Professor Surprises Students With AI Teacher Assistant (smh.com.au)
An anonymous reader writes: Jill Watson is an artificial intelligence bot, it is also Ashok Goel's teaching assistant. Ashok Goel, a computer science professor at Georgia Tech, hired Jill Watson to answer questions online for his students so that his teaching staff wasn't so overworked. On average, Goel and his staff receive more than 10,000 questions from students online each semester. So he decided to use IBM Watson, an artificial intelligence system designed to answer questions. After training and tweaking it for months, he was able to spit out good enough answers. Originally, Goel didn't reveal Watson's true identity to his students until after the last final exam was turned in at the end of the class. Students were amazed. "I feel like I am part of history because of Jill and this class!" wrote one student in the class's online forum. "Just when I wanted to nominate Jill Watson as an outstanding TA in the CIOS survey!" said another. Goel is now working to bring the bot to as as many education centers are possible. He expects the bot's question-answering abilities to help online classes, where there's little engagement with a human instructor.
From TFA...
Goel and his teaching assistants receive more than 10,000 questions a semester from students on the course's online forum. Sometimes the same questions are asked again and again. Last year he began to wonder if he could automate the burden of answering so many repetitive questions.
The first order of business ought to be updating the course material to answer those frequently-asked-questions, so they don't need to be asked in the first place.
My interactions with professors usually went something like this:
"I don't understand how this answer was arrived at."
Prof scrutinizes the textbook for a while, then says "ah, you have found an error in the text."
I wonder if Jill can handle that kind of interaction with students?
There are many questions Jill can't handle. Those questions were reserved for human teaching assistants.
Ah... the answer is no.
That that is is that that that that is not is not.