use Echo several times a day, every day. Whether it's to ask the forecast for that day or the next, to set a timer for tea, to turn the lights on/off when we walk into the kitchen (where our Echo lives), or for the latest news brief from NPR and BBC (though you can set different ones). I've also used it for unit conversions while cooking or baking and it's used fairly frequently for playing Pandora stations or something from Amazon's music service since it's actually got a very nice speaker built into it.

      I find it much, much more reliable than Siri (which is disappointing, being an Apple user) and fairly close to Google's Now as far as speed and accuracy. They're constantly adding new features and send an email every Friday letting you know what's new and how to use it.

    4. Re:Sleeper hit? by mlts · · Score: 1

      I am not impressed with Bluetooth speakers. If I try one during a conference call, it either has 0 volume or KISS concert, deaf-in-5-seconds volume as the next step up. Even then, people say that one can't be heard.

      Now, add IoT stuff to the mix, which would allow any blackhat who manages to find the device now has a dedicated microphone to record what is going on 24/7? Not worth the cash or the bother. Especially with the state of IoT where security updates are talked about, but rarely done, just because to IoT firms, "security has no ROI", and they want people to buy their new stuff, not expect upgrades to their existing items.

    5. Re:Sleeper hit? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      It is also handy to turn off the lamp by telling it to turn on.

      Is this a typo? Or did you mean to write this?

      Except for the novelty, how is this better than a clapper? or a motion sensor attached to a light?

    6. Re:Sleeper hit? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      No one cares about voice recognition in its current, almost absolutely useless state. Its nothing more than a broken toy.

      Users are supposed to "train" their Echo devices to get the voice recognition feature to work properly. My friend got upset because his Echo understood me without any training from me whatsoever. The Echo is nothing more than speaker with a microphone. I'm familiar with speaking into a microphone and annunciating each word clearly. Most people don't realize that the training is for them and not the Echo.

    7. Re: Sleeper hit? by slazzy · · Score: 1

      I really hate anything amazon for some reason, with the exeption of ordering items from their website.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    8. Re:Sleeper hit? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      It has? Is that why they've introduced two more models, and other companies are licensing the tech? Interesting definition of "failed miserably."

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    9. Re:Sleeper hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Echo and Dot every day. Smart home control, news and music. Sorry you live in an ivory tower.

    10. Re:Sleeper hit? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Companies are desperate these days and do not want to miss on new fads because those fads climb hard and die fast.

    11. Re:Sleeper hit? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's like Microsoft Windows, where you have to click on "Start" to be able to select "Shut down".

    12. Re:Sleeper hit? by chispito · · Score: 1

      Voice 'activation' or 'recognition' SUCKS currently. These types of devices ride a VERY SHORT hype train just like Siri did, and then no one at all cares.

      I have an Echo as do several people at at my work. The voice recognition is far better than any other device I've ever used and often is able to be activated from the other room. The only issues I've had is figuring out the exact phrasing Amazon's servers are listening for to listen a particular artist, album, or podcast, but the device is incredibly accurate for detecting the words I'm saying (you can read back what Echo hears you say to it using the app).

      I know it's popular to bag on Echo and Amazon for privacy reasons, but it's no different than a similar service on your phone.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    13. Re:Sleeper hit? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      What? Sleeper hit?

      It does sound like a term the NSA/CIA would use. It would be like an always-on surveillance device, but it would be an all-in-one solution that could also take out an entire living room and all its occupants should someone ever try to fast-forward through an FBI copyright warning on a movie.

    14. Re:Sleeper hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Sleeper hit? I don't know anyone that owns one outside of my office, the one we have in the office is for testing and it sucks. I hear them talking to it all the time and continually repeating themselves trying to get it to figure out what they actually mean.

      Voice 'activation' or 'recognition' SUCKS currently. These types of devices ride a VERY SHORT hype train just like Siri did, and then no one at all cares. I suspect that the general public doesn't give a flying fucking about any voice recognition anymore.

      I was an early adopter of the Echo, and, in the beginning, voice reorganization worked pretty well (For me, anyway. I always have had a problem with Siri recognizing what I was saying, and Google wasn't much better. Cortana (when I had a windows phone) was the best, but I digress)

      Anyway, in the beginning, Echo was good. It was quick, responsive, and mostly free of false positives (IE: Hearing something on the TV and not think that was being addressed) Now... It's slow. I have to actually see the little blue light come on before I speak the next command, otherwise its a guess as to whether or not Echo understands what I say. It sometimes gets confused when the TV is on (Over the weirdest things, it often thinks it was asked to add something to a list) Having said that, it still is very good at understanding what I say.

      Now tell me ... WHY DO I NEED a voice controlled speaker to integrate with my thermostat and fire alarm

      I agree here. I have a programmable thermostat, and it basically says: "Turn on the heat when it gets to cold" and "Turn on the cooler when it gets to hot" In fact, I don't even need a programmable thermostat to do that, it's just what came with the apartment. Fortunately, Echo does much more then that.

      No one cares about voice recognition in its current, almost absolutely useless state. Its nothing more than a broken toy.
          The only people who are telling you Amazon has a 'hit' is Amazon.

      Stop slashvertising and get a cluepon. Echo isn't impressive, if you can find anyone with one of these 'sleeper hits' for more than a week, ask them how much they use it ...

      It all depends on what you expect out of it. I ask for news in the morning as I get ready for work, and I ask it to read my current audio book from Audible, or play music from Pandora while I'm doing things around the house. Being able to set a timer via voice is very handy when cooking. They keep adding features, some trivial (Guess a number), some trivia (mostly sports, that I can tell), some game specific (Minecraft recipies). Whether or not these are useful or just gimmick is up to the individual.

      and then I dare you to find me the person who doesn't regret wasting the money after the first month is over.

      I liked it well enough to get the Tap for the bedroom (The benefit there is that it is NOT listening 24x7, you have to push a button to get its attention)

    15. Re:Sleeper hit? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Introducing more models just means "we messed up on the previous models. I hope you like this one better". Failed miserably is means NO ONE IS BUYING IT and they have likely lost tens of millions of dollars on developing it. Ridiculous. Do YOU know anyone that has one? It is the same with the Microsoft Surface. Ever seen one outside of a store? No. And they keep introducing "new models". I think they are up to the 4th now and the still aren't selling.

    16. Re:Sleeper hit? by jittles · · Score: 1

      WHY DO I NEED a voice controlled speaker to integrate with my thermostat and fire alarm ... two things that I NEVER touch. You set the temp and you leave it, it heats or cools the house as needed, if you have a good thermostat (note, the Nest devices are actually pretty shitty as far as 'smart devices' go.) it has sensors in each room that detects occupancy and temp and adjusts the temp based on the rooms people are in.

      If your thermostat can detect when you're home, great. It would meet my needs. I travel a lot. On occasion I am gone for 2 or 3 weeks straight. Sometimes I forget to adjust the thermostat while I am gone. I love being able to tell my thermostat I'm away after I've already left. I don't always get home at the same time, either. So I don't really have a schedule for adjusting the temperature when I get home. I typically just kick the thing on when I am walking out of my office and it starts cooling as I commute. Since I live in a hot and humid area, it's nice to come in to a house that is already starting to cool off. Is it essential? No, but it's nice.

    17. Re:Sleeper hit? by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Voice recognition on the Echo is excellent as long as you don't have more than one person talking at a time, and most of us do not regret getting one. It can even understand me when I have a bad cold and my voice is just a croak.

      It seems like you just resent being advertised to on Slashdot, so you're pushing back with misinformation.

    18. Re:Sleeper hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one. It kind of sucks, mostly because cell phones exist and Amazon sucks. AC because it was a gift.

      There is no manual, just a terse "things to try" page. Alexa cannot teach you what it can do. Alexa cannot report bugs or take complaints. I can sum up the entirety of it's known capabilities below. The voice recognition is not bad, and the mic pretty sensitive. Oddly, it has had more trouble hearing my wife in recent weeks, but not more trouble hearing me. It mostly gets words correctly, but since it asks you to listen to music and compile shopping lists, you're going to still see plenty of nonsense interpretations of what you said. The things it is good at are things Siri/Android/Cortana already did better.

      5 minutes of playing with it looking for Easter eggs:
      * "Alexa. Tea. Earl Grey. Hot." - "I'm sorry, the replicators on this deck are down."
      * "Alexa, open the pod bay doors Alexa" - "I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that. We're not in space."
      * "Alexa, do you know HAL?" - "We don't talk after what happened."
      * "Thank you, Alexa" - "You're welcome." (I guess it was still listening for a few seconds after completing the request. Normally you have to say " (brief silence) Alexa[, [optional silence] command]" to wake it up

      Things it can do (that your phone could already do by voice, too):
      * "Alexa, set a timer for 1 hour and 5 minutes"
      * "Alexa, set a reminder for five P.M."
      * "Alexa, what is the traffic like?"
      * "Alexa, what is the weather like tomorrow?" - delivers current temperature, expected range, forecast
      * "Alexa, what temperature is it outside?" - delivers the entire report as if you'd asked for weather.

      Things it can halfway do:
      * "Alex, add 'grocery shopping: to to-do list" - "I've added grocery shopping to your to-do list"
      * "Alexa, put milk on shopping list" - "I've added milk to your shopping list" (If the order is complicated, novel, or has units, it dramatically increases the chance she will mishear you.) Also, I bet they thought they were going to acquire a lot more useful information than they did. "ice cream... milk... make up... cheese...meat..." Yeah, that's the sort of specificity big data loves to see...
      * "Alexa, remove 'malk' from shopping list" - "to remove items or clear your list, use the Alexa app" (on your phone)
      * "Alexa, clear to-do list" - "to remove items or clear your list, use the Alexa app" (on your phone)
      * I'd be willing to bet it's good at ordering stuff from Amazon for you, though I've never tried.
      * "Alexa, what time does Sullivan's Dry Cleaners close?" - "I could not find that listing, but Nation Dry Cleaner on the corner of 28th and Martin Luther King is open until 8 PM." (Thanks, but who gives a fuck? My clothes aren't there.)

      Things it could do if Amazon sucked less:
      * "Alexa, play Classic Rock" - "Playing 'Classic Rock Dinner Party' (note: does not rock) playlist, from Amazon Prime"
      * "Alexa, play _good_ Classic Rock." - "Playing 'Classic Rock Dinner Party' playlist, from Amazon Prime"
      * "Alexa, play Eagles" - "Playing (deep track/forgotten songs by) Eagles"
      * "Alexa, play _Hotel California_" - "Playing _Hotel California_ by Ska-themed Cover Band.
      * "Alexa, play _Hotel California_ by _the Eagles)" - "Playing a sample of _Hotel California_ by the Eagles... (20 seconds later, music stops.) Would you like to buy _Hotel California_ by the Eagles from Amazon Prime?"

      At some point it Amazon implemented a Jeopardy mini-game, which was kind of stretching.

      And why the hell is the persona for the Amazon Echo called 'Alexa'? Why didn't they name the Echo the Alexa, or make the persona 'Echo'?

    19. Re:Sleeper hit? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Great. 2 sales. Give me a break. You won't be using it in 6 months.

    20. Re:Sleeper hit? by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      You'll find that a lot of people here are driven by their emotions. People get their hate on for something, and will insist it's a failure, even when an item is so popular that there's a wait to get one. Echo, Dot, and Tap are all useful products, but some people would rather shout at clouds, and pretend they're a failure for personal emotional reasons, rather than even trying to come to a rational conclusion.

    21. Re:Sleeper hit? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You also own 5 Nest devices. You aren't normal. You just like shiny tech. That is fine, but don't pretend there are many people like you.

    22. Re:Sleeper hit? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I don't hate it. I own a Fire TV and Fire Tablet myself which I use frequently. It doesn't change the fact they are market failures. The Echo is something that is "useful" for 6 months until the shiny new wears off.

    23. Re:Sleeper hit? by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

      Mine didn't require any training, and can understand me, even when I'm sick and can just croak at it. It's a lot more than a speaker and a microphone. It's a cluster of microphones, with the processing power to reject noise, and pick up on your voice, along with the computing power to connect to the Alexa voice service.

    24. Re: Sleeper hit? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I really hate anything amazon for some reason, with the exeption of ordering items from their website.

      You're the type of consumer where once a company fits if your mind as doing "x" you only allow them to do "x". You don't want a company to be good at multiple things; it doesn't fit into the boxes in your brain where you store things.

    25. Re:Sleeper hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of comment is the reason this is now considered a conspiracy blog, rather than a tech blog.

      There was a time when people who like technology hung out here, now it's people frightened the FBI is listening to their pointless, empty lives.

    26. Re:Sleeper hit? by jerk · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do this multiple times a day? You have a problem.

      Since you know so much about me, you know that our weather actually changes from day to day, sometimes even in the same 24-hour period. I've even checked the weather, wanted to hear the news headlines of the hour, and set a tea timer within mere minutes of each other. Craziness, I know!

      cause switches you walk by are hard ...

      We don't actually walk by the switches for the lights in question. One is mounted in an area that's inaccessible because the refrigerator we installed is larger than ones the kitchen was designed for in 1963. I installed a Lutron switch with a remote control that's affixed to the front of the fridge with a magnet. Call it laziness, poor kitchen design, or whatever...it works (very well) for us and we like it.

      Because this is easier and faster than reading it ...

      Yes, actually. I don't have to get out , wake it from sleep, then launch or navigate to . Our local newspaper isn't worth the price of the paper it's printed on, so I simply say "Alexa, what's in the news?" while making my tea or coffee and she plays the briefing within 3 seconds.

      My "excuses" are simply my use cases. It's a convenience for us and it was well worth the $99 they were charging for the Echo at the time. It's not quite the impulse buy it used to be at its current price point, but if mine were to die out of warranty, I'd likely replace it with another.

    27. Re:Sleeper hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I liked it well enough to get the Tap for the bedroom (The benefit there is that it is NOT listening 24x7, you have to push a button to get its attention)

      What's the benefit to needing to touch the button to command the device? If you're a criminal, or mentally-ill, there's no reason to feel any less spied-on with this device. The actual benefit of the tap is decent battery life. If not for that constraint, it would probably be always-on like Echo and Dot.

    28. Re:Sleeper hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a double dog dare?

      Do you research Dr. BlowHard. Its the 4th best selling product on Amazon >> Electronics, with millions of units sold. Common sense would indicate that the addition of the Tap and Dot are results of sales doing well, no? Based on all the press, people apparently love it. I've had one for 7 months and use it daily. Everyone I know who has one loves it. Is there room for improvement? Of course there is, but I'd say they did a pretty solid job on the first go around, and is improving daily.

      http://qz.com/611026/amazon-echo-is-a-sleeper-hit-and-the-rest-of-america-is-about-find-out-about-it-for-the-first-time/
      http://www.geekwire.com/2016/report-amazon-sold-3-million-echo-smart-speakers-awareness-grows/
      http://www.wsj.com/articles/how-amazons-echo-is-turning-up-the-volume-1457718746

    29. Re:Sleeper hit? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      WHY DO I NEED a voice controlled speaker to integrate with my thermostat and fire alarm ... two things that I NEVER touch.

      You need them because you're narrow minded and need to wakeup to the fact that just because the word "Nest" was used doesn't mean that Google is spending millions of dollars introducing voice activation just to change the room temperature.

    30. Re: Sleeper hit? by WillRobinson · · Score: 2

      I will chirp in, pun intended. I use the grocery list the most while having hands full taking things from the fridge. Second setting timers for what I am cooking and alarm clocks. Third is my drive times then weather and music. Looking up fun facts during arguments is fun too. Way more useful around the house than that smart watch would ever be. Voice recognition is superior to Siri . I find the smart interface to to my AnyMote to clumsy at the moment and use the direct connect from my pad or phone more to control my IR devices. But hay that's just software and it can get better. No smart light yet. I am building my own.

    31. Re:Sleeper hit? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      A motion sensor will turn it on day or night and I may not want to have the lamp turn on when I get up to go to the bathroom.
      The clapper could work but it is not a bluetooth speaker, it does not play music or audio books, and I can not have more than one in a room and have individual control over both.

      I find it very handy and have been using it for a few months. You may not but I find that it works well and it is a good bt speaker and audio player.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    32. Re:Sleeper hit? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I have had it since launch. I got it for $99 and I do find it useful. What I find interesting is the active hostility to a person that actually find use out of the product. From your attitude I take it that you do not have one.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    33. Re:Sleeper hit? by jerk · · Score: 1

      You also own 5 Nest devices. You aren't normal. You just like shiny tech. That is fine, but don't pretend there are many people like you.

      Six now, since adding a thermostat to the bedroom (its heating/cooling system is separate from the rest of the house.) I got quite a chuckle out of the thought of you searching my history for that little nugget of information; you're taking this very personally.

      And we're discussing this on slashdot, where I'd argue that most readers have an interest in shiny tech, though I know two other people (who are not gadget nerds like me) that own Echos.

    34. Re: Sleeper hit? by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      it doesn't fit into the boxes in your brain where you store things.

      Wow, you should become a neurosurgeon, so you can rearrange all the contents in the boxes in peoples brains.
      Then Amazon would really have a hit!
      Get busy.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    35. Re:Sleeper hit? by Krojack · · Score: 1

      I love when people like you feel the need to berate others for buying and using a device you personally hate or feel is a gimmick. Why do you care what others spend their money and time on?

      I personally feel what he's using his for is 100% valid and if I had one would use it for the same things. I considered getting one but I just don't like Amazon and I'm neck deep in Google services (which I like) and the Echo does't work with them. I will be looking closely at the Google version and just might get it of not to expensive.

    36. Re:Sleeper hit? by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      Your situation is interesting, and probably a precursor of things to come.

      The IoT lobby is powerful and as Millenials get older and buy homes, condos, etc they will embrace this sort of thing.
      My problem with this sort of thing is the loss of privacy, the management of maintaining IoT/cloud enabled devices with security, patching, etc;

      I imagine there are benefits to this tech, but the trade offs don't make it worth my time or money.
      To me much of this "convenience tech" is a solution looking for a problem.

      Now for someone who is disabled, things like this could be a life changer.

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    37. Re:Sleeper hit? by jerk · · Score: 1

      I considered getting one but I just don't like Amazon and I'm neck deep in Google services (which I like) and the Echo does't work with them. I will be looking closely at the Google version and just might get it of not to expensive.

      They did add Google calendar functionality to the Echo last month. Usage instructions here.

    38. Re:Sleeper hit? by jerk · · Score: 1

      Ugh....last year, not last month.

    39. Re:Sleeper hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your girlfriend's name is Lexi, you don't get the awkward moment of Alexa responding when you exclaim, "Fuck yes, Lexi! Suck that cock like the dirty whore you are!"

    40. Re:Sleeper hit? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      If you even have a system able to turn off your lights programmatically, you are so far outside the norm as to be an alien being.

      I find Siri pretty reliable for the other things you mentioned, I use Siri white a bit to check weather or play a song...

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    41. Re:Sleeper hit? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I'm not hostile. I have two of them! So now they have sold 4.

    42. Re:Sleeper hit? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Amazon has sold more than 3 million echos. I have one, several of my neighbors have them, and so do some of my co-workers. Mostly people seem happy with it, and when they complain about something, it is usually in the context of hoping it will be fixed in the next version, rather than something that will make them stop using it. Since I have bought mine, several features have been fixed or added via free over-the-air software updates.

    43. Re:Sleeper hit? by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      If you even have a system able to turn off your lights programmatically, you are so far outside the norm as to be an alien being.

      Lol, I've always wondered about that... I love my Insteon system. It's really nice when the lights in my office turn on when I enter the room, or when the living room lamps come on at sundown. I also have a handy little remote that I can use to control devices instead of using the app on my phone. The system can also be controlled programmatically by sending HTTP requests to the controller hub.

    44. Re:Sleeper hit? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      The only thing I really want (apart from better recognition, obviously) is voice commands for casting.

      Today, I can go "OK Google, play Iron Maiden on Google Play Music" and it'll start playing a random playlist. But after that, I have to manually cast it to my stereo. If I could tack on "cast to living room" or "cast to multiroom", it would work so much better.

      The idea of ubiquitous always-on voice control is cool in a sci-fi way, but also slightly worrying, as it will always be listening. At least the voice control on my phone is only active when it's unlocked and on the home screen.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    45. Re:Sleeper hit? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Whoooosh!!!

  4. There's already "chirp" by tekrat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Chirp is software to program Ham Radios.

    When will these oversized companies with their own army of lawyers actually CHECK to make sure they aren't stepping on someone else's toes?

    I'm sure Google will sue the programmer of the other software.... even though he had it first.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:There's already "chirp" by pr0t0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      has not been officially named yet but is internally known as the Chirp

      Easy there ham-cowboy, it's just a code name, not the official name. Companies use IP stuff for internal names all the time.

      --
      I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    2. Re:There's already "chirp" by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      That was the provisional name. The final name of the product has just been released, it's the 'Q' revision of Google's Killer App 9 (the internal code name for their voice recognition project), so will be named 'KA9Q', which is kind of catchy.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:There's already "chirp" by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      ... Chirp is a pretty generic name used by hundreds of different products.

      Unless you happen to know someone that makes a voice activated speaker that spies on you and sends it all back to Google, then there isn't really anything to sue for.

      I promise you I used the name 'Chirp' for sonar software before the HAM project was a glimmer in someones eyes, so if you want a law suit, I'll sue them for a start. I have proof via multiple public web archives and revision control systems such as google code. Sound like a plan?

      Yea, I didn't think so.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:There's already "chirp" by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Probably not.
      I worked a company that produced a program called Eclipse for Court reporters to translate and edit their transcripts. The Eclipse IDE came out many years latter. You can have more than one produce with the same name and as long as they do not compete or confuse the market it is not an issue.
      For example Eclipse the mini computer from DG, Eclipse the car, Eclipse the IDE.
      So a smart speaker named chirp and a program to work with HAM radios called chirp should not be a problem.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:There's already "chirp" by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Google will sue the programmer of the other software.... even though he had it first.

      Please calm down and put that pitchfork away.

      Chirp is a cutesy name that is only used internally. Besides, I doubt very much that even Google would officially market that device under a name that reminds people of a smoke detector running low on battery.

    6. Re:There's already "chirp" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chirp is software to program Ham Radios.

      It is registered to 68 companies. I'm sure many of those predate the Chirp program used to setup radios.

      When will these oversized companies with their own army of lawyers actually CHECK to make sure they aren't stepping on someone else's toes?

      Why in the world would you think they don't. It is you who seems to have no understanding of trademark law.

      I'm sure Google will sue the programmer of the other software.... even though he had it first.

      I'm sure you're wrong.

    7. Re:There's already "chirp" by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Google will sue the programmer of the other software.... even though he had it first.

      Are you sure? Maybe cite an example of Google doing this in the past before you make such wonderful claims.

  5. Why isn't Apple already buying Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple should just buy Google and put an end to the silliness already.

    1. Re:Why isn't Apple already buying Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's product line leans heavily in another direction from Google and I'm thankful for both to a point. Some of the practices I find shady but I accept that most businesses are in some gray areas. Either way, monocultures suck and people who desire a monoculture suck too.

    2. Re:Why isn't Apple already buying Google? by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Let me be the first to second that emotion! America needs more CEO dick fights! Just look around to see how far we've sunk as a nation, nay, as a world! You'll see people working in companies that actually produce physical "goods" instead of financial instruments. How in the world do they expect to survive?! Sure, they may have food to eat, but where are their stock options? Where are their "2 & 20" hedge-fund accounts? People these days seem to have been brainwashed into believing in this mythical beast called a "physical economy". Good grief! Don't they know we've changed all that now? Don't they know the only way to create real wealth is to leverage the shit out of everything in sight, and then foreclose on it later when the markets get a whiff of the vapors?

      Just look at these cretins, pining over the loss of 60,000 factories in the last 15 years from American soil. Can't they see that free trade agreements actually help American workers, with strong protections for environmental and workplace concerns? Are they blind to the benefits of mergers & acquisitions that consolidate markets into effective monopolies? Have they not heard that Comcast and AT&T are the most beloved corporations in America?

      My heart weeps for America... once the cradle of our "service" economy, which is without doubt the best economic system ever devised by the mind of man. Can they not see that the future lies on the path of everybody delivering pizzas to each other? [sigh!] I am depressed.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    3. Re:Why isn't Apple already buying Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are waiting for trump to become president because he will cut taxes so that apple can get back its money for free. He understands it very well, he himself pays no taxes. Thats why he doesn't want to release his returns, and why he is audited every single year. His business friends pay their taxes, and they have never heard of audits.

    4. Re:Why isn't Apple already buying Google? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Apple cash on hand: $216B
      Google market cap: $487B

      Certainty of DoJ objection on antitrust grounds: 100%

      That's probably why.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    5. Re:Why isn't Apple already buying Google? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Apple sells to people who are the customers and buy products.

      Google sells people to its customers as products.

      Apple makes copious amounts of money by providing products people actually want.

      Google makes money selling adds that people don't want and spying on people via the virus known as Android and its absolutely shitty permissions system that requires you to essentially let google (or any other app) do anything it wants with your device because of stupid permissions and the lack of being able to run an app WITHOUT granting it permissions.

      Apple is currently at the top of the food chain. Google is a bottom feeder.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  6. The telescreen barked: by Thud457 · · Score: 2

    Winston Smith! You can do better than that. Your hands are barely reaching your knees.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  7. Oh Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two things I've never heard of. Competing!

  8. Echo Owner Here by ohieaux · · Score: 2

    I got in early on the Echo and we've yet to find a good use case for it. It's a decent speaker for playing Amazon Prime music and will answer SIMPLE questions. But for the most part, it cannot answer the questions we throw at it. We use Google or Siri in those cases.

    Since it listens to everything said in the room, I'd be less comfortable with Google eavesdropping on my life than I am with Amazon.

    --
    Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.
    1. Re: Echo Owner Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the Echo also functioned as a good speakerphone I'd have one already. I don't quite understand why they decided not to include that.

    2. Re:Echo Owner Here by chispito · · Score: 1

      There's also a lot of Internet radio it can receive now, including local radio stations. The only two stations I care about, my favorite NPR affiliate and a certain rock station that likes to bill itself as "world famous" come right up when I tell Echo to play them.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    3. Re:Echo Owner Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Since it listens to everything said in the room, I'd be less comfortable with Google eavesdropping on my life than I am with Amazon."

      Which is one of the reasons why all devices with audio/video input should have hardwired restrictions on their operation. When in operation they should have and LED or something noting they are operating, in the case of devices like Echo it shouldn't be too difficult to create some unchangeable firmware that could listen for an activation phrase and at that point activate an LED and then begin sending audio/video to the cloud server (this is I believe the way Echo works, but voluntarily). It may not sound like much but this simple feature has been the clue that led to many findings that people were being spied upon (Lower Merion School District spying on students through school issued laptops for example), but virtually all (if not all) of these features are software based and can be changed with a simple update.

    4. Re:Echo Owner Here by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Since it listens to everything said in the room"
      Kind of but not really.
      Echo uses a simple local voice recognition system that listens for the key word Alexa. It does not digitize everything you say and send it to Amazon. The bandwidth would be too high as would the cost of processing all the speech for the key word.
      BTW here is the source for the echo https://www.amazon.com/gp/help...

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Echo Owner Here by ohieaux · · Score: 1

      It's clear that not everything is reported back, but it is listening and could report back.

      I'm not going to open the source code and try and determine if there are other keywords beyond "Alexa". And, it is listening and I would expect somehow digitizing all of the sounds to match the keyword "Alexa"

      --
      Where all think alike, no one thinks very much.
    6. Re:Echo Owner Here by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      And your TV could have a mic and a cell connection in it and could be reporting everything you watch on TV and say in your home...
      And your computer could be doing the same thing for all you know. How do you know that the nic does not have a mic and is sending audio right now to the NSA? Do you packet sniff everything that goes out?
      It actually looks for Alexa or Amazon. or Echo.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  9. I blame these always online minllenials by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    How else are you going to watch your house burn down from 300 miles away unless you've got it crammed to the gills with the latest home automatation gimcrackery?!

    These internet-connectimacated micropaphones are obviously the latest HOT product from the NSA. They also are handy for Russian & Chinese haxx0rs to steal your precious secrets.

    Now instead of the local miscreants ringing your doorbell and running away, bored global jackaninnies can sonically assault you with Ministry at 3 AM, flick your lights on and off and turn off your beer fridge so your beer gets warm.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:I blame these always online minllenials by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
      > Ministry at 3 AM

      Is that really considered an assault? Sounds like what I'm normally doing around this time.

    2. Re:I blame these always online minllenials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad that old age has left you like this. Your mental health problems are your own, and have nothing to do with young people today.

    3. Re:I blame these always online minllenials by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      > Ministry at 3 AM

      Is that really considered an assault? Sounds like what I'm normally doing around this time.

      "Connect the God Damned Dots!"

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  10. And then in 3 years... by EvilSS · · Score: 0

    So what happens in a few years when they kill the product and leave everyone who bought one out in the cold? Yea, no thanks. Google is has a bad rep for killing anything that isn't an instant hit in the market. Their online products are bad enough but at least there you usually don't pay for it, and you can migrate to something else. Hardware you're just screwed, especially if it relies on a backend service.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:And then in 3 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it uses the same backend as Now, which I don't see going away anytime soon. But it *is* Google, so maybe...

  11. The FBI, CIA, and NSA are lovin' it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're all so happy their surveillance jobs are being made much easier for them.

    1. Re:The FBI, CIA, and NSA are lovin' it! by jerk · · Score: 1

      Nah, we use our "secure room" in the basement for all of our plotting and conniving.

    2. Re:The FBI, CIA, and NSA are lovin' it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, we know.

  12. Your anecdote is useless by mveloso · · Score: 1

    I brought my Echo into the office, and it's been able to recognize at least 5 separate people with no issues from across the room. At home, it recognized everyone's voice, kids and adults. Three people in the office have bought one after using mine.

    So your anecdote, like mine, means nothing overall.

    I had to bring my Echo in because my kids were continuously asking Alexa for jokes, which gets unbelievably annoying.

    1. Re:Your anecdote is useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His isn't an anecdote, it's obvious FUD from a deranged hater. It's not ownership changes that wrecked Slashdot, it's the readership change.

  13. No radio by crow · · Score: 1

    I know the world is streaming, but why, oh, why don't they include a radio receiver? Many stations stream, but almost universally that doesn't include sports broadcasts. My wife uses a radio to listen to baseball when she's doing other things and can't watch the TV.

    If not for that one shortcoming, we would probably get one.

  14. Echo, Dot, MyCroft by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    I liked it well enough to get the Tap for the bedroom

    We have an Echo (which we use quite a bit.... timers, alarms, news, weather, spelling, etc.) but for music.... the built-in speaker is low-fi and not satisfactory to me. So I bought an Echo Dot as soon as they came out, specifically because it had a line-out connection. That one, I use to listen to music here in my office (I have a very nice audio system in here), and I find the dot very satisfactory indeed in that role, although I do use the other features as well.

    There do seem to be a lot of user-level haters; which leads me to believe there are a lot of people who've never actually used one. The claims that it has been a marketing failure are laughable; There is some approximate sales information, indications are that the product is doing quite well. Speaking as a user, I can understand why. We (my SO and I) find it very handy.

    My objections to Echo / dot are about the developer ecosystem, the voice recognition implementation, and the secure server issues.

    The "canned phrase" collection approach to command recognition is the very antithesis of any attempt to reach for "AI." It would have been wonderful if there was either a local interface so you could provide smarter processing, or if Amazon would actually provide smarter processing on their own. Between that, which is really a pretty crippling issue, and the requirement for an secure server with a +$ certificate for anything other than testing, Echo is not appealing to me as a development platform.

    I've been watching MyCroft; that looks like it might have some potential.

    Both presently suffer from online-only operation; the speech handling is dead if there is no connection. Hopefully that will be resolved in MyCroft's case, as it's actually an open system and they have mentioned that they're interested in pursuing local STT. My cheapo GPS ca. 2013 has reasonable general purpose offline speech recognition. However that was done, I would hope the underlying code would be better today, and I would love to see the capability in MyCroft, or Echo, or whatever. Being tethered to an active network is not a good thing.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Echo, Dot, MyCroft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked it well enough to get the Tap for the bedroom

      We have an Echo (which we use quite a bit.... timers, alarms, news, weather, spelling, etc.) but for music.... the built-in speaker is low-fi and not satisfactory to me.

      I have tinnitus and I find that the speaker is fine for background noise when falling asleep. Also the quality is fine for listening to audiobooks or podcasts, where there is very little in the way of dynamic range.

    2. Re:Echo, Dot, MyCroft by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Sure, seems like a great use case.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  15. You're just trolling. Also silly. by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    As you are clearly not very familiar with the Echo, a clarity that arrives due to your ridiculously truncated list of "thing Echo can do", I'll kindly give you two tips you can generalize from:

    First, if you want it to answer to "Echo", then change the settings in the control app so it does. Duh. There are other interesting settings and enablments in there too.

    Second, actually learn what it can do for you. Others have; so can you.

    For instance, you want a good classic rock playlist that isn't a subset of prime music? Then create a playlist from your own library of carefully selected classic rock. If you don't have such a library, then your complaint is wholly ridiculous. MY classic rock playlist is freaking awesome. Because, you know, I built it out of tunes I really like. Depending on prime music... that's depending on some taste metric that will be an amalgam of Other People's Opinions selected from whatever tunes are actually on prime music (read, not the good stuff that might still sell decently) and, like you, that's definitely up for lighting my fire. Unlike you, however, I figured that out by myself and spent ten seconds Googling to see how to remedy the problem. :)

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  16. Mor choices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For home installed government listening devices.
    I just can't stop thinking that's what they're really about.

    1. Re:Mor choices by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I like voice recognition and control for tasks where it's so much quicker than manually clicking through menus to set up a playlist or something.

      But I sure as hell don't want it to be always on, always listening.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  17. I own one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own one and , me and my wife are extremely happy with it. It is not something that is crucial in our lives but we definitely enjoy being able command music with just our voice. It understands us very well even with our accents. I got it as a gift and use it mainly for music, news and podcast. It is so convenient to not have to stop whatever you are doing and just bark at someone to play this song, or get news or the latest of your favorite podcast. I also occasionally get news on Xur (Destiny) since I enabled that app.

    I am looking forward on getting it integrated with Alarm.com (upcoming) since our house is already fitted with one. I will recommend it specially for old people and people with disabilities, they will be life changing. I love how my parents immediately figured out how to use it since the voice interface is very intuitive. It is not for answering questions but useful for timers, setting up a shopping list, listening to news and music. Place it at the center of the house (specially with how open designs are more popular now) and you can just shout at it from anywhere.